Become a Member: JOIN SFPMA TODAY   LogIn / Register: LOGIN/REGISTER

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

A Green Guide for Your Building Community

A Green Guide for Your Building Community

  • Posted: Apr 15, 2024
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on A Green Guide for Your Building Community

The sudden emergence of Kermit the Frog as a box office draw is not an accident—it seems that everywhere, everybody is ‘going green.’ The term is shorthand for a movement of environmental awareness, and it involves everything from the way architects design new construction to the way HOAs recycle their waste.

Search the Directory of top companies being used today by condos and hoa’s all over Florida. sfpma.com

The movement began as an arguably quixotic attempt by activists to arrest global warming and help preserve the environment. But it’s now driven by a different kind of green—money. Going green doesn’t just appease the environmentally conscious; it impacts an HOA’s bottom line. Solar panels drastically reduce the cost of electricity. Better windows further reduce the amount of electricity needed. And then there’s the real estate values.

“There are all kinds of studies that show that, if you’re trying to sell the units, that they will sell quicker and for a higher market value when you can market it as a green, efficient building,” says Suzanne Cook, executive director of the Florida Green Building Coalition. “If you’re trying to rent the units, you will get higher leasing payments and higher occupancy.”

Let’s take a look at how South Florida residential buildings are going green.

Going Green…

Rare is the new residential building development that does not factor environmental concerns into its design. This includes everything from building materials and solar power to the direction the front door faces. The primary piece that has changed is that there’s a greater awareness of how we design the orientation of the building: where sun and shadow is, and where we can use mechanisms that are not necessarily green products, but green design techniques such as solar shades, where we extend the concrete slab out.”

At first blush, this may sound arbitrary, or else influenced a bit too heavily by feng shui. But there are very practical reasons for making the right choices with building orientation. “For example, on south-facing windows, in morning and afternoon sun, when the sun is low and perpendicular to the glass, that’s going to be a higher heat gain,”  So you want to manage where you have that type of exposure.

Architect’s agree, “Anything that shades the window will help, like roof overhangs or canopies, so that the sun’s not shining directly in. Even shading the wall in general,” he says. “If you can keep the sun off the wall or the exterior enclosure, that will help the insulation not have to work as hard.”

These considerations are particularly important in the Sunshine State, where A/C, rather than heat, is the primary energy expenditure. “In Florida, the challenge is that we’re highly dependent on air conditioning, which uses a lot of energy.”  So how do we solve the energy production issue? Do we begin to use fuel cells, or alternate methods like solar power that will help mitigate the consumption of power from our local utility? Questions of this sort keep an architect busy these days.

 

…and Everything Old is New

While Florida has always been, and remains, an epicenter of new construction, the lion’s share of residential buildings were built before the recent surge in green construction. This means that if an HOA wants to go green, it will have to retrofit a building rather than build one from scratch. This speaks to the core of the green movement.

“By the nature of adaptive reuse, or using an existing building, you not only have to look at how much energy is consumed during its operation, but also the energy that’s consumed by construction. So by starting with an existing building, you’re already at your first steps of doing something that’s environmentally friendly, because you’re reusing, instead of taking down and reconstructing.

How Does an Existing Building Go Green?

“When you’re trying to retrofit a residential property, the three primary focuses are to tighten the building envelope and make sure you don’t have leaks, to enhance the insulation, and to make sure the windows are energy efficient,” says Cook. “Those are the big ticket items. But those three things impact the systems of the building, so when you make it tighter and you enhance the efficiency of the insulation and the windows, you impact the size of the air conditioner [required to cool the property]. You actually need less tonnage.”

The bigger-is-better mentality is a trap that many HOAs fall into. We assume that a bigger HVAC unit is more powerful and perhaps more efficient, but that is not necessarily the case. “People tend to do all these retrofit things but they often don’t test their HVAC to see whether it’s the size they actually need,” says Cook. “When you have an oversized air-conditioner, you get all kinds of problems. The air exchanger won’t stay on long enough to get the moisture out of the home, so it feels clammy to the occupant. And while it doesn’t create mold, it gives mold a friendly atmosphere. So realizing that all of the systems with a structure affect each other, you have to really make sure that you understand that building science.”

Understanding that science can lead to big savings. “I recommend higher efficiency in the air conditioning systems, so you can get a higher SEER rating,” says Barry. “The semi-conditioned attic is a big point, because that brings the air conditioning ducts into a semi-conditioned space as opposed to a hot attic. This makes your air conditioning system not have to work as hard, so it’s more efficient that way. The ducts are not bleeding conditioned air into the exterior and sucking in hot humid air and putting it inside.”

New technologies are being placed in existing condo communities on a regular basis in order to cut energy use and reduce their carbon footprint. According to experts, advances are being made in mechanical, electrical and plumbing technologies that affect the types of heating and air conditioning systems that are being used on a daily basis. Boiler controls, cogeneration, solar, low flow fixtures and Energy Star appliances are all examples of improved technology.

Sometimes retrofitting means replacing. “In a lot of existing buildings, we find that removing and replacing the mechanical systems is a better strategy than trying to retrofit them. At the end of the day, there may be a slightly greater upfront cost, but the maintenance and long term operating costs will be much less. So we’re looking at how we update the building and its systems, not just to modify or modernize.

The prevailing wisdom is that “going green” means huge upfront expenses and massive overhauls. It’s not always the case. There are smaller changes buildings can make that also have an impact. Another place boards can look to save money on energy costs is lighting. The traditional “Edison” incandescent light bulb was of course a quantum leap forward from the use of candles, yet only 30 percent of the energy used by incandescent went toward the production of light; 70 percent was wasted as heat energy.

The newest generation of solid-state lighting lasts up to 25 times longer than a standard incandescent bulb and saves up to 80 percent more energy in comparison. Replacing common area lighting with LED [light-emitting diode] bulbs can prove to be cost effective over the long run by reducing both operating and maintenance costs.

