Become our Member : JOIN SFPMA TODAY   LogIn / Register: LOGIN/REGISTER

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

The COVID-19 Vaccine & Your Community: How do you feel about your community becoming a point of distribution (POD)? by Becker

The COVID-19 Vaccine & Your Community: How do you feel about your community becoming a point of distribution (POD)? by Becker

  • Posted: Jan 28, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on The COVID-19 Vaccine & Your Community: How do you feel about your community becoming a point of distribution (POD)? by Becker

The COVID-19 Vaccine & Your Community: How do you feel about your community becoming a point of distribution (POD)?

by Becker Lawyers

Community leaders and residents have been tested by an unprecedented pandemic that created upheaval and strain worldwide.

Some communities suffered multiple infections and deaths, others struggled to strike the right balance between COVID-19 safety protocols and personal freedoms but all recognized that this public health crisis presented a novel challenge for both veteran board members and newcomers alike. With COVID-19 vaccines becoming available, many communities are considering whether or not to register to become a point of distribution (POD).

Please note that becoming a POD is subject to certain requirements and not every community will be eligible or able to meet the terms of the required agreements with vaccine providers.

Please take our 2-minute survey. For those communities who indicate a willingness to serve as a POD, and are a Becker client, your Becker attorney will assist your board in registering as a POD.

 

Please fill out the COVID-19 POD Servey

 

Tags: ,
Tired of chasing your electrical contractors? Lighting of Tomorrow is here to help!

Tired of chasing your electrical contractors? Lighting of Tomorrow is here to help!

  • Posted: Jan 28, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Tired of chasing your electrical contractors? Lighting of Tomorrow is here to help!

Tired of chasing your electrical contractors?

We offer indoor & outdoor lighting solutions.

✅Licensed and insured electricians
✅City permits
✅UL Listed lighting
✅Hurricane rated poles
✅Lighting designs
✅Photometric reports
✅Electrical Maintenance
When you hire us, you get to relax! Its simple, we inspect, install and maintain your lighting.

📞Call us now for a free consultation! (954)626-0267 or email us info@lightingot.com

Tags: ,
Florida Condominium Act, extensively regulates amendments to condominium documents. by Becker

Florida Condominium Act, extensively regulates amendments to condominium documents. by Becker

Florida Condominium Act, extensively regulates amendments to condominium documents.

Joseph E. Adams / Becker
BlogPublication Florida Condo & HOA Law Blog

 

Q: After the unit owners in a condominium association vote to approve an amendment, is there a time limit or deadline by which the amendment must be recorded with the county? (M.A. via e-mail)

A: Chapter 718 of the Florida Statutes, known as the Florida Condominium Act, extensively regulates amendments to condominium documents. However, the Act does not contain a specific deadline for when properly adopted amendments to the condominium documents must be recorded.

Section 718.110(3) of the Act states that amendments to the declaration are effective when properly recorded in the public records of the county where the declaration is recorded. Similarly, Section 718.112(1)(b) of the Act states that amendments to the articles of incorporation or bylaws are not valid unless recorded in the public records of the county where the declaration of condominium is recorded. Further, Chapter 617, the Florida Not For Profit Corporation Act, provides that amendments to the articles of incorporation must be filed in the office of the Department of State.

In my opinion, the recording of such amendments is a ministerial act that the board would be required to undertake within a reasonable time of the approval of the amendment. While there is room debate what is reasonable, I would say absent unusual circumstances (such as an intervening legal challenge or some after-discovered error), 30 days from approval would be a reasonable time frame.

However, there is also no specific prohibition in the statute preventing an association from recording an amendment long after the owner vote. I occasionally see situations where an association failed to record an amendment due to changes in the board or management or other circumstances, and records an amendment a year or longer after its approval. This is obviously not an ideal situation since you might have new owners who did not get a chance to vote on the amendment and who could claim that they bought there unit based on what was in the public records.

 

Q: Can you explain what a “material alteration” is? We have a constant argument in our condominium association, usually driven by one particular owner, over what the board can and cannot do. (J.F., via e-mail)

A: This is one of the most common areas of disputes in condominiums. As you probably know, Section 718.113(2) of the Florida Condominium Act provides that there can be no material alterations or substantial additions to the common elements except as authorized by the declaration of condominium. If the declaration is silent, then 75 percent of all voting interests must approve the alteration or addition (there is usually one voting interest per unit).

