Become our Member : JOIN SFPMA TODAY   LogIn / Register: LOGIN/REGISTER

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

Only a licensed, structural engineer can provide accurate assessments and solutions for a home buyer or seller.

Only a licensed, structural engineer can provide accurate assessments and solutions for a home buyer or seller.

Many engineering firms do not offer residential services. But United Professional Engineering (UPE) does.

We understand the residential market and the homeowner and we value their business. Only a licensed, structural engineer can provide accurate assessments and solutions for a home buyer or seller.

 

Residential Structural Inspections

Many engineering firms do not offer residential services. At UPE, we understand the residential market and the homeowner. We value their business and our team is proud to service this sector. Most of the work that we perform for residential homeowners begins with an onsite engineering assessment. Our licensed, structural engineers make a site visit to the property. We survey the areas of concern and assess the severity of the structural problems in question.

After a site investigation is conducted, our structural engineers prepare a structural engineering report outlining onsite findings, identifying probable cause of the structural issue and recommendations for remediation of any structural deficiency uncovered. We provide our clients with a photograph log documenting existing conditions at the time of the site visit. Only a licensed, structural engineer can provide accurate assessments and solutions for a home buyer or seller. Give us a call today!

 


United Professional Engineering (UPE)

Provides a unique “one-stop-shop” for all your structural engineering needs in Palm Beach and Broward County. Our South Florida area founded firm has been in business since 1999 and we have a diverse team; from licensed designers and structural engineers to inspectors and general contractors. For that reason, our projects range from designing and restoration to structural inspections and more!

We understand how valuable your time is and we are committed to providing our industry leading expertise to your next project. Our team welcomes any and all challenges to ensure a smooth and cost effective project for all our clients and everyone involved. Your journey with us is important, and we take pride in making it memorable!

At UPE, we understand it is hard to find a service provider you can trust and count on and we are here to change that.

Today, one of the largest investments is building a structure and how to maintain its lifespan. Structural integrity, environmental factors, atmospheric elements, and maintaining aesthetics are all important factors that we evaluate very carefully, when working on a project.

Our highly qualified licensed designers, engineers and general contractors promises to ensure your investment is protected. We believe it’s important to exhibit and maintain an open communication network, while working towards each of our client’s best interests, as well as everyone involved.

We are committed to structural safety and serviceability, identify equilibrium conditions, resolve limitations and utilize preventive and corrective maintenance behavior. UPE is here to help accomplish each milestone of your project, together!

Give us a call today!
📱(561) 582-1733
💻 upefl.com

Find us on the Members Directory on SFPMA.com

LinkedIn:  Find us on LinkedIn

 

Tags:
30/40 Year Building Recertification: Your Property Depends on it.

30/40 Year Building Recertification: Your Property Depends on it.

  • Posted: Dec 11, 2024
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on 30/40 Year Building Recertification: Your Property Depends on it.

30/40 Year Building Recertification: Your Property Depends on it.

Building inspections are crucial for maintaining the safety and integrity of buildings. This is particularly true here in South Florida due to our region’s unique climate and environmental conditions. High humidity, Salt Air, extreme heat, and the hurricane season can all cause damage to building’s structure and envelopes over time. These are some of the reasons why building recertification has become mandated in South Florida every 30 or 40 years, depending on the building’s age.

 

Identifying Hidden Problems

Building inspections are essential to identify underlying problems that may not be readily apparent to residents. For instance, buildings may develop foundation cracks, leaks in the roof, or other issues that can pose significant risks to the property’s structural integrity. Regular inspections can catch these issues early and detect severe problems that may cause serious water damage or building collapse.

Building inspections can prevent these situations, uncover hidden issues, and allow for prompt repair or replacement. Identifying problems early on can also save property owners money and time by preventing more severe cases from developing. Deterioration in coastal environments is a progressive problem that will cost more to address as time passes. By addressing these problems, property owners can promote their buildings’ safety and structural integrity.

 

Cost Savings

Building inspections can provide property owners with significant cost savings in the long run by identifying potential issues early on. Often, structural engineers can find problems during an inspection that can be repaired immediately at a lower cost than if they were allowed to escalate into more significant issues.