“I always suggest upgrading the light bulbs to compact fluorescent, or if the budget permits, LEDs  Mike Smith from BriteLED Lighting in Miami, a Member of SFPMA. “LEDs are great, because they’re energy efficient and they last for a long time. They cost quite a bit more, but because they don’t use as much electricity, your utility bills will go down. They also don’t put out as much heat, so your air conditioner doesn’t have to work as hard, which reduces the utility bill as well.”

In a similar vein, upgrading appliances can also save money. “Another smart idea is using energy-efficient appliances,” Mike says. “Washer-dryers, those types of things, they use a lot of electricity and they’re used regularly, so it’s better to go with something that has an Energy Star rating.”

Next Steps

Three and a half decades after President Carter famously installed solar panels at the White House, the noble idea of going green has started to make good financial sense. “I would say that we’re at a tipping point right now where there’s a common interest between the architect and the developer,  We are seeing that the financial institutions, especially the institutional lenders, are wanting green elements in the project. We’re seeing that on the financing side, this is becoming more and more desired. Those institutions want the building projects that are responsible, as part of their mission.

In short, green is this year’s color—and will be the color for the foreseeable future. As more money is invested in green technologies, and more HOAs realize the money saved by it, the Sunshine State will soon be even greener than it already is.

“For me, the solution in Florida is finding alternative energy sources that are more environmentally friendly and have lower costs, such as fuel cells, solar and wind.  We’re at the beginning of that now but with our air conditioning consumption, that’s where I think the future needs to be: looking at our energy options, versus just using infrastructure and building new infrastructure to accommodate it.

Greg Olear is a freelance writer we have used this article as a base and wish to thank Greg.

 

 

Tags: ,
How To Seal Pavers For a High Gloss Wet Look | Brick, Driveway & Concrete Pavers

How To Seal Pavers For a High Gloss Wet Look | Brick, Driveway & Concrete Pavers

  • Posted: Aug 14, 2023
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on How To Seal Pavers For a High Gloss Wet Look | Brick, Driveway & Concrete Pavers

A bit of gloss on your driveway gives it a beautiful, just-finished look that will last for a long time if done correctly. Click the link for our tips on how to seal brick and concrete driveways, and be sure to contact us today for all of your indoor or outdoor flooring needs!

Looking for a wet look, gloss appearance that brings out the colors in your pavers?  Do you want something that holds up to sun and weathering for 2 to 3 years – or more?

You’re in the right place.  To get the results above, it’s important to understand how to seal pavers… and why.  We’ve got your answers below.

Details below. Click to go there now.

It’s Easier Than You Think To Seal Your Pavers

After 18 years of dealing with the question of how to seal pavers the right way, my best recommendations are as follows:

  1. Spray apply rather than roller apply.
  2. Use water based sealers rather than solvent based.
  3. Use urethane sealers rather than acrylic sealers.

Let’s expand on these 3 guidelines a little further. (And here’s a quick video to show you what we mean.)

Spray Application vs Roller to Seal Pavers

While roller applying a sealer is easier than spraying, roller application does not work as well on pavers compared to something like concrete.

The biggest drawback when rolling sealer on brick pavers is that the roller can pick up the joint sand and roll it over the top of the brick paver surface.  This is especially true if the joints are wide. Furthermore, the amount of sealer that soaks into the sand joints is difficult to control when rolling.

How Much Sealer Do I Apply

Apply a flood coat to the paver surface including the joints. This method will apply the sealer very generously while allowing the sealer to soak into the sand joints as well.

As long as you apply the paver sealer on a windless day, the coverage can be generous and effortless.

If you really can’t get a pump up garden sprayer, opt for a sponge-type roller to apply the sealer. A nap roller is more likely to grab and trap your joint sand.

Water Based Sealer vs Solvent Based

Solvent based sealers are bad for the environment! Manufacturers are gradually moving away from these type products.

Regardless, solvent based sealers are more difficult to spray apply than water-based sealers, and they don’t really seal the joint sand, as well as the water based products.

The solvent based sealer tends to seal only the top surface of the sand compared to the water based, which soak down deeper into the sand.

From our lead chemist:

” While solvent-based sealers can produce a nice high gloss surface, they can also make the surface slippery if applied too thick

Also the gloss finish, typically burns off after 6 months of exposure to the sun. “

Water based acrylic sealers eliminate the issues with using solvents and are better at stabilizing joint sand to prevent sand loss.

However, it is important to use a high solids acrylic sealer or a urethane modified acrylic sealer, otherwise they fade and lose the glossy appearance after 6 months to a year.

Polyurethane vs Acrylic

Water based polyurethanes are a tougher sealer than acrylics and are more UV resistant and chemically resistant.

They don’t yellow, perform better outside and they are more resistant to chemicals oil, brake fluid, and chlorine.

The best water based polyurethanes are 2-part products (Part A and B requiring mixing). These 2-part polyurethanes when mixed together chemically cross link to form a paver sealer that is highly durable and long lasting when exposed to sunlight and/or freeze thaw.

A big plus is that they are much less sensitive to moisture. You can apply a 2-part polyurethane water based sealer as soon as you finish pressure washing. We call it “same day” sealing.

” The down side of using 2 part polyurethanes to seal pavers is that they are more expensive.  And once you have mixed them, you have to use them.  There is no shelf life or coming back the next day to seal pavers, with left over mixed product. 

Tags:
We are dedicated to the highest level of expertise in assessing the state of aging structures. Our staff is committed to saving clients time and money by determining any repair quantities during inspection.

We are dedicated to the highest level of expertise in assessing the state of aging structures. Our staff is committed to saving clients time and money by determining any repair quantities during inspection.

  • Posted: Jun 07, 2023
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on We are dedicated to the highest level of expertise in assessing the state of aging structures. Our staff is committed to saving clients time and money by determining any repair quantities during inspection.

Coastal areas like South Florida have a unique need for concrete rehabilitation and protection services predominantly related to assessing structural damage.

SRI Consultants, we provide the highest level of expertise in assessing the state of aging structures and are committed to saving clients time and money by determining repair quantities during inspection. With over thirty-five years of experience, and a registered professional engineer in Florida & Virginia, the president and founder of SRI, Mr. Shirish “Raj”pathak, is a NACE Cathodic Protection Specialist. We have specialists in structural engineering, civil engineering, environmental engineering and corrosion engineering at your disposal. The extra effort and attention to detail put forth by our team ensure you receive the highest quality services available to the industry.