The standard still used by the courts today comes from a decision from a Florida appeals court rendered almost 50 years ago. In ruling that a unit owner’s closing in a screened lanai with windows was a material alteration, the court stated that the term means “to palpably or perceptively vary or change the form, shape, elements or specifications of a building from its original design, or current condition, in such a manner as to appreciably affect or influence its function, use or appearance.” Using this test, appellate courts have ruled that changing the exterior color scheme of condominium buildings is a material alteration, as is changing mansard roof shingles made of cedar to tile type shingles.

As with most rules, there are exceptions, one being the so-called “necessary maintenance exception,” which originates from a series of appellate court cases from the Second District Court of Appeals (which includes southwest Florida). These cases basically say that certain changes can be made without and owner vote when necessary to comply with law or when necessary for the proper maintenance and preservation of the condominium property.

 


Joe Adams is an attorney with Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., Fort Myers.

Send questions to Joe Adams by e-mail to jadams@beckerlawyers.com.

Past editions may be viewed at floridacondohoalawblog.com.

 

Tags: , ,
December 8th, 9th and 10th Virtual HOA, Condo and HARASSMENT, CYBER-STALKING, DEFAMATION & SLANDER Events by Kaye Bender Rembaum

December 8th, 9th and 10th Virtual HOA, Condo and HARASSMENT, CYBER-STALKING, DEFAMATION & SLANDER Events by Kaye Bender Rembaum

  • Posted: Dec 07, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on December 8th, 9th and 10th Virtual HOA, Condo and HARASSMENT, CYBER-STALKING, DEFAMATION & SLANDER Events by Kaye Bender Rembaum

Virtual:

  • HOA Board Certification Course,
  • Condo Board Certification Course and
  • Board & Property Management Seminar on  “HARASSMENT, CYBER-STALKING, DEFAMATION & SLANDER IN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS” 

Virtual HOA Board Member Certification Course

WEBINAR Florida

Virtual HOA Board Member Certification Course Tuesday, December 8, 2020 from 5:30 PM – 8:00 PM

Join us for this Virtual HOA Board Certification Course taught by Emily Gannon from Kaye Bender Rembaum. We will also have a “Board Member Best Practices” presentation during the course presented by Campbell Property Management. This session is for Board Members of Homeowners Associations only – NOT Condo Associations.

Register Today

 


 

CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION BOARD MEMBER CERTIFICATION by Kaye Bender Rembaum

WEBINAR Florida

CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION BOARD MEMBER CERTIFICATION  December 9th  5:30 pm – 8:00 pm Course #: 9630075  |  Provider #: 0005092  |  2 CEs in IFM or ELE Join us for this Virtual Condo Board Certification Course taught by Allison L. Hertz from Kaye Bender Rembaum. We will also have a “Board Member Best Practices” presentation during the course presented by Campbell Property Management. This session is for Board Members of Condominium Associations only – NOT Homeowners’ Associations. Hosted by Campbell Property Management. Webinar Online

Register Today

 


 

WEBINAR- “HARASSMENT, CYBER-STALKING, DEFAMATION & SLANDER IN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS”

WEBINAR Florida

WEBINAR- “HARASSMENT, CYBER-STALKING, DEFAMATION & SLANDER IN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS”  December 10th  11:00 am – 12:30 pm Harassment, Cyber stalking. Defamation & Slander in Community Associations: What the $%@# Did You Say to Me? Instructor: Shawn G. Brown, Esq., BCS An informative seminar covering various forms of communication and threats in Community Associations, including Facebook, Twitter and Next Door; how it affects those directly involved, how it affects the community, and how it affects the operations of the association; and what types of communication are protected. Note that there is no CE credit for this webinar.

Register Today

 

 

 

 


 

State of Florida Property Management Associations events brings attendees from all over the State of Florida – information, insights, and expertise, where amazing relationships are formed.  Members and Clients tell us the time spent with their peers at events are invaluable.  We’d love to hear from you- for questions, comments, or ideas, Note: as of now these members events are virtual, we hope to soon have in class education events in the future.

contact:  membership@sfpma.com

 

 

Tags: , , ,
WHEN THE PRESIDENT THINKS THEY’RE THE KING  By Eric Glazer, Esq.