For example, if a building inspector discovers a small leak in the roof, the property owner can have it repaired before it causes more extensive damage to the interior of the building. If left unattended, this leak could cause extensive water damage, resulting in costly repairs and possible damage to the building’s structure.

Inspectors may identify areas in the building that could be more energy-efficient. In this case, the property owner can upgrade the building’s insulation, HVAC, or lighting systems—leading to significant savings in energy costs and reducing the property owner’s overall operating expenses.

 

Experience and Expertise

Structural Workshop has extensive experience conducting building inspections. Our experienced engineers and inspectors work closely with clients to help them keep their buildings safeand well-maintained. Whether you are a property manager, building owner, or homeowner, we can help you navigate the complexity of building inspections. Please get in touch with us today to schedule a recertification or learn more about our services.

 



If your company needs marketing please contact our member
Jessica Vail
Vail Marketing Solutions
(908) 528.4087
www.vailmarketingsolutions.com

 

Tags: ,
HOA Parking Lot Flooded?    Now is the time to give  Allstate Resource Management a call!

HOA Parking Lot Flooded? Now is the time to give Allstate Resource Management a call!

Our schedule is filling up fast for storm drain cleanings, the rain that occurred this weekend was a preview of what most summers will look like for your HOA community.

Contact us to talk to a Stormwater Specialist today!

Contact us at 954-382-9766 or info@allstatemanagement.com

“Why does our HOA need a lake management company?”
Sometimes, aquatic management is viewed as a frivolous or unnecessary expense for a community. “My lake looks fine, why should I pay to have someone take care of it?”
Most people that live on lakes also see them differently than someone who maintains them. The difference is homeowners tend to look “at” the water, where as waterway managers look “in” the water. Too often people put off lake maintenance until they see a problem and weed populations have already become established.
As a property owner or property manager, it’s valuable to have a company that will respond to these unexpected outbreaks. Every lake matures differently, and it takes a combination of experience and expertise to maintain a healthy balance as changes occur.
Allstate Resource Management’s staff is always there to answer your questions and works to ensure excellent results in any lake management situation.

 

Tags: ,
A Differing Tale of Two Terminating Condominiums by Rembaum’s Association Roundup

A Differing Tale of Two Terminating Condominiums by Rembaum’s Association Roundup

A Differing Tale of Two Terminating Condominiums

Have an association related question?

Find your answer at RembaumsAssociationRoundup

An extremely similar fact pattern leads to diametrically opposed results between Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal and Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal.

In the case before the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Fellman v. Mission Viejo Condominium Association, Inc., Case No. 4D22-1260, (Fla. 4th DCA April 6, 2023), 175 of the 176 condominium units were acquired over time by a bulk owner, and the bulk owner sought termination of the condominium. However, Fellman as the single holdout objected to the plan of termination. At trial, the trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of terminating the condominium, which Fellman then appealed to the Fourth District Court of Appeal.

The Mission Viejo Declaration of Condominium was recorded in 1980 and required 100 percent consent of all unit owners as necessary to terminate the condominium form of ownership. Forty-one years later, on February 5, 2021, the bulk owner amended the required vote to terminate the condominium from 100 percent to 80 percent, using the general amendatory provision set out in the Declaration of Condominium, which required only 80 percent consent of the voting interests. Therefore, notwithstanding the original 100 percent requirement necessary to terminate the condominium, only 80 percent of the owners had to vote in favor of lowering the consent needed from 100 percent to 80 percent, which resulted in fully divesting Fellman of the right to object to the termination of the condominium.

Obviously, Fellman did not vote in favor of the amendment. Fellman argued that by allowing 80 percent of the unit owners to amend the otherwise required 100 percent consent of all owners to terminate the condominium, it fully eviscerated his right to object to the termination of the condominium and his voting rights—a right bestowed upon him when he purchased the unit. There are few things more sacrosanct than an owner’s right to vote. Nevertheless, neither the trial court nor the Fourth District Court of Appeal agreed.

