Become a Member: JOIN SFPMA TODAY   LogIn / Register: LOGIN/REGISTER

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

Discriminatory Practices: Is Your Association Prepared? by KBR Legal

Discriminatory Practices: Is Your Association Prepared? by KBR Legal

  • Posted: Feb 12, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Discriminatory Practices: Is Your Association Prepared? by KBR Legal

Discriminatory Practices: Is Your Association Prepared?

by Kaye Bender Rembaum

On September 26, 2016, Rembaum’s Association Round Up published an extremely important article regarding a community association’s potential liability when allegations by one member accuse another member of a discriminatory practice. (Click HERE to view the 2016 article). On September 13, 2016, HUD made clear that a housing provider is responsible for discriminatory practices that may take place. In its Rules and Regulations set out in Chapter 24, Part 100 of the Code of Federal Regulations, effective which further interprets the Federal Fair Housing Act, HUD explained that it believes that, “we are long past the time when racial harassment is a tolerable price for integrated housing; a housing provider is responsible for maintaining its properties free from all discrimination prohibited by the Act.” Those regulations became effective on October 14, 2016.

In this author’s opinion, HUD went way too far by mandating that housing providers act as the investigator, police, judge and jury in cases of alleged discrimination. After all, there are countless Fair Housing offices in each state where complaints can be filed and are actively investigated, often times with only a bare inference. Community association board members are volunteers with no required special training other than to be “certified” within 90 days of taking office, which certification can be met by signing a one-page form acknowledging duties or taking a two-hour class. Neither the individual board members nor the community as a whole should have to bear liability for its board of directors not taking action in a neighbor to neighbor dispute. Afterall, the court room is the proper setting where such matters should be resolved.

In the January 25, 2021, edition of the Palm Beach Post reporter Mike Diamond Special to Palm Beach Post USA TODAY NETWORK, authored an article titled “Judge Won’t Dismiss HOA Religious Bias Suit.” In the article the judge was quoted as follows: ““the La-Grassos [the plaintiff’s] have plausibly alleged a claim against the association for its failure to respond to or seek to control Ms. Tannenholz’s allegedly discriminatory conduct.” Amongst other things, the allegation is that Tannenholz’s told La-Grassos, “you do not belong in a community that is 80% Jewish and that La-Grassos should “move the F… out and go to a white supremist community.”

 

But for HUD’s position that a housing provider can have liability for discriminatory practices of the residents it is unlikely the association would be a defendant in this lawsuit. By forcing housing providers, such as Florida’s countless condominium, homeowners’ and cooperative associations, to interject themselves into what should be private disputes amongst neighbors, HUD is providing the deepest of pockets to the plaintiff’s attorneys. At the end of the day, it is just another reason to sue the innocent community association to create liability where there should not be any in the first place.

Practical Tip no. 1: In light of this lurking danger, be sure to check in with your association’s insurance agent to be sure the association has proper liability coverage for accusations of discrimination.

Practical Tip no. 2: Also, given that there can even be personal liability in such actions, board members would be wise to speak to their own personal insurance agents too… Afterall you never know when that umbrella policy may come in handy. Remember this, too: if one board member has knowledge about an event, then such knowledge can be imputed to all board members as if they are all similarly aware. In other words, when one board member knows, then the association itself is on notice.

Practical Tip no. 3: Consider formally adopting a “no discrimination” type of rule. It could be as simple as “discrimination of any kind will not be tolerated”.

Practical Tip no. 4: If your association is made aware of an alleged discriminatory practice, then a written record of such allegation and the association’s efforts to remedy the situation should be made.

Be sure to discuss each and every alleged discriminatory practice brought to the attention of the board and/or its manager with the association’s attorney to obtain the proper guidance needed.

 

 

Tags: , , ,
Hosting Association Meetings via Zoom by KBRLegal.com

Hosting Association Meetings via Zoom by KBRLegal.com

  • Posted: Feb 08, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Hosting Association Meetings via Zoom by KBRLegal.com

Hosting Association Meetings via Zoom

by KBRLegal.com

 

What You Need to Know    

The most asked question of 2020 is this: Can our association host our board and annual meetings using Zoom or another similar virtual/electronic platform? There is no doubt that technology will always advance faster than legislation. In fact, advances in technology seem to take place in light speed whereM as advances in legislation seem to travel at the speed of your average turtle.

 

As to board meetings, §718.112(2)(b)5 of the Condominium Act provides, “A board or committee member’s participation in a meeting via telephone, real-time videoconferencing, or similar real-time electronic or video communication counts toward a quorum, and such member may vote as if physically present. A speaker must be used so that the conversation of such members may be heard by the board or committee members attending in person as well as by any unit owners present at a meeting.” Note that similar provisions are provided for cooperative associations in §719.106(1)(b)5 and in §617.0820 for homeowners’ associations.