WHEN THE PRESIDENT THINKS THEY’RE THE KING By Eric Glazer, Esq.

  • Posted: Nov 30, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on WHEN THE PRESIDENT THINKS THEY’RE THE KING By Eric Glazer, Esq.

WHEN THE PRESIDENT THINKS THEY’RE THE KING

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

So all this talk about the Presidency lately has got me thinking about an issue that comes up every week in my practice for the past 30 years or so. I get a call from someone on a Board of Directors. And they tell me that they have a President on the Board who is a real dictator. He or she doesn’t listen to any other board member, makes decisions on their own, signs contracts, sets policy, hires and fires people — all without input from the other board members. Again – I get calls like this once a week at least.

So does the president of a board have any power above and beyond other board members, or are they simply on par with the other board members?

Well……….let’s look at some arbitration decisions……(A single director has no power to act in a representative capacity for the corporation on matters for which a vote of the directors is required.); June Katchen and Lawrence Katchen v. Braemer Isle Condominium Association, Inc., Arb. Case No. 98-5485, Final Order (August 5, 1999) (Association president, acting alone, did not have the authority to act for the board and bind the association).

In point of fact, an association president has no greater authority than any other member of the board. See Aldrich v. Tahitian Gardens Condominium Association, Inc., Arb. Case No. 96-0472, Summary Final Order (May 22, 1997). The president has no power to take action on behalf of the association in the absence of a specific order or resolution of a majority of the board.

Your bylaws may allow the President to chair the meetings and sign contracts that have already been approved by the board, but that’s about it.

So while it’s clear that a president has no greater authority than any other director, suppose that president doesn’t stop acting like a dictator? What should the board do? Well remember, the officers of the Board serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. The Board always has the right to call a new Board meeting / organizational meeting — and remove that person as President. No big deal. But even if they remove that person as president – that person still remains as a member of the board. The unit owners can have a recall and remove that person completely from the Board – but the Directors can very easily remove that person from the President’s spot — and then hopefully – problem solved.

I have to say that I’m still surprised by some of these calls and how one person can sometimes bully a whole board or even a whole community. Why don’t people fight back with simply removing that person from the Presidency?

Tags: ,
THERE ARE THINGS TO STILL BE THANKFUL FOR  By Eric Glazer, Esq.

THERE ARE THINGS TO STILL BE THANKFUL FOR By Eric Glazer, Esq.

  • Posted: Nov 23, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on THERE ARE THINGS TO STILL BE THANKFUL FOR By Eric Glazer, Esq.

THERE ARE THINGS TO STILL BE THANKFUL FOR

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

I wrote this blog last year.  I’m using it again because for many of us, and perhaps almost all of us, we are in the middle of the most difficult year of our lives. Nobody could have predicted the disaster that has been 2020 on a world-wide scale.  So –I’m running the column again, hoping to challenge all of us into thinking about the positives that still remain in our lives and I’m hoping that your words of inspiration help inspire and cheer up all of us.

 

In three days from now we are supposed to sit around the table stuffing turkey down our throats while reflecting on all the things we should be thankful for.  The easy ones are family and good health.  Some might also be thankful for a new job, new car, new spouse or even new body part(s).  How many of you however would be thankful for the community and home you live in?

Week after week, throughout the year, many of you write in complaining that there isn’t much to be thankful for in your community.  While you may be sincere in your belief you’re your community is worse than North Korea and that your association should be named after Alcatraz, I also believe that if given enough time to think about it and come up with an answer, you can come up with at least one thing to be thankful for about the community you live in.

So, in the spirit of the Thanksgiving holiday, I am politely asking you to dig down, way down.  Keep going.  A little more…….and find something to be thankful for in your community.  Perhaps you’re only thankful that someone other than yourself is crazy enough to serve on your Board.  Maybe you’re thankful for a wonderful neighbor you have.  Perhaps you’re thankful about the wonderful amenities your association has to offer, like the clubhouse and the swimming pool.  Maybe, just maybe you’re thankful for the good work your Board is doing.