We are dedicated to providing the highest level of expertise in assessing the state of aging structures. Our staff is committed to saving clients time and money by determining any repair quantities during inspection.

 

ARCHITECTURE

Creativity + Partnership. Our architectural services include new building design, remodeling, site planning, interior design, and historic renovation. We collaborate with independent architects to ensure the excellence of site plans, building design and finishes.

ENGINEERING

Technical Expertise. We are experts in our field with certifications from NACE and FL Board of Professional Engineers. Our team offers civil, environmental, structural and corrosion engineering services for single & multi-story structures, condos, hotel and motels, cooling towers and seawalls.

STRUCTURAL REHABILITATION

Comprehensive Solutions. Together, we have over 50 years of experience in structural rehab, offering a full range of integrated services including condition assessments, testing, specifications preparation, bid & permit prep and project management.

TESTING

Precision + Innovation. We use the most advanced tools to identify concrete defects, assess steel corrosion, and locate moisture in structures. We offer remediation services to measurably extend the life of your investments.

 

We have specialists in structural engineering, civil engineering, environmental engineering and corrosion engineering at your disposal. The extra effort and attention to detail put forth by our team ensure you receive the highest quality services available to the industry.

Important Hurricane Ian Recovery Information from the Falcon Emergency Service Team

Important Hurricane Ian Recovery Information from the Falcon Emergency Service Team

  • Posted: Oct 12, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Important Hurricane Ian Recovery Information from the Falcon Emergency Service Team

Building Envelope & Façade Inspections

Our structural engineers will design, plan and execute your project, tailored to suit each individual’s specific needs and budgets. Our engineers will inspect all materials used to ensure the strength and stability of your structure from low-, mid-, to high-rise structures and facilities. Falcon’s engineers pride themselves on ensuring the services and recommendations provided to each of our clients are held at the desired level of individualized care and attention.

  • High Rise & Mid Rise Façade Inspections & Repair/Restoration/Replacement

  • Stucco & Exterior Insulation Finish Systems (EIFS) Evaluations & Repair

  • Mid Rise & Low Rise Siding Inspections & Repair Replacement

  • Roof Inspections & Repair/Replacement

  • Water Infiltration Investigation & Remediation

  • Window & Door Replacement Design

  • Balcony & Deck Repair/Restoration/Replacement

  • Foundation Inspections & Waterproofing

  • Parking Garage Inspections & Repair/Restoration

  • Firewall / Fire Separation Assembly Inspections & Remediation

 

Building Envelope & Façade Inspections -Our structural engineers will design, plan and execute your project, tailored to suit each individual’s specific needs and budgets.  By A leader in the industry by providing professional, cost effective and innovative architectural and engineering designs, solutions and services through the use of highly qualified staff and outstanding customer service.


In case you missed it! Below is the link to the recording from yesterday’s fantastic webinar featuring Sinisa Kolar, P.E., Principal, on Extreme Weather in South Florida and Preventative Maintenance.
Tags: , , ,
WHO REPAIRS THE INCIDENTAL DAMAGES CAUSED BY THE ASSOCIATION? Article by KBR Legal

WHO REPAIRS THE INCIDENTAL DAMAGES CAUSED BY THE ASSOCIATION? Article by KBR Legal

  • Posted: Jun 14, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on WHO REPAIRS THE INCIDENTAL DAMAGES CAUSED BY THE ASSOCIATION? Article by KBR Legal

WHO REPAIRS THE INCIDENTAL DAMAGES CAUSED BY THE ASSOCIATION?

 Imagine: the association has just informed you it is set to begin a massive concrete restoration project. As part of the project, the contractor will need access to the rebar beneath the concrete slab connected to (or in legalese, “appurtenant to”) your unit’s balcony. To access the balcony slab, the contractor will have to remove the custom Italian tiles you just installed on your balcony. Who is responsible for the costs of the removal? Who is responsible to replace the tiles? The answers to these questions will largely depend on whether the governing documents of the association include an “incidental damage clause” and the specific circumstances of the situation, too.

In its most simplistic sense, an incidental damage clause in the declaration means that the association is responsible to repair any “incidental damage” caused by the association’s exercise of its maintenance, repair, and/or replacement responsibility. However, the existence or absence of such language is not always dispositive as to the repair responsibility. This is similar to “i” before “e” unless after “c” as there always seem to be exceptions.

For example, the repair and replacement obligation of the association may be limited only to damage caused to the unit and not cover any owner improvements to limited common elements, such as the balcony; or the obligation may be limited to damage to improvements only as originally installed by the developer, too. Whether the association or the owner will be responsible to repair the damage is highly fact-specific and will depend on the exact language in the governing documents of the association. Arbitration decisions of the Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes (the Division), discussed below, provide some guidance as to when the association may be responsible for incidental damage and when the owners will be responsible to repair same. That said, bear in mind that such decisions are not precedential and in addition only apply to the parties in the arbitration that resulted in the Division’s order. However, it does provide a good understanding of how the Division may rule in a similar circumstance.

As discussed above, where the governing documents contain incidental damage language, and the association damages a portion of the unit while conducting its maintenance, repair, and replacement responsibility, the association is likely responsible for the repair. This is illustrated in Rock v. Point East Three Condominium Corporation, Inc., Arb. Case No. 99-0220, Final Order (September 29, 2000).

In Rock, the association removed a shelf located under a sink and several wall tiles in order to repair rough plumbing in the common elements. The association replaced the wall tiles but did not replace the shelf after the repairs were completed. The unit owner sought, among other things, to have the association replace the shelf. The unit owner also sought to have the association repair tiles in the dining room of the unit which had “popped up” as a result of an unrelated water leak. The association’s declaration of condominium provided that the association was responsible to repair conduits and rough plumbing and provided that “[a]ll incidental damage caused to an apartment by such work shall be promptly repaired by the association.” The arbitrator ordered the association to replace the shelf, holding that the incidental damage to the shelf was caused by the repair to the rough plumbing, which was the association’s duty to maintain. As such, the incidental damage language of the declaration applied to the shelf. However, the arbitrator held the association was not responsible to replace the tiles in the dining room, as the damage to the tiles was not incidental to any work the association performed to repair the rough plumbing.