 

As to virtual membership meetings, Chapter 617 Florida Statutes, applicable to all of Florida’s not-for-profit community associations, provides in §617.0721(3) that if authorized by the board of directors, and subject to such guidelines and procedures as the board of directors may adopt, members and proxy holders who are not physically present at a meeting may, by means of remote communication participate in the meeting and be deemed to be present in person and vote at the meeting if the corporation implements reasonable means to verify that each person deemed present and authorized to vote by means of remote communication is a member or proxy holder; and the corporation implements reasonable measures to provide such members or proxy holders with a reasonable opportunity to participate in the meeting and to vote on matters submitted to the members, including an opportunity to communicate and to read or hear the proceedings of the meeting substantially concurrent with the proceedings. If any member or proxy holder votes or takes other action by means of remote communication, a record of that member’s participation in the meeting must be maintained by the corporation in accordance with §617.1601. [emphasis added]

 

In addition, the Condominium, Homeowners Association, and Cooperative Acts (Chapters 718, 720, and 719, Florida Statutes, respectively), provide that members have a right to speak during board and membership meetings (more on that below). In fact, each of the Acts also provide that board members can even communicate, but not make decisions, via email. Rule 61B23.001(2) of the Florida Administrative Code provides, in relevant part, that “all unit owners have the right to attend and observe all meetings of the board…” With this limited guidance as our backdrop, let’s ask the question slightly differently.

 

Can our association host our board and annual meetings via Zoom or another electronic platform so long as all members have their opportunity to speak at the relevant times and all other statutory requirements are followed, such as a speakerphone in the designated meeting location for condominium association board meetings? The answer, simply put, is “yes,” you can.

 

It is extremely important when planning on hosting the meeting through a Zoom-type platform that you think ahead about the implications. The type of vote that will occur at any membership meeting must be carefully considered. For example, what if there is an election and members have not yet opted to vote electronically? Provisions must be made to gather ballots up to the closing of the balloting at the membership meeting and for write-in candidates, too, as applicable (in a homeowners association type setting). Instructions must also be clearly provided to the members letting them know how the votes will be counted and ensuring the membership that they can observe the entire tabulation of the voting process. For example,

 

Dear Members, In accordance with s. 720.316, Florida Statutes, in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the Association’s members, except for the members who volunteer to assist with the tally of the ballots (along with the man- agement team and the Association’s legal counsel), there will be NO in-person attendance at the annual meeting. Although there will be no in-person atten- dance, the annual meeting will be broadcast through Zoom (online video conf- erencing) for those who wish to remotely attend and observe the annual meeting, including the tallying of ballots. You may join the Zoom meeting at the appointed time by using the following link in your web browser: ___________ or through the Zoom ap- plication on your smart phone or tablet with Meet- ing ID: __________ and entering the following Password: ___________.

 

Since we are on the subject of board and membership meetings and we are in “election season,” as it is affectionally referred to, let’s take a quick look at meeting notice requirements, eligibility, and terms for board of directors, vacancies, election disputes, and a members’ right to speak.

 

BOARD MEETING NOTICE REQUIREMENTS

 

Pursuant to §718.112(2)(c)1, 719.106(1)(c), and 720.303(2)(c), Florida Statutes, notice of a meeting of the board must be posted in a conspicuous place on the property at least 48 continuous hours preceding the meeting, unless the governing documents of the association require additional notice. However, notice of meetings of the board at which regular or special assessments against unit owners or at which amendment to the rules regarding unit use will be considered must be mailed, delivered, or electronically transmitted to the owners and posted conspicuously on the property not less than 14 days before the meeting. Remember, too, electronic transmission is only permitted if the owner provides prior written consent.

 

As discussed in more detail below, for annual meetings of the membership where an election will be held, the notice requirements for condominium and cooperative associations differ from the requirements for homeowners associations. However, for other meetings of the members, unless a homeowners association’s bylaws provide differently, the notice requirements are the same. Pursuant to §718.112(2)(d)3 and 719.106(1)(d), Florida Statutes, notice of a meeting of the membership must be given to each owner and posted in a conspicuous place on the property at least 14 days before the meeting. For homeowners associations, pursuant to 720.306(5), Florida Statutes, notice of meetings of the members must be given 14 days prior to the meeting, unless the bylaws provide differently. For meetings of the members where an election will be held, pursuant to §718.112(2)(d)4 and 719.106(1)(d)1, Florida Statutes, the first notice of the annual meeting of the membership must be sent to the members at least 60 days prior to the meeting, and the second notice must be provided at least 14 days to the members and posted conspicuously on the property at least 14 days in advance before the meeting. For homeowners associations’ annual meetings, notice must be provided at least 14 days before the meeting unless the bylaws provide differently pursuant to §720.306(5), Florida Statutes.

