Become our Member : JOIN SFPMA TODAY   LogIn / Register: LOGIN/REGISTER

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

Community Update: February Wrap Up – Florida Condo & HOA Law Blog

Community Update: February Wrap Up – Florida Condo & HOA Law Blog

  • Posted: Mar 01, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Community Update: February Wrap Up – Florida Condo & HOA Law Blog

Spring is just around the corner and sprucing up is often top of mind. Whether that means improving yards, documents, or relationships, this edition of Becker’s Community Update offers practical guidance on how to move forward. Check out the hot topics below, and don’t forget to connect with us on Facebook to get real time updates on these issues and more!

by Becker / Florida Condo & HOA Law Blog

While Mother Nature may be hard to harness, community associations are often tasked with doing just that to protect both residents and property. In Responsibility for Tree Branches and Roots Elizabeth Lanham-Patrie explores how the law decides who needs to tackle this chore.

In the second part of our two part series Amending Governing Documents, Jay Roberts outlines best practices for getting proposed changes approved by membership.

Maritrini Soto Garcia discusses presidential power in Does a Community Association Board President Have Executive Action Authority or Unilateral Powers?, and reminds everyone that the work of a community association is, ultimately, a group effort.

Assessments are not the most popular feature of a community association, but they are a vital resource in maintaining the amenities and ambiance to which the community has grown accustomed. In THIS CASE: Abbey Park Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Bowen, Rob Caves reviews how the Florida court decided the seminal case regarding an owner’s right to withhold payment of an assessment.

 

If you have new members on your board or a new manager for your community and want them to be part of our Community Update, have them subscribe here:

 


 

Amending Governing Documents Part II – How?

By: Jay Roberts, Esq.

In Part I of this two-part series, we discussed the importance of amending governing documents. Part II discusses tips on how a board of directors can put itself in the best position to have the proposed amendments approved by the membership.

START EARLY:

Work with the association’s counsel to craft the language appropriate for the amendments well before you plan to present it to the membership formally.

Click here to read more!

Does a Community Association Board President Have Executive Action Authority or Unilateral Powers?

By: Maritrini Soto Garcia, Esq.

Community associations are not administered by a single director or officer of the board, instead, the affairs of such associations are administered by its board. The articles of incorporation and/or bylaws of an association most often specify the required minimum number of board members. In the condominium context, the Florida Condominium Act provides that in the absence of such specification, the board of administration must be composed of five members (or three members in condominiums with five or fewer units).

Click here to read more!

Abbey Park Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Bowen,

508 So.2d 554 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)

By: Rob Caves, Esq.

Assessments paid by owners are the lifeblood of any community association and efforts to collect assessments are the most consequential and common legal proceedings any association engages in. Typically, there are few valid defenses an owner can raise to challenge the collection of properly adopted assessments. One common defense that is attempted is that the association is failing to properly maintain the common elements of a condominium or the common areas of a homeowners’ association.

The seminal case on the issue of whether owners can withhold the payment of assessments due to the association’s failure to properly maintain the common elements is Abbey Park Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Bowen, 508 So.2d 554 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). In the case, the appellate court held that the failure to maintain the common elements is not an affirmative defense to the association’s action to foreclose on the unit for the failure to pay assessments. Accordingly, a claim by an owner that the association is improperly maintaining the condominium property would not be a valid defense to the association’s action to collect unpaid assessments or enforce the association’s assessment lien against a unit.

However, there are subsequent cases that hold that while such claims are not affirmative defenses to a foreclosure action by an association, they could constitute counterclaims and entitle the owner to a “set-off” if they were to prove that the association failed to properly maintain the condominium property and such failure resulted in damage to the unit owner or their property. See Qualcom Corp. v. Global Commerce Center Association, Inc., 59 So. 3d 347 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (holding that the owner was able to argue at trial that its damages from a roof leak, if proven, could be a “set-off” against the outstanding assessments). However, the facts which would entitle an owner to a set-off would be very specific and would not apply to an owner’s general allegation that the common elements, or common areas, were not being maintained, as was alleged in Abbey Park.

Accordingly, pursuant to the legal principles outlined in the Abbey Park case, the fact that an owner alleges that the association is not properly maintaining the common property, or operating the association, would not be a defense against the association’s action to collect properly levied assessments.

 


 

CALLING ALL BOARD MEMBERS AND COMMUNITY MANAGERS

As a service to the community and industry, we are pleased to offer some of our most popular classes online! While our in-person classes remain suspended until further notice due to COVID-19, we are thrilled to bring you the following classes to participate in from the comfort of your own home.

HOA/Condo Board Member Certification

VIEW ALL CLASSES

 

Tags: , , ,
A newly filed bill by Senator Jason Pizzo, SB 1490, could create a significant change in terms of an association’s ability to invest the community’s operating and reserve funds in depositories other than a traditional bank or savings and loan.

A newly filed bill by Senator Jason Pizzo, SB 1490, could create a significant change in terms of an association’s ability to invest the community’s operating and reserve funds in depositories other than a traditional bank or savings and loan.

  • Posted: Feb 26, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on A newly filed bill by Senator Jason Pizzo, SB 1490, could create a significant change in terms of an association’s ability to invest the community’s operating and reserve funds in depositories other than a traditional bank or savings and loan.

A newly filed bill by Senator Jason Pizzo, SB 1490, could create a significant change in terms of an association’s ability to invest the community’s operating and reserve funds in depositories other than a traditional bank or savings and loan. 

 

For years there have been significant legal constraints on a condominium association’s ability to use reserve funds. In addition to the statutory requirement to obtain membership approval for non-designated reserve usage, the prevailing school of thought was that association funds could not be invested since investments can and do fail.