While Fellman should have been able to rely on the 100 percent termination approval requirement as originally required in the declaration of condominium, the trial court believed that if the 100 percent requirement was to be protected from being amended with a lower percentage of voting interests, then the provision in the declaration of condominium should have clarified that it could only be amended by nothing less than 100 percent approval of the unit owners. Since it did not, the trial court found no issue with the bulk buyer eviscerating the 100 percent vote needed to terminate the condominium with 80 percent of the voting interests casting their vote in favor of the amendment.

Fast forward eleven months to March 13, 2024, when Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal, in Avila v. Biscayne 21 Condominium, Inc., Case No. 3D23-1616 (Fla. 3d DCA Mar. 13, 2024), noted that the provision in the Biscayne 21 Declaration of Condominium (requiring 100 percent of the voting interests to vote in favor of the termination could NOT be amended using the lower vote threshold needed to amend the declaration of condominium) was likely to prevail. As you will note, this decision diametrically opposes the outcome in the Fellman case. In this case, Avila sought a temporary injunction to stop the plan of termination. The trial court denied it. Avila appealed, and the Third District Court of Appeal agreed with Avila that Avila’s claim stood a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. The declaration of condominium at issue in the Avila case had an additional provision that required “100 percent approval for amendments that alter the voting power of unit owners.” However, it should be axiomatic that to obliterate an owner’s right to vote by terminating the condominium where the declaration had required 100 percent of the owners to vote in favor of termination could not be amended by a termination provision of anything less than 100 percent of the owners.

The Third District Court of Appeal commented that the change to the termination vote threshold materially altered the unit owners’ voting rights. By requiring a unanimous vote for termination, the declaration of condominium originally gave every unit owner an effective “veto” over any termination plan, which would be lost if the amendment adopted by using the general amendatory powers set out in the declaration of condominium were to stand. The Court even cited the Tropicana Condominium Association, Inc. v. Tropical Condominium , LLC, 208 So. 3d 755 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016), finding that nonunanimous amendments to a declaration reducing the vote threshold for termination of condominium could not be applied where the declaration expressly required the unanimous vote to amend the termination provision, and the amendment, if retroactively applied, would eviscerate the unit owners’ contractually bestowed veto rights.

In fact, Fellman also argued the Tropicana case to the trial court, which rejected the argument; and to add insult to injury, such decision was affirmed by the Fourth District Court of Appeal. So, in the world of inconsistent decisions, Fellman was denied by the Fourth District Court of Appeal the right to veto the plan of termination and is in process of potentially losing his unit, while the Avila court found his right to veto the plan of termination seemingly protected by the Third District Court of Appeal as evidenced by issuance of the temporary injunction in his favor. Unfortunately, even once the Avila case reaches a final judgment, and if in Avila’s case that decision is appealed and upheld by the Florida Supreme Court, Fellman still loses his right to veto the plan of termination as initially bestowed upon him and, even more unfortunately, will lose ownership of the unit.


Sign up for the upcoming courses.

November Board Member Certification Courses

  1. Condominium Nov. 13 – Click Here
  2. HOA Nov. 19 Daytime – Click Here
  3. HOA Nov. 21 Evening – Click Here

If you plan to enroll in any of the free courses above, please note the following:

All Board Members who attend must conduct their own webinar registration and, on the day of the webinar, log in/join in on their own, with their own unique link (or phone in information) provided by Zoom. This must take place even if you watch with other people. This assures you will appear on the attendance sheet, providing proof of attendance.

 

Tags: ,
“Stormwater Pond Management: Aren’t Nutrients in the Water Good?” by Solitude Lake Management.

“Stormwater Pond Management: Aren’t Nutrients in the Water Good?” by Solitude Lake Management.

This Article provides valuable insights into the role of nutrients in ponds and lakes, explaining how excess nutrients contribute to water quality challenges like algae and weed growth.

We explore practical, eco-friendly solutions for addressing these issues, including nutrient remediation, beneficial bacteria, and hydro-raking, as well as preventative strategies like buffer management and shoreline restoration.

This article is designed to help communities implement sustainable practices that preserve the health and beauty of their waterbodies for years to come.