 

ELIGIBILITY AND TERMS FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

The eligibility requirements for board members are set out in §718.112(2)(d)2, 719.106(1)(a), and 720.306(9)(b). Pursuant to the foregoing, a person who is delinquent in the payment of any fine, fee, or other monetary obligation to the association is not eligible to be a candidate for the board. Additionally, any person who has been convicted of a felony is not eligible to serve on the board unless the person’s civil rights have been restored for at least five years. With the passage of Amendment 4, voting rights were restored to people convicted of a felony. It is unclear what impact Amendment 4 will have on the restrictions to eligibility for board members.

 

Additionally, condominium associations should be aware that §718.112(2)(d)2 was amended to provide that a board member may not serve more than eight consecutive years unless approved by two-thirds of all votes cast in an election or if there are not enough eligible candidates to fill vacancies on the board. However, this provision applies prospectively, which means the clock did not start until the law went into effect on July 1, 2018. Additionally, this only prohibits eight consecutive years of service. If a board member has a break in service, then the clock would begin again.

 

For condominium and cooperative associations with 10 or more units, co-owners of units are not eligible to serve on a condominium board unless they own more than one unit or unless there are not enough eligible candidates. This is not applicable to homeowners associations.

 

Governing documents may provide that you must be an owner to serve on the board, but generally they cannot establish other eligibility requirements, such as residency requirements.

 

VACANCIES

 

In the event of a vacancy on the board, pursuant to §718.112(2)(d)9, 719.106(1)(d)6, and 720.306(9)(c), unless the bylaws provide otherwise, the vacancy may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors, even if the remaining directors constitute less than a quorum, or if there is only one director remaining. In the event there is only one director remaining on the board, that director can choose to appoint people to fill all of the vacancies.

 

ELECTION DISPUTES

 

Election disputes for condominium, cooperative, and homeowners associations are handled by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes (the “DBPR”) through mandatory arbitration in accordance with §718.1255(1), 719.1255, and 720.311(1), Florida Statutes. Pursuant to §718.112(2)(d)4.c, 719.106(1)(d)1.a, and 720.306(9)(a), any challenge to an election must be brought within 60 days after the election results are announced. Additionally, a board member cannot be subject to a recall when there are 60 or fewer days until a scheduled election, or when 60 or fewer days have not elapsed since the election of the board member sought to be recalled.

 

MEMBER PARTICIPATION

 

Members have a right to speak at meetings of the membership. Pursuant to §718.112(2)(c) and 719.106(1)(d)4, Florida Statutes, members of condominium and cooperative associations have the right to participate in meetings of the unit owners with reference to all designated agenda items. Pursuant to §720.306(6), members of a homeowners association have the right to speak with reference to all items opened for discussion and all items included on the agenda. In other words, in a homeowners association, members can speak on any matter that was opened for discussion, even if the matter was not listed on the agenda for the meeting. Additionally, §720.306(6), Florida Statutes, provides that a member must be allowed at least three minutes to speak on any item.

 

Members also have a right to speak at meetings of the board of directors. [Pursuant to §718.112(2) (d)7 and 719.106(1)(c), Florida Statutes, members of condominium and cooperative associations have a right to speak at board meetings with reference to all designated agenda items. Pursuant to §720.303(2)(b), members have a right to speak at a board meeting with reference to all designated items.]

 

In all instances condominium, cooperative, and homeowners association boards are authorized to adopt reasonable rules governing frequency, duration, and other manner of member comments for the board and membership meetings. To make the member comments more meaningful, consider permitting them after the board fully discusses each item, prior to voting, and prior to moving on to the next item.

 

It is recommended you consult with your association legal counsel on the adoption of reasonable rules to ensure your virtual/electronic meetings run smoothly while also ensuring that they are in compliance with the association’s governing documents, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code.

 

 

Tags: ,
Learn how to manage the unrelenting tidal wave of parcel deliveries

Learn how to manage the unrelenting tidal wave of parcel deliveries

  • Posted: Feb 08, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Learn how to manage the unrelenting tidal wave of parcel deliveries

Watch our webinar on the challenges faced by many residential communities during COVID-19.

Learn how to manage the unrelenting tidal wave of parcel deliveries.

https://hubs.ly/H0FvlYr0

Tags: , ,
OWNER MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST by Steven J Weil, PhD, EA, LCAM

OWNER MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST by Steven J Weil, PhD, EA, LCAM

  • Posted: Feb 04, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on OWNER MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST by Steven J Weil, PhD, EA, LCAM

OWNER MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST

by Steven J Weil, PhD, EA, LCAM

 

Over the years, many owners have asked us, “What maintenance duties am I responsible for within my condominium unit?” While every association is unique there are some things that are standard. This list is intended to assist you in understanding what you are responsible for and what you should make sure is done to protect yourself, your unit and your neighbors, for easily prevented but often costly damages that failure to maintain could make you liable for.

