SFPMA

Menu
Join SFPMA

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

WHY THE DIFFERENCES? By Eric Glazer, Esq.

WHY THE DIFFERENCES? By Eric Glazer, Esq.

WHY THE DIFFERENCES?

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

At a time when it would make sense for the condo and HOA laws to become easier to learn, they are becoming harder.  Much has to do with why in the world are there such differences between the condo and HOA statutes?  It’s actually ridiculous.  For example:

  1. In order to get access to the official records, why does the condo statute allow access if the owner asks for access in writing while the HOA statute requires the owner to request access by certified mail return receipt requested?
  2. Why does the condo statute require condos with 150 units or more to have a website, while an HOA with 150 units or more does not require a website?
  3. Why does the HOA statute allow voting by proxy but the condo statute doesn’t and requires a very strict way of performing the election?
  4. Why do HOA documents expire after thirty years, but the condo declaration never expires?
  5. Why is competitive bidding required in a condo if the amount at issue is 5% of the budget but competitive bidding is required in an HOA if the amount at issue is 5% of the budget?
  6. Why in an HOA, if the owners amend the declaration to prohibit rental terms of less than six months or 3 times in a calendar year, that amendment applies to everyone, even those who did not vote in favor of the amendment ———- however that same amendment would not apply to those who specifically did not vote in favor of the amendment in a condo?
  7. Why does the condo statute require a 75% vote of the owners in order to make a material alteration, yet the HOA statute does not mention material alterations?
  8. Why as of January 1st, 2025 are condominiums required to reserve funds for all portions of the common elements but HOAs are not?

There are more, but you get the point.  There are no reasons of which I’m aware as to why these statutes are different for condos and HOAs, yet they continue to exist.  At a time when it’s confusing enough to learn the laws, The Florida Legislature should amend the statutes so that the laws are the same and fair across the Board, regardless of whether you live in a condo or HOA.

 

Tags:
The mandatory funding of all the required reserve funds will make living in these hi-rises very interesting in the next two years

The mandatory funding of all the required reserve funds will make living in these hi-rises very interesting in the next two years

  • Posted: Oct 28, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on The mandatory funding of all the required reserve funds will make living in these hi-rises very interesting in the next two years

MANDATORY RESERVES

By Jan Bergemann

Finally the Florida Legislature got the message they should have gotten 20 years ago: FULLY FUNDED RESERVES ARE MANDATORY!

And even if the legislature gave condo owners a reprieve until December 2025, condo owners should start now to consider their options:

Will they be able to afford the much higher maintenance fees they will have to pay monthly in the future or will these much higher fees break their household budget?

Let’s just face it: For most of the years past condo owners waived reserves in order to keep maintenance fees artificially low – meaning that many of the associations at this point don’t have any reserves worth talking about. Remember: According to media reports the Champlain Tower South had only $700,000 in reserves, but needed about $16M to pay for the necessary repairs.

That will have to change real fast and the fact that many of the required inspections will have to be followed up by costly repairs and maintenance high special assessments are on the horizon for many hi-rise buildings (buildings higher than three floors).

As much as this change to the Florida statutes was long overdue it will definitely price quite a few families out of their homes. But in all reality there is really no other way around it and the fact that many condo owners used the loophole in the statutes that allowed waiving the funding of reserves is now coming back to haunt the owners who in former times dismissed the idea of funding reserves.

We already see condo owners protesting against boards about the problems that are visible in these buildings. The big question in these cases: Does the association have the necessary funds to take care of the needed maintenance and repairs or are the owners willing and able to pay the special assessment the board might have to levy in order to pay for the contractor?

The mandatory funding of all the required reserve funds will make living in these hi-rises very interesting in the next two years – and we will have to see how strong the government agencies tasked with overseeing these new provisions in FS 718 are enforcing these provisions.

Our Blog ( Industry Articles ) can be found on SFPMA.com – between our writers and all members of sfpma we have been for over 15 years keeping our industry up to date with the right Legal, Business and Services Articles. SFPMA sends and publishes these and sends to over 230,000 emails keeping everyone informed.

Look for our article upcoming on Condo Funds and Investments, on SFPMA

Tags: , , , ,
IF THERE EVER WAS A TIME TO GET EDUCATED – Update

IF THERE EVER WAS A TIME TO GET EDUCATED – Update

Update:  Eric Glazer, Esq.
Published October 10, 2022

Rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated.