Stormwater Pond Management: Aren’t Nutrients in the Water Good?
SOLitude Lake Management 

 

Nutrients are a cornerstone of healthy freshwater ecosystems, playing a vital role in fostering fish, micro-organisms, and native plants. However, perhaps due to the word’s positive connotation, property managers are often surprised to learn that abundant nutrients aren’t always good. Just as ingesting too many vitamins can make you sick, an excess of nutrients can cause harmful water quality imbalances. Like many things in life, moderation is key. 

Over time, lakes and ponds become increasingly enriched with nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen that create fertile conditions for excessive vegetation and algae growth. When it eventually dies and decays, it releases nutrients that fuel new growth. Without intervention, the cycle will perpetually continue until the waterbody fills in with decayed material. This process is called eutrophication—or, put simply, aging. 

While nutrient enrichment is normal and may occur naturally over hundreds of years, human activities accelerate the aging process and can reduce a pond’s lifespan to just a few decades. Once a pond is filled in, it can only be restored by dredging out all accumulated materials. Dredging is one of the biggest expenses a community will ever face, but by understanding why nutrient enrichment occurs and how to help slow the process, communities can prolong the need for costly dredging for as long as possible.   

During storms, rainwater picks up nutrient-rich materials and substances as it flows over sidewalks, roadways, agricultural land, construction sites, and other developed areas. The water is diverted to stormwater ponds that are specially designed to prevent flooding and filter out pollutants before the water is released downstream. Most urban ponds, particularly in homeowners communities, are man-made for this purpose. 

 

Some of these nutrient-rich materials include:

  • Lawn and garden fertilizers
  • Grass clippings
  • Leaves and yard debris 
  • Eroded sediment
  • Pet waste 
  • Septic system runoff 
  • Trash 

 

Unsightly weeds, slimy mats of algae, and toxic blue-green algae (cyanobacteria) are common signs that your waterbody is over-enriched with nutrients. If water quality tests reveal that nutrients are above desirable thresholds, communities have several solutions at their disposal to help manage them. 

First and foremost, property managers can implement impactful changes such as installing more trash bins and pet waste stations around a community, moving designated dog parks further from the vicinity of their ponds, and instructing landscapers to reduce fertilizer use and properly bag grass clippings and lawn debris. Every individual living or working in the vicinity of a waterbody influences its health and these small changes can have a significant cumulative effect over time. 

 

Incorporating these best practices can help amplify the benefits of more impactful solutions: 

 

Nutrient Remediation

This involves applying eco-friendly products that bind with or “deactivate” excess phosphorus in the water column and in the bottom sediments so it is no longer available for uptake by weeds and algae. Subsequent water quality testing will allow experts to assess if nutrient levels have been restored to an ideal range. 

 

Biological Bacteria

Biological bacteria play a central role in decomposing plant debris and organic materials. Comparable to probiotics for your waterbody, supplementing these beneficial bacteria can help make the decomposition process more efficient and inhibit the accumulation of nutrient-rich muck. These bacteria need dissolved oxygen to thrive, so installing a fountain, surface aerator, or submersed aerator can enhance their activity.

 

Mechanical Hydro-Raking

In cases of significant muck and debris build-up, experts can use a floating barge equipped with a specialized clamshell bucket to physically remove hundreds to thousands of pounds of nutrient-rich material. This can also help restore several feet of depth back to the pond, limiting flood risks.

These strategies are highly effective at targeting excess phosphorus in the waterbody, but it’s also imperative to prevent additional nutrients from invading the ecosystem. Such efforts start outside of the water and can involve residents, landscapers, and other employees. 

 

Buffer Management

While many communities desire an unobstructed view around their ponds, it’s favorable to maintain a healthy buffer of beneficial vegetation around the perimeter. These plants act as a protective barrier, filtering rainwater and capturing nutrients and debris before they enter the pond. A well-curated buffer should incorporate native plants that densely extend 3-5 feet from the shoreline and receive regular trimming and maintenance.