  • Change your Air Conditioning filter, monthly is best but never less than quarterly.
  • Sign up with an Air Conditioning company for an annual preventative maintenance plan.
  • Leave the Air Conditioning running when you are away for long periods to prevent mold and mildew. The humidity in South Florida can be a breeding ground for mold and mildew, your Air Conditioning helps lower the humidity in your unit preventing both from growing.  You can turn your thermostat up to 80 degrees so your Air Conditioning runs less but don’t turn it off.
  • Have your hot water tank checked by a licensed plumber to make sure it is not past its useful life. Hot water tanks that are 10 years or older should be replaced before they fail.
  • Inspect plumbing fixtures including toilets, sinks, faucets, drains (check under sinks and in cabinets for leaks to drain and traps) and water supply lines; replace all rusted or worn parts. South Florida water eats away at the fittings inside your toilet tank and faucets allowing water leaks that run up the common water bill costing every owner more in monthly maintenance; water is becoming a precious commodity in South Florida and this means that the cost keeps going up. Failure of any of these can result in damage to not only your unit but the units of your fellow owners as well making you responsible for the cost of putting things back the way they were.
  • Make sure the main water cut-off valve coming into your unit is working by testing it. If it’s not working have it replaced. Be sure to coordinate replacement with the Property Manager.
  • Check hose fittings on washing machines for tightness. Consider changing from the standard rubber style to a flexible metal-covered or “braided” hose. Old laundry hoses have been known to break and cause a flood. It’s best to replace these every 5 years or whenever you see signs of possible failure like bulges or fittings coming loose.
  • Replace old refrigerator ice maker supply lines with new industry standard flexible line.
  • Check caulking around all tubs and showers. Inadequate caulking or cracked caulking can cause leaks.
  • Have the duct for your dryer cleaned at least once each year. Lint-clogged ducts are the cause of many condominium fires.
  • When you’re planning to be away from your unit for longer than a few days, think about turning off your main water supply valve to prevent a flood while you are away.
  • Remember damage cause by failure to maintain your unit is your responsibility and it can be costly.

Doing a little bit of preventive maintenance can protect you, your property and your neighbors.

 


Royale Management Services, Inc. provides the most professional, effective, accurate and efficient condominium management service available.

We provide professional property management services only in South Florida: Broward, Dade & Palm Beach County.

Royale Management Services, Inc. is a full-service, CAM (Community Association Management) licensed, residential property management company, specializing in management, consulting and accounting for Condominium Associations and Home Owners Associations.

We are dedicated to excellent customer service and pride ourselves on providing condominium management services and home owner association management that work for you and your association.

Please browse our website to learn more about our company, our many services, and our commitment to excellence.

If you want to learn more or have questions about our services, call us at 1-800-382-1040 or 954-563-1269 to speak with one of our professionals today.

 

 

Tags: , ,
SUPPOSE I TOLD YOU THAT ONE DAY YOU MAY NOT OWN YOUR CONDO OR CO-OP EVEN THOUGH YOU PAID IT OFF IN FULL.

SUPPOSE I TOLD YOU THAT ONE DAY YOU MAY NOT OWN YOUR CONDO OR CO-OP EVEN THOUGH YOU PAID IT OFF IN FULL.

  • Posted: Feb 01, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on SUPPOSE I TOLD YOU THAT ONE DAY YOU MAY NOT OWN YOUR CONDO OR CO-OP EVEN THOUGH YOU PAID IT OFF IN FULL.

SUPPOSE I TOLD YOU THAT ONE DAY YOU MAY NOT OWN YOUR CONDO OR CO-OP EVEN THOUGH YOU PAID IT OFF IN FULL.

by Eric Glazer / Glazer & Sachs / Condo Craze & HOA’s

 

In about 25 years a crisis is coming to the condo and co-op world  that will be shocking to say the least.  Here is the problem.  Many of you think that by purchasing your condo or co-op, you can live there forever, as long as the mortgage, taxes and assessments are paid.  You may be wrong.  Very wrong.

Florida condo and co-op law basically say:  Leaseholds.—

(1) A condominium or co-op may be created on lands held under lease or may include recreational facilities or other common elements or commonly used facilities on a leasehold if, on the date the first unit is conveyed by the developer to a bona fide purchaser, the lease has an unexpired term of at least 50 years. 

 

That’s right your condo could be built on land that you don’t own.  Land that you are leasing and someone else owns and who is simply leasing the underlying land to the condo association for 99 years.  After the 99 years are over, the lease may require that all property built on the land (meaning all of the condo units) revert back to and becomes owned by the owner of the land.  In other words, after 99 years, you lose your home.

Many of these 99 year leases began in the 1960s.  So, in about 40 years, lots of buildings will be faced with this fiasco if they don’t do something about it before then.  As the date gets closer to the expiration of the 99 year lease term, the value of the unit keeps going down.  How can you sell a unit to someone if in 5 years it reverts back to the underlying land owner?  That unit is valueless.