Today, you must come up with something nice to say.  It’s easy to participate when the topic allows you to attack.  Today, I’m asking you to work harder and say a few nice words about your community, your neighbors or dare I say it…….your Board.

To all of our wonderful blog readers and your families, I wish you a happy and healthy Thanksgiving holiday.  Now….Be nice.

 

Glazer & Sachs, P.A.

Florida Homeowners’ Association and Condominium Law Attorneys

 

Thank you for your interest in Glazer and Sachs, P.A.  Our six attorney firm exclusively practices community association law.  Visit our website located at www.condo-laws.com and be sure to click on our “Legal Beat” newsletter where you can read our association law newsletters that we have been publishing for the past two decades.  While there, you can also learn more about the firm’s attorneys, see some of our TV appearances and read articles from around the country wherein attorneys at this firm have been asked to comment about association legal issues.

 

 

 

 

Tags: , ,
Katzman Chandler: Two Great Webinars SCREENING POTENTIAL BUYERS AND RENTERS & Questions and Answers.

Katzman Chandler: Two Great Webinars SCREENING POTENTIAL BUYERS AND RENTERS & Questions and Answers.

  • Posted: Nov 16, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Katzman Chandler: Two Great Webinars SCREENING POTENTIAL BUYERS AND RENTERS & Questions and Answers.

Katzman Chandler: Two Great Webinars SCREENING POTENTIAL BUYERS AND RENTERS & Questions and Answers.

SCREENING POTENTIAL BUYERS AND RENTERS

by: Katzman Chandler

Date: Wednesday, November 18, 2020
Time: 1:00 pm
Location: Online Event via, Zoom

Learn what you need to know about the screening and approval process in a Community Association, including Fair Housing issues, credit and background checks, estoppels, right of first refusal, and more!

 

Q & A SESSION FOR SCREENING POTENTIAL BUYERS AND RENTERS

by: Katzman Chandler

Date: Thursday, November 19, 2020
Time: 1:00 pm – 2:00 pm
Location: Online Event via, Zoom

You have questions, we have answers! Come join our Q & A Session to answer all your questions about Screening Buyers and Renters.

 

Tags:
Election Webinar: Condominiums, Homeowners’ Associations and Cooperatives by KBRLegal 

Election Webinar: Condominiums, Homeowners’ Associations and Cooperatives by KBRLegal 

  • Posted: Nov 16, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Election Webinar: Condominiums, Homeowners’ Associations and Cooperatives by KBRLegal 

Elections: Condominiums, Homeowners’ Associations and Cooperatives

by KBRLegal 

Join attorney Allison L. Hertz for a one-hour webinar addressing election law and procedures for condominiums, cooperatives and homeowners associations, including, eligibility requirements and terms of directors, best practices for remote meetings, vacancies between elections, and election disputes.

Course # 9630571 | Provider # 0005095 | 1 CE in OPP or ELE
Instructor: Allison L. Hertz, Esq., B.C.S.

Nov 18, 2020 11:00 AM in Eastern Time (US and Canada)

Register Now

 

Tags: , ,
Outgoing board members to return all official records

Outgoing board members to return all official records

  • Posted: Nov 03, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Outgoing board members to return all official records

Outgoing board members to return all official records … to the incoming board.

Now as benign as this may seem it speaks to a greater problem and that issue is: Where are all the association’s records? Why did the legislature have to go out of its way to create a specific law to obligate a proper transition from one board to the other? There must be a problem here.

 

The problem is that community associations have a lot of records and it goes beyond what a board of directors has control of because managers and management companies also have control of essential documents that very often go missing. Let’s take a few examples to demonstrate the problem.

A big wind comes and knocks off a couple of roofs in your association, it happens all the time. Well, the first thing that the insurance company wants are the maintenance records roofs going back seven years before they pay for the claim. No records…claim denied and its lawyer time. Another good one relating to community association collections, is that the board has decided to foreclose on Mister Delequaint for non-payment of assessments for the past five years. Mr. Delequaint arrives in court and his lawyer asks the association’s attorney to provide the proof of mailing for the budgets for said five years and they are nowhere to be found. As a matter of fact even the budgets are stone cold lost.

The judge can very well possibly rule in favor of Mr. Delequaint (no association foreclosure) and even award him prevailing attorney fees. All these maladies could have been avoided if the association had a document retention policy and followed the protocol.

