Become a Member: JOIN SFPMA TODAY   LogIn / Register: LOGIN/REGISTER

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

ACTION ALERT: The insurance industry is backing another bill that is trying to take away your rights and significantly reduce your coverage for roof damage.

ACTION ALERT: The insurance industry is backing another bill that is trying to take away your rights and significantly reduce your coverage for roof damage.

  • Posted: Jan 30, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on ACTION ALERT: The insurance industry is backing another bill that is trying to take away your rights and significantly reduce your coverage for roof damage.

The insurance industry is backing another bill that is trying to take away your rights and significantly reduce your coverage for roof damage.

The insurance industry is backing another bill that is trying to take away your rights and significantly reduce your coverage for roof damage. If passed, Senate Bill 76 could potentially cost Floridian homeowners millions of dollars.

We need homeowners and business owners in Tallahassee on Tuesday, February 2nd to be heard and oppose this bill.

 

Here are some highlights of the bill:
  • Insurance companies can limit coverage for roofs more than 10 years old based on a “roof reimbursement schedule.” This could result in significant out of pocket expenses for homeowners.
  • The roof reimbursement schedule limits coverage to a percentage of the amount to repair or replace the roof.

Coverage can be limited to:

  • 70% for metal roofs
  • 40% for concrete tile and clay tile roofs
  • 40% for wood shake and wood shingle roofs
  • 25% for all other roof types, including asphalt shingle roofs

 

  • Timeframe to report property damage claims, including Hurricanes, is reduced to 2 years!
  • Policyholders must send their insurer a Notice of Intent to file a lawsuit prior suing for recovery of insurance proceeds.
  • Notice of Intent must include: the amount of damages sought, a detailed estimate for repairs, the actions of the insurer that gave rise to the action, and the amount of attorney’s fees incurred by the insured policyholder.
  • Notice of Intent must be served at least 60 days before filing a lawsuit. Given the 90 day period insurers already have to adjust claims, adding 60 days means generally waiting 5 months from the date the claim was reported before being able to sue for failure to adequately pay the claim.
  • Limits policyholders’ ability to recover attorney’s fees in a lawsuit against their insurer, a right that has been guaranteed under Florida law for decades.

 

  READ the BILL

Insurance companies are making more in profits than ever before (read about the CEO earning $27 million here: https://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/state–regional/rate-hike-greedy-insurance-ceo-paid-27m-times-citizens-chief/DBgq9ulJnA3GHE0Ap6e8oJ/?template=ampart). Their profits are your losses!
We need every roofing company to bring a homeowner to the Tallahassee Civic Center on Tuesday, February 2, 2021, to testify against bad legislation backed by insurance companies. Please call your representative and tell them you oppose Senate Bill 76 because it is bad for property owners, insurance consumers and contractors. This could affect your home and your livelihood!
Homeowners, do not let the insurance industry take away your rights with Senate Bill 76. Your voice counts! Call or email your representative today!

 


At Cohen Law Group, It’s About Justice!

It’s more than a slogan, it’s our firm’s mantra. We are zealous in protecting your rights. We offer 24-hour availability through our answering service. Call us today.

(407) 478-4878

Tags: , , ,
Washington, D.C. Update: Bipartisan Emergency COVID Relief Act of 2020

Washington, D.C. Update: Bipartisan Emergency COVID Relief Act of 2020

  • Posted: Dec 10, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Washington, D.C. Update: Bipartisan Emergency COVID Relief Act of 2020

Washington, D.C. Update: Bipartisan Emergency COVID Relief Act of 2020

by  Omar Franco of Becker

Tuesday evening, the House passed HR 8900, an appropriations Continuing Resolution (“CR”) that extends current government funding levels through the end of Friday, December 18th. Its intent is to avoid disruption of relief efforts while Congress continues to work toward an agreement on a longer-term omnibus appropriations bill to fund the federal government for the FY2021. Further complicating negotiations is the renewed push on the Hill to pass additional COVID relief legislation. Any legislation to provide pandemic relief or economic stimulus before the end of the year will most likely need to pass as part of a broader appropriations package, intertwining the fate of both legislative efforts. The Senate is expected to pass the CR with enough time to allow President Trump time to sign it into law before midnight on Friday evening.