It’s amazing how many people have no idea that this is going to happen.  How many people thought that once they paid off their mortgage, they were safe and secure.  They were wrong.  One day, the underlying land owner will be able to make you purchase the unit all over again if you want to stay.  Or, simply kick everyone out and build something new or sell to a new developer.

The law should never have allowed condos or co-ops to be built on leased land.  But, this is Florida – the land where developers call the shots.

If you live in a community with such a land lease, you want to see if you can buy it out and obtain a deed to the land.  That will avoid the potential disaster that awaits.  The Florida Legislature better start thinking about this coming crisis and not wait for it to creep up on everyone.

Tags: , ,
ACTION ALERT: The insurance industry is backing another bill that is trying to take away your rights and significantly reduce your coverage for roof damage.

ACTION ALERT: The insurance industry is backing another bill that is trying to take away your rights and significantly reduce your coverage for roof damage.

  • Posted: Jan 30, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on ACTION ALERT: The insurance industry is backing another bill that is trying to take away your rights and significantly reduce your coverage for roof damage.

The insurance industry is backing another bill that is trying to take away your rights and significantly reduce your coverage for roof damage.

The insurance industry is backing another bill that is trying to take away your rights and significantly reduce your coverage for roof damage. If passed, Senate Bill 76 could potentially cost Floridian homeowners millions of dollars.

We need homeowners and business owners in Tallahassee on Tuesday, February 2nd to be heard and oppose this bill.

 

Here are some highlights of the bill:
  • Insurance companies can limit coverage for roofs more than 10 years old based on a “roof reimbursement schedule.” This could result in significant out of pocket expenses for homeowners.
  • The roof reimbursement schedule limits coverage to a percentage of the amount to repair or replace the roof.

Coverage can be limited to:

  • 70% for metal roofs
  • 40% for concrete tile and clay tile roofs
  • 40% for wood shake and wood shingle roofs
  • 25% for all other roof types, including asphalt shingle roofs

 

  • Timeframe to report property damage claims, including Hurricanes, is reduced to 2 years!
  • Policyholders must send their insurer a Notice of Intent to file a lawsuit prior suing for recovery of insurance proceeds.
  • Notice of Intent must include: the amount of damages sought, a detailed estimate for repairs, the actions of the insurer that gave rise to the action, and the amount of attorney’s fees incurred by the insured policyholder.
  • Notice of Intent must be served at least 60 days before filing a lawsuit. Given the 90 day period insurers already have to adjust claims, adding 60 days means generally waiting 5 months from the date the claim was reported before being able to sue for failure to adequately pay the claim.
  • Limits policyholders’ ability to recover attorney’s fees in a lawsuit against their insurer, a right that has been guaranteed under Florida law for decades.

 

  READ the BILL

Insurance companies are making more in profits than ever before (read about the CEO earning $27 million here: https://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/state–regional/rate-hike-greedy-insurance-ceo-paid-27m-times-citizens-chief/DBgq9ulJnA3GHE0Ap6e8oJ/?template=ampart). Their profits are your losses!
We need every roofing company to bring a homeowner to the Tallahassee Civic Center on Tuesday, February 2, 2021, to testify against bad legislation backed by insurance companies. Please call your representative and tell them you oppose Senate Bill 76 because it is bad for property owners, insurance consumers and contractors. This could affect your home and your livelihood!
Homeowners, do not let the insurance industry take away your rights with Senate Bill 76. Your voice counts! Call or email your representative today!

 


At Cohen Law Group, It’s About Justice!

It’s more than a slogan, it’s our firm’s mantra. We are zealous in protecting your rights. We offer 24-hour availability through our answering service. Call us today.

(407) 478-4878

Tags: , , ,
Discriminatory Practices, Is Your Association Prepared?  by Rembaum’s Association Roundup

Discriminatory Practices, Is Your Association Prepared? by Rembaum’s Association Roundup

  • Posted: Jan 28, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Discriminatory Practices, Is Your Association Prepared? by Rembaum’s Association Roundup

Discriminatory Practices, Is Your Association Prepared?

by Rembaum’s Association Roundup  presented by: Kaye Bender Rembaum

On September 26, 2016, Rembaum’s Association Round Up published an extremely important article regarding a community association’s potential liability when allegations by one member accuse another member of a discriminatory practice. (Click HERE to view the 2016 article). On September 13, 2016, HUD made clear that a housing provider is responsible for discriminatory practices that may take place. In its Rules and Regulations set out in Chapter 24, Part 100 of the Code of Federal Regulations, effective which further interprets the Federal Fair Housing Act, HUD explained that it believes that, “we are long past the time when racial harassment is a tolerable price for integrated housing; a housing provider is responsible for maintaining its properties free from all discrimination prohibited by the Act.” Those regulations became effective on October 14, 2016.