Let’s face the facts and understand that community associations are volatile environments and calling them dynamic is kind. Boards of Directors change, emotions run high, management companies are dismissed frequently, as are attorneys, vendors and whoever else gets an opportunity to work for an association. In the middle of all of this mess records, contracts, ledgers, insurance policies, minutes, proof of mailings, warranties, governing documents, proof of meeting notices, notes and everything else that can be put on paper fall into a deep dark abyss never to be found again. Sometimes by accident and often by design by disgruntled board members, dismissed employees (managers), or untrained office staff who may feel that the round file is for everything that is over a year old.

So now that the problem has been identified what is the solution? First as mentioned above, the board of directors must establish a record keeping policy and protocol (vote on it and put it in the minutes). Don’t lose those minutes and approve them at the next meeting. Said policy should identify all the records that an association must keep and for how long. This is easy because it’s all in the statutes (for Florida condos 718.111 and Florida HOAs 720.305) and I doubt that any state does not address this issue.

 

The next thing is:

HOW can an association keep these records from disappearing never to be found again? There are many ways to go about this and technology may have the answer. Although it might seem to be expensive it is possible that all documents be kept electronically and not just on paper.

Have them scanned and put them away on a remote server. This technology also gives an association a backup just in case that big wind comes and blows away your office or the management office.

Once again referring to Florida condo statutes 718.111(12)(b) it is crystal clear that documents can be maintained in digital format. In Florida HOA statutes 720.303(5) the legality of keeping records in digital form is not so clear but it is still a prudent idea. No matter what your board comes up with you should be able to easily get your hands on the minutes of a meeting from five years ago or all the maintenance records for the roofs. Try it and if you cannot put your eyes on them it proves that your community association has a problem that needs to be fixed right away.

Find the right companies to help you with Digital Record Keeping, Websites and Accounting.

 

Tags: , ,
Association Publication of Deadbeat List & Third-Party Purchaser Assessment Liability: by KBRLegal.com

Association Publication of Deadbeat List & Third-Party Purchaser Assessment Liability: by KBRLegal.com

Association Publication of Deadbeat List & Third-Party Purchaser Assessment Liability: 

by KBRLegal.com

 

Association Publication of Deadbeat List & Third-Party Purchaser Assessment Liability: 

Two New Cases Board Members and Managers Need to Know About


 

CASE No. 1: On June 12, 2020, the Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal (“5th DCA”) entered its opinion in Latheresa Williams, On Behalf Of Herself And All Others Similarly Situated v. Salt Springs Resort Association, Inc., and Bosshardt Property Management, LLC., Case No. 5D18-3913 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020), The holding of this case echoes advice I have all too often provided to board members and managers to NOT publish what is commonly referred to as a “deadbeat list.” This type of list is posted in the community and identifies each debtor’s name and sometimes the assessment balance past due, too. No good ever comes from publication of such a list. In fact, the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (the “FCCPA”) forbids it if such publication of the deadbeat list is to harass and/or annoy the debtor.

 

More specifically, section 559.72, Florida Statutes, provides in relevant part that “[i]n collecting consumer debts, no person shall… [p]ublish or post, threaten to publish or post, or cause to be published or posted before the general public individual names or any list of names of debtors, commonly known as a deadbeat list, for the purpose of enforcing or attempting to enforce collection of consumer debts.”

 

In this case, the plaintiff was seeking class action status for all others similarly treated. This could lead to tremendous liability should discovery later evidence that the association and/or its management company regularly published deadbeat lists. At trial, the court had granted a motion to dismiss filed by the association based on a prior case, Bryan v. Clayton, also a 5th DCA case dating back to 1977 where the Court held that maintenance assessments were not “debts” for purposes of the FCCPA. In order to re-consider the prior Bryan decision, all of the 5th DCA sitting appellate judges participated in the Williams case, a process legally known as an “En Banc” style of review.

 

The Court in Williams took note that the FCCPA is designed to protect consumers and does not limit unlawful activities only to “debt collectors,” but rather to “all persons” involved in the collection of a debt. By way of contrast, the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FFDCPA) applies only to debt collectors, which excludes the association and arguably its management company, and not to “all persons” involved in the collection of a debt, as in the FCCPA.