I just spent a week in the hospital — again with kidney stone issues.  This is I believe the 5th time I needed some sort of surgery for this never ending painful problem.  I left the hospital with a tube coming out of my right side.  I still need a lithotripsy procedure.  That’s the one where you lay down in water and they zap your kidney stones hoping to break them up.  I’m guessing I have another week or two of this insanity.

I want to apologize to the wonderful people at the L&L Condo and HOA Expos.  As all of you know, I always attend all of their shows all around the state and have the honor of kicking off the event by doing my board certification course.  Unfortunately I won’t be able to attend the events In Palm Beach and in Broward.  I am desperately hoping to attend the events in Orlando and Tampa.  I think all of you know that I love nothing more than being with all of you, teaching you, and answering your questions.  It’s simply my favorite part of being an attorney.  It’s killing me that I can’t teach the classes that so many of you attend each and every year.  However, L&L will be finding another well qualified attorney from another law firm to teach and certify you.  I urge you to attend and continue to make the L&L shows the success that they always are.

I’m taking two weeks off from the radio show.  I expect to do the show October 16th — with or without a tube coming out of my side.  BY THE WAY……THAT’S THE SAME DAY I WILL BE ON 60 MINUTES — AS THEY ARE DOING A SHOW ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT GRANDMA AND GRANDPA CAN STILL MOVE TO A FLORIDA CONDOMINIUM IF THEIR SOLE INCOME IS SOCIAL SECURITY.  I think we all know the answer.   This really should be an amazing show which shines the spotlight on Florida condominiums but truly needs to be watched by the entire country as every state better follow Florida’s lead when it comes to mandating safety.

In any event, I hope to be back at my desk in a week or two and look forward to speaking with all of you again.  In the mean time, please get in touch with Rich, Pennie or Paul if you need immediate help.

PS: The nurse told me that the epidural was not invented to relieve pain from child birth.  It was invented to relieve pain from kidney stones!

 

We know everyone is wishing Eric Glazer a full recovery and well wishes.  Ouch

 

In light of the tragedy at The Champlain Towers in Surfside last year, The Florida Legislature, to its credit, passed massive condominium reform regarding safety, inspections and reserves.  These laws are confusing to those who work in the industry every day, never mind to those who serve on condo Boards throughout the state.

 

Stay up to date with the new law -FLORIDA BUILDING INSPECTIONS (SB-4D)

Florida Condo Building Inspections (SB4d)

http://FLBuildingInspections.com  a division of SFPMA

The State of Florida Property Management Association with Legal & Engineering Members are here to help you understand the new laws and how to take the correct action now to ensure you are in full compliance. 

 

The Florida Legislature thought that it was so important for condo boards to enforce these laws that they included a provision which considers a breach of these laws a breach of the director’s fiduciary duty.  Imagine, personal liability can be imposed against a director who fails to enforce these new laws.

Once again, I drafted legislation which would require Board members to learn these new laws in order to get certified and once again this requirement was removed from the statute.  It’s hard to believe, but The Florida Legislature drafted a law which imposes personal liability against those directors who fail to follow these new laws yet removed the requirement to learn these new laws.  In any event, I will again try to make learning these new laws a condition of becoming certified in the next legislative session.

As far as condominium Board members go…….there can be no more important time than the present to learn these new laws.  They are designed to keep you and your fellow unit owners alive.

Don’t dare get certified by signing that dumb, silly form that says I read my governing docs and promise to enforce them.  Even if you read your governing documents from cover to cover, you still wouldn’t learn any of the new condo laws.  What a disgrace that you can still become certified this way.

I am teaching at the following times and locations this month.  It is more imperative than ever to attend an educational course.  In fact, if you don’t learn the new laws and don’t apply the new laws on your condo board, you can face personal liability.  Moreover, any condo Board member who can’t find a few hours to take an educational course is not worthy of a single vote.  So what do you say?  Please register for any of the free following Condo Craze and HOAs Board Certification Classes offered around the state

Find the Condo & HOA Event Dates

 

Tags: , , ,
NEW LAWS – WILL THEY AGAIN BE IGNORED BY MANY BOARDS?

NEW LAWS – WILL THEY AGAIN BE IGNORED BY MANY BOARDS?

NEW LAWS – WILL THEY AGAIN BE IGNORED BY MANY BOARDS?