 

Shoreline Restoration

Pond erosion is not just an eyesore and safety hazard, it allows sediment to build-up in shallow areas around the shoreline. Tree roots, pipes, and other buried equipment can become exposed as sediment deteriorates. Experts can employ bioengineering techniques that physically reshape and anchor the shoreline in place, preventing future collapse and erosion. Sod or vegetative buffers can be installed directly on top to blend in harmoniously with community landscaping. 

 

Nutrients play a major role in the health and appearance of community water bodies, but they are only part of the equation. Maintaining balanced levels of pH, dissolved oxygen, alkalinity, and salinity is essential for clean, weed- and algae-free water. An ongoing management program tailored to your community’s specific goals and budget is one of the most effective ways to ensure your waterbody remains healthy, beautiful, and functional for years to come.

 


As part of our commitment to professional development, we offer Continuing Education courses, each worth 1 credit hour. If your company/organization is interested, please feel free to contact me for further details.

Tags:

S2E38 – A Tribute, Tough Truths, and Condo Realities (Aired 11/3/24)

S2E38 – A Tribute, Tough Truths, and Condo Realities (Aired 11/3/24)

This week’s show is dedicated to Eric’s late mother-in-law, Linda, honoring her courageous five-year battle with cancer. We also dive into essential updates on Florida’s mandatory condo laws, and discuss the challenges of selling units amidst an oversupply. Plus, we spotlight PD Concrete’s impressive work and touch on the critical importance of voting in the upcoming election.

As always, we’ll be taking your calls on whatever topic you need answers to or whatever you need to get off your chest.

Call in with your questions & comments or ask them in the live YouTube chat! (717) 452-9378

 


Keep up to date with new topics for Condo and HOA Communities each week on Condo Craze & HOAs every Thursday on YouTube 

The next show:

Condo and HOA Elections: Are You Making These Costly Mistakes?

This Sunday on Condo Craze and HOAs, Eric and Karen dive into a critical topic for every Florida association: election season! With the national elections behind us, it’s time to focus on your community’s elections and ensure the process runs smoothly. We’ll cover the essential steps, from sending out the first notice 60 days in advance to handling candidate information sheets and voting certificates. Eric will highlight common mistakes—like incorrect deadlines, missing documents, and improper ballots—that could force costly do-overs.

As always, we’ll take your calls on any topic you need answers to, or anything you need to get off your chest live in the chat or call in at 717-GLAZER8. Don’t miss it.

 

Tags:
Extended: Get 10% Off A Fountain or Aerator from Solitude Lake Management.

Extended: Get 10% Off A Fountain or Aerator from Solitude Lake Management.

 

 

 

 

 

Great news! Our year-end savings have been extended. This is your sign to invest in your lake or pond’s health with a new fountain or aerator!

Get 10% OFF a new fountain, surface aerator, submersed aerator, or de-icer*! This discount applies to the new system PLUS labor and installation.

This special offer ends on Friday, November 15th. Claim your savings now!

LEARN MORE ABOUT THE SAVINGS

 

* This offer applies to all fountains, surface aerators, submersed aerators, and de-icers available for purchase through SOLitude Lake Management and is valid for all contracts signed between 10/08/24 and 11/15/24. All fountains, surface aerators, and submersed aerators must be paid for by 12/31/24.

Tags:
DOS AND DON’TS OF ELECTION CHALLENGES by Rembaum’s Association Roundup

DOS AND DON’TS OF ELECTION CHALLENGES by Rembaum’s Association Roundup

  • Posted: Nov 04, 2024
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on DOS AND DON’TS OF ELECTION CHALLENGES by Rembaum’s Association Roundup

DOS AND DON’TS OF ELECTION CHALLENGES

Rembaum’s Association Roundup

Pursuant to their relevant statutory provisions, election disputes that take place in condominium, homeowners’, and cooperative associations are subject to mandatory nonbinding arbitration before the Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes (the “Division,” for short). It is referred to as “nonbinding” because the arbitrator’s order is not final until 30 days after its issuance, which provides time for either party in the dispute to challenge the decision to their local circuit court, which hears the case de novo (anew).