 

Under the prior Bryan holding, a past due assessment obligation was not even considered a “debt” for purposes of the FCCPA and the FFDCPA. In the recent Williams case, the Court went to great lengths to explain that, in fact, an association assessment obligation “is a debt which arose out of an obligation by a consumer out of a money, property, insurance or services transaction which is primarily for personal, family, or household purposes” and is therefore subject to FCCPA.

 

Thus, the Court remanded the case back to the trial court for further proceedings. While, its unknown how the plaintiff’s attempt for a class action certification will resolve, it is extremely likely that one or more defendants will be found to have violated the FCCPA for having published the “deadbeat list.” The takeaway from the Williams case is to never, ever publish a list of association debtors. This does not at all mean that the board cannot be provided a list of those members delinquent in their assessment obligations. However, it does mean such a list should not be made readily available to the membership by posting or mailing, etc.

 

 

CASE No. 2: On May 20, 2020, Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal entered its opinion in Old Cutler Lakes by the Bay Community Association, Inc. v. SRP SUB, LLC, Case No. 3D19-528 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) regarding the liability of a third-party purchaser at a mortgage foreclosure sale for assessments that came due prior to the third-party acquiring title to the property. The Court’s holding in this case is in line with its prior holding in the case of Beacon Hill Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Colfin Ah-Florida 7, LLC, 221 So. 3d 710 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017), which based its decision on the landmark case decided by Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal in Pudlit 2 Joint Venture, LLP v. Westwood Gardens Homeowners Association, Inc., 169 So.3d 145 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

 

In the Old Cutler Lakes case, SRP SUB, LLC (“SRP”) was the successful bidder at a foreclosure sale on a first mortgage held by Wells Fargo. After obtaining title by a certificate of title, SRP filed an action for declaratory relief seeking a determination as to its liability for assessments that accrued prior to the issuance of the certificate of title. In relevant part, the Declaration of Covenant and Restrictions of Old Cutler Lakes by the Bay (“Declaration”) provided the following:

 

The sale or transfer of any Lot pursuant to the foreclosure or any proceeding in lieu thereof of a first mortgage meeting the above qualifications, shall extinguish the lien of such assessments as to payments which became due prior to such sale or transfer.

 

This language is similar to the language contained in the declarations in the Beacon Hill and Pudlit 2 cases. In these cases, the courts applied a constitutional principal prohibiting the impairment of contracts in deciding that the statutory safe harbor did not control over the provisions of the declarations where the statute did not require such application and the declarations did not contain “Kaufman” language, which has the effect of making amendments to the Florida Statutes automatically applicable to a declaration as they are “amended from time to time.” As the provisions of the declarations expressly created rights for third-party purchasers, the third-party purchasers are “intended third-party beneficiaries” to such provisions which rights cannot be impaired pursuant to the constitutional principal prohibiting the impairment of contracts. In following the holdings of the Beacon Hill and Pudlit 2 cases, SRP was found not liable for any of the past due assessments that accrued prior to the issuance of the certificate of title. Thus, as with many declarations which have not been amended since their creation by the community’s developer, these, as yet to be amended, declarations may provide for a complete wipe out of all assessments that accrued prior to the transfer of title as a result of a mortgage foreclosure action or by deed in lieu of foreclosure.

 

The takeaway from the cases discussed above emphasizes the importance of reviewing and updating the association’s declaration, with the guidance of your association’s legal counsel, to ensure that it provides for necessary and available protections for the association and its members, including the use of “Kaufman” language, if appropriate to collect as much overdue assessment revenue as possible.


Rembaum’s Association Roundup  The community association legal news that you can use!

Kaye Bender Rembaum is a full service commercial law firm devoted to the representation of community associations throughout Florida. Under the direction of attorneys Robert L. Kaye, Esq.Michael S. Bender, Esq., and Jeffrey A. Rembaum, Esq., Kaye Bender Rembaum is dedicated to providing clients with an unparalleled level of personalized and professional service regardless of their size and takes into account their individual needs and financial concerns. We have offices in Broward County (Pompano Beach), Palm Beach County (Palm Beach Gardens), (Hillsborough County) Tampa, and office locations in Miami-Dade County by appointment.

Read More

 

 

Tags: , ,