By Jan Bergemann

Year for year we see new community association bills passed, claiming to close more loopholes in laws that have more holes than Swiss cheese. In reality most of these laws are being ignored – or circumvented – because the folks violating these laws are even told by certain attorneys that nothing will happen if they ignore existing laws.

Just take a look at what happened with their ordinances requiring older buildings to have 40-year inspections? Not much, because it seems that nobody ever followed up trying to really enforce these ordinances. After the collapse of the Champlain Towers South people looked into these ordinances – and guess what? In Miami for example, two hi-rise condos were due for the 50-year inspection, but hadn’t even done the 40-year inspection. There were lots of similar examples that many associations plainly ignored these requirements in a timely fashion. That definitely raises the question: Will the enforcement be better now that it is state law?

Many condo-owners plainly refused to vote in favor of fully funded reserves. Did the legislators even ask why before passing a bill that will require fully funded reserves? Definitely not, because otherwise they would have found out that owners didn’t want to fund the reserves for one simple reason: Boards used these reserve funds for all kinds of projects other than intended, and when time came to — for example – have a new roof installed, the roof reserves were empty and a special assessment had to be levied. But what’s the big deal? Instead of a new roof they had nice palm trees when entering the community property.

A bill was offered in the last legislative session that would have taken care of the problem: HB 811 – Condominium Association Complaints and Investigations – filed by Representative Tom Fabricio (R-Miami). But like most of the other bills in the past years that would have created enforcement of all these laws the legislature is enacting on a yearly basis it was clearly ignored.

When will all our elected officials — from county to federal – finally get the message that creating laws without enforcement is just a waste of paper that makes attorneys rich!

 

Tags: ,
SOME OTHER NEW LAWS CONDOS MUST FOLLOW – PART TWO By Eric Glazer, Esq.

SOME OTHER NEW LAWS CONDOS MUST FOLLOW – PART TWO By Eric Glazer, Esq.

SOME OTHER NEW LAWS CONDOS MUST FOLLOW – PART TWO

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

DISTRIBUTION OF THE INSPECTION REPORTS

Upon completion of a phase one or phase two milestone inspection and receipt of the inspector-prepared summary of the inspection report from the architect or engineer who performed the inspection, the association must distribute a copy of the inspector-prepared summary of the inspection report to each unit owner, regardless of the findings or recommendations in the report, by United States mail or personal delivery and by electronic transmission to unit owners who previously consented to receive notice by electronic transmission; must post a copy of the inspector-prepared summary in a conspicuous place on the condominium property; and must publish the full report and inspector-prepared summary on the association’s website, if the association is required to have a website.

THE DEVELOPER’S TURNOVER REPORT

Notwithstanding when the certificate of occupancy was issued or the height of the building, the developer must provide a milestone inspection report in compliance with s. 553.899 included in the official records, under seal of an architect or engineer authorized to practice in this state, and attesting to required maintenance, condition, useful life, and replacement costs of the following applicable condominium property common elements comprising a turnover inspection report:

  1. Roof.
  2. Structure, including load-bearing walls and primary structural members and primary structural systems as those terms are defined in s. 627.706. 
  3. Fireproofing and fire protection systems.
  4. Elevators.
  5. Heating and cooling systems.
  6. Plumbing.
  7. Electrical systems.
  8. Swimming pool or spa and equipment.
  9. Seawalls.
  10. Pavement and parking areas.
  11. Drainage systems.
  12. Painting.
  13. Irrigation systems.
  14. Waterproofing
  15. A copy of the association’s most recent structural integrity reserve study.

     

POWERS OF THE DIVISION

So let’s say the developer is ignoring all of these new safety laws.  Does the DBPR have any power to do anything about it?

(1) The division may enforce and ensure compliance with this chapter and rules relating to the development, construction, sale, lease, ownership, operation, and management of residential condominium units and complaints related to the procedural completion of milestone inspections under s. 553.899.

However, Once The Developer Has Turned Over…

(2) However, after turnover has occurred, the division has jurisdiction to investigate  complaints related only to financial issues, elections, and the maintenance of and unit owner access to association records under s. 718.111(12), and the procedural completion of structural integrity reserve studies under s. 718.112(2)(g).

So………..if your Board ignores these new safety laws and you want to do something about it…..it’s off to court.