In this author’s opinion, HUD went way too far by mandating that housing providers act as the investigator, police, judge and jury in cases of alleged discrimination. After all, there are countless Fair Housing offices in each state where complaints can be filed and are actively investigated, often times with only a bare inference. Community association board members are volunteers with no required special training other than to be “certified” within 90 days of taking office, which certification can be met by signing a one-page form acknowledging duties or taking a two-hour class. Neither the individual board members nor the community as a whole should have to bear liability for its board of directors not taking action in a neighbor to neighbor dispute. Afterall, the court room is the proper setting where such matters should be resolved.

In the January 25, 2021, edition of the Palm Beach Post reporter Mike Diamond Special to Palm Beach Post USA TODAY NETWORK, authored an article titled “Judge Won’t Dismiss HOA Religious Bias Suit.” In the article the judge was quoted as follows: ““the La-Grassos [the plaintiff’s] have plausibly alleged a claim against the association for its failure to respond to or seek to control Ms. Tannenholz’s allegedly discriminatory conduct.” Amongst other things, the allegation is that Tannenholz’s told La-Grassos, “you do not belong in a community that is 80% Jewish and that La-Grassos should “move the F… out and go to a white supremist community.”

But for HUD’s position that a housing provider can have liability for discriminatory practices of the residents it is unlikely the association would be a defendant in this lawsuit. By forcing housing providers, such as Florida’s countless condominium, homeowners’ and cooperative associations, to interject themselves into what should be private disputes amongst neighbors, HUD is providing the deepest of pockets to the plaintiff’s attorneys. At the end of the day, it is just another reason to sue the innocent community association to create liability where there should not be any in the first place.

 

Practical Tip no. 1: In light of this lurking danger, be sure to check in with your association’s insurance agent to be sure the association has proper liability coverage for accusations of discrimination.

Practical Tip no. 2: Also, given that there can even be personal liability in such actions, board members would be wise to speak to their own personal insurance agents too… Afterall you never know when that umbrella policy may come in handy. Remember this, too: if one board member has knowledge about an event, then such knowledge can be imputed to all board members as if they are all similarly aware. In other words, when one board member knows, then the association itself is on notice.

Practical Tip no. 3: Consider formally adopting a “no discrimination” type of rule. It could be as simple as “discrimination of any kind will not be tolerated”.

Practical Tip no. 4: If your association is made aware of an alleged discriminatory practice, then a written record of such allegation and the association’s efforts to remedy the situation should be made.

Be sure to discuss each and every alleged discriminatory practice brought to the attention of the board and/or its manager with the association’s attorney to obtain the proper guidance needed.

 


Jeffrey Rembaum, Esq.

Board Certified Specialist in Condominium and Planned Development Law and a community association lawyer with the law firm Kaye Bender Rembaum, in its Palm Beach Gardens office.

His law practice consists of representing condominium, homeowners, and cooperative associations, developers and unit owners throughout Florida.

He can be reached by email at JRembaum@KBRLegal.com or by calling 561-241-4462.

 

 

Tags: , , ,
The COVID-19 Vaccine & Your Community: How do you feel about your community becoming a point of distribution (POD)? by Becker

The COVID-19 Vaccine & Your Community: How do you feel about your community becoming a point of distribution (POD)? by Becker

  • Posted: Jan 28, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on The COVID-19 Vaccine & Your Community: How do you feel about your community becoming a point of distribution (POD)? by Becker

The COVID-19 Vaccine & Your Community: How do you feel about your community becoming a point of distribution (POD)?

by Becker Lawyers

Community leaders and residents have been tested by an unprecedented pandemic that created upheaval and strain worldwide.

Some communities suffered multiple infections and deaths, others struggled to strike the right balance between COVID-19 safety protocols and personal freedoms but all recognized that this public health crisis presented a novel challenge for both veteran board members and newcomers alike. With COVID-19 vaccines becoming available, many communities are considering whether or not to register to become a point of distribution (POD).

Please note that becoming a POD is subject to certain requirements and not every community will be eligible or able to meet the terms of the required agreements with vaccine providers.

Please take our 2-minute survey. For those communities who indicate a willingness to serve as a POD, and are a Becker client, your Becker attorney will assist your board in registering as a POD.

 

Please fill out the COVID-19 POD Servey

 

Tags: ,
Collections Tools for Self-Managed HOAs & Condos by Bob Gourley @Axela Technologies

Collections Tools for Self-Managed HOAs & Condos by Bob Gourley @Axela Technologies

  • Posted: Jan 28, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Collections Tools for Self-Managed HOAs & Condos by Bob Gourley @Axela Technologies

Collections Tools for Self-Managed HOAs & Condos

by Bob Gourley @Axela Technologies

 

When a condominium association or HOA makes the decision to self-manage, the Board of the association often must make difficult decisions about what to do themselves and what functions to outsource to third-party entities. What you need are the tools for collections for your self-managed condo or HOA.