Therefore, Rock clearly establishes that while an association is responsible to repair portions of the unit that are damaged as a result of the association’s exercise of its maintenance, repair, and replacement obligation, the damage must be incidental to the association’s work.

If the declaration requires the association to repair or replace incidental damage to the unit, the association will likely be responsible to repair and replace owner modifications to the units, too, unless the declaration provides otherwise. In Brickell Town House Association, Inc. v. Del Valle, et al., Arb. Case No. 95-0133 Final Order (September 12, 1995), the association was required to remove certain owner-installed alterations to the unit in order to access and maintain the common elements. The unit owners asserted that the association was responsible to replace the alterations in accordance with the incidental damage provision in the declaration of condominium. The arbitrator agreed, holding that the association was required to reimburse the owners for the expenses required to restore the units to the condition which existed immediately prior to the association’s reconstruction activities, including betterments which were added by the unit owners since the original construction of the units by the developer.

In accordance with the holdings in Brickell and Rock, if the governing documents provide that the association is responsible for incidental damage to the unit, the association will likely be responsible to repair any portions of the unit damaged by the association’s exercise of its maintenance, repair, and replacement responsibility, including alterations made by owners (unless specifically provided for otherwise).

On a different note, if the governing documents of the association contain incidental damage language which is specific to damage caused to units, then the association will not be responsible for incidental damage caused to owner modifications to the common elements or the limited common elements. Similarly, the association will likely not be responsible to repair any damage to any owner alteration to a unit where the declaration required association approval and the owner failed to obtain same prior to installation of the improvement.

In Continental Towers, Inc. v. Nassif, Arb. Case No. 99-0866, Summary Final Order (November 24, 1999), the association needed to conduct concrete restoration, waterproofing, and other repairs to the unit owner balconies. The unit owners had installed tiles on the balcony and argued that the association was responsible for the replacement of the tile because the declaration provided that the association was responsible for incidental damage to the unit. However, the balcony was part of the common elements, not the unit. Therefore, the incidental damage language in the declaration did not apply to the tile, and, absent any other agreement between the parties, the association had no responsibility to repair and replace same. The arbitrator concluded that:

…in the absence of an agreement between the parties or a controlling provision of the documents, ‘it cannot be said from the mere fact of association permission that the association has assumed the perpetual obligation to remove and replace the personal property when necessary to repair and replace the common elements.’ The arbitrator adopts the rationale articulated in the Carriage House case. Since the balcony is a part of the common elements, and the tile was not part of the original construction, the unit owners are responsible for its removal and replacement.

Further, where there are owner modifications which were not approved as required by the declaration, the association will likely not be responsible to repair notwithstanding the incidental damage requirement set out in the declaration. In Harrison v. Land’s End Condominium Association, Inc., Arb. Case No. 94-0298, Final Order (June 27, 1995), the association was required to remove an owner-installed balcony finish in order to effectuate repairs to the balcony slab. In this case, the balcony was considered part of the unit, and the declaration contained a provision requiring the association to repair incidental damage to the unit. The declaration also required the owner to obtain approval of the association before making any alterations to the bal-cony. However, the owner never obtained such approval. Therefore, despite the incidental damage provision, the arbitrator determined that the association was not responsible to replace the balcony finish because the owner did not obtain association approval as required by the declaration.

Therefore, if an alteration requires association approval and an owner fails to obtain such approval, the association will far more likely not be responsible to repair any incidental damage to the alteration notwithstanding the existence of incidental damage language.

Generally, the association’s repair obligation is limited to actual damage caused to the unit as a result of its maintenance, repair, and replacement obligation. If the unit owners are required to vacate their unit in order for the association to effectuate the repairs, the association is not generally responsible to reimburse the owners for the costs of same. However, as the Brickell case, discussed above, shows us, that is not always the case. In Brickell, the owners also argued that the association was responsible to reimburse them for the costs they incurred in vacating the unit for the repairs. In this case, the association chose to proceed with a method of repairing damage to common element pipes from the interior of the units, which required the unit owners in the affected units to vacate. The association did not explore an option in which the repairs could be made from the exterior, which would permit the unit owners to remain in the unit. The arbitrator agreed with the owners and ordered the association to pay for the costs the owners incurred in vacating the units. As you can glean, this case is very fact specific, which led to this outcome.

In an order denying the association’s motion for rehearing, the arbitrator in Brickell, reiterated its earlier decision that the board, within its business judgment, decided to proceed with a method of reconstruction that required the removal of the owners. Therefore, the expenses of those owners are a common expense to be borne by all owners. The important consideration in this case was the fact that the association proceeded with the repairs from the interior without exploring options to proceed from the exterior. The arbitrator notes that the order should not be construed to mean that an association would be responsible for accommodations for all unit owners in the event that the condominium building had to be tented for termites, or if a hurricane rendered the building uninhabitable. In those cases, all owners would be required to vacate the units, and there can be no other decision of the board. Additionally, in Brickell, if there was no way for the association to make the repairs that would allow the owners to remain in unit, the arbitrator’s decision may have been different. How-ever, as the association chose to displace certain unit owners to effectuate the repairs without exploring any other options, the association was responsible for the owners’ costs to vacate.

Finally, even when there is no incidental damage language in the governing documents, the association may be responsible for damage to the units if the association fails to conduct necessary maintenance to the common elements, when the association knows that such maintenance is necessary. In Dibiase v. Beneva Ridge, Arb. Case No. 92-0210, Final Order (January 19, 1994), the association was aware that the common element parking area was consistently flooding into an owner’s unit. The association retained an engineer to conduct a drainage study, and the engineer recommended several remedial measures to address the drainage problem. While the association took some remedial steps, the association did not follow through on the study’s recommendations. The arbitrator concluded that the association was responsible for the owner’s costs to repair the unit caused by the flooding. The arbitrator explained that, while “[n]o association is required to protect the property against a 100-year storm…” the association was responsible to take those steps reasonably necessary to protect the condominium property.