The bipartisan “908 coalition” continued efforts to reach agreement on the remaining sticking points of coronavirus legislation (state and local aid and liability reform) will garner most of the media attention as the legislative year ends, but the expected final passage of the CR is significant as well. In addition to giving Congress an additional week to find consensus on an omnibus bill, COVID legislation, or both by avoiding a shutdown, the CR included a few potentially notable health extenders as the pandemic is expected to worsen in the coming weeks. Medicare, Medicaid, FDA, and public health extenders included in this CR would:

  • Extend the Medicare work geographic index floor
  • Extend the delays of Medicaid disproportionate share hospital (DSH) reductions
  • Extend funding for low-income assistance programs including State health insurance programs like CHIP, aging and disability resource centers, and community health centers
  • Extend funding for the National Health Service Corps and teaching health centers that operate graduate medical education programs

To read the relief bill’s outline, please click here to read the Bill. Becker’s Federal Lobbying Team will continue to monitor these developments as they evolve and will share with you as soon as information becomes available.


 

Omar Franco is the Managing Director of Becker’s Washington, D.C., office. He currently represents a wide variety of clients including Fortune 500 companies, small businesses, higher education institutions, trade associations, non-profit organizations, and municipal governments

Omar Franco
Managing Director
Washington, D.C.
202.621.7122
202.731.3401
OFRANCO@beckerlawyers.com

Tags: ,
CALL’s COVID-19 Survey Results by CALL/Becker

CALL’s COVID-19 Survey Results by CALL/Becker

  • Posted: Sep 21, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on CALL’s COVID-19 Survey Results by CALL/Becker

CALL’s COVID-19 Survey Results

by CALL / Becker

During the Summer of 2020, CALL’s COVID-19 Survey was open for Floridians to share their experiences during the height of the pandemic.

More than 1,000 association directors, managers and residents took the time to share what steps helped them keep their communities safe as well as the challenges they encountered along the way.

While each of us tried to keep our heads above these uncharted waters when COVID-19 changed our daily lives overnight, none of us were truly alone. Volunteer boards throughout Florida, who encounter operational challenges under ordinary circumstances, soon found themselves having to make impactful decisions about amenity closures, guest restriction and safety protocols.

We hope the results of our COVID-19 survey give your board some food for thought as you manage your safety protocols during the remainder of our statewide State of Emergency which is currently not scheduled to expire until November 3.

For full COVID-19 survey results, please click here.

 

Tags: ,
Legal Update 2020 Summary: Florida Legislature passing several community association related bills this Season  By: Shayla Johnson Mount / Becker

Legal Update 2020 Summary: Florida Legislature passing several community association related bills this Season  By: Shayla Johnson Mount / Becker

  • Posted: Aug 18, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Legal Update 2020 Summary: Florida Legislature passing several community association related bills this Season  By: Shayla Johnson Mount / Becker

Legal Update 2020 Summary:  Florida Legislature passing several community association related bills this Season

By: Shayla Johnson Mount / Becker

The Florida Legislature was especially busy this past session filing, debating, and ultimately passing several community association related bills. Below is an outline of those bills and the potential impact on your community association this year.

 

  1. Emotional Support Animals – Chapter 2020-76 (Senate Bill 1084) – This long championed and highly anticipated bill managed to make it to the finish line this year to become law on July 1, 2020. This law amends portions of the Florida Fair Housing Act (Chapter 760.20, F.S.) to officially define an “emotional support animal” (“ESA”) and prohibit discrimination in housing against individuals with a disability-related need for an ESA. More specifically, the new law requires a housing provider (which for purposes of the law includes a community association) to make “reasonable accommodations” to allow for the individual’s ESA at no additional cost under certain circumstances. If the person’s disability is not readily apparent, the association can request additional supporting documentation from the person’s health care provider or other proof of disability (i.e.: proof of receipt of federal or state disability benefits). However, an association cannot inquire as to the person’s specific disability.  The new law also makes the individual directly responsible for any personal or property damage the ESA causes and also makes it a second-degree misdemeanor to falsify or misrepresent information or documentation concerning an individual’s need for an ESA.