Collecting common fees and assessments is the only way a self-managed association can fund itself and provide the goods and services to homeowners called for the association’s governance documents. Defaulting on these provisions is not an option. Ideally, all unit owners within the association remain solvent and pay their common fees and assessments on time. But what happens when they don’t? What tools are available to a self-managed condominium or HOA?

 

The High Cost of the Traditional Collection Method

Traditionally, collection of past-due common fees and assessments required hiring an attorney to represent the association in bringing forth a lien, and, if needed, a foreclosure action. While this approach can bring the association the title to a delinquent unit owner’s home, it isn’t always a profitable or even practical solution for the condominium or HOA.

Hiring an attorney creates additional risk in the form of legal fees that the association is bound to pay, regardless of the outcome of the legal actions. A well-intentioned association could very well spend more money than it could ever hope to receive in an attempt to collect past due monies they are owed and need to operate their associations.

 

New, Technology-Based Collections Tools for Self-Managed Associations

Axela Technologies decided to address the problem of common fee and assessment delinquency in a different and modern manner. As a full-fledged collection agency, Axela Technologies is able to offer true assistance to condominium associations and HOAs that find their budgets in jeopardy due to deficits created by delayed or delinquent common fees and assessments.

Charging no upfront money to the condominium association or HOA, Axela Technologies takes on the risk that would have been incurred by the expense of an attorney. The cost of using Axela Technologies is minimal and is passed on through the delinquent homeowner once the account is outsourced for collections.

This is an optimal situation for the association, and, to some extent, the delinquent homeowner, who is provided an opportunity to pay his common fees and assessments without having the onerous legal fees of an attorney added to his or her outstanding balance. The association minimizes risk and does not have to pay any fees to Axela Technologies. Additionally, Axela Technologies boasts a very high rate of successful collections, with only 5% remaining delinquent and requiring the use of an attorney to bring a foreclosure action against the delinquent homeowner.

Keep in mind that a foreclosure action still doesn’t guarantee a positive outcome for the self-managed condominium association or HOA. All the foreclosure action will do is gain title to the unit or home. It still needs to generate income, either through sale or rental, before the association may see some financial relief. While the attorney may assist in the foreclosure action, Axela Technologies will keep a vigilant eye on any surplus funds or other possible recovery for the condominium association or HOA. The goal is full recovery with minimal risk for the association.

 

Outsource Collections to Reduce Risk and Maximize Debt Recovery

Unless a self-managed condominium association or HOA is so well-funded that financial risk is of no concern to them, they would be well advised to outsource their collection efforts. Further, unless a self-managed condominium association or HOA wishes to risk spending money on legal fees, they would be well advised to outsource their collections to Axela Technologies. Axela Technologies’ history of successful condominium and HOA delinquency collection with no upfront cost or risk make them the easy choice.

The fact that their collection costs are far less than the legal fees charged by an attorney makes Axela’s collections tools a better choice, not just for the community, but also for the delinquent homeowner, giving them a much more likely chance to pay their delinquent fees and assessments to the association. Outsourcing collections to Axela Technologies is about minimizing risk and producing a successful outcome for all involved.

 

Learn more about Easy Collect, Axela’s collections solution for community associations here.

 


Need a Better Cash Flow for Your Condo or HOA?

YOUR COLLECTIONS PROCESS MAY BE WHAT’S HOLDING YOUR BUDGET BACK. LET US HELP WITH THIS FREE ANALYSIS.

A poor collections process can lead to a number of negative symptoms for a community association, from budget shortfalls to never-ending legal fees to loan denials for capital improvements. If your community is suffering, you may be looking in the wrong place for the right solution.

Axela Technologies specializes in community association collections. Our experts have years of CAM industry knowledge, combined with a deep understanding of collections processing.

Learn More!   In just 30 minutes, our experts will work with you to identify the areas in your current collections process that are not working, and give you actionable advice on how to improve your current process, increase the amount you are collecting, and save your community money.

Fill out the form to set up your free collections analysis now. Your analysis is completely free, and you are under no obligation to take any action.

It’s time to take a good, hard look at your collections process. Your community members, your board, and your budget will thank you!

 

 

Tags: , ,
Tired of chasing your electrical contractors? Lighting of Tomorrow is here to help!

Tired of chasing your electrical contractors? Lighting of Tomorrow is here to help!

  • Posted: Jan 28, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Tired of chasing your electrical contractors? Lighting of Tomorrow is here to help!

Tired of chasing your electrical contractors?

We offer indoor & outdoor lighting solutions.

✅Licensed and insured electricians
✅City permits
✅UL Listed lighting
✅Hurricane rated poles
✅Lighting designs
✅Photometric reports
✅Electrical Maintenance
When you hire us, you get to relax! Its simple, we inspect, install and maintain your lighting.