As the association had an expert report that advised if the association did not take certain remedial measures, the damage to the condominium property would continue, the association had an obligation to make the repairs. As the association failed to follow the report, it was responsible for the damage caused to the unit.

In accordance with the decision in Dibiase, if the association receives a report from an expert advising that certain repairs must be performed, and the association fails to take action, the association may be responsible for the costs of any damage to the units caused by its failure to act.

As you have likely gleaned from the foregoing discussion, it can be difficult to determine who is responsible to repair and replace improvements damaged during the association’s exercise of its maintenance, repair, and replacement obligations. Given the complexities of the issue, your association should consult with its legal counsel with any inquiries regarding the association’s responsibility for incidental damage.

Kaye Bender Rembaum

We are dedicated to providing clients with an unparalleled level of personalized and professional service regardless of their size and takes into account their individual needs and financial concerns. Our areas of concentration include

1200 Park Central Boulevard South, Pompano Beach, FL. Tel: 954.928.0680
9121 North Military Trail, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL. Tel: 561.241.4462
1211 N. Westshore Boulevard, Suite 409, Tampa, FL. Tel: 813.375.0731
  • Assessment collections
  • Construction defect claims
  • Contract drafting and negotiation
  • Cooperatives
  • Covenant enforcement
  • Fair Housing
  • Land Use and Zoning
  • Litigation and Arbitration
  • Master/ Sub Association Issues
  • Pre and Post Turnover Planning
  • Real Estate and Title Concerns
  • Review and amendment of covenants

 

Tags: ,
We have 2022 Sales for Members: Advertising in our Magazine and in the News Blast and on our website.

We have 2022 Sales for Members: Advertising in our Magazine and in the News Blast and on our website.

  • Posted: Dec 28, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on We have 2022 Sales for Members: Advertising in our Magazine and in the News Blast and on our website.

Take advantage of our Advertising Sales.

Members Advertising in our magazine,News Blast and Website are avail for the new year.

 


 

ADVERTISING SALES

 

1-  We are running this sale for all members become a featured sponsor of our Email News Blast

  • Every week we publish our Email Blast filled with News, Articles, Member Information, This is sent 3 days every week at 9am
  • Your company send us a 300px by 300px logo picture we link to your website.
  • Be seen by over 230,000 readers as sponsors.  52weeks @3x every week.  In every posted Email your company is set on this with your logo as a featured sponsor.

Special Price of 450.00 for the entire year

This is limited there are only 15 spots  Act now. we are getting ready for 2022

NOTE: our news feed has been upgraded with featured post pictures that are displayed for the Articles in these email blasts.

 

2- Take out Advertising in our Publication – FLORIDA RISING MAGAZINE

  • Take out half and full pages 12 months of company advertising
  • take advantage of this special pricing
  • See our Advertising FLAT Rates: This Special ends FEB 2022.

    Business Card size:(12 months/200.00)

    Quarter Page: (12 months/450.00)

    Half Page: (12 months/700.00)

    Full Page: (12 months/950.00)

All Ads taken out for this special will run in every edition at this flat price. You can write articles every month we will publish. Your company is set on the Category sections in our magazine

 

3- Contact us for Advertising banners on the Pages of our website

 

Call us today and lock your Spaces or Fill out the Form We will call you!

 

    Main Contact Form SFPMA

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone: We will call you back (required)

    Your Website URL

    Subject

    Your Message

     

    Tags: ,
    Engineering & Compliance for your Buildings

    Engineering & Compliance for your Buildings

    • Posted: Jul 07, 2021
    • By:
    • Comments: Comments Off on Engineering & Compliance for your Buildings

    Engineering & Compliance for your Buildings

    The question on the minds of many South Floridians, especially those in older, beachfront buildings that are faced day in and day out with similar conditions as the Champlain Towers South: salty air, rising seas and aging concrete. here are some of our members of SFPMA in Engineering & Compliance. Members of the State of Florida Property Management Association SFPMA.ORG are ready to help!


    UNITED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING

    561-582-1733

    Leaders in Professional Engineering

    Providing exceptional engineering services through integrity, reliability and professionalism. With over 21 years of experience, we are the leaders in the industry, and we can help you as well!

    United Professional Engineering (UPE) provides a unique “one-stop-shop” for all your structural engineering needs. Our South Florida area founded firm has been in business since 2005 and we have a diverse team; from licensed designers and structural engineers to inspectors and general contractors. For that reason, our projects range from designing and restoration to structural inspections and more!

    At UPE, we understand how valuable your time is and we are committed to providing our industry leading expertise to your next project. Our team welcomes any and all challenges to ensure a smooth and cost-effective project for all our clients and everyone involved. Your journey with us is important, and we take pride in making it memorable!

     


    SRI Consultants

    561-372-1290

    Coastal areas like South Florida have a unique need for concrete rehabilitation and protection services predominantly related to assessing structural damage. At SRI Consultants, we provide the highest level of expertise in assessing the state of aging structures and are committed to saving clients time and money by determining repair quantities during inspection. With over thirty-five years of experience, and a registered professional engineer in Florida & Virginia, the president and founder of SRI, Mr. Shirish “Raj”pathak, is a NACE Cathodic Protection Specialist. We have specialists in structural engineering, civil engineering, environmental engineering and corrosion engineering at your disposal. The extra effort and attention to detail put forth by our team ensure you receive the highest quality services available to the industry.

    We are dedicated to providing the highest level of expertise in assessing the state of aging structures. Our staff is committed to saving clients time and money by determining any repair quantities during inspection.


    The Falcon Group – Engineering Architecture Energy Consultants Specialists

    An industry-leader providing professional, cost effective and innovative architectural and engineering designs, solutions and services through the use of highly qualified staff and outstanding customer service.