OTHER NEW CONDO LAWS TO KNOW – PART ONE

OTHER NEW CONDO LAWS TO KNOW – PART ONE

  • Posted: Jul 26, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on OTHER NEW CONDO LAWS TO KNOW – PART ONE

SOME OTHER NEW LAWS CONDOS MUST FOLLOW – PART ONE

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

We all know by now the myriad of new safety laws condos that are 3 stories or more are required to follow.  They include mandatory fire sprinklers or an engineered life safety system (for buildings 75 feet or higher only), a Phase One Milestone Inspection after 30 years and every ten years thereafter (25 years if the building is on the coast), a likely Phase Two Inspection which will result in required repairs to the structure and of course structural integrity reserve studies performed by an architect or engineer and the mandatory full funding of reserve accounts.

There’s actually more to know.

OFFICIAL RECORDS TO INCLUDE  AND BE POSTED ON THE ASSOCIATION’S WEBSITE:

  1. All audits, reviews, accounting statements,structural  integrity reserve studies, and financial reports of the association or condominium. Structural integrity reserve studies  must be maintained for at least 15 years after the study is completed.

 

A copy of the inspection reports for the milestone inspections and the structural integrity reserve studies  and any other inspection report relating to a structural or life safety inspection of the condominium property. Such record must be maintained by the association for 15 years after receipt of the report.

NO LONGER IS THERE THE ABILITY

TO WAIVE RESERVES OR USE THEM FOR OTHER PURPOSES

 

It was always ridiculously easy to waive the funding of the reserve account.  All it took was a lousy majority of a quorum.  Those days are now over and reserve accounts must be fully funded, like it or not.

The same rule finally applies to developers.  Before turnover of control of an association by a developer to unit owners other than a developer under 718.301, the developer-controlled association developer may not vote the voting interests allocated to its units to waive the reserves or reduce the funding of the reserves.

You can no longer vote to use reserves set aside for one category to be used to repair another category.  Effective December 31, 2024, members of a unit-owner controlled association may not vote to use reserve funds, or any interest accruing thereon, that are reserved for items listed in paragraph (g) for any other purpose other than their intended purpose.

(g) Structural integrity reserve study.

  1. An association must have a structural integrity reserve study completed at least every 10 years after the condominium’s creation for each building on the condominium property that is three stories or higher in height which includes, at a minimum,  a study of the following items as related to the structural integrity and safety of the building:
  2. Roof. 
  3. Load-bearing walls or other primary structural members.
  4. Floor. 
  5. Foundation.
  6. Fireproofing and fire protection systems. 
  7. Plumbing. 
  8. Electrical systems. 
  9. Waterproofing and exterior painting. 
  10. Windows.
  11. Any other item that has a deferred maintenance expense or replacement cost that exceeds $10,000 and the failure to replace or maintain such item negatively affects the items listed in subparagraphs a.-i., as determined by the licensed engineer or architect performing the visual inspection portion of the structural integrity reserve study.
  12. Before a developer turns over control of an association  to unit owners other than the developer, the developer must have a structural integrity reserve study completed for each building on the condominium property that is three stories or higher in height.

 

  1. Associations existing on or before July 1, 2022, which are controlled by unit owners other than the developer, must have a structural integrity reserve study completed by December 31, 2024, for each building on the condominium property that is three stories or higher in height.

BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY – THIS IS SCARY

 

  1. If an association fails to complete a structural integrity reserve study pursuant to this paragraph,such failure is a breach of an officer’s and director’s fiduciary relationship to the unit owners under s. 718.111(1).  If you’re an officer or director, this new law should scare you to death.  If you fail to do the reserve study, you have automatically breached your fiduciary duty.  This could potentially result in individual liability against a director should the failure to do the reserve study result in collapse or injury.

 

(h) Mandatory milestone inspections.—If an association is required to have a milestone inspection performed pursuant to s. 553.899, the association must arrange for the milestone inspection to be performed and is responsible for ensuring compliance with the requirements of s. 553.899. The association is responsible for all costs associated with the inspection. If the officers or directors of an association willfully and knowingly fail to have a milestone inspection performed pursuant to s. 553.899, such failure is a breach of the officers’ and directors’ fiduciary relationship to the unit owners under s. 718.111(1)(a).  Again, If you’re an officer or director, this new law should scare you to death.  If you fail to do the milestone inspection, you have automatically breached your fiduciary duty.  This could potentially result in individual liability against a director should the failure to do the reserve study result in collapse or injury.