A newly filed bill by Senator Jason Pizzo, SB 1490, could create a significant change in terms of an association’s ability to invest the community’s operating and reserve funds in depositories other than a traditional bank or savings and loan.

The bill provides as follows:

“Unless otherwise prohibited in the declaration, and in accordance with s. 718.112(2)(f), an association, including a multicondominium association, may invest any funds in one or any combination of investment products described in this subsection.”

If this bill passes and an association invests funds in any type of investment product other than a depository account, the association must meet all of the following requirements:

  1. The board shall annually develop and adopt a written investment policy statement and select an investment adviser who is registered under s. 517.12, F.S. and who is not related by affinity or consanguinity to any board member or unit owner. Any investment fees and commissions may be paid from the invested reserve funds or operating funds.
  2. The investment adviser selected by the board shall invest any funds not deposited into a depository account in compliance with the prudent investor rule in s. 518.11, F.S. It is important to note that the statutory prudent investor rule is a test of conduct and not resulting performance. Under this statute, no specific investment or course of action is, taken alone, considered prudent or imprudent. Instead, the investment adviser is deemed to be acting as a fiduciary and he or she may invest in every kind of property and type of investment, subject to that statute. The fiduciary’s investment decisions are evaluated on the basis of whether he or she exercised reasonable business judgment regarding the anticipated effect on the investment portfolio as a whole under the facts and circumstances prevailing at the time of the decision or action. Although the proposed statute requires that funds invested be subject to insurance under the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, it is important to note that this insurance is only there if the brokerage firm fails, not if the investment turns out to be ill-advised and loses the association’s money.
  3. The investment adviser shall act as a fiduciary to the association in compliance with the standards set forth in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 at 29 U.S.C. s. 1104(a)(1)(A)-(C).
  4. At least once each calendar year, the association shall provide the investment adviser with the association’s investment policy statement, the most recent reserve study report or a good faith estimate disclosing the annual amount of reserve funds which would be necessary for the association to fully fund reserves for each reserve item, and the financial reports.
  5. The investment adviser shall annually review these documents and provide the association with a portfolio allocation model that is suitably structured to match projected reserve fund and liability liquidity requirements. There must be at least thirty-six (36) months of projected reserves in cash or cash equivalents available to the association at all times.
  6. Portfolios managed by the investment adviser may contain any type of investment necessary to meet the objectives in the investment policy statement; however, portfolios may not contain stocks, securities, or other obligations that the State Board of Administration is prohibited from investing in under ss. 215.471, 215.4725, and 215.473, F.S. or that state agencies are prohibited from investing in under s. 215.472.

Lastly, the bill would exempt registered investment advisors from having their bids subjected to the competitive bidding requirements found in Section 718.3026, F.S.  The companion bill to SB 1490 is HB 1005 (Killebrew/Fine).

As more associations change their old habits and begin to fund reserves, the allure of more aggressive investment vehicles for these funds, which can be substantial amounts, is undeniable. However, the risk is also undeniable. As such, if this bill becomes law and the investment of reserves becomes available, boards are strongly encouraged to take an extremely cautious, measured approach with reserves.

While investment of your association’s operating and reserve funds might result in a substantially better return than a savings account, you might also see significant losses. The investment of association funds must be done with careful consideration of the demographic in your community, the age of your buildings and facilities, the required liquidity of your funds and, most importantly, the sensitivities and risk tolerance of your membership all taken into account. If your members fuss about your board’s landscaping decisions imagine the potential fallout if you make the wrong investment decisions!

 


Very truly yours,

Donna DiMaggio Berger, Founder & Executive Director
Community Association Leadership Lobby
Tags: , , ,
NEW Video Section: CONDO AND HOA VIDEO’S & COURSES on sfpma

NEW Video Section: CONDO AND HOA VIDEO’S & COURSES on sfpma

  • Posted: Feb 25, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on NEW Video Section: CONDO AND HOA VIDEO’S & COURSES on sfpma

CONDO AND HOA VIDEO’S & COURSES

Educational Videos & Webinar Presentations

Videos and Webinar presentations offered to Clients that work and live in Condo, HOA’s and the Management Industry. Learn at your own pace, some of the presentations provide course certificates of completion while others offer you the ability to learn valuable lessons on the many questions you may have for your Condo and HOA.  Below you can find videos on; Legal and Legislative presentations, Q & A for Condo and HOA, Collections, Accounting and Taxes, Education and Licensing, Become a CAM and many more….

 

Educational Providers: Florida Member Companies with The State of Florida Property Management Association.

In our efforts to bring educational courses to our industry in a safe way, Our Members provide many courses online through Zoom and Video presentations. Take advantage of these online Courses many are approved by the State of Florida where after watching, joining and taking part in will give you credits and certifications for the Courses. These lively, interactive and informational Video courses are approved for board member certification and property manager continuing education credits. (ECU Credits) some are held in a Video setting while others are online through Zoom and other platforms. SFPMA is happy to bring to you these Educational Resources for you to take part in.

View and Learn through Videos & Courses offered to Condo & HOA Board Members throughout the State of Florida. 

View our YouTube Channel and keep up to date with Members, Courses, and Learn through the Great Videos for our industry!