    The Falcon Group is a multidisciplinary engineering, architectural and energy consulting firm with offices in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Maryland, Washington DC, Virginia and Miami. Our services include Civil, Structural, MEP Engineering, Architecture. Energy Consulting and Aerial Imaging services.

    The Falcon Group is a unique Engineering and Architectural firm that focuses on the specific needs of Community Associations, including Capital Reserve Studies and Transition Reports, along with full-service engineering capabilities: Civil, Structural, Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing (MEP), Architecture, Energy Consulting and Litigation Support services.

     

     


    O&S Engineers & Architects

    305.676.9888

    O&S Associates, Inc. (O&S) is a full-service multi-disciplinary architectural and engineering consulting and design firm.

    One key attribute that separates O&S from a typical engineering firm is the range and diversity of our experience. Our team of seasoned professionals excels in project leadership, teamwork, dedication, and cooperation, which provides our clients with superior designs and exceptional service. This expertise and our commitment to quality provide clients with the latest technologies and advances in materials and products.

    O&S specializes in design and restoration, particularly structural/civil engineering and MEP services including historic preservation and facility renewal. Our engineering specialties include parking, MEP, structural, restoration, exterior envelope services, energy audits, façade law compliance, cogeneration, and HVAC. O&S provides sustainable design on all our projects. We maintain LEED Accredited Professionals as an effort to show our commitment to “Green” design.


    ONM&J Structural Engineers & Special Inspections

    (561) 835-9994

    O’Donnell, Naccarato, Mignogna & Jackson, Inc. (ONM&J) is one of Florida’s most experienced structural engineering firms.  It is the firm’s reputation for innovative design solutions that keeps ONM&J ready to service public and private clients.

      Headquartered in West Palm Beach since 1985, ONM&J offers clients resources throughout the state of Florida.

    ONM&J approaches every project with a fresh eye providing flexible, economical, structural design.  The firm is a capable and integral member of the project team for projects ranging from high-rise residential to single-story retail, including all types of civic facilities.  Functional and aesthetic project goals are identified and resolved through the firm’s unique project management approach. This approach involves a design strategy that meets at the project’s inception, followed by the development of inventive solutions to structural systems, thorough pre-construction consultations, as well as assisting the project team during construction and beyond with post construction evaluations.

     


     

     

     

     

    Tags:
    A TRAGEDY WITH MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS  By Eric Glazer, Esq.

    A TRAGEDY WITH MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS By Eric Glazer, Esq.

    • Posted: Jun 29, 2021
    • By:
    • Comments: Comments Off on A TRAGEDY WITH MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS By Eric Glazer, Esq.

    A TRAGEDY WITH MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS

    By Eric Glazer, Esq.

    Published June 28, 2021

     I was lucky enough to be on vacation the past two weeks.  On my last day, I woke up to the tragedy that was unfolding in Dade County as the Champlain Towers South Condominium came crashing down in Surfside.  There are still over 150 people missing or unaccounted for.  Before commenting on this devastation that will no doubt change the way Boards and counties and municipalities inspect condominiums going forward, let’s start by feeling terrible for the victims and families of this tragedy.  My heart truly goes out to them.

    I’ve seen a lot of strange things happen in my legal career.  I’ve seen owners spray their unit with ammunition from an AK-47.  I’ve seen unit owners throw contents of an entire apartment over their 20 story balcony from roid rage, I’ve seen owners store dangerous toxic chemicals in their unit.  But, you know what I have never seen………..a building like the Champlain Towers simply collapse.  Sorry, I’ve never seen that before.  We have all seen buildings that collapsed after a terrorist attack and buildings that were destroyed by a hurricane.  But I don’t believe we have seen anything quite like what happened here.

    So…….what the hell really happened?

    Apparently, an Engineer gave the Board of Directors a report in October of 2018 that found “failed waterproofing is causing major damage to the concrete slab.  Failure to replace the waterproofing in the near future will cause the extent of the concrete deterioration to expand exponentially.”  The engineer recommended a very expensive but necessary process to correct this.  In the garage, there was evidence of cracking and spalling in the concrete columns, beams and walls —- with exposed rebar.  “Most of the concrete needs to be repaired in a timely fashion.  Clearly, the Board knew about structural defects that needed repair.  The question is, did those necessary repairs go unanswered and if so, was that the cause of this tragedy.  I am not blaming anyone for anything.  However, the lawyer in me tells me that buildings don’t just simply fall down without any warning signs whatsoever.  .  But here is what I want to know and see:

    1. Has the City or County previously notified the condominium about any structural defects?  If so when and how?
    2. Has any contractor or engineer notified the condominium about any structural defects?  If so, when and how?
    3. Has any engineer or contractor inspected the property or performed repairs on the property that could have caused damage that led to this disaster?
    4. Has any unit owner or the association made any material alterations to the property by removing any structural walls?
    5. Was the Board ever made aware that the structure of the building needed repair?  If so, when and how?
    6. Was the board aware that balconies were spalling and rebar was rusting?  If so, what did they know and when did they know it?
    7. Has the insurance carrier performed any inspections of the property and if so, when and what were the results?
    8. Has the County required a 40 year certification regarding the structural and electrical components of the building?  If so, what were the results?
    9. Was a reserve study performed on the condominium?  When?  What were the results?
    10. What bid packages were sent to contractors?  When were bids received?
    11. What follow-up was done by the association with the engineer of the 2018 report?
    12. What was discussed at Board meetings regarding the need for repairs to the structure?
    13. Were any owners complaining about damage in their unit or parking spots?

    The results of reviewing these documents are crucial for several reasons and may lead to a need to review additional documentation.

    In addition to their unit, many people at Champlain Towers South lost every piece of personal property they owned.  They lost all of their furniture, appliances, electronics, clothing, jewelry etc… If they did not have an HO-6 insurance policy, the only way they can get reimbursed for their loss is by proving negligence against the association.  The above documents will be crucial in knowing whether or not there was or was not negligence here. If there was, owners can sue the association for damages .  If there wasn’t, the owners suffered a total loss without a chance for recovering damages for their personal property.  And by the way…….just because the building exploded and people died does not relieve any of these owners from having to continue to pay their mortgages while now having to find a new home.  It is a tragedy on many levels.