Tags:

WILL THE NEW LAWS BE DEVASTATING FINANCIALLY TO SOME FLORIDA RESIDENTS?

WILL THE NEW LAWS BE DEVASTATING FINANCIALLY TO SOME FLORIDA RESIDENTS?

  • Posted: Jul 14, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on WILL THE NEW LAWS BE DEVASTATING FINANCIALLY TO SOME FLORIDA RESIDENTS?

WILL THE NEW LAWS BE DEVASTATING FINANCIALLY TO SOME FLORIDA RESIDENTS?

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

In a word — YES. Are all these new laws really necessary?  In a word –YES.  This is all happening due to a complete lack of foresight and planning by The Florida Legislature.  Mandatory Reserves and Mandatory Inspections should always have been the law.  I urged The Florida Legislature in May of 2018 to make reserves mandatory.  Instead they waited for a building to collapse and for 98 people to die before making these common sense laws.  Of course a building should require an inspection after 25 or 30 years.  Of course a building should be required to make necessary repairs to prevent a potential collapse.  Of course a building should be required to put away money each month for future repairs.  Of course that amount should be determined by a professional architect or engineer and not an unqualified board member who has a financial interest in the outcome of the reserve study. These laws should have been required thirty years ago, as building started to boom.  Instead however, The Florida Legislature always caved to the developer lobby in order to keep the cost of living in a condominium artificially cheap, and the sale of units flowing.  Now, because these laws were not in place thirty years ago, current condominium owners have a lot of catching up to do financially to pay for the sins of the past.

 

The days of a couple or a widower from up north retiring to a high rise condominium in Florida if their sole income is social security are done and over.  That cannot happen anymore.  They need to look for a condominium less than three stories in height that has some reserves put away.

 

If your condominium is at least 30 years old and is 6 stories or higher, has no fire sprinklers or  Engineered life safety system, has not yet undergone a Mandatory Phase One and Phase Two Inspection, has not made the repairs required by those inspections and has no reserves in the bank, you are now forced to either sell your condominium unit immediately or pay massive special assessments that you may not be able to afford, or even come close to affording it.

 

On the flip side, if your condominium is at least 30 years old and is 6 stories or higher, and already has fire sprinklers or  an Engineered life safety system, has already undergone a Mandatory Phase One and Phase Two Inspection, has already made the necessary repairs, and is fully funding reserves, you have little to nothing to worry about.  Your monthly assessments should remain where they are, give or take the increases in insurance that are simply astronomical.

 

Developers are waiting to pounce.  They are focusing their attention on those condominium at least 30 years old and are 6 stories or higher, but has no fire sprinklers or Engineered life safety system, has not yet undergone a Mandatory Phase One and Phase Two Inspection, and has not made the repairs that will be required by those inspections and has no reserves in the bank.  Developers will be approaching the Boards of these condominiums with offers to buy everyone’s unit for a certain price.  You will either consent to selling or have to pay the costs for all these inspections, repairs and funding of reserves.  For many there will be no choice at all.  They will have to sell and somehow find housing elsewhere.

 

Like everything else, the poor people or even the average workers who had saved up enough money for a down payment on their condo and proudly purchased their unit, they will get hit the hardest.  In reality, in upper class buildings, they were either putting reserve money aside all along, or worse comes to worse they can stroke a check for these increased costs.  They’re OK.

 

This will take years to sort out.  Some condos simply won’t be able to comply with the new laws and the owners will sell out to a developer.  Some condominiums will opt not to sell and pass massive special assessments and/or borrow the money from a bank.  Either way their expenses are going up.  Many associations will be foreclosing on many of their owners who can’t afford these special assessments.  I can tell you that even before these massive changes go into effect, foreclosures are already on the rise, simply due to nearly $6.00 per gallon of gasoline and out of control food prices.  These new laws will start what I believe will be a tremendous increase in foreclosures, perhaps as bad as 2007 and 2008.  Yet, all of it is necessary.  You can’t allow buildings not to get inspected, you can’t allow building not to get fixed, you can’t allow buildings not to have fire safety measures and you can’t allow buildings to deliberately waive a requirement to put funds away each month for future structural repairs.