As you will read, not every election dispute will be heard by the Division. As a threshold matter of importance, the Division will not hear election disputes within 60 days prior to an election or 60 days after the election has taken place. In order to bring an election challenge, Florida Statutes require prior written notice to the other party of the dispute, where a reasonable opportunity to correct the alleged error is provided, and it is clearly expressed that if the alleged error is not cured, an arbitration action will take place. In a prior arbitration case, it was held that providing only 10 days to cure the alleged defect in a pre-arbitration notice was insufficient. Therefore, it is suggested to provide more than 10 days opportunity to cure the alleged election defect prior to filing an action for arbitration.

Interestingly, the general rule is that to have standing to challenge election results, arbitration action must be brought by a candidate or an individual who was prevented from being a candidate.  The Division has even held that a member who was not a candidate did not have standing to challenge the election results that other persons should have been declared the winning candidates. While these arbitration decisions are not binding precedent, they are instructive and, if nothing else, useful in evaluating the best course of action.

In the context of condominium election challenges, there are three flaws that are typically “fatal” to the association, if committed. They are i) a substantive or serious defect in the first notice of election, ii) the failure to include a timely submitted candidate information sheet in the second notice of election, and iii) failure to include the name of each eligible candidate on the election ballot. While each of these can potentially be timely cured in advance of the election, if not, then they likely lead to a successful election challenge.

For example, failing to mail the notice of election to one or more owners or the failure of the first or second notice of election to accurately state the street address of the meeting have been considered as “fatal” flaws. Also, the failure to include a timely submitted candidate information sheet or failure to include the name of a candidate on the ballot have also been considered as  “fatal” flaws. However, so long as the election is re-noticed from the second notice of election, including all of the candidate and information sheets and/or also including the name of all of the candidates on the ballot, then such fatal flaws can be cured in advance of the election. In these instances there would be no further solicitation of candidates, but rather a rescheduling of the night of the election itself by sending a revised and corrected second notice of election at least 14 days prior to the election which would cure that defect. This amended second notice should clearly state the reason(s) for having to send the corrected notice.

It is important to note that while condominium association elections are strictly construed in accordance with relevant Florida Statutes, homeowners’ association elections occur in accordance with their governing documents. Therefore, whether the above fatal flaws have applicability to a homeowners’ association fully depends upon the style of election set out within the governing documents.

Arbitrators with the Division have held that a new election will have to be scheduled if  in the governing documents there is included a requirement that candidates be full-time residents of the state of Florida or even reside in their unit full time and such requirements were enforced during the election. Therefore, there cannot be a residency requirement of any kind for board members. Similarly, arbitrators have held that associations cannot require candidates to complete a criminal background check or even execute an acknowledgment that they are not a felon.

Contrary to popular belief, the relevant Florida Statutes do not require candidates to be members of a community association in order to run for the board of directors (often, “membership” is defined in the governing documents as being an owner of a parcel within the community). However, such requirements can be set out in the governing documents; but if such a requirement is not in the governing documents, then the board cannot disqualify a potential candidate because he or she is not an owner or member. This means that without such requirements specifically set forth in the governing documents of the association, any non-member, including tenants and occupants, are qualified to run for the board of directors. Therefore, if you desire to avoid such a circumstance, you should consult with legal counsel for your association regarding whether such requirements exist in the governing documents; if not, then you should consider preparing an amendment for the community to approve to ensure that only members who are actual members/owners of the association are qualified to run and serve on the board.

As to the first notice of election, notwithstanding any strict requirements set out in the first notice of election regarding where potential candidates must submit their notice of candidacy, it is not sufficient to exclude a candidate on the basis of the candidate  delivering his or her intent to be a candidate elsewhere so long as it is reasonable to conclude the association actually received notice of such candidate’s intent to run for the board. For example, a specific address could be required to mail the intent to run form, but the fact that a candidate hand-delivered such notice to a board member or manager would likely not be sufficient grounds to exclude the candidate.