    As many of you know, in both Miami-Dade and Broward County, condominiums are required to undergo a 40 certification process whereby an engineer must attest that the building is structurally safe and electrically safe.  If you can believe it, it appears that the Carlisle was in its 40th year.  Apparently, there was a demand for certification by the county.

    It would not surprise me if we see a change going forward, reducing the 40 year certification to 30 years or even less.  I think engineers are about to be busy.  I don’t think anyone in condominium buildings will ever turn a blind eye to cracks in the concrete that is so often done.

    I pray for the families that have suffered a loss and/or still don’t know for sure if a loved one is among the rubble.  I also pray that the Boards of Directors of every condominium understand the immense power they have to potentially save lives by making sure the property is always safe and sound.  Too many times you hear about not being able to afford necessary repairs.  Too many times the can is kicked down the road.  The reserves are waived for the umpteenth year again and again and again.  I’m not saying that this definitely happened here at the Champlain Towers.  I am saying what I said at the top:  buildings just don’t fall down.  But every board everywhere has the solemn obligation to make sure something like this never happens again.

     

     

    There has been a lot of talk lately about the 40 Year Recertification of Buildings in Florida

    There has been a lot of talk lately about the 40 Year Recertification of Buildings in Florida

    • Posted: Jun 29, 2021
    • By:
    • Comments: Comments Off on There has been a lot of talk lately about the 40 Year Recertification of Buildings in Florida

    There has been a lot of talk lately about the 40 Year Recertification of Buildings in Florida

    The truth be told the law that requires recertifications after 40 years and then again every 10 years after that is not a state law. or Miami/Dade County and Broward County law.

    The law was first put in place by Miami Dade county in 2001 with Broward County essentially copying the Miami/Dade law in 2006.

    The process is primarily a creature of Miami-Dade and Broward counties. It’s an inspection intended to ensure buildings are structurally and mechanically safe and intact as they age.

    It requires an engineer to do a study of the building based on its structure, electrical, plumbing, and so on, the study is going to tell, what’s wrong with the building. In south Florida that often means issues with concrete and other structural systems. Living in paradise might be great for people but, sun, wind, salt air, and hurricanes takes a toll on buildings. Regular maintenance painting, waterproofing, and other repairs can slow the toll but not eliminate it.

    To learn more, check out https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/40YBSI-INFO-Rev.6-15.pdf

     

    Differentiating Class A, B, and C Office Space by SFPMA

    Differentiating Class A, B, and C Office Space by SFPMA

    • Posted: Feb 17, 2021
    • By:
    • Comments: Comments Off on Differentiating Class A, B, and C Office Space by SFPMA

    Differentiating Class A, B, and C Office Space

     

    Many of our members take the time to complete projects using the County Codes that are in place, While there are so many companies that cut corners or a Management company that looks at prices we have to ask? How do you Value the Buildings you manage?

    We have one of the Top Condo, HOA and Property Management Directories in Florida. Through the many Categories clients can find only the Best of the Best to have their maintenance requests performed on time, up to Code in their buildings and properties from Jacksonville to the Keys.

    Search our Directory

    When only the best will do, Find companies all over Florida ready to help you!

    Remember: “Skilled labor isn’t cheap; cheap labor isn’t skilled”. by James Terry of GreenTeam Service Corp.

     

    Office buildings are generally classified into one of three categories: Class A, Class B, or Class C. Standards vary by market, and each category is defined in relation to its counterparts. Building classification allows a user to differentiate buildings and rationalize market data — that said, classification is an art, not a science. While a definitive formula for each class does not exist, the general characteristics are as follows:

    Class A
    These buildings represent the newest and highest quality buildings in their market. They are generally the best looking buildings with the best construction, and possess high-quality building infrastructure. Class A buildings also are well located, have good access, and are professionally managed. As a result of this, they attract the highest quality tenants and also command the highest rents.

    Class B
    This is the next notch down. Class B buildings are generally a little older, but still have good quality management and tenants. Oftentimes, value-added investors target these buildings as investments since well-located Class B buildings can be returned to their Class A glory through renovations such as facade and common area improvements. Class B buildings should generally not be functionally obsolete and should be well maintained.

    Class C
    The lowest classification of office building and space is Class C. These are older buildings and are located in less desirable areas and are often in need of extensive renovation. Architecturally, these buildings are the least desirable, and building infrastructure and technology is outdated. As a result, Class C buildings have the lowest rental rates, take the longest time to lease, and are often targeted as re-development opportunities.

    The above is just a general guideline of building classifications. No formal standard exists for classifying a building. Buildings must be viewed in the context of their sub-market; i.e., a Class A building in one neighborhood may not be a Class A building in another.

     

     

     

    Tags: , ,
    O&S Engineers & Architects, performed inspections and structural evaluation of the building’s exterior façade, roofs, and developed a repair program.

    O&S Engineers & Architects, performed inspections and structural evaluation of the building’s exterior façade, roofs, and developed a repair program.

    • Posted: Feb 27, 2020
    • By:
    • Comments: Comments Off on O&S Engineers & Architects, performed inspections and structural evaluation of the building’s exterior façade, roofs, and developed a repair program.

    O&S Engineers & Architects

    Members of SFPMA: Find out more how we can help with your Florida buildings,  O&S Engineers & Architects 

     

    O&S Engineers & Architects is a multi-discipline engineering and architectural consulting firm specializing in the assessment, design and restoration of high-rise communities, commercial buildings and parking garages. 

    Since 1996, our staff of licensed professionals have consistently and successfully produced positive results on numerous projects ranging from small properties to large developments. O&S has an impressive portfolio in numerous markets. 

     

    O&S provides:

    • 40/50 Year Recertification
    • Architectural Design
    • Structural & Civil Engineering
    • Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing Engineering & Design
    • Capital Reserve Studies & Turnover Reports
    • Concrete Restoration
    • Building Envelope Design & Restoration
    • Balcony & Deck Restoration
    • Storm Damage Assessments & Inspections
    • Parking Garage Design & Restoration

    For more information please follow us on social media or visit our website.