 

 

Tags: ,
Legal Morsel | Court Concludes That Mistakes on a Claim of Lien Does Not Invalidate the Claim by BY ROBERT KAYE, ESQ., B.C.S

Legal Morsel | Court Concludes That Mistakes on a Claim of Lien Does Not Invalidate the Claim by BY ROBERT KAYE, ESQ., B.C.S

  • Posted: Feb 22, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Legal Morsel | Court Concludes That Mistakes on a Claim of Lien Does Not Invalidate the Claim by BY ROBERT KAYE, ESQ., B.C.S

Legal Morsel | Court Concludes That Mistakes on a Claim of Lien Does Not Invalidate the Claim

by BY ROBERT KAYE, ESQ., B.C.S

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal recently provided a ruling regarding the ability of a homeowner’s association to successfully complete a foreclosure for unpaid assessments when there was an error in the amount indicated as being owed on the claim of lien.  In the case of Pash v. Mahogany Way Homeowners Association, Inc., Case No. 4D19-3367, January 27, 2021, the Appellate Court was faced with the challenge of a lower court ruling in favor of the homeowner’s association in which the homeowner, Mr. Pash, had claimed that the amount indicated on the claim of lien was overstated from what was owed.  The record also reflected that the homeowner’s association admitted that it made a mistake in its calculation of the assessments on the lien but corrected the amount when it filed the foreclosure case.  It was not disputed that some assessments were delinquent when the foreclosure case began.

In a split decision, a majority of the Court focused on the requirements of Section 720.3085(1)(a) of Florida Statutes, as well as the provisions of the Declaration of Covenants for the Community.  The Statute provides the following:

To be valid, a claim of lien must state the description of the parcel, the name of the record owner, the name and address of the association, the assessment amount due, and the due date.  The claim of lien secures all unpaid assessments that are due and that may accrue subsequent to the recording of the claim of lien and before entry of a certificate of title, as well as interest, late charges, and reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred by the association incident to the collection process.  The person making payment is entitled to a satisfaction of the lien upon payment in full.

While the case was reversed for other reasons, the majority of the Court stated that “Nothing in section 720.3085(1)(a) suggests that the claim [of lien] must be free of error for it to serve as an otherwise valid claim of lien.”  The Court also concluded that the statute, as written, does not provide that an error in the amount stated in the claim of lien invalidates an otherwise valid claim by an association.  Rather, the Court indicated that the association is merely asserting “a claim” in the lien and the association remains obligated to prove its claim in order to prevail in its case and homeowners have the ability to contest the claim made.

The Florida Condominium Act contains substantially the same provision as set forth above in Section 718,116(5)(b) F.S.  Consequently, it is anticipated that a lower court would likely apply the conclusions of this case to a condominium association foreclosure case.

It remains to be seen whether this holding is going to be viewed as an anomaly or will be followed by the remaining District Courts in Florida.  Notwithstanding this easing of the perception of association requirements on this point, it remains the recommendation that all collection efforts by associations be fully documented to a “zero” balance on the specific homeowner account to minimize any possible adverse conclusion in an assessment foreclosure case.  Legal counsel familiar with community association law should be involved to assist in the formal collection efforts against any homeowner.

 

 

Tags: , , ,
An Introduction to HB 969: Florida’s Proposed Data Privacy Law by Becker

An Introduction to HB 969: Florida’s Proposed Data Privacy Law by Becker

  • Posted: Feb 18, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on An Introduction to HB 969: Florida’s Proposed Data Privacy Law by Becker

An Introduction to HB 969: Florida’s Proposed Data Privacy Law

Jack S. Kallus | Becker Lawyers
Client Advisory

 

Yesterday, House Bill 969 titled Consumer Data Privacy was introduced as a potential new law to protect the personal data of Florida consumers. Governor Ron DeSantis’ stated goal for the bill is to “safeguard the privacy and security of consumer data.”

The bill is intended to give consumers more control over the personal information that businesses routinely collect and may even sell to third parties. Many of the basic rights under the new bill mirror that of the California Consumer Privacy Act passed in 2018 (CCPA). Like the CCPA, HB 969 attempts to secure new privacy rights for Florida consumers. If you are a Florida resident, you may ask businesses to disclose what personal information they have about you and what they do with that information as well as the right to request a business delete and to not sell your personal information. Consumers will also have the right to be notified, before or at the point businesses collect personal information, about the types of personal information being collected and what the business may do with that information. Generally, businesses will not be able to discriminate against you for exercising your rights under HB 969.

As stated above, the consumer will be provided the right to request that businesses disclose what personal information they have collected, used, shared, or sold about the consumer, and why they collected, used, shared, or sold that information. Businesses must provide a consumer with this information for the twelve-month period preceding the request and must provide the information free of charge.

If passed, HB 969 would require businesses to inform consumers about certain information being collected at the time of collection. Businesses would be required to inform consumers about:(i) categories of personal information collected; (ii) specific pieces of personal information collected; (iii) sources from which the business collected personal information; (iv) purposes for which the business uses the personal information; (v) categories of third parties with whom the business shares the personal information; and (vi) categories of information that the business sells or discloses to third parties.

If the business sells consumers’ personal information, then the information at collection must include a “Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information” link. The information of consumer rights must also contain a link to the business’s privacy policy, where consumers can get a description of the business’s privacy practices and of their privacy rights.

 

A Florida consumer may also request that businesses stop selling their personal information (“opt-out”). With some exceptions, businesses cannot sell your personal information after they receive an opt-out request unless later provide authorization allowing them to do so again. Businesses must respect the consumer’s decision to opt-out for at least twelve months before requesting that the consumer authorize the sale of the consumer’s personal information. Businesses can offer consumers financial incentives in exchange for collecting, keeping, or selling personal information. However, businesses cannot use financial incentive practices that are unjust, unreasonable, coercive, or usurious in nature.

After discovering what personal information is collected, used, shared or sold a consumer may request that a business delete the personal information collected and to tell their service providers to do the same. However, there are many exceptions that allow businesses to keep personal information. Businesses must respond to a request to delete within 45 calendar days and can only extend that deadline once by another 30 days (75 days total) if they notify the consumer.

Consumers may be worried about retaliation for exercising rights under HB 969. However, the bill prohibits businesses from denying goods or services, charging a different price, or providing a different level or quality of goods or services just because a consumer exercised rights under the proposed law. Businesses also cannot make the consumer waive these rights, and any such contract provision is unenforceable.