 

The Band Aid was ripped off in one shot.  As a result, Florida condominiums and their owners will have some tough financial times ahead.  There will definitely be gentrification in some neighborhoods.  The look, feel and face of Florida will change going forward.  If only these measures were passed when these buildings were being built so people would not be forced out of their homes today.  There simply was no foresight and now the change won’t be smooth and gradual, but will be difficult and immediate.  And yet, there’s no other way to go.  A collapse like Champlain Towers can never happen again.

 

Tags:
THE NEW CONDO LAWS —- MANDATORY INSPECTIONS – PART ONE & PART TWO

THE NEW CONDO LAWS —- MANDATORY INSPECTIONS – PART ONE & PART TWO

  • Posted: Jun 14, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on THE NEW CONDO LAWS —- MANDATORY INSPECTIONS – PART ONE & PART TWO

Let’s start discussing the new condominium laws that go into effect on July 1st.  We won’t cover them all in one week, so look forward to next week’s blog as well.

IF YOU HAVE A MANAGEMENT COMPANY the statute says:

If a community association manager or a community association management firm has a contract with a community association that has a building on the association’s property that is subject to s. 553.899, (the Mandatory Inspections statute) the community association manager or the community association management firm must comply with that section as directed by the board.

This is a weird provision to me.  Clearly, it’s warning managers and management companies to comply with the new mandatory inspection statute. But it also says “as directed by the board.”  What does that mean?  Suppose the board tells the manager that they are deliberately not complying with the new mandatory inspection statute? Does that get the management company off the hook?  Can the management company now sit back and do nothing?  I certainly don’t think that’s the intent of the statute, but it should definitely be clearer.  In any event, at least to me, the management company must not hinder the association’s efforts to comply with the new mandatory inspection statute.  If I were a manager or management company, I would document my efforts thru e-mails to all of the Board members urging them to comply and reminding them of their responsibility to comply with the new mandatory inspection requirements.

Remember, prior to this new law becoming effective, only Dade and Broward had mandatory / structural inspection requirements.  Well, we now have in every Florida county something called milestone inspections — and there is part one and part two.

In every county in Florida, your first milestone/structural  inspection is after 30 years and every ten years thereafter.  But, if your condo is ON THE COAST or within three miles of the coast, your first milestone/structural inspection is AFTER TWENTY FIVE YEARS AND EVERY TEN YEARS THEREAFTER. And this applies to every condo or co-op that is three stories or more in height by December 31 of the year in which the building reaches 30 years of age

The structural inspection of a building, including an inspection of load-bearing walls and the primary structural members and primary structural systems, must be done by by a licensed architect or engineer authorized to practice in this state for the purposes of attesting to the life safety and adequacy of the structural components of the building and, to the extent reasonably possible, determining the general structural condition of the building as it affects the safety of such building, including a determination of any necessary maintenance, repair, or replacement of any structural component of the building.

If the building’s certificate of occupancy was issued on or before July 1, 1992, meaning that you are already 30 years old, the building’s initial milestone inspection must be performed before December 31, 2024.

 

Here is what’s required in a Phase One Inspection:

PHASE ONE — (a) For phase one of the milestone inspection, a licensed architect or engineer authorized to practice in this state shall perform a visual examination of habitable and nonhabitable areas of a building, including the major structural components of a building, and provide a qualitative assessment of the structural conditions of the building. If the architect or engineer finds no signs of substantial structural deterioration to any building components under visual examination, phase two of the inspection, as provided in paragraph (b), is not required.

In all candor, in a post Champlain Towers world, if I’m the phase one guy — I don’t want to be sued for saying this building is in perfect shape and doesn’t even need a phase two inspection.  I think the Phase One Inspection will Always result in the First architect or engineer calling for a Phase Two study.  What does he or she have to lose?

MANDATORY BUILDING INSPECTIONS – PART TWO

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

So last week we discussed the fact that the change in the law will now require every condominium building in the state that is 3 stories or higher and at least 30 years old (25 years old if within 3 miles of the coast) to undergo a Phase One inspection, every 10 years, by a licensed architect or engineer who is looking for visual signs of structural damage to the building.