Through a variety of arbitration decisions, the arbitrators have made clear that if the violation at hand would not have changed the results of the election, then the challenge will fail. For example, an association that improperly excluded several ballots due to perceived flaws with the outer envelope, which in fact were later held not to be flaws at all and which if counted would not have overturned the otherwise valid election results if the ballots were later included in the total count, would not have changed the result.

In other instances where numerous violations combine to clearly affect the reliability of the election results, then an election challenge may be valid. For example, where unit owners are permitted to cast ballots without inner envelopes, at least one owner was permitted to retrieve his ballot and change it, and nobody verified signatures on the outer ballot envelopes and where at least one unit owner was allowed to cast a ballot after the polls had already closed, then cumulatively the election results were determined to be  no longer reliable and a new election was required.

While the Division has promulgated condominium election rules in the Florida Administrative Code, it has not yet done so for homeowners’ associations. Therefore, the body of condominium arbitration decisions can provide some guidance; but for the most part, when examining homeowners’ association election challenges, the arbitrators are required to consider the significance and totality of violations in their decision-making as to whether to void an election, or not.

At times, for reasons that really do not make any practical sense, some management companies when preparing a homeowners’ association election revert back to the condominium form of election with a first notice, second notice, intent to run, etc. rather than relying on the homeowners’ association governing documents, which have a completely different election style and where voting is by proxy or in person. Also, there are no requirements to declare candidacy in advance of the annual election, meaning a candidate could actually nominate himself or herself from the floor of the meeting on the election day itself. When management companies go on autopilot and use the condominium style of election contrary to the requirements set out in the homeowners’ association governing documents, then the arbitrators will likely require a new election to take place in conformity with the governing documents of the homeowners’ association.

A successful challenge of a homeowners’ association election often rests upon whether the alleged violation affected the outcome of the election. This once again is evidence that unless the alleged violation would have changed the outcome of the election, then the election challenge likely fails even if there were serious irregularities during the election process.

A few odds and ends are worthy of discussion as well. An active board of directors should not use the association’s pulpit for campaigning. Doing so can lead to a successful election challenge. However, an existing board member can certainly campaign on his or her own time and using their own means but not through the association or its website. If the association has not enforced use of voting certificates, then to do so without providing advanced written notice and an opportunity for the owners to comply could invalidate election results. Finally, if a valid election does not occur because either a quorum was not achieved or in the condominium context at least 20 percent of the eligible voters did not cast the ballot, then there is no obligation of the association to try again.

When bringing an election challenge is under consideration, ask yourself if the irregularity would have brought about a change in the outcome of the election. If not, then, think twice about bringing the challenge. In any event, it is worthwhile for an association concerned with its election process to consult with the association’s lawyer for a detailed conversation as to how best to avoid such problems in the future.

Tags: ,
Meet BuildingBoard, an e-voting and virtual meeting solution to streamline annual sessions for your properties.

Meet BuildingBoard, an e-voting and virtual meeting solution to streamline annual sessions for your properties.

  • Posted: Nov 04, 2024
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Meet BuildingBoard, an e-voting and virtual meeting solution to streamline annual sessions for your properties.

Meet BuildingBoard, an e-voting and virtual meeting solution to streamline annual sessions for your properties.

With this tool, you can:

·        Invite unit owners to meetings seamlessly via email

·        Send meeting reminders and add candidates to ballots

·        Host annual meetings virtually

·        Achieve quorum at every annual meeting

·        Automate voting – each unit owner votes via their computer or smartphone (whew, no more manual counting!)

Click here to learn more BuildingBoard
and start running a better meeting today!

So, go ahead and kick up your feet! Optimize all of the day-to-day business you already take care of with BuildingLink by trusting us to support your annual meetings too.

Ready to make your life easier?
Reach out to sales@buildingboard.com.

Richard Worth

Regional Sales Director – Florida

407-529-6063

Richard@BuildingLink.com

 

Tags: ,
Should Delinquent Owners Voting Rights Be Revoked?

Should Delinquent Owners Voting Rights Be Revoked?

  • Posted: Nov 04, 2024
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Should Delinquent Owners Voting Rights Be Revoked?