What happens if a business violates HB 969? What rights are given to the consumer? Much like the CCPA, HB 969 only provides a private cause of action against a business if there is a data breach, and even then, only under limited circumstances. A consumer can sue a business if their nonencrypted and nonredacted personal information was stolen in a data breach as a result of the business’s failure to maintain reasonable security procedures and practices to protect it. If this happens, the consumer can sue for the amount of monetary damages actually suffered from the breach or up to $750 per incident. An important aspect of the proposed law is that it does not provide for prevailing party legal fees.

For all other violations of HB 969, only the Department of Legal Affairs (“Department”) can file an action. If the Department has reason to believe that any business is in violation and that proceedings would be in the public interest, the Department may bring an action against such business and may seek a civil penalty of not more than $2,500 for each unintentional violation or $7,500 for each intentional violation. Such fines may be tripled if the violation involves a consumer who is sixteen years of age or younger. A business may be found to be in violation if it fails to cure any alleged violation within 30 days after being notified in writing by the Department of the alleged noncompliance.

The bill also contains other provisions outlining who is protected under the bill, what is considered personal information, data retention and biometric information rules and procedures for businesses to follow. We will publish additional articles exploring these provisions and expand on the information addressed in this article. In addition, we will explore the importance of Florida enacting a well-balanced privacy law which does not act as an anchor for businesses and appropriately protects the rights of Florida consumers.

 

Tags: , ,
We all have fond memories of time spent on the water, but bad odors, algae, aquatic weeds, and other imbalances can distract you from the fun and serenity your waterbody provides by SOLitude

We all have fond memories of time spent on the water, but bad odors, algae, aquatic weeds, and other imbalances can distract you from the fun and serenity your waterbody provides by SOLitude

  • Posted: Feb 18, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on We all have fond memories of time spent on the water, but bad odors, algae, aquatic weeds, and other imbalances can distract you from the fun and serenity your waterbody provides by SOLitude

We all have fond memories of time spent on the water, but bad odors, algae, aquatic weeds, and other imbalances can distract you from the fun and serenity your waterbody provides

by SOLitude Lake Management

 

Dive Deeper with a Water Quality Assessment

We all have fond memories of time spent on the water, but bad odors, algae, aquatic weeds, and other imbalances can distract you from the fun and serenity your waterbody provides. Professional water quality assessments are a key tool to not only help resolve these issues, but prevent them from reoccurring.

Lake and pond management is a complex field that presents never-ending puzzles and surprising challenges. Like a fingerprint, no two bodies of water are exactly the same—and they are always in a state of continuous change based on how the water is used, the surroundings, and even the weather. When diagnosing and designing a solution for a problem like bad odors or nuisance algae growth, professionals take all of this information into account, but it doesn’t provide a complete picture of what’s going on below the surface.

Comprehensive Lake & Pond Assessments

Understand Your Waterbody Inside and Out

 

A professional assessment is the first step to achieve a comprehensive view of your lake or pond’s health. Think of this like a physical for your waterbody. An array of scientific tests are conducted to check its vitals and establish an initial baseline of health. Over time, the comprehensive scientific data can be used to:

  • Identify root causes of recurring issues
  • Predict and prevent the onset of future water quality problems
  • Make better informed proactive management decisions
  • Achieve more impactful and long-lasting results
  • Reduce your environmental footprint and cut management costs

SOLitude offers a variety of waterbody assessment options. Each package includes the creation of a customized, comprehensive report for you and your stakeholders. Your freshwater management professional can help you determine which package is most appropriate based on the history of the waterbody, as well as your unique goals and budget.

Find out more…

 

 


You’re In Good Hands! Meet Our Industry Leaders

The aquatic management industry is burgeoning with scientists, researchers, and other passionate experts. SOLitude is the proud home to many of these thought leaders who have steered the industry towards innovation, technological advancement, and holistic management strategies through the roles they hold in various environmental organizations and authority groups.

SOLitude Lake Management is the proud home of many industry experts who hold prestigious roles in a variety of environmental organizations, including the North American Lake Management Society (NALMS), the Aquatic Plant Management Society (APMS), and other authority groups. As industry thought leaders, these colleagues go above and beyond to demonstrate SOLitude’s commitment to science, technology, innovation, and holistic lake and pond management strategies. We believe that these tenets create the foundation for memorable experiences around the water and encourage the long lasting functionality of these precious aquatic resources.

Marc Bellaud, President – Aquatic Biologist & Director of Technical Services – MAmarc-bellaud-web-new

Marc Bellaud has more than 25 years of experience in lake, pond and wetland management, and has been actively involved in advancing the science of the freshwater management industry. He currently serves as Director of the Aquatic Plant Management Society (APMS). Previously, he was the President and Director of the Northeast Aquatic Plant Management Society (NEAPMS) and has remained involved with the organization since it was initially founded in 1999. Bellaud also served as a Director of the New York State Aquatic Managers Association (NYSAMA). In addition, he was a contributing author and co-editor for the third edition of the BMP Manual by the Aquatic Ecosystem Research Foundation (AERF).

Glenn Sullivan, Environmental Scientist & Certified Lake Manager – NY

glenn-sullivan-web-newGlenn Sullivan entered the aquatics industry in 1993 and is currently the President of the New York State Aquatic Managers Association (NYSAMA). He is also a former member of the Board of Directors for the Northeast Aquatic Plant Management Society (NEAPMS). Over the course of 20 years, he held many roles including President, Director, Treasurer, and Editor, and continues to serve as a committee co-chair. In 2015, he was named Preferred Applicator of the Year by SePRO Corporation. He is also the recipient of multiple awards recognizing environmental stewardship, best management practices and sustainable leadership.

 

Will Stevenson, Director of Integration – MA

Will_Stevenson_web

William Stevenson is the Treasurer and a member of the Board of Directors and past President of the Northeast Aquatic Plant Management Society (NEAPMS). Before joining SOLitude, He also serves on the Massachusetts Audubon Council and as a Vice President of Timber Owners of New England, an organization dedicated to preserving multi use forested land.

 

Bob Schindler – Aquatic Biologist & Project Manager – PA

Bob_Schindler_web2

Bob Schindler is a two-time president and current Regional Director of the Pennsylvania Lake Management Society (PALMS), through which he coordinates educational opportunities and annual conferences. He also helps PALMS administer a grant program through the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection’s Growing Greener program. Schindler has served on the PALMS.

 

Shannon Junior, Aquatic Ecologist – VAshannon-junior-web-new

Shannon Junior is the Editor for Women of Aquatics (WOA), an organization founded to promote and support women in the lake and pond management industry through professional advancement, continuing education opportunities and peer mentorship programs. She also serves on the Virginia Leadership Retreat Committee. Junior has worked in the lake and pond management industry since 2000. In 2013, she received the SePRO Applicator of the Year Award, which recognizes an individual who shows leadership in advancing the science of aquatic plant management.

Emily Mayer, Aquatic Biologist & Project Manager – NJEmily_Mayer_web-1

Emily Mayer is a 10-year veteran in the lake management industry and serves on the board of directors for the Northeast Aquatic Plant Management Society (NEAPMS). She is the editor of the organization’s newsletter and assists with the organization of the NEAPMS annual conference. Previously, she served as a student director, a role through which she encouraged student involvement and helped increase awareness of the organization across social media. In addition to her longstanding involvement with NEAPMS, Emily is currently a member of the New Jersey Invasive Species Strike Team (NJISST), the North American Lake Management Society (NALMS), and Lower Hudson PRISM – a group which seeks to protect the rich biodiversity and ecosystems in the Mid-Atlantic.

Kim Niesel, Senior Business Development Consultant – VA

Kim_Niesel_web_12.15Kim Niesel holds her CMCA (certified manager of community associations) designation, as administered by the Community Association Managers International Certification Board and is involved in several industry-related organizations, including the Southeastern Virginia and Central Virginia chapters of Community Associations Institute (CAI). She has served as a board member and president for both of these associations. Kim is also one of the founders of the Virginia Leadership Retreat and has been recognized several times for her volunteer involvement. She currently serves on the Board for the Virginia Leadership Retreat and is the Chairperson for the Communications Committee of the Southeastern VA CAI.

 

 

 

Tags: , , ,
Condos and HOAs who are forced to collect on delinquent accounts must consider the proper and most important ETHICAL solution. “Ask Mr. Condo” Bob Gourley

Condos and HOAs who are forced to collect on delinquent accounts must consider the proper and most important ETHICAL solution. “Ask Mr. Condo” Bob Gourley

  • Posted: Feb 17, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Condos and HOAs who are forced to collect on delinquent accounts must consider the proper and most important ETHICAL solution. “Ask Mr. Condo” Bob Gourley

Condos and HOAs who are forced to collect on delinquent accounts must consider the proper and most important ETHICAL solution.

by Axela’s “Ask Mr. Condo” Bob Gourley

 

Why Ethical Collections Really Matters for HOAs and Condominium Associations

What happens if 5% or more of the members of a condominium association or HOA don’t make timely payments to the association as expected? What if one or more homeowners stops contributing altogether? How can condominium associations and HOAs protect themselves while not playing the role of the villain in the eyes of the delinquent homeowners? Here is the argument in favor of ethical collections.

What is in the best interest of the association or the delinquent homeowner?

No one can question the need for a condominium association or HOA to act against delinquent owners within their association. After all, successful collection and distribution of common fees and assessments are the only way a condominium association or HOA can surviveBudgets are prepared annually. On one side of the budget are all of the known and anticipated expenses, contributions to Reserve Funds, and other expenses the association will face in the upcoming year. On the other side of the budget are the income items to pay for those expenses, namely the anticipated income from common fees and assessments from individual homeowner and unit owners within the association. A balanced budget can only be maintained if both sides of the equation are accurate.

Condominium associations and HOAs are typically not-for-profit businesses. The governing documents that create the bond between the unit owner and the association usually give the association serious clout when it comes to collecting common fees and assessments in a timely manner. Additionally, many associations engage an attorney to assist them in contract negotiation, interpretation and modification of governance documents, and much more. It’s not surprising, then, that many condominium associations and HOAs simply turn to their attorney when it comes to matters of collection of delinquent common fees and assessments. But boards should be asking themselves, is that wise? Is that in the best interest of the association or the delinquent homeowner? Is it the best way to protect the association’s assets and actually collect the money it is owed? Is it ethical?

 

The goal should be to educate delinquent homeowners and help them get current

There are several reasons that a condominium or homeowner can become delinquent. The simplest reason is that they simply don’t have enough money to pay all of their bills. Credit card bills, utility bills, car payments, and even the mortgage all need to be paid. There are perceived repercussions from missing any of these payments, including having utilities turned off, a car repossessed, or a foreclosure action from missed mortgage payments. For these reasons, a person who is short of cash might make the decision to defer or miss payments on their common fees or assessments for the simple reason there doesn’t appear to be any repercussions from doing so. It is a mistaken notion that is all too common. Other reasons include an owner’s death or severe illness, a lack of receiving or paying attention to communications from the condominium association or HOA, and even plain forgetfulness.

Whatever the reason, once the unit or homeowner gets behind in their common fees, the goal should be to educate them and get them back up and current so that their lack of payment doesn’t hurt the other association members who are paying on time.

 

Legal fees can even outweigh the amount the homeowner owes to the association

There is a huge difference between attempting to collect a debt and simply taking legal action against the debtor. Both have very real consequences to both the condominium association or HOA and the delinquent homeowner. Simply referring the matter to an attorney isn’t an attempt to collect a debt. It is an action that will lead to a lien and eventual foreclosure if the debt isn’t settled. Used as a first resort, it is an unethical solution because it harms the homeowner and puts the association at risk of losing additional money as the attorney will get paid for the legal work regardless of the outcome.

Since the delinquent unit owner is encumbered to the terms of the association’s governing documents, the hefty and often burdensome cost of the legal fees is also lumped onto the delinquent amount the homeowner owes to the association. In some extreme cases, the legal fees can even outweigh the amount owed to the association. Can you blame the delinquent unit owner for crying “foul” when this happens? It is unfair and unethical.

 

A specialized collection agency can work with the homeowner without threatening to foreclose

A far better and less expensive solution would be to work with a specialized collection agency that fully understands the plight of the condominium owner or HOA homeowner who has missed a few payments and become delinquent.

Axela Technologies is just such a collection agency. In addition to offering a no upfront cost to the condominium association or HOA, the fees for using a collection agency to service the debt is far more agreeable to the delinquent homeowner. They have the opportunity to address their delinquency and get themselves back in good standing with their association. A specialized collection agency can work with the homeowner politely and professionally, encourage a repayment plan, without involving the courts or threatening to foreclose on the homeowner’s home unless, and only unless, the debtor is unwilling to resolve the debt.

 

95% of delinquencies are settled without the need for the hefty legal expense of an attorney

In our experience, that is a rare occasion that only happens about once for every 20 accounts referred. That means up to 95% of delinquencies are settled without the need for the hefty legal expense of an attorney. Not only is this solution far less expensive for all concerned, it’s also a far more effective method of collecting delinquent common fees and assessments.

An ethical collection strategy needs to be considered in all cases of homeowner delinquency and not just because it is the right or ethical thing to do. Many associations have felt the bitter sting of financial loss after pursuing a strictly legal “lien and foreclose” strategy. Savvy homeowners who get swamped with legal fees on top of delinquencies are far more likely to file their own bankruptcy leading to the association simply “writing off” the delinquency and the legal fees spent trying to collect.

Using Axela Technologies and their ethical collections strategy proves effective 19 times out of 20. Ethical collections save time, save money, and encourages a “win/win” for the association and the homeowner. Take a look at your current condominium association or HOA collections strategy today. If it isn’t ethical, it’s time to talk to Axela Technologies.

 

Tags: , , ,
COVID-19 Best Practices for Community Associations with US Congressman TED Deutch Presented by KWPM & Kaye Bender & Rembaum

COVID-19 Best Practices for Community Associations with US Congressman TED Deutch Presented by KWPM & Kaye Bender & Rembaum

  • Posted: Feb 16, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on COVID-19 Best Practices for Community Associations with US Congressman TED Deutch Presented by KWPM & Kaye Bender & Rembaum

COVID-19 Best Practices for Community Associations with US Congressman TED Deutch

Feb 17, 2021 03:00 PM

Presented by KWPM & Kaye Bender & Rembaum

KWPM Executive Director Tim O’Keefe host this live, monthly webinar offering a dynamic landscape that addresses best practices for HOAs and Condo Associations, provides updates and features guests who offer insight into the industry.

This week’s panel of experts:
*US Congressman Ted Deutch, FL-22
*Attorney Jeffrey Rembaum, Partner with Kaye, Bender, & Rembaum
*Attorney Michael Bender, Partner with Kaye, Bender, & Rembaum

Register Today

Feb 17, 2021 03:00 PM
Mar 17, 2021 03:00 PM
Apr 21, 2021 03:00 PM
May 19, 2021 03:00 PM
Jun 16, 2021 03:00 PM
Jul 21, 2021 03:00 PM
Aug 18, 2021 03:00 PM

Time shows 

Tags: , ,
Discriminatory Practices: Is Your Association Prepared? by KBR Legal

Discriminatory Practices: Is Your Association Prepared? by KBR Legal

  • Posted: Feb 12, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Discriminatory Practices: Is Your Association Prepared? by KBR Legal

Discriminatory Practices: Is Your Association Prepared?

by Kaye Bender Rembaum

On September 26, 2016, Rembaum’s Association Round Up published an extremely important article regarding a community association’s potential liability when allegations by one member accuse another member of a discriminatory practice. (Click HERE to view the 2016 article). On September 13, 2016, HUD made clear that a housing provider is responsible for discriminatory practices that may take place. In its Rules and Regulations set out in Chapter 24, Part 100 of the Code of Federal Regulations, effective which further interprets the Federal Fair Housing Act, HUD explained that it believes that, “we are long past the time when racial harassment is a tolerable price for integrated housing; a housing provider is responsible for maintaining its properties free from all discrimination prohibited by the Act.” Those regulations became effective on October 14, 2016.

In this author’s opinion, HUD went way too far by mandating that housing providers act as the investigator, police, judge and jury in cases of alleged discrimination. After all, there are countless Fair Housing offices in each state where complaints can be filed and are actively investigated, often times with only a bare inference. Community association board members are volunteers with no required special training other than to be “certified” within 90 days of taking office, which certification can be met by signing a one-page form acknowledging duties or taking a two-hour class. Neither the individual board members nor the community as a whole should have to bear liability for its board of directors not taking action in a neighbor to neighbor dispute. Afterall, the court room is the proper setting where such matters should be resolved.