 

  1. FireworksChapter 2020-11 (Senate Bill 140) – The new law prohibits a homeowners association from passing a board-rule banning the use of fireworks on certain “designated holidays,” including New Year’s Eve, New Year’s Day, and Independence Day. This law does not specifically apply to condominium associations and a homeowners association is still able to amend its Declaration to regulate or limit the use of fireworks within the community.

 

  1. Law Enforcement Vehicles 2020-5 (Senate Bill 476) – One of the first bills passed and approved by Governor DeSantis this session, is a law that prohibits a condominium, cooperative or homeowners association from prohibiting a law enforcement officer from parking his or her assigned vehicle in an area where the individual would otherwise have the right to park.

 

  1. State Reporting for 55+ Communities – Chapter 2020-153 (Senate Bill 255) – This law removes the requirement that 55+ communities must initially register, and biannually report its compliance status, to the Florida Commission on Human Relations. This bill does not eliminate the need for these communities to comply with federal reporting requirements.

 

  1. Housing Discrimination – Senate Bill 374 – This bill passed the House and Senate but, at the time of this writing, is still pending action by the Governor. If it becomes law, this bill will amend the Marketable Record Title Act  (Chapter 712, F.S.), to automatically extinguish and make void as a matter of law any “discriminatory restriction” on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, gender or physical disability which are contained in an Association’s recorded governing documents.  The law would allow the board by majority vote to amend its governing documents to remove any such restrictions.

 

  1. Lease Requirements – Chapter 2020-102 (Senate Bill 469) – This law removes the requirement that a lease agreement must be signed by a subscribing witness.

 

  1. Florida Guaranty Insurance ClaimsChapter 2020-155 (House Bill 529) – This bill increases the amount of insurance available through the Florida Guaranty Insurance Fund from $100,000 to $200,000 for each condominium or HOA claim, where the association has the responsibility to insure residential units.

 

  1. Rental Agreements – Chapter 2020-99 (Senate Bill 1362) – Also known as the “Protecting Tenant at Foreclosure Act,” this law requires a party or entity who obtains a property at foreclosure that is subject to a pending lease agreement to provide to the tenant a 90-day notice to vacate.

 

Thankfully, Senate Bills 295 and 1488 did not pass, both of which would have significantly revised and limited the ability of a condo or homeowners association to bring construction defect claims against developers and builders on behalf of its members.  This year, the legislature revisited the controversial issue of regulating short term vacation rental (i.e.: Airbnb) through consideration of Senate Bill 1128 and House Bill 1011.  These bills would have prohibited cities and counties from passing ordinances regulating or limiting an owner’s ability to use their home or unit as a short-term vacation rental. Although neither bill specifically addressed an association’s ability to pass rules or regulations regarding short-term rentals, it is likely that this issue will return next year for further debate before the Legislature.  Prior to next year’s session, associations that are concerned with short-term rentals in their community should seriously consider amending their governing documents now as future versions of this bill may propose to limit an associations ability to regulate short-term rentals as well.


Shayla J. Mount is an Associate Attorney in Becker’s Community Association Practice Group. She focuses her practice on providing counsel and representation to homeowner and condominium associations throughout Central Florida. An experienced litigator,

she has handled collections litigation and served as general legal counsel for numerous homeowner and condominium association boards throughout Orange, Osceola, Seminole, Duval, and Sarasota Counties. Shayla regularly advises association boards on issues regarding vendor contracts and disputes, document amendments, and covenant enforcement issues.

She also has substantial experience handling a variety of civil litigation issues including small business and contracting actions, foreclosure defense, real estate transactions, and insurance disputes.