     

    West Point Military Academy required a comprehensive structural assessment and exterior envelope renovation of the following buildings: Building 639, Water Treatment Plant, Scott Barracks, Eisenhower Barracks, The Fire House, and the Library Building. O&S Associates performed inspections and structural evaluation of the building’s exterior façade, roofs, and developed a repair program. O&S prepared repair drawings and technical specifications and made periodic observations of construction as part of construction management services.

    The restoration of the buildings’ repairs was comprised of replacing the existing roofing with new cold-applied, built-up roofing, renovation of all exterior brick and stone façade elements, reconstruction of cracked and bulged brick masonry parapet wall, replacement of cracked and spalled brick masonry, removal and reinstallation of coping stones with new cap flashing, tuck pointing of brick and stone masonry, and installation of new windows, window sealants, and application of new surface sealer for the entire façade. Total cost of restoration was $14.2 million. O&S was selected to study the exterior envelope of several buildings at the West Point Military Academy and develop a repair program for a multi-year renovation project.

    The existing roofing system at each building was deteriorated and leaking in multiple areas. All six buildings required a new roofing system. The total size of the roofs was approximately 800,000 square feet. The existing brick façade of building 639 needed extensive reconstruction. The water treatment plant, Eisenhower barracks, Scott barracks, and library building had ornate stone facade, cornices, and copings stones that needed careful design and construction.

     

    Firehouse Building: The firehouse consists of a single-story, four-vehicle garage; a two-story center portion; and a single-story portion located to the left of the two-story portion. The garage portion and the single-story portion has a flat roof, and the two-story portion has a hip roof with roofing tiles (asbestos tiles). O&S provided the following repair program:

    • Replacement of flat roof
    • Removal and disposal of existing asbestos tiles at the two-story portion (asbestos abatement) and installation of new roofing shingles
    • Removal and reinstallation of precast coping stones with lead-coated copper cap flashing
    • Replacement of corroded lintels
    • Rebuilding of cracked corners
    • Tuckpointing of deteriorated mortar joints
    • Pressure wash clean and apply waterproof coating on inside face of parapet walls
    • Pressure wash clean brick facia and coping stones and apply water-repellent surface sealer
    • Remove joint deteriorated joint sealants and install mortar joints
    • Repairs were approximately $170,000

     

    Building 639: Building 639 is an L-shaped building with five roof setbacks. The original building was built in 1937. O&S provided the following repair program:

    • Reconstruction of three corners with proper through-wall flashings and cap flashings
    • Existing limestone copings removed, saved, cleaned and reinstalled
    • Reconstruction of all other corners to introduce proper expansion joints at corners
    • Removal of about five courses of face brick or removal of limestone facia and reinstallation of the same after steel repairs
    • Replacement of deteriorated and/or spalled brick masonry as required
    • Introduction of two new vertical expansion joints on the North and South Building Elevations
    • Tuck-pointing of deteriorated mortar joints
    • Cleaning, sealing, and pointing of existing limestone copings
    • Cleaning by pressure washing and sealing the exterior brick masonry with clear penetrating water repellent sealer
    • Repairs were approximately $440,000

     

    Wastewater Treatment Plant: The original water filtration facility was constructed in 1931. Several building additions have been made over the years in 1936, 1944, and 1945. O&S provided the following repair program:

    • Removal of all existing roofing and installation of new roofing
    • Removal of all coping stones, installation of new lead coated copper cap flashing, and termination of the roofing flashing underneath the cap flashing, and reinstallation of the coping stones with new anchors
    • Removal of sealants from the perimeter of all windows, doors, joints and openings and installing new sealants
    • Removal of delaminated concrete from walls and repair using polymer-modified mortar
    • Tuckpointing of cracked, deteriorated, and open wall joints
    • Repair of cracked corners of stone headers, sills, and stone trims around doors, windows, and openings
    • Replacement of rotted wood planking with new pressure treated plywood for roofing planks in Building B
    • Replacement of rotted wood beams with new beams in Building B
    • Repairs were approximately $570,000

     

    Scott Barracks: The Scott Barracks consists of a main roof, approximately 166’ long by 46’ wide with three small high roofs. The rear parapet wall is 4’ high and the front and all other parapet walls are 7’ high. All walls are built with exterior stone facing and interior brick facing and with precast coping stones. O&S provided the following repair program:

    • Removal of precast coping stones, installing cap flashing, and reinstallation of the coping stones with new anchors
    • Removal of all sealants in mortar joints from the inside face of the brick walls and tuckpointing the brick facia as needed
    • Repair of precast stones that are chipped using repair mortars that match the stone
    • Repairs were approximately $245,000

     

    Project Data:

    O&S Associates was responsible for A/E Design, Construction Management, and Construction Administration on this 5-year Design/Build IDIQ at the United States Military Academy at West Point. The five-year contract included work at restoration work at multiple buildings around the campus. Most buildings were historic structures. The campus repairs included roof restoration, roof replacement, exterior wall restoration, asbestos abatement, waterproofing, and other related services. O&S also provided Construction Inspection services for the Waste Water Treatment Plant, the Library, the Firehouse, several barracks, and some educational buildings. Each set of buildings had different issues related to water infiltration. As part of the Design/Build team, O&S was responsible for ensuring the cost, quality, and schedule for the project.

     

    Special Features:

    O&S provided construction inspection services for multiple historic buildings at West Point Military Academy. Building 639 is an “L” shaped building with five roof setbacks. The original building was built in 1937. O&S provided a comprehensive repair program that included the introduction of two new vertical expansion joints on the North and South Building Elevations. The original water filtration facility was constructed in 1931. Several building additions have been made over the years in 1936, 1944, and 1945. O&S provided a complete replacement of the entire roofing system. O&S also provided services for other buildings at the West Point Military Academy Campus including the Library, Holleder Hall, Old Chapel Building, and the Eisenhower Barracks.

     

    Owner:

    United States Military Academy at West Point
    Construction Cost: $14.2 million

     

     

     

    Tags: