Become our Member : JOIN SFPMA TODAY   LogIn / Register: LOGIN/REGISTER

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

Condo and HOA Expo: February 1st in Palm Beach, February 4th in Miami Beach and February 15th in Broward. See you there!

Condo and HOA Expo: February 1st in Palm Beach, February 4th in Miami Beach and February 15th in Broward. See you there!

  • Posted: Jan 22, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Condo and HOA Expo: February 1st in Palm Beach, February 4th in Miami Beach and February 15th in Broward. See you there!

Condo and HOA Expo’s: February 1st in Palm Beach, February 4th in Miami Beach and February 15th in Broward. See you there!

 

Learn From The Industry Leaders

Get the tools and information you need to manage your condo or HOA more efficiently. Regional and national experts will offer insights into the latest industry trends and best practices in legal oversight, financing, maintenance, renovations, energy efficiency, administration, communication and more. Bring your questions to these lively, informative sessions and come away with a clear blueprint for improved management for the future.

 

Palm Beach County Convention Center
Tuesday, February 1, 2022

For one day only, the Palm Beach Convention Center will be packed with the latest products and services as well as an array of industry experts. It’s an unparalleled opportunity to make valuable connections and speak directly with local and national experts about the topics that are relevant to you and your property.

Get legal insights, financial advice, communication tips, proactive management solutions and much more from some of the region’s top professionals. This one-day event will also give you a sneak peek at the latest design trends gracing today’s most prestigious developments, plus innovations in building and remodeling and the newest energy efficiency options.

Register to Attend

 

 


Miami Beach Condo & HOA Expo
Join Us on February 4th!

For one day only, the Miami Beach Convnetion Center will be packed with the latest products and services as well as an array of industry experts. It’s an unparalleled opportunity to make valuable connections and speak directly with local and national experts about the topics that are relevant to you and your property.

Get legal insights, financial advice, communication tips, proactive management solutions and much more for some of the region’s top professionals. Attend FREE educational seminars and CEU courses covering all of today’s essential property management topics. This one-day event will also give you a sneak peek at the latest design trends gracing today’s most prestigious developments, plus innovations in building and remodeling and the newest energy efficiency options.

Register to Attend

 

 


The Broward County Condo & HOA Expo
Join Us Tuesday, February 15, 2022!

For one day only, The Signature Grand will be packed with the latest products and services as well as an array of industry experts. It’s an unparalleled opportunity to make valuable connections and speak directly with local and national experts about the topics that are relevant to you and your property.

Get legal insights, financial advice, communication tips, proactive management solutions and much more from some of the region’s top professionals. This one-day event will also give you a sneak peek at the latest design trends gracing today’s most prestigious developments, plus innovations in building and remodeling and the newest energy efficiency options.

Register to Attend

 


Condo, HOA and Property Management Expo
Tampa Convention Center

Thursday, February 10th, 2022

Seminars: 9:00 am – 4:30 pm  Exhibits: 10:30 am – 3:00 pm 

Sign up for the networking and educational event of the year! Get face-time with industry experts, browse the latest products and services and learn how to save thousands on the management and maintenance of your condo or HOA.

It’s the ONLY event to bring everything you need under one convenient roof for a single, information-packed day.

Registration is FREE for community association managers, board members, board presidents, active HOA members and industry professionals. Don’t delay… register for this one-of-a-kind event today!


Naples Condo & HOA Expo & Seminars
March 25, 2022

New Hope Event Center
7675 Davis Blvd. Naples, FL 34104

Seminars 9:00 am – 4:30 pm   Exhibits 10:30 am – 3:00 pm

Sign up for the networking and educational event of the year! Get face-time with the industry experts, browse the latest products and services and learn how to save thousands of the management and maintenance of your condo or HOA.

Registration is FREE for association managers, board members. Don’t delay!


Orlando Condo HOA Property Management Expo & Seminars
Orange County Convention Center-West Bldg
Tuesday, April 12, 2022

Seminars 9:00 am – 4:30 pm  Exhibits 10:30 am-3:00 pm

Sign up for the networking and educational event of the year!
Get face-time with the industry experts, browse the latest
products and services and learn how to save thousands on the
management and maintenance of your condo or HOA.

Registration is FREE for association managers, and board members. Don’t delay!


 

Tags: , ,
“Fla. Construction Defect Bill Would Hurt Consumer Interests,” Law360 by Becker

“Fla. Construction Defect Bill Would Hurt Consumer Interests,” Law360 by Becker

  • Posted: Jan 21, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on “Fla. Construction Defect Bill Would Hurt Consumer Interests,” Law360 by Becker

“Fla. Construction Defect Bill Would Hurt Consumer Interests,” Law360

Patrick C. Howell of Becker

Last year, Florida politicians attempted to weaponize Chapter 558 of the Florida Statutes and eviscerate the cause of action for violations of the Florida Building Code. Thankfully, that legislation died in committee and never saw the light of day.

Unfortunately, through H.B. 583 filed by Rep. Clay Yarborough, R-Jacksonville, and S.B. 736 filed by Sen. Travis Hutson, R-St. Augustine, developer-backed politicians are once again seeking to weaponize Chapter 558, and, this time, completely eliminate the tolling provisions in Section 95.11(3)(c) of the Florida Statutes for latent construction defects.

In their current iterations, Chapter 558 and Section 95.11(3)(c) are consumer- friendly provisions drafted and signed into law to protect Florida homeowners, homeowner associations and condominiums from defective construction, provide for the resolution of construction defect claims, and promote the settlement of claims without litigation.

Chapter 558 was passed by the Legislature years ago to assist with the resolution of claims outside of litigation. It requires that a party damaged by construction defects submit the claim to the at-fault developer or contractor, allows for inspections, and gives the developer or contractor an opportunity to settle the claim.

This process has worked effectively for many years and has resulted in countless settlements without expensive litigation. The changes proposed during this legislative session would severely damage Chapter 558 and the ability of homeowners, HOAs and condominiums to timely submit claims and foster settlements outside of court.

First, the proposed amendments take a heavy-handed approach with regard to owners, condos and HOAs versus developers and contractors. Under the changes proposed, if an owner, condo or HOA rejects a settlement offer, they must then prove that the offer wasn’t enough to address the repairs.

However, what is the penalty for a developer or contractor ignoring a properly served and documented Section 558 claim? Nothing. Just this one provision shows how anti-consumer and pro-developer this bill is.

Second, poison pill language has been worked into the bill that would require that a party receiving settlement funds (1) execute a contract to start repairs within 90 days; and (2) complete the repairs in one year.

Beyond the big government incursion into our day-to-day decisions, which is by itself disturbing, here’s the nightmare scenario this provision sets up: A condominium association has a multiparty claim against the developer, contractor, subcontractors and design professionals for a structure built with numerous defects to the roof, framing, stucco, foundations and windows.

The stucco subcontractor makes an offer to settle related to its scope of work. The owner accepts the offer. Under this bill, a contract to complete the repair to the stucco must be finalized within 90 days and the work must be completed within a year.

This is despite the fact that the owner has not settled with the contractor, developer, roofer, the window supplier or any of the other trades. So the work to the stucco gets completed, as mandated by this bill, and the claims continues against everyone else.

Two years later, the owner gets a verdict against the other parties and has the money to address the remaining defects. Unfortunately, the newly replaced stucco now has to be torn off to address the defective framing underneath the stucco, the windows installed in the stucco walls, and the roofs with kickouts and other elements adjacent to the stucco. It’s doubtful that anyone would ever accept a settlement offer under these circumstances.

This provision sets up for failure a claim made under Chapter 558, as well as the resulting settlement offer, at least for claims involving defects to more than one building element. As such, this amendment just won’t work for condominium towers, multifamily buildings, or homes constructed by dozens of different trades.

Third, the new proposed Section 558.0045 requires that the judge in a pending construction defect case appoint a third-party expert engineer, contractor or building code inspector to inspect the structures involved in litigation and issue a report 15 days later. The bill doesn’t detail how this appointed expert is to be paid beyond the statement that “the parties shall compensate the expert.”

So under this bill, each of the parties have the expenses of their own expert witnesses, plus now they have to share in the expense of an additional expert witness or witnesses. Wealthy developers will be easily able to foot the bill for these extra costs, but such will be a difficulty for an HOA, condominium or individual owner.

Despite the added expense required by this bill, the third-party expert does not have the ability to make any sort of decisions that bind any of the parties. So what really is the point? Also, it is unclear who would be the party contracting with the expert, and it’s hard to see any court signing off on such a contract. As such, what expert would expose themselves to the liability for these inspections without some contractual protection? Why would they?

Fourth, the new proposed Section 558.0046 requires that a claimant receiving compensation repair the defect. But why? If a defect renders a building uninhabitable and the plaintiff receives compensation for that loss, why shouldn’t they be able to demolish the building and use the settlement or verdict proceeds however they want?

The government should not be in the business of telling its citizens what to do with such proceeds.

Furthermore, settlements often occur because a plaintiff decides to take less than what they are owed, repair some defects and live with the others that don’t affect habitability. This provision would discourage such settlements, which goes against the very purpose behind Chapter 558.

As with last year’s disastrous bill, the proposed amendments to Chapter 558 also go so far as to insert big government into the relationship between a homeowner and their mortgage company. The amendments add a new subsection requiring that a homeowner with defects advise their mortgage company that they’ve asserted a construction defect claim as to the property and provide other details about the resolution of the claim.

This requirement could jeopardize the homeowner’s loan and expose the homeowner to inordinate amounts of red tape. There is nothing in the description of the bill advising as to the goal of this proposed change or what wrong it proposes to right. Note that no banking institutions or mortgage lenders have even requested this change to Chapter 558.

As such, and considering the other proposed changes to Chapter 558, it is assumed this is just another barrier that is being erected to dissuade homeowners, HOAs and condominiums from pursuing otherwise legitimate claims for construction defects against developers and contractors.

The proposed bill also tinkers with Section 95.11(3)(c) of the Florida Statutes, which establishes a four- year statute of limitations for construction defect claims. To protect consumers, the same provision also includes a provision that the statute of limitations does not begin to run on latent defects until the defect is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence.

To then in turn protect developers and contractors, there is an absolute bar to such claims 10 years after the completion of construction. This time period was shortened from 15 years to 10 a few years back. This absolute bar is known as the statute of repose. When the statute of repose runs on a claim, the homeowner, HOA and condominium is then forever precluded from bringing a claim against the developer or contractor.

However, under the amendments proposed by this bill, the concept of latency is completely removed from Section 95.11(3)(c). As such, if this law passes, courts will be required to apply a hard four-year statute of limitations for construction defect actions, with the time running from the certificate of occupancy, completion of the contract, etc. What this would mean for consumers is that the 10-year period for bringing claims based on latent defects would be effectively shortened to four years.

Thus, a developer would be able to complete a community and then maintain control over the HOA for just four additional years to run out the statute of limitations.

This change also completely disregards the nature of construction. As a condominium tower, townhome building, or home is built, trades working on the structure naturally cover up the work of the trades that came before them. The framer covers up the completed concrete foundation, the stucco and roofing contractors cover up the framing, the painter covers up the stucco, and on and on.

Thus, it is easy to see how defects can be hidden and not noticed by the end user owner for several years to come. Careful inspections along the way can forestall mistakes, but careful inspections don’t always occur.

Allowing affected owners or associations to sue over defects that have been covered up by contractors and developers keeps contractors and developers accountable and results in better construction. Taking such a cause of action away will just result in shoddy construction, and owners and associations will have no way of rectifying dangerous conditions on their property.

The proposed changes included in S.B. 736 and H.B. 583 would weaken consumer protections, increase litigation costs and result in the settlement of fewer claims outside of litigation. The changes to Chapter 558 and Section 95.11(3)(c) should be vigorously opposed by anyone who supports consumer rights for homeowners, HOAs and condominiums.

To view the original Law360 article, please click here. (Subscription required.)

Reprinted with permission from Law360.

 


Patrick C. Howell

Office Managing Shareholder

 PHOWELL@beckerlawyers.com

 

Tags: , , ,
Triploid Grass Carp- Can They Help Control Weeds on my Lake? By: Allstate Resource Management

Triploid Grass Carp- Can They Help Control Weeds on my Lake? By: Allstate Resource Management

  • Posted: Jan 18, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Triploid Grass Carp- Can They Help Control Weeds on my Lake? By: Allstate Resource Management

Triploid Grass Carp- Can They Help Control Weeds on my Lake?

By: Allstate Resource Management

The grass carp has been introduced throughout the world for aquatic weed control. The grass carp was considered for introduction into the U.S. primarily because of its plant-eating diet, which was thought to have great potential for the control of aquatic weeds.

Wide-scale use of the grass carp in Florida and many other states from 1970 to 1984 was limited and closely regulated due to fears about its reproduction and negative impact on sport fish. Since the grass carp’s potential for causing such problems was evident, early research focused on developing a fish that would be non-reproductive but would retain the grass carp’s herbivorous diet.

Research with the grass carp resulted in the production of a sterile triploid grass carp, which has an extra set of chromosomes. The triploid grass carp is produced in the same way as the diploid, except that fertilized eggs are subjected to heat, cold, or pressure shock result in the formation of fish with an extra set of chromosomes for a total of 72. The extra chromosomes make these fish sterile.

The grass carp is primarily a “grazer”; it tends to feed on the surface and in shallow water. The ability of grass carp to consume and utilize aquatic plants depends on the size of both plants and fish. Additional factors which influence the feeding behavior of grass carp include their size, age, gender, and population density, and the species, abundance, and location of plants within a body of water.

In Florida, a permit is required by law for the use or possession of grass carp. Only grass carp certified as triploid can be used in an aquatic weed management program. Allstate Resource Management recommends triploid grass crap in combination with a lake management program.

Speak with a lake management specialist on how we can develop a management program for your lake or pond!

 

 Contact Allstate Resource Management
 954-382-9766
 info@allstatemanagement.com 

 

Tags: , ,
Security Tips for Managing the Association’s Bank Accounts Online  By: Sara K. Wilson, Esq. / Becker

Security Tips for Managing the Association’s Bank Accounts Online By: Sara K. Wilson, Esq. / Becker

  • Posted: Jan 14, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Security Tips for Managing the Association’s Bank Accounts Online By: Sara K. Wilson, Esq. / Becker

Security Tips for Managing the Association’s Bank Accounts Online

By: Sara K. Wilson, Esq.  Becker

Increasing numbers of people and small businesses, including community associations, have switched to managing their bank accounts exclusively over the internet.  Not surprisingly, these numbers surged even higher during the pandemic.  While online banking has become common place, so have incidents of cybercrime and fraud.  Banks of course use a variety of security measures to protect their customers’ accounts, but there are also steps that you as the customer should take to minimize risk.

  1. Verify that your bank is using the latest security technology in step with banking industry standards.
  2. Have a dedicated computer for conducting the association’s online banking, and make sure that computer stays current with anti-virus protection and updates. If the dedicated computer is a laptop, never conduct online banking in public spaces or use public Wi-Fi.
  3. Choose passwords that are complex by using a combination of letters, numbers, and symbols, and institute a policy for changing passwords on a regular basis. Limit the number of people who know the password to only those who are managing the accounts.  Passwords should not be recorded on personal computers or mobile devices or accessible to other owners, family members, guests, etc.  Avoid automatic logins to prevent unauthorized persons from easily accessing the association’s accounts.
  4. Be on high alert for phishing scams. Phishing is a technique that cyber-criminals use to gain sensitive information, like bank account numbers and passwords, through fraudulent emails and texts.  Your bank will never ask for your password via email or text; so if you receive such an email or text, delete it. Also beware of any email requesting that you “update your account,” or of any email warning of dire consequences if you do not act immediately.  If you are not sure whether the email came from your bank, contact your banking institution to verify whether they sent the email.  Because phishing scams are so prevalent, it is important to provide information about phishing to anyone who will be managing the association’s accounts online so they know what to look for.
  5. Reconcile your bank accounts on a regular basis – ideally daily – to avoid an irregularity going unnoticed. Inquire whether your bank sends alerts for transactions over a certain amount or if your account drops below a certain amount for added protection.

These are just a few of the steps an association can take to decrease risks when managing its bank accounts online. Because a community association has a fiduciary responsibility to its members, it is imperative that it takes the necessary steps to minimize potential cyber threats to its bank accounts. While there is no guarantee that even a well-protected system won’t be hacked, by adopting and following online banking security policies, an association greatly lessens its chances of being an easy target for a potentially devastating cybercrime.

Sara K. Wilson

Tags:
Why Condominium Associations Must Obtain Approval Before Work Begins and A Plea To The Florida Legislature For A Remedy by KBR Legal

Why Condominium Associations Must Obtain Approval Before Work Begins and A Plea To The Florida Legislature For A Remedy by KBR Legal

  • Posted: Jan 12, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Why Condominium Associations Must Obtain Approval Before Work Begins and A Plea To The Florida Legislature For A Remedy by KBR Legal

Why Condominium Associations Must Obtain Approval Before Work Begins and A Plea To The Florida Legislature For A Remedy

 

When it comes to material alterations, some might say that homeowner associations have it easy compared to condominium associations. For a homeowners association, because Chapter 720, Florida Statutes is silent on the issue, unless otherwise provided in the governing documents, decisions regarding material alterations are made by the board. But, as to condominium associations, and as their board members should know, §718.113(2), Florida Statutes, requires advance membership approval for material alterations to the common elements and association real property. In this regard, there is no parity between the Condominium Act versus the Homeowners Association Act.

Before explaining further, a reminder of the Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal  definition of what constitutes a “material alteration” from the seminal case Sterling Village Condominium, Inc. v. Breitenbach,  251 so.2d 685, 4th DCA (1971) is in order. As explained in Sterling,  “as applied to buildings the term ‘material alteration or addition’ means to palpably or perceptively vary or change the form, shape, elements or specifications of a building from its original design or plan, or existing condition, in such a manner as to appreciably affect or influence its function, use, or appearance.”

Prior to July 1, 2018, §718.113(2)(a), Florida Statutes, provided that no material alteration or substantial addition can be made to the common elements or association real property without the approval in the manner provided for in the declaration, or if the declaration is silent, then by 75 percent of the total voting interests of the association. As adopted by the 2018 Florida legislature, (effective July, 1, 2018), §718.113(2), Florida Statutes was amended to provide that approval of the material alteration or substantial addition must be obtained before the work commences.

 

The current language of §718.113(2)(a), Florida Statutes, provides as follows:

Except as otherwise provided in this section, there shall be no material alteration or substantial additions to the common elements or to real property which is association property, except in a manner provided in the declaration as originally recorded or as amended under the procedures provided therein. If the declaration as originally recorded or as amended under the procedures provided therein does not specify the procedure for approval of material alterations or substantial additions, 75 percent of the total voting interests of the association must approve the alterations or additions before the material alterations or substantial additions are commenced. This paragraph is intended to clarify existing law and applies to associations existing on July 1, 2018.

Prior to the 2018 amendment, §718.113(2), Florida Statutes, did not expressly provide that the approval must be obtained before the material alteration or substantial addition was commenced. However, in a recent decision by the Third District Court of Appeal, the Court held that approval was required before the material alteration or substantial additions were commenced even before the language of §718.113(2), Florida Statutes, was amended to include the advance approval requirement!

In Bailey v. Shelborne Ocean Beach Hotel Condominium Association, Inc., Nos. 3D17-559, 3D17-01767 (Fla. 3d DCA July 15, 2020), unit owners brought a claim against their association alleging that the association violated §718.113(2), Florida Statutes, by failing to obtain the approval of the membership before commencing a large construction project which, they argued, constituted a material alteration to the common elements. Later, both parties agreed that all but two of the alleged “material alterations” actually constituted necessary maintenance that the association was authorized to commence without a vote of the membership.

The association alleged that the remaining two construction items were also necessary maintenance, which was an allegation the unit owners disputed. The trial court held that the remaining two alleged material alterations were valid notwithstanding whether they were necessary maintenance or material alterations because the association eventually obtained the approval of the membership (presumably after the fact). Therefore, the trial court reasoned it did not need to make a determination as to whether the two items were material alterations since the membership approved them, albeit in a tardy fashion.

On appeal to the Third District Court of Appeal, the unit owners challenged the trial court’s decision arguing that the statute required the association to obtain approval for material alterations before it commenced the work. Therefore, the plaintiff unit owners argued that the membership could not provide their consent and approval posthumously. As the construction project at issue took place between 2010 and 2016, the applicable version of §718.113(2) did not include the express requirement that approval be obtained before material alterations are commenced. However, the Court still held that the portions of a construction project that do not constitute necessary maintenance must be approved prior to commencement.

The court explained that “based on the structure of the statute, the 75 percent approval requirement is a condition necessary to overcome the statute’s clear prohibition, insofar as any of the construction work amounts to material alteration or substantial additions.” However, because the trial court did not rule on whether the two items at issue were material alterations or necessary maintenance, the Court was unable to determine whether a vote of the members was pre-required and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceeding to determine the nature of the two construction items.

Because the Court did not make a final determination whether the two construction items constituted necessary maintenance, the Court did not address the remedy for the association’s failure to obtain the advance approval of the membership. Additionally, the law fails to address the remedy when an association does not obtain membership approval before commencing a project.

In cases of material alterations already completed which required the advance approval of the membership, the present version of §718.113(2), Florida Statutes leaves no room whatsoever for the court to order an association to posthumously acquire the membership vote or put things back the way they were. Rather, the only remedy that appears available to the court would be to restore the common elements to its pre-existing state (or as close as can be accomplished under the circumstances), which explains why a legislative fix to §718.113(2), Florida Statutes, to provide for additional remedy would be helpful.

There is a very important lesson to be gleaned from the Bailey case. If your association is considering a material alteration of any kind, then the association would be wise to attain the required approval before commencing the project to avoid a successful legal challenge. If the association fails to obtain the required approvals before commencement of the project, in the event of a legal challenge, the association may well be required to undo whatever alterations were made to the common elements as Bailey suggests this was the case even before the relevant statute was amended. This can result in significant expense to the association, not to mention having to explain what happened to many irate unit owners.

 


Remember, prior to commencing any material alteration or substantial addition, be sure to consult your association’s attorney to ensure you comply with the requirements of the Florida law and your association’s governing documents.

1200 Park Central Boulevard South, Pompano Beach, FL. Tel: 954.928.0680
9121 North Military Trail, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL. Tel: 561.241.4462
1211 N. Westshore Boulevard, Suite 409, Tampa, FL. Tel: 813.375.0731

 

 

Tags: , ,
Condo Craze and HOAs Radio Show on 850 WFTL every Sunday 11am – 12pm  Is now live on YouTube!

Condo Craze and HOAs Radio Show on 850 WFTL every Sunday 11am – 12pm  Is now live on YouTube!

  • Posted: Jan 10, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Condo Craze and HOAs Radio Show on 850 WFTL every Sunday 11am – 12pm  Is now live on YouTube!

Condo Craze and HOAs Radio Show on 850 WFTL every Sunday 11am – 12pm  Is now live on YouTube!

Condo and HOA Boards and Owners you can now watch the show ask questions.  Each Sunday morning we will bring to you topics and discussions for out industry.

Subscribe to our YOU TUBE PAGE. 

Condo Craze and HOAs In 2009, Eric began a career in radio, starting and hosting the weekly Condo Craze and HOAs Radio Show on 850 WFTL. Eric answers questions from the callers week in and week out and the show has become incredibly popular throughout the state. For more information, and to listen to past shows.

Eric M. Glazer is a native of Brooklyn, New York Mr. Glazer obtained his B.A. in Political Science at New York University. While at N.Y.U., Mr. Glazer was employed in the Kings County District Attorney’s Office. Mr. Glazer obtained his Juris Doctorate at the University of Miami School of Law. In 1994 he established Glazer and Associates, P.A. and has focused his career on representation of community associations and their members.

Visit our Website: https://www.condocrazeandhoas.com Board Certification Classes Eric has certified over 12,000 board members in the State of Florida, who are now eligible to serve on either a condominium or homeowner association board.

 

Tags: , ,
Need some help getting ready for for your tax planning meeting? We have developed the YEAR END TAX PLANNING GUIDE

Need some help getting ready for for your tax planning meeting? We have developed the YEAR END TAX PLANNING GUIDE

  • Posted: Dec 21, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Need some help getting ready for for your tax planning meeting? We have developed the YEAR END TAX PLANNING GUIDE

Need some help getting ready for for your tax planning meeting?

We have developed the YEAR END TAX PLANNING GUIDE, to help you uncover tax planning opportunities to

Download a copy of this important guide just click here.

Tags: ,

DECONSTRUCTING THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT A Plain English Explanation by Kaye Bender Rembaum

DECONSTRUCTING THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT A Plain English Explanation by Kaye Bender Rembaum

  • Posted: Dec 19, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on DECONSTRUCTING THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT A Plain English Explanation by Kaye Bender Rembaum

DECONSTRUCTING THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT A Plain English Explanation

by Kaye Bender RembaumRembaum’s Association Roundup

If your community association has engaged the services of a contractor, engineer, architect, or other construction or design professional to perform a maintenance, repair, replacement, or capital improvement project, you know the process can be overwhelming. No matter the mad rush to execute the contract as soon as possible, when beginning such projects, no matter how big or small, the board needs to ensure the contract adequately protects the association. Even the smallest of projects can have unexpected, disastrous consequences. A few of the more common provisions which every board member should understand follow.

The Indemnity Provision

In today’s extremely litigious world, it is important that your association does what it can to protect itself against unforeseen claims that can arise out of the contractor’s performance of the work. For example, assume a crane fell on the building being repaired, the contractor accidentally damaged the elevator shaft, or worse still, a life is lost. An indemnity provision provides that the contractor will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the association from and against claims arising out of or resulting from the performance of the work by the contractor or any of its employees, subcontractors, suppliers, etc.

Indemnification provisions can be tricky to understand. The general contractor, engineer, and design professionals (aka the architect) may seek to avoid and/or cap their overall liability. Even a small contract can have significant consequences if the negligence of the contractor causes significant damage or injury.

Rarely does the inclusion of a single word have disastrous consequences; however, a recent trend we have seen in many contracts is the contractor requiring the indemnity obligation to be limited only to damage caused by the contractor’s “sole” negligence. As events which cause loss or damage rarely occur by the “sole” actions of an individual, this provision significantly diminishes the contractor’s responsibility to indemnify the association. The association should look out for any indemnity provision which provides that the contractor is only responsible to indemnify for its “sole” negligence. Without getting into too much complexity, Florida is a “contributory negligence” state. This means each party is responsible to satisfy a judgment against them in proportion to their responsibility for the blame. So, if the contractor is found to be 33 percent responsible for an accident, then it pays 33 percent of the final judgment award. But, if the contract indemnity provision required sole negligence, the contractor would pay nothing at all because the accident was not “solely” caused by the contractor. Youch!

Another trend we see is the contractor limiting its liability to damage caused by its “gross negligence,” which by definition excludes “simple negligence.” As a brief explanation, simple negligence is when a person fails to take reasonable precautions that any prudent person would take in similar circumstances and their actions cause harm (for example, a driver who runs a stop sign and causes an accident). Gross negligence is extreme indifference or reckless disregard for the safety of others (for example, driving 100 mph in a parking lot and injuring a pedestrian). As any claims arising out of the work are likely to result from the contractor’s simple negligence, this heightened standard is not favorable to the association.

If the contractor is insistent on limiting its liability, the association may consider limiting the contractor’s indemnification obligation to the maximum payable under the contractor’s insurance policy. This way, the contractor is not on the hook for unlimited liability, but the association has some decent protection as claims can be covered up to the maximum amount payable under the insurance policy. However, in the event of a catastrophic loss or casualty event, even the amount payable under the insurance policy may not be enough to protect the association.

In addition to these limitations, “design professionals” have the added benefit of statutory authority to further limit their liability in a contract (they must have better lobbyists). Section 558.0035, Florida Statutes, provides a procedure by which a design professional can exclude any “individual liability” for damages resulting from negligence occurring within the course and scope of a professional services contract. In other words, the design professional will not be personally liable to the association for any negligence in its design if the contract includes a provision that excludes such personally liability. Section 558.002(7), Florida Statutes, defines a “design professional” as a person who is licensed in the state of Florida as an architect, landscape architect, engineer, surveyor, geologist, or a registered interior designer. Therefore, if your association is contracting with any of the foregoing design professionals, you will likely need to negotiate this provision.

You should also be aware that disputes over the enforceability of the indemnification clause do not automatically include prevailing party attorneys’ fees unless the indemnification provision specifically provides that, in the event of a dispute concerning the applicability of the indemnification, the prevailing party must be indemnified for their attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses incurred in enforcing their right to be indemnified.

Insurance Provisions

To ensure there are sufficient funds to satisfy an indemnity judgment in favor of the association, it is important that the association require the contractor to carry certain minimum insurance. Therefore, the contract should contain a clause which provides that the contractor will maintain such general liability insurance as will protect the contractor and the association from claims that may arise out of or result from the contractor’s operations under the contract documents in the amounts set out in the contract. Additionally, the association should ensure that the contractor obtains sufficient workers’ compensation coverage.

There are a couple of terms with which you should be familiar:

  • Certificate Holder: The certificate holder is merely entitled to the proof of insurance, nothing more. When the policy holders have their insurance agents issue a certificate of insurance to the entity that hired the contractor to do the work, that entity becomes a certificate holder. It is simply the contractor’s way of saying, “I have insurance.” Certificates show that the contract has the insurance policies in the limits shown on such certificate. It also provides that the certificate holder is entitled to know if the policy lapses.
  • Additional Insured: An additional insured is provided the same coverage and rights under the policy as the named insured. In other words, when you become an additional insured, you are entitled to the same insurance protections as the original policy holder. Therefore, in the event of loss, the association may file a claim on the contractor’s policy through its status as an additional insured.

Thus, the contract should not only require that the contractor carry insurance but also provide that the contractor is obligated to provide a certificate of insurance evidencing the insurance coverage and containing an endorsement listing the association as an “additional insured.”

In addition to the insurance requirements for the contractor, your association may consider purchasing builder’s risk insurance for the project. Builder’s risk insurance is designed to protect the owner of a construction site from loss and damage. This should be further discussed with the association’s insurance agent.

Paying the Contractor

During a major construction project, the association’s contractor will likely be working with several subcontractors to complete the work. The process for payments in such projects is set out in §713.13, Florida Statutes. (For a more detailed discussion on the construction payment process, you can read my prior article, “Construction Progress Payments: The Hidden Trap,” at rembaumsassociationroundup.com, originally published in the Florida Community Association Journal, February 2020 edition.)

By way of brief explanation, when the project commences, the association records a “Notice of Commencement” identifying the contractor and the legal description of where the work is being performed. The purpose of the Notice of Commencement is to inform all subcontractors and suppliers that if they intend to provide goods and/or services to the property, and if they want to have proper legal standing to record a lien against the property in the event they are not paid, the subcontractor and/or supplier must serve a “Notice to Owner” to the association. The Notice to Owner informs the association of all subcontractors working under the general contractor and all suppliers who provide suppliers and materials to the job site.

In exchange for payments to the general contractor, the general contractor provides the association with “partial payment affidavits” for each payment and a “final payment affidavit” upon conclusion of the work at hand. The subcontractors and suppliers provide the association “partial releases” for the payment received from the general contractor using the general contractor as the delivery conduit to deliver the partial release to the association. This method ensures that subcontractors and suppliers cannot later claim that they were not paid. However, in order to ensure this protection, it is important that the contract requires the contractor to provide the subcontractors’ and suppliers’ partial releases contemporaneously with the association’s progress payment. With the partial releases in hand, in the event the contractor does not pay the subcontractors and suppliers, the association is fully protected.

Some general contractors insist on providing the association with the partial releases from the subcontractors and suppliers one payment behind. This should be a red flag to your association because it means if the contractor fails to pay the subcontractors and suppliers after receiving payment from the association, the association will still have to pay the subcontractors and suppliers. In such event, the association will end up having to pay twice for all or part of the same work.

Prevailing Attorney’s Fees

Another important consideration is the prevailing party attorneys’ fees provision of the contract. An attorneys’ fee provision generally provides that in the event of litigation to enforce the terms of the contract, the prevailing party is entitled to recover their attorneys’ fees. However, this provision must be carefully worded to ensure that your association will be able to recover its attorneys’ fees.

Termination

Most contracts provide that the association may terminate the contract for cause. The termination for cause provision should include examples of conduct by the contractor which would entitle the association to terminate the contract for cause. In addition to termination for cause, we recommend the inclusion of a “without cause” termination provision. This provision gives the association an out in the event the contractor is not working out, but the contractor’s conduct does not rise to the level which would allow dismissal for cause.

Generally, if an association terminated an agreement without good cause, and unless otherwise spelled out in the contract, the contractor would likely be entitled to approximately 15 to 22 percent of the contract price for its anticipated lost profit and overhead.

Payment and Performance Bonds

Another way the association can protect itself is by requiring the contractor to obtain “payment and performance bonds,” which are most often purchased together as a set. While doing so typically adds three to five percent to the total contract price, it is well worth it. In addition, if the contractor is not able to provide such a bond because the bonding companies will not bond the contractor, it is very telling because not every contractor is bondable.

A “performance bond” is a surety bond issued by a bonding company or bank to guarantee the satisfactory completion of the work by the contractor. It acts to protect the association in the event the contractor fails to complete its contractual obligations.

A “payment bond” guarantees the contractor will pay all laborers, material suppliers, and subcontractors engaged by the contractor for the work. In the event the association pays the contractor, but the contractor fails to pay the laborers, material suppliers, and/or subcontractors, the surety will step in to pay same.

Force Majeure

Many contracts contain force majeure language which provides that the parties will not be responsible to the other if they are unable to fulfil the terms of the contract due to events beyond the control of the parties. Most often, a force majeure event adds delay to the targeted project completion date and avoids claims for breach of contract due to the delay. Such events may be acts of God, flood, fire, hurricanes, war, invasion, terrorist acts, government order or law, actions, embargoes, or blockades, etc. Of late, for reasons that need no explanation, pandemics are added to this list, too.

The above discussion is not meant to be all inclusive. There are so many other important provisions to consider, but space is limited. To ensure your association is protected, the association should always rely on its legal counsel to review the association’s contracts and make the necessary revisions to assist in the  protection of the association.

The Kaye Bender Rembaum Team Remains Available To You and Your Community Association

Happy Holidays from all of us at Kaye Bender Rembaum

 


Kaye Bender Rembaum

We are dedicated to providing clients with an unparalleled level of personalized and professional service regardless of their size and takes into account their individual needs and financial concerns. Our areas of concentration include

1200 Park Central Boulevard South, Pompano Beach, FL. Tel: 954.928.0680
9121 North Military Trail, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL. Tel: 561.241.4462
1211 N. Westshore Boulevard, Suite 409, Tampa, FL. Tel: 813.375.0731
Tags: , ,
Call Pioneering Pest Services today for your free estimate on any of our services!! ☎️ 386.734.2142 ☎️

Call Pioneering Pest Services today for your free estimate on any of our services!! ☎️ 386.734.2142 ☎️

  • Posted: Dec 10, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Call Pioneering Pest Services today for your free estimate on any of our services!! ☎️ 386.734.2142 ☎️

Call today for your free estimate on any of our services!! ☎️ 386.734.2142 ☎️

Send us a Facebook message or email spetit@pioneerpestservices.com for more information!

☘️Lawn & Shrub care   🐜 Pest Prevention  🪳Termite Protection

Fertilizer ☑️ Insect control ☑️
Weed elimination ☑️

Dependability starts with Pioneer Pest Services!

Pioneer Pest Services, Inc. was established in 1985 and proudly serves Volusia, Flagler, Lake, and Seminole counties. We are a local family-owned and operated company with a proven track record for reliable and professional pest services.

Our goal is to partner with homeowners, business owners, and property managers to control pest, termite, and lawn and shrub problems. We will immediately assess and address current pest issues, as well as your lawn and shrub needs, and help you to prevent them from happening in the future.

Whether they fly, creep, sting, or swarm, pests are a persistent problem for Floridians—and they can do serious damage if they’re not kept in check. At Pioneer Pest Services, we understand that pests need to be taken care of promptly and effectively. That’s been our mission for the past three decades! A local, family-owned company, we’re committed to quality service for residential and commercial customers in Volusia, Flagler, Seminole, and Lake counties. RELIABLE PEST SERVICES SINCE 1985

Protecting your property is our priority, call us today for a FREE estimate. 📱386.734.2142📱

Members of SFPMA: View our Membership page.

 

 

Tags: , ,