 

 

Tags: , ,
Federal Coronavirus Legislation and Enforcing Your COVID-19 Protocols  by DONNA DIMAGGIO BERGER

Federal Coronavirus Legislation and Enforcing Your COVID-19 Protocols by DONNA DIMAGGIO BERGER

  • Posted: Apr 17, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Federal Coronavirus Legislation and Enforcing Your COVID-19 Protocols by DONNA DIMAGGIO BERGER

Federal Coronavirus Legislation and Enforcing Your COVID-19 Protocols

by DONNA DIMAGGIO BERGER

Contact: dberger@beckerlawyers.com

I hope this CALL Alert finds each of you in continued good health.

The extent to which this pandemic has and will impact our private residential communities will not be known for some time. In the interim, we are urging our CALL members to take all recommended precautions to minimize the potential for community spread in their associations.

It is not surprising that some of your residents are pushing back against the COVID-19 protocols you’ve put in place for their protection.  As the weeks go on, you can expect even more violations as residents grow even more restless. However, it is important to remember that any individual who continues to use closed common areas, refuses to adhere to social distancing or enhanced sanitization guidelines or who has been ordered to self quarantine but refuses to do so is not committing a trivial violation. That resident is potentially putting his or her neighbors at serious risk of contracting COVID-19.  As such, boards must react swiftly to such violations.

If you have individuals who have arrived in your community from a hotspot where there has been substantial community spread who do not adhere to the 14-day quarantine order, the penalties can be quite severe. Any person who violates any isolation or quarantine directed by the Department of Health commits a misdemeanor of the 2nd degree punishable by imprisonment not to exceed 60-days and a fine of up to $500.  It is the duty of every state and county attorney, sheriff, police officer and other city and county officials to enforce the DOH’s quarantine order.  That being said, some local officials are stringently enforcing these orders while others are not.  In addition, you may have individuals who are not subject to a quarantine order but have nevertheless jumped the pool fence to continue accessing your closed pool or decided to keep using the fitness room. All of these violations require swift action on your part.

Please click here to read my latest column in the Miami Herald on enforcing your COVID-19 protocols. If you are experiencing violations of your COVID-19 protocols please contact me immediately to discuss your options.

****

Many of you have been following the COVID-19 legislation Congress is passing and wondering whether the relief being offered will apply to your association.The Coronavirus Aid, Relief & Economic Security Act (CARES) is a $2 trillion relief package which allocates $350 billion to help small businesses keep their workers employed throughout this pandemic.  The Small Business Administration (SBA) will provide loans of up to $10 million which may be forgiven provided workers stay employed through the end of June known as the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). The purpose for these loans is to allow small businesses to fund payroll and to make their mortgage, lease and utility payments. Unfortunately, community associations do not appear to currently be eligible for these payments as they do not fit within any of the eligible categories:

  • Small Businesses with fewer than 500 employees
  • 501(c)(3) organizations (charitable, religious or educational institutions)
  • 501(c)(19) organizations (veterans)
  • Tribal businesses
  • Individuals who operate a sole proprietor
  • Individuals who are independent contractors

There is confusion in some quarters about the difference between a not-for-profit corporation and a nonprofit. Community associations fit within the former category as they are not-for-profit corporations.However, community associations could qualify for Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL) which are low interest loans of up to $2 million with principal and interest deferment at the Administrator’s discretion and are available to pay expenses that could have been met had the disaster not occurred and include payroll and other operating expenses. Obtaining this loan may require membership approval so speak to your Becker attorney when applying for same.

In addition to helping businesses stay afloat, CARES will provide most individuals earning less than $75,000 (based on either one’s 2018 or 2019 tax return) a one-time cash payment of $1,200 with married couples each receiving a payment. Families would also receive $500 per child. People who receive Social Security benefits but do not file tax returns are still eligible for these payments. Individuals who are out of work will receive an additional $600 per week from the federal government on top of the base amount that the State of Florida provides.  CARES also creates a new, temporary Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program through the end of this year to help people who lose work as a direct result of COVID-19 and provides an additional 13 weeks of unemployment insurance. This monetary relief should help ease the financial uncertainties that many of your residents are facing.

****

The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”) was signed into law on March 18, 2020 and became effective on April 2, 2020. Among other items, this legislation provides paid sick leave and expanded paid leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).  This legislation:Covers all private employers with fewer than 500 employees. Including community association employers that have fewer than 500 employees.

  • Covers both full and part-time employees. Full time employees receive sick leave of up to 80 hours. Provides part-time employees with paid sick leave equal to the number of hours the employee works on average over a 2-week period.
  • Provides that employees may immediately take paid sick leave regardless of the length of employment.
  • Provides that employees may take expanded leave under the FMLA provided the employee must have worked for an employer for at least 30 calendar days.
  • Protects employees who are taking paid sick leave because they have been diagnosed with COVID-19, experiencing symptoms and seeking a diagnosis, experiencing symptoms substantially similar to those exhibited by COVID-19 or who are quarantined by providing them with a maximum of $511 per day or $5,110 in total.
  • Protects employees taking paid sick leave to care for a family member who is sick or quarantined or to care for a child whose school or place of care is closed by providing them with a maximum of $200 per day or $2,000 in total.
  • The FFCRA requires a community association to provide employees leave to care for a child who is not sick. FFCRA requires up to 12 weeks of paid leave to care for a child under 18 years of age if the child’s school or place of care has been closed. It does not matter whether the child is sick. The first 10 days of leave are unpaid, but the employee can use any accrued paid leave during that time. The remainder of the leave is paid at 2/3 of the employee’s regular rate of pay, not to exceed $200 per day or $10,000 in total.
  • Presently there is no relief for community associations with fewer than 50 employees. However the Secretary of Labor under FFCRA has the authority to exempt small businesses with fewer than 50 employees when compliance with FFCRA would jeopardize the viability of the business.
  • Employers who pay leave under FFCRA will be reimbursed through a payroll tax credit.
  • It is unlawful for an employer to retaliate against an employee who takes paid sick leave in accordance with FFCRA or who files a complaint under FFCRA. The penalties are similar to those provided for under the Fair Labor Standards Act which generally provides for lost wages, liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees and costs to a prevailing employee.

So many important aspects of our daily lives have changed since Governor DeSantis first declared a State of Emergency on March 9, 2020 and a national State of Emergency was declared on March 13, 2020.  The coming weeks will continue to present their challenges but we are here to help your board and management professionals.For our most up to date information please visit us at www.beckercovid19.com.

 

Donna DiMaggio Berger

DONNA DIMAGGIO BERGER

Contact: dberger@beckerlawyers.com

Donna DiMaggio Berger is a member of the College of Community Association Lawyers (CCAL), a prestigious national organization that acknowledges community association attorneys who have distinguished themselves through contributions to the evolution or practice of community association law and who have committed themselves to high standards of professional and ethical conduct in the practice of community association law. Ms. Berger is also one of only 129 attorneys statewide who is a Board Certified Specialist in Condominium and Planned Development Law.

 

 

 

Tags: , ,
Vacation rentals has pitted local government officials against advertising platforms, such as Airbnb, in what has been one of the most intensely waged legislative battles.

Vacation rentals has pitted local government officials against advertising platforms, such as Airbnb, in what has been one of the most intensely waged legislative battles.

  • Posted: Mar 03, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Vacation rentals has pitted local government officials against advertising platforms, such as Airbnb, in what has been one of the most intensely waged legislative battles.

The long-running dispute over vacation rentals has pitted local government officials against advertising platforms, such as Airbnb, in what has been one of the most intensely waged legislative battles.

The plan under consideration this year would require online platforms to collect and remit taxes on the properties that advertise on their sites. The platforms would have to ensure that only properly licensed rentals are advertised and provide the state with specific information about the rentals.

In exchange, regulation would be “preempted” to the state, largely preventing local governments from regulating vacation rentals. Local governments could only regulate the rentals in the same way as other properties in neighborhoods, a restriction that cities and counties strenuously oppose.

Florida law already bans local governments from passing ordinances to outlaw vacation rentals.