📞Call us now for a free consultation! (954)626-0267 or email us info@lightingot.com

Tags: ,
MANY OF YOU LIVE IN COMMUNITIES THAT ARE GOVERNED BY TWO ASSOCIATIONS. MASTER V. SUB – PART TWO

MANY OF YOU LIVE IN COMMUNITIES THAT ARE GOVERNED BY TWO ASSOCIATIONS. MASTER V. SUB – PART TWO

  • Posted: Jan 27, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on MANY OF YOU LIVE IN COMMUNITIES THAT ARE GOVERNED BY TWO ASSOCIATIONS. MASTER V. SUB – PART TWO

MANY OF YOU LIVE IN COMMUNITIES THAT ARE GOVERNED BY TWO ASSOCIATIONS.

MASTER V. SUB – PART TWO

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

Today we continue with  a very interesting case that was just decided by Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal.  RIVIERA-FORT MYERS MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC., v. GFH INVESTMENTS, LLC.  2020 WL 7767856.  To simplify, in a mixed-use community, meaning a community made up of commercial property and residential housing, the Master Association adopted seven amendments to the community’s master declaration. The court referred to the sub associations as the “Liner Buildings.”  In general terms, the amendments addressed the Master Association’s authority to approve proposed uses of the property located in the sub communities, (Liner Buildings) increased assessments on them, and imposed additional restrictions on the Liner’s tenants.

Again, I write about the case because it is a great learning case about the relationship between a Master and a Sub and about community living in general. 

CAN THE MASTER ASSOCIATION MAKE RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING PETS THAT ARE DIFFERENT THAN THE SUBS?

We agree with the Master association’s assertion that these restrictions on number, size, type,and breed of pets are reasonable, as are the requirements that owners leash and pick up after their animals. The Liner Buildings are in relatively close proximity to the condominium buildings, and it is inevitable that dogs kept in the Liner Buildings will need to go outside and use the common areas of the property, and they can therefore be regulated to a reasonable degree to protect the community members’ mutual enjoyment of the common areas. Cf. Majestic View Condo. Ass’n v. Bolotin, 429 So. 2d 438, 440 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (implying in dicta that such pet restrictions are reasonable in the condominium setting). As such, the circuit court erred in enjoining the enforcement of this amendment.

WHAT ABOUT PARKING RULES?

In this case, the Master Association made a rule that said the owners in the sub associations cannot park in common areas and can only park in designated parking spaces assigned to that community.  In upholding the decision of the Master Association, the court relied on Juno By The Sea North Condominium Ass’n (The Towers), Inc. v. Manfredonia, 397 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), a seventy-unit condominium building had three parking lots: a covered lot with twenty spaces that had been designated in the master declaration as limited common elements and sold to individual unit owners who had exclusive use of those spaces; a second lot that had been designated as a common element with fifty spaces that were unassigned; and a third lot across the street with additional auxiliary parking. Id. at 301. Due to congestion, the condominium association assigned the fifty spaces in the common area lot to the fifty units that did not own exclusive spaces in the covered lot. Id. The owners of the covered spaces sued, contending that the association could not prohibit their use of the common area lot. The Fourth District disagreed. To the contrary, the court held that the limitation on use of the common area lot passed the test of reasonableness because the association’s plan fairly ensured that each unit had access to parking. Id. at 302–05. Thus, even though the fifty-space lot remained a common area, its use reasonably could be restricted to certain unit owners.

CAN THE MASTER ASSOCIATION AMEND THE GOVERNING DOCS TO IN EFFECT CONTROL THE LEASING PROVISIONS IN THE SUB COMMUNITY?

Here is what the court said:

The Liner Buildings, although separate structures, are part of a community for which courts have granted “a greater degree of control over and limitation upon the rights of the individual owner than might be tolerated given more traditional forms of property ownership.” Seagate Condo. Ass’n v. Duffy, 330 So. 2d 484, 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), approved sub nom. Woodside Vill. Condo. Ass’n v. Jahren, 806 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 2002). Indeed, the court in Seagate held that even an absolute prohibition against the leasing of units in a condominium complex can be a reasonable use limitation: Given the unique problems of condominium living in general and the special problems endemic to a tourist oriented community in South Florida in particular, appellant’s avowed objective—to inhibit transiency and to impart a certain degree of continuity of residence and a residential character to their community—is, we believe, a reasonable one, achieved in a not unreasonable manner by means of the restrictive provision in question. The attainment of this community goal outweighs the social value of retaining for the individual unit owner the absolutely unqualified right to dispose of his property in any way and for such duration or purpose as he alone so desires. Id. at 486–87. We reach the same conclusion here and conclude that the amendment adopting section 10.12 is reasonable and enforceable.

 

Tags: ,