In the January 25, 2021, edition of the Palm Beach Post reporter Mike Diamond Special to Palm Beach Post USA TODAY NETWORK, authored an article titled “Judge Won’t Dismiss HOA Religious Bias Suit.” In the article the judge was quoted as follows: ““the La-Grassos [the plaintiff’s] have plausibly alleged a claim against the association for its failure to respond to or seek to control Ms. Tannenholz’s allegedly discriminatory conduct.” Amongst other things, the allegation is that Tannenholz’s told La-Grassos, “you do not belong in a community that is 80% Jewish and that La-Grassos should “move the F… out and go to a white supremist community.”

 

But for HUD’s position that a housing provider can have liability for discriminatory practices of the residents it is unlikely the association would be a defendant in this lawsuit. By forcing housing providers, such as Florida’s countless condominium, homeowners’ and cooperative associations, to interject themselves into what should be private disputes amongst neighbors, HUD is providing the deepest of pockets to the plaintiff’s attorneys. At the end of the day, it is just another reason to sue the innocent community association to create liability where there should not be any in the first place.

Practical Tip no. 1: In light of this lurking danger, be sure to check in with your association’s insurance agent to be sure the association has proper liability coverage for accusations of discrimination.

Practical Tip no. 2: Also, given that there can even be personal liability in such actions, board members would be wise to speak to their own personal insurance agents too… Afterall you never know when that umbrella policy may come in handy. Remember this, too: if one board member has knowledge about an event, then such knowledge can be imputed to all board members as if they are all similarly aware. In other words, when one board member knows, then the association itself is on notice.

Practical Tip no. 3: Consider formally adopting a “no discrimination” type of rule. It could be as simple as “discrimination of any kind will not be tolerated”.

Practical Tip no. 4: If your association is made aware of an alleged discriminatory practice, then a written record of such allegation and the association’s efforts to remedy the situation should be made.

Be sure to discuss each and every alleged discriminatory practice brought to the attention of the board and/or its manager with the association’s attorney to obtain the proper guidance needed.

 

 

Tags: , , ,
Hosting Association Meetings via Zoom by KBRLegal.com

Hosting Association Meetings via Zoom by KBRLegal.com

  • Posted: Feb 08, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Hosting Association Meetings via Zoom by KBRLegal.com

Hosting Association Meetings via Zoom

by KBRLegal.com

 

What You Need to Know    

The most asked question of 2020 is this: Can our association host our board and annual meetings using Zoom or another similar virtual/electronic platform? There is no doubt that technology will always advance faster than legislation. In fact, advances in technology seem to take place in light speed whereM as advances in legislation seem to travel at the speed of your average turtle.

 

As to board meetings, §718.112(2)(b)5 of the Condominium Act provides, “A board or committee member’s participation in a meeting via telephone, real-time videoconferencing, or similar real-time electronic or video communication counts toward a quorum, and such member may vote as if physically present. A speaker must be used so that the conversation of such members may be heard by the board or committee members attending in person as well as by any unit owners present at a meeting.” Note that similar provisions are provided for cooperative associations in §719.106(1)(b)5 and in §617.0820 for homeowners’ associations.

 

As to virtual membership meetings, Chapter 617 Florida Statutes, applicable to all of Florida’s not-for-profit community associations, provides in §617.0721(3) that if authorized by the board of directors, and subject to such guidelines and procedures as the board of directors may adopt, members and proxy holders who are not physically present at a meeting may, by means of remote communication participate in the meeting and be deemed to be present in person and vote at the meeting if the corporation implements reasonable means to verify that each person deemed present and authorized to vote by means of remote communication is a member or proxy holder; and the corporation implements reasonable measures to provide such members or proxy holders with a reasonable opportunity to participate in the meeting and to vote on matters submitted to the members, including an opportunity to communicate and to read or hear the proceedings of the meeting substantially concurrent with the proceedings. If any member or proxy holder votes or takes other action by means of remote communication, a record of that member’s participation in the meeting must be maintained by the corporation in accordance with §617.1601. [emphasis added]

 

In addition, the Condominium, Homeowners Association, and Cooperative Acts (Chapters 718, 720, and 719, Florida Statutes, respectively), provide that members have a right to speak during board and membership meetings (more on that below). In fact, each of the Acts also provide that board members can even communicate, but not make decisions, via email. Rule 61B23.001(2) of the Florida Administrative Code provides, in relevant part, that “all unit owners have the right to attend and observe all meetings of the board…” With this limited guidance as our backdrop, let’s ask the question slightly differently.

 

Can our association host our board and annual meetings via Zoom or another electronic platform so long as all members have their opportunity to speak at the relevant times and all other statutory requirements are followed, such as a speakerphone in the designated meeting location for condominium association board meetings? The answer, simply put, is “yes,” you can.

 

It is extremely important when planning on hosting the meeting through a Zoom-type platform that you think ahead about the implications. The type of vote that will occur at any membership meeting must be carefully considered. For example, what if there is an election and members have not yet opted to vote electronically? Provisions must be made to gather ballots up to the closing of the balloting at the membership meeting and for write-in candidates, too, as applicable (in a homeowners association type setting). Instructions must also be clearly provided to the members letting them know how the votes will be counted and ensuring the membership that they can observe the entire tabulation of the voting process. For example,

 

Dear Members, In accordance with s. 720.316, Florida Statutes, in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the Association’s members, except for the members who volunteer to assist with the tally of the ballots (along with the man- agement team and the Association’s legal counsel), there will be NO in-person attendance at the annual meeting. Although there will be no in-person atten- dance, the annual meeting will be broadcast through Zoom (online video conf- erencing) for those who wish to remotely attend and observe the annual meeting, including the tallying of ballots. You may join the Zoom meeting at the appointed time by using the following link in your web browser: ___________ or through the Zoom ap- plication on your smart phone or tablet with Meet- ing ID: __________ and entering the following Password: ___________.

 

Since we are on the subject of board and membership meetings and we are in “election season,” as it is affectionally referred to, let’s take a quick look at meeting notice requirements, eligibility, and terms for board of directors, vacancies, election disputes, and a members’ right to speak.

 

BOARD MEETING NOTICE REQUIREMENTS

 

Pursuant to §718.112(2)(c)1, 719.106(1)(c), and 720.303(2)(c), Florida Statutes, notice of a meeting of the board must be posted in a conspicuous place on the property at least 48 continuous hours preceding the meeting, unless the governing documents of the association require additional notice. However, notice of meetings of the board at which regular or special assessments against unit owners or at which amendment to the rules regarding unit use will be considered must be mailed, delivered, or electronically transmitted to the owners and posted conspicuously on the property not less than 14 days before the meeting. Remember, too, electronic transmission is only permitted if the owner provides prior written consent.

 

As discussed in more detail below, for annual meetings of the membership where an election will be held, the notice requirements for condominium and cooperative associations differ from the requirements for homeowners associations. However, for other meetings of the members, unless a homeowners association’s bylaws provide differently, the notice requirements are the same. Pursuant to §718.112(2)(d)3 and 719.106(1)(d), Florida Statutes, notice of a meeting of the membership must be given to each owner and posted in a conspicuous place on the property at least 14 days before the meeting. For homeowners associations, pursuant to 720.306(5), Florida Statutes, notice of meetings of the members must be given 14 days prior to the meeting, unless the bylaws provide differently. For meetings of the members where an election will be held, pursuant to §718.112(2)(d)4 and 719.106(1)(d)1, Florida Statutes, the first notice of the annual meeting of the membership must be sent to the members at least 60 days prior to the meeting, and the second notice must be provided at least 14 days to the members and posted conspicuously on the property at least 14 days in advance before the meeting. For homeowners associations’ annual meetings, notice must be provided at least 14 days before the meeting unless the bylaws provide differently pursuant to §720.306(5), Florida Statutes.

 

ELIGIBILITY AND TERMS FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

The eligibility requirements for board members are set out in §718.112(2)(d)2, 719.106(1)(a), and 720.306(9)(b). Pursuant to the foregoing, a person who is delinquent in the payment of any fine, fee, or other monetary obligation to the association is not eligible to be a candidate for the board. Additionally, any person who has been convicted of a felony is not eligible to serve on the board unless the person’s civil rights have been restored for at least five years. With the passage of Amendment 4, voting rights were restored to people convicted of a felony. It is unclear what impact Amendment 4 will have on the restrictions to eligibility for board members.

 

Additionally, condominium associations should be aware that §718.112(2)(d)2 was amended to provide that a board member may not serve more than eight consecutive years unless approved by two-thirds of all votes cast in an election or if there are not enough eligible candidates to fill vacancies on the board. However, this provision applies prospectively, which means the clock did not start until the law went into effect on July 1, 2018. Additionally, this only prohibits eight consecutive years of service. If a board member has a break in service, then the clock would begin again.

 

For condominium and cooperative associations with 10 or more units, co-owners of units are not eligible to serve on a condominium board unless they own more than one unit or unless there are not enough eligible candidates. This is not applicable to homeowners associations.

 

Governing documents may provide that you must be an owner to serve on the board, but generally they cannot establish other eligibility requirements, such as residency requirements.

 

VACANCIES

 

In the event of a vacancy on the board, pursuant to §718.112(2)(d)9, 719.106(1)(d)6, and 720.306(9)(c), unless the bylaws provide otherwise, the vacancy may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors, even if the remaining directors constitute less than a quorum, or if there is only one director remaining. In the event there is only one director remaining on the board, that director can choose to appoint people to fill all of the vacancies.

 

ELECTION DISPUTES

 

Election disputes for condominium, cooperative, and homeowners associations are handled by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes (the “DBPR”) through mandatory arbitration in accordance with §718.1255(1), 719.1255, and 720.311(1), Florida Statutes. Pursuant to §718.112(2)(d)4.c, 719.106(1)(d)1.a, and 720.306(9)(a), any challenge to an election must be brought within 60 days after the election results are announced. Additionally, a board member cannot be subject to a recall when there are 60 or fewer days until a scheduled election, or when 60 or fewer days have not elapsed since the election of the board member sought to be recalled.

 

MEMBER PARTICIPATION

 

Members have a right to speak at meetings of the membership. Pursuant to §718.112(2)(c) and 719.106(1)(d)4, Florida Statutes, members of condominium and cooperative associations have the right to participate in meetings of the unit owners with reference to all designated agenda items. Pursuant to §720.306(6), members of a homeowners association have the right to speak with reference to all items opened for discussion and all items included on the agenda. In other words, in a homeowners association, members can speak on any matter that was opened for discussion, even if the matter was not listed on the agenda for the meeting. Additionally, §720.306(6), Florida Statutes, provides that a member must be allowed at least three minutes to speak on any item.

 

Members also have a right to speak at meetings of the board of directors. [Pursuant to §718.112(2) (d)7 and 719.106(1)(c), Florida Statutes, members of condominium and cooperative associations have a right to speak at board meetings with reference to all designated agenda items. Pursuant to §720.303(2)(b), members have a right to speak at a board meeting with reference to all designated items.]

 

In all instances condominium, cooperative, and homeowners association boards are authorized to adopt reasonable rules governing frequency, duration, and other manner of member comments for the board and membership meetings. To make the member comments more meaningful, consider permitting them after the board fully discusses each item, prior to voting, and prior to moving on to the next item.

 

It is recommended you consult with your association legal counsel on the adoption of reasonable rules to ensure your virtual/electronic meetings run smoothly while also ensuring that they are in compliance with the association’s governing documents, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code.

 

 

Tags: ,