Sen. Wilton Simpson, who will take over as Senate president later this year, worked behind the scenes to forge a proposal that garnered support from the advertising platforms, the Florida Realtors and even the Florida Restaurant & Lodging Association, which in the past has strenuously resisted similar measures.

“Next year. That’s what they make next year for,” Simpson, R-Trilby, told The News Service of Florida when asked Monday evening about the measure’s prospects.

Airbnb Florida Policy Director Tom Martinelli said the platform remains hopeful that the issue “will be addressed legislatively to provide the vacation rental industry with uniformity and much-needed stability.”

“We remain hopeful this bill will move through the process to provide the much-needed relief to Florida’s vacation rental property owners and surrounding industry,” Martinelli said in a prepared statement.

 

Vacation rentals have sparked backlash from some homeowners, who complain about raucous parties, parking issues and a steady stream of strangers in neighborhoods. Many of the objections come from coastal regions of the state. Cities and counties also remain firmly opposed to the House and Senate bills.

And Gov. Ron DeSantis has indicated he was not keen on the measure, saying recently he was “leaning against” the legislation.

Diaz pointed to amendments offered by senators Monday that were “counter or interfering with some of the stuff that we’re trying to do.”

 

Tallahassee, FL – A controversial measure dealing with vacation rental properties appears doomed, as time runs out in the 2020 legislative session.

The Senate Rules Committee was scheduled to hear the bill (SB 1128) Monday, but bill sponsor Manny Diaz Jr., R-Hialeah, said the measure was postponed because he lacked the support necessary to get it out of the committee.

The Rules Committee is not scheduled to meet again before the session ends March 13, and even if it does, it appears unlikely that Diaz’s proposal will be on the agenda.

“This is an incredibly complex bill that obviously had been tried for years, and you can see that every stop we’ve made massive changes. We’re still not there with the changes that … we needed to have enough votes. So we’re still working to make sure that all senators are satisfied with that bill,” he said.

Sen. David Simmons, R-Altamonte Springs, sponsored amendments that would have effectively gutted the bill.

“So, it became incredibly convoluted. That’s why we’re holding on to it for now, to try to see if we can work that out,” Diaz said.

Diaz had planned to amend his bill to bring it in line with a House proposal (HB 1011) that is awaiting a House floor vote.

DeSantis told reporters Feb. 24 he had not made up his mind but expressed strong reservations about the effort.

“We have 22 million people almost. We are a very diverse state. For us to be micromanaging vacation rentals, I am not sure that is the right thing to do,” DeSantis said.

“These are things where you’ll have kind of a quiet neighborhood,” DeSantis continued. “Then you will have someone doing this, and there are parties going on and some of the residents get upset. My view would be, probably, that should be determined locally.”

Opponents of the measure had repeatedly complained about “party houses” that wreak havoc in single-family neighborhoods.

But Diaz said he wants to address those concerns.

“Right now, it’s just regroup, have conversations with the stakeholders (and) the senators involved and try to see where we’re at,” he said.

 

 

Tags: , ,
A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE LAW THAT HAS DANGER WRITTEN ALL OVER IT

A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE LAW THAT HAS DANGER WRITTEN ALL OVER IT

  • Posted: Feb 03, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE LAW THAT HAS DANGER WRITTEN ALL OVER IT

Until now, you couldn’t sue an association for a violation of these rights inasmuch as the action by the association did not constitute “state action.”  This new statute changes all that if it passes and will open a Pandora’s box and flood of litigation between associations and their owners.

By Eric Glazer, Esq. 

Published February 3, 2020

Two weeks ago, I wrote to you about House Bill 623 that is making its way through The Florida Legislature.  Another change to the law currently included in the bill is the following language:

718.112 Bylaws.—

(1) GENERALLY.—

(c) Any provision of the declaration, the association bylaws, or reasonable rules or regulations of the association which diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution or Art. I of the State Constitution is void and unenforceable without further action of the association. The association may record a notice in the public records of the county in which the condominium is located evidencing its intention to not enforce such provision. The failure of the association to record a notice in the public record may not be the basis for liability or evidence of discrimination or a discriminatory intention.

To simplify, the 14th Amendment made The Bill of Rights (The first ten amendments to the Constitution) applicable to the states.  So this law basically says no provision of your governing documents can infringe upon the rights you have under the Bill of Rights.  All of you know several of these rights such as the right to free speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of religion.

There is plenty of law out there that says when you move into an association, you may give up some of the rights you may ordinarily have in your private home. You do this by agreeing to be bound by the governing documents.   For example, courts have upheld the rights of Florida associations to prevent the use of the common elements for religious purposes, allowed associations to impose reasonable restrictions on speech through time limitations at meetings, impose restrictions on placement of political signs on the property or even placement of religious symbols in excess of certain sizes on your windows and doors.

The adoption of this proposed amendment by The Florida Legislature may throw all of these restrictions into doubt, including another one I haven’t mentioned yet.  The Second Amendment is the right to bear arms.  Inasmuch as Florida law allows associations to prohibit alcohol use on the common elements and prohibit religious ceremonies on the common elements I always opined that the association had the right to ban weapons on the common elements via a rule. If this proposed amendment passes, no way would an association be allowed to ban guns from the common areas.

I have serious concerns that if this amendment passes, associations will potentially be embroiled in case after case, where the association attempted to impose all of the reasonable restrictions mentioned above, and unit owners taking the position that the association is prohibited from doing so because it violates their constitutional rights.  Until now, you couldn’t sue an association for a violation of these rights inasmuch as the action by the association did not constitute “state action.”  This new statute changes all that if it passes and will open a Pandora’s box and flood of litigation between associations and their owners.

If you are a believer that associations are notorious for not providing their owners with rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, this new proposed law may not bother you.  If on the other hand you believe that the association should still be able to impose reasonable restrictions in order for all of us to live in harmony with each other, this new law should bother you.  A LOT.

 

 

Tags: ,
The Internet of things

The Internet of things

The telecommunications industry says the upgrades are needed by 2020 to meet the demand for faster internet speeds, smart cities, driverless vehicles, instantaneous 3D downloads, the “Internet of things” where machines talk to machines, and more.

The battle between infrastructure needed for fast digital service and property rights may soon come to communities across Palm Beach County. Right now, it’s playing out in Tallahassee courtesy of legislation before lawmakers.

“It’s a ticket for multi-billion dollar wireless communication companies to come into a city and do as they please in city right of ways,” said Riviera Beach Councilwoman Dawn Pardo.

The brewing fight is over technological advances. First there was 1G wireless technology, for “first generation,” and as telecommunications technology evolved, 2G, 3G, 4G and 4G LTE came to be. Now 5G, a fifth generation network technology allowing greater connectivity at higher speeds for many more devices, is on its way.

To place the infrastructure needed for 5G service, a proposal pending in the Florida Legislature would limit state and local control of public rights-of-way where the 5G equipment is being installed.

 

SFPMA feels that with the proposal in the Florida Legislature with some changes is what we need to advance this to all of our Florida communities, this upgrade is for reliability “If you are stranded in an heavy traffic area or one that has many customers using services at one time it slows down and this brings problems” Can you get through in an emergency? We have members right now that offer Building Owners the ability to place towers, on rooftops and other locations with need to advance the networks. Many of our building members can make money each month by the placement of these on the properties and in the communities they own and manage. 

Senate Bill 596 sponsored by Sen. Travis Hutson, R-Palm Coast, and House Bill 687, sponsored by Rep. Mike La Rosa, R-St. Cloud, would create the Advanced Wireless Infrastructure Deployment Act and prohibit the Florida Department of Transportation and local governmental entities from prohibiting, regulating or charging for collocation of small wireless facilities in public rights-of-way.

Municipalities say the bill is one-sided, would take away their ability to control where 5G equipment is installed and totally favors telecommunications giants such as AT &T, Verizon and Sprint. The companies want the right to install their equipment on utility poles, light posts, signs and traffic arms in rights-of-way.

Pardo was one of about a dozen officials from cities and counties across Florida, including Miami, Fort Lauderdale and St. Petersburg, who spoke against the bill before the Senate Committee on Communications, Energy and Public Utilities in Tallahassee on March 7.

Pardo told the committee the bill would eliminate residents having a say in the location of 5G facilities.

Currently, Riviera Beach requires “stealth designs” that are unobtrusive, and has other rules as well. The city doesn’t allow the equipment within residential communities.

“We have a couple of these wireless companies proposing to put towers in residential communities without any input from the public. This is unacceptable. This bill allows companies to put as many towers as they want,” Pardo said.

The proliferation of poles and equipment on rights-of-way would jeopardize public safety, entice kids to climb up the poles and create more debris when a hurricane hits, Pardo said.

Riviera Beach has spent a “couple million dollars” to bury utility lines, Pardo said, adding, “Then the next thing you know, we have these 100-foot poles in the middle of the sidewalk.”

Both bills have passed their first round in the Senate Committee on Communications, Energy and Public Utilities and the House Subcommittee on Energy & Utilities.

While the bills deal only with “small cells,” the suitcase-size to small refrigerator-size building blocks of the 5G system, some companies are also submitting applications for poles as high as 120 feet.

The telecommunications industry says the upgrades are needed by 2020 to meet the demand for faster internet speeds, smart cities, driverless vehicles, instantaneous 3D downloads, the “Internet of things” where machines talk to machines, and more.

Houston-based Crown Castle, the nation’s largest provider of wireless infrastructure, sought to install 50 to 60 poles all over Riviera Beach, but in September 2016 the city passed an ordinance regulating them. The equipment boxes must be grouped together in a single location and spaced a minimum of 2,000 feet from each other unless technical documentation is provided by the applicant and approved by the city management. If more than six poles are to be located within one linear mile of a city block, the manager must notify the council.

Crown Castle installed four poles prior to the regulations. Mobility had planned to install numerous 120-foot poles, but Riviera Beach’s ordinance does not allow the poles to be over 35 feet. That’s got municipal leaders worried.

Eric Poole, deputy director of public policy at the Florida Counties Association, spoke about SB 596 before the committee. The committee passed the bill on preliminary reading.

“This bill is a one-way street. It says the telecommunications industry can come into any county and city and require us to give them a permit to co-locate one of their small cell packages on any of our utility poles, light posts, signs or traffic arm signals. We can’t tell them no,” Poole said.

Poole said he first became aware of the 5G issue about 10 months ago when a wireless infrastructure provider submitted an application in a Florida county he did not mention by name, and said it had the right to use the right-of-way. In the past, such installations were typically done on private property, not on public rights-of-way.

The proposal states that if the local government doesn’t approve or deny the telecommunication company’s application within 60 days, approval is automatic. The maximum fee the companies can be charged for use of each right-of-way is $15.

Some local governments have declared moratoriums while they work with the industry, Poole said. He said his organization doesn’t want to stop smart schools, economic development and other advancements, but that the industry needs to respect home rule authority.

Advocates for the bill included representatives of AT&T, Sprint, Verizon, T-Mobile and other companies, as well as their trade groups.

Bethanne Cooley, legislative affairs director of CTIA, the trade association for the wireless communications industry, said networks need to be updated today to be ready for the next generation of wireless networks.

The fifth generation, 5G, will connect 100 times as many devices and be up to 100 times faster. It could create up to 3 million jobs nationwide over the next seven years, Cooley said.

A January report by the Florida Association of County Attorneys Cell Tower Right-of-Way Task Force states that numerous counties and cities in Florida have been confronted with applications from private companies wanting to place cellular telecommunications towers and small cells in the public right-of-way.

The companies are seeking to classify these cellular towers as tall as 120 feet as “utility” poles, but they are not, the report states.

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the Florida Statutes do not support a right of telecommunication firms to force local government to allow placement of cellular communication facilities in the local government’s own right-of-way, the report concludes.

Reposted by: SFPMA for the advancement of our communities. original published by; The Palm Beach Post (West Palm Beach, Fla.) Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

 

Tags: , ,