Should Delinquent Owners Voting Rights Be Revoked?

by Steve Walz

One of the thorniest issues to tackle in an HOA is homeowners in delinquency – not paying their dues or being significantly behind on dues payments. The community and owner dues are two sides of the same coin. The community canno maintain the grounds, amenities, or sidewalks without yearly owner dues. However, financial issues are a minefield of complications from family tragedy to cantankerous entitlement.

A challenging question arises: What should an HOA do if a homeowner refuses to pay their dues? Your options range from leveling fines to revoking voting rights. Many communities favor withdrawing voting rights – cutting off the privilege of community control that comes from being a contributing homeowner in the community. Any HOA considering this route should plan carefully to ensure this decision is legal, permitted, and potentially effective before putting it in place.

Is it Legal to Suspend Delinquent Owner Voting Rights?

Your state determines the legality of suspending voting rights in an HOA. Some states allow for the suspension of HOA voting rights for specific reasons or in general, but others prohibit the rest of any remaining owner voting rights. You will need to check the detailed laws regarding HOAs in your state. There may also be rules relating to HOA homeowner rights regarding delinquency and suspension of voting rights in your county and municipality.

Is it Permitted to Suspend Voting Rights Over Dues Delinquency?

The next question is whether your own HOA permits this policy. Next, check your governing documents and by-laws to determine if there are already policies regarding dues delinquency and when an owner’s voting rights can be permitted.

The legal language in HOA governing documents can vary widely. For example, according to some condo associations, all homeowners are subject to the same rules, which means no voting rights. On the other hand, some HOAs may define that an owner always has certain voting rights, like council elections. Still, you may be able to suspend lesser voting rights regarding community matters.

Can Suspending Voting Rights Effectively Resolve Delinquent Dues?

Finding a practical consequence for delinquent dues has always been a challenge for HOAs. The community can’t support many homeowners using the roads and amenities without paying into the infrastructure. Nevertheless, choosing the proper measures to achieve your goals is also imperative.

Considerations

  • If a homeowner never votes on anything, suspending their voting rights will not impact them in any way. Likewise, if the community votes on very little.
  • How can you fairly make exceptions for invested people experiencing financial hardship?
  • How can you protect against people who take advantage of safety net systems?
  • Never combine vote suspension and leveled fees  (not dues). This opens the door to corruption and the ability for the board to tax a homeowner out of being able to vote, then drive them from the community. If you revoke voting rights, this must only be for dues and not the total owed amount in fees.
  • You may revoke some – but not all – types of voting. Most HOAs take a few types of votes: meeting votes, election votes, special assessment votes, and so on. You may find selective vote limitations to be more effective – or permitted by your documents.
  • Prevent them from making changes, but don’t prevent them from self-advocation.

Other Potentially Effective Ways to Penalize Delinquent Dues

Suspending voting rights is a sticky proposition. Some homeowners won’t care, some will be devastated. This means it’s also worth considering a few alternatives or additional penalties that may drive homeowners to get right with their dues more effectively.

Denying Permit Approvals

  • Parking permits
  • Building permits

Refuse delinquent owners of any more permit approvals. No guest parking, and no home improvement projects. Guest parking is for people who are contributing to the neighborhood road and lot maintenance.

Denying Amenity Access

  • Pool access
  • Spa/Fitness room access
  • Clubhouse bookings
  • Sport court reservations

A first-time refusal to allow someone access to the pool due to their inability to maintain it can emphasize its importance. Consider denying non-paying homeowners something they will miss that their dues contribute to paying for if this type of solution is permitted in your state and governing documents. Your HOA gets to have sweet amenities because everyone pays in. Those who don’t, don’t. Also, this has a fair, lower impact on families experiencing financial hardship. However, they may need to use their voting rights to oppose special assessments they cannot pay or fight an oppressive fee structure.

When approaching the issue of HOA owners with delinquent dues, remember to create an adaptive and considerate system of response. Build a plan that equally accounts for the absent-minded, the scam artists, the family hardships, and the belligerent bullies. Whatever your solution, make it your central goal to resume regular dues for each property without causing or being subject to unnecessary loss.

 

Tags: , ,