Now if I’m the guy doing the Phase One Inspection, it’s pretty likely that I’m going to find something that requires a Phase Two inspection.  Why not?  Is it worth the potential liability for saying the building is fine and then someone is injured or killed because of a structural defect?  Of course not.  So count on lots of Phase Two Inspections.  Here is what that entails:

 

PHASE TWO – Only If found to be necessary after the Phase One Inspection

(b) A phase two of the milestone inspection must be performed if any substantial structural deterioration is identified during phase one. A phase two inspection may involve destructive or nondestructive testing at the inspector’s direction. The inspection may be as extensive or as limited as necessary to fully assess areas of structural distress in order to confirm that the building is structurally sound and safe for its intended use and to recommend a program for fully assessing and repairing distressed and damaged portions of the building. When determining testing locations, the inspector must give preference to locations that are the least disruptive and most easily repairable while still being representative of the structure. An inspector who completes a phase two milestone inspection shall prepare and submit an inspection report pursuant to subsection (8).

(8) Upon completion of a phase one or phase two milestone inspection, the architect or engineer who performed the inspection must submit a sealed copy of the inspection report with a separate summary of, at minimum, the material findings and recommendations in the inspection report to the condominium association or cooperative association, and to the building official of the local government which has jurisdiction. The inspection report must, at a minimum, meet all of the following criteria:

(a) Bear the seal and signature, or the electronic signature, of the licensed engineer or architect who performed the inspection.

(b) Indicate the manner and type of inspection forming the basis for the inspection report.

(c) Identify any substantial structural deterioration, within a reasonable professional probability based on the scope of the inspection, describe the extent of such deterioration, and identify any recommended repairs for such deterioration.

(d) State whether unsafe or dangerous conditions, as those terms are defined in the Florida Building Code, were observed.

(e) Recommend any remedial or preventive repair for any items that are damaged but are not substantial structural deterioration.

(f) Identify and describe any items requiring further inspection.

THE ASSOCIATION’S RESPONSIBILITY

(9) The association must distribute a copy of the inspector-prepared summary of the inspection report to each condominium unit owner or cooperative unit owner, regardless of the findings or recommendations in the report, by United States mail or personal delivery and by electronic transmission to unit owners who previously consented to receive notice by electronic transmission; must post a copy of the inspector-prepared summary in a conspicuous place on the condominium or cooperative property; and must publish the full report and inspector prepared summary on the association’s website, if the association is required to have a website.

 (10) A local enforcement agency may prescribe timelines and penalties with respect to compliance with this section.

(11) A board of county commissioners may adopt an ordinance requiring that a condominium or cooperative association schedule or commence repairs for substantial structural deterioration within a specified timeframe after the local enforcement agency receives a phase two inspection report; however, such repairs must be commenced within 365 days after receiving such report. If an association fails to submit proof to the local enforcement agency that repairs have been scheduled or have commenced for substantial structural deterioration identified in a phase two inspection report within the required timeframe, the local enforcement agency must review and determine if the building is unsafe for human occupancy.

The bottom line is that if forced to do a Phase One inspection, you can ensure you will be required to do a Phase Two Inspection.  The Phase Two Inspection will be costly and the architect or engineer performing the study has full reign over the property.  What they say needs fixing, needs fixing.  And what do they have to lose in stating that certain structural repairs should be made?  On the other hand, they have a lot to lose if they don’t recommend a fix and catastrophe strikes.  Rest assured that Phase Two Study will require repairs and they won’t come cheap.

[AdSense-A]

 

Tags: , ,
NEW CONDO AND CO-OP LAWS NOW AWAITING SIGNATURE BY THE GOVERNOR.

NEW CONDO AND CO-OP LAWS NOW AWAITING SIGNATURE BY THE GOVERNOR.

  • Posted: May 27, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on NEW CONDO AND CO-OP LAWS NOW AWAITING SIGNATURE BY THE GOVERNOR.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: I PRESENT TO YOU THE NEW CONDO AND CO-OP LAWS NOW AWAITING SIGNATURE BY THE GOVERNOR.
IF THEY SOUND SCARY AND IMMENSELY EXPENSIVE, YOU ARE INTERPRETING THEM CORRECTLY. THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE HAS CHANGED CONDOMINIUM LAW FOREVER. THE COST TO STAY IN YOUR CONDO WILL NEVER BE THE SAME. BUT DON’T BLAME THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE FROM MAKING LAWS THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN MADE DECADES AGO BY PREVIOUS FLORIDA LEGISLATURES. THE TRUTH IS…..THIS IS WHAT HAD TO BE DONE. ANYTHING ELSE WOULD HAVE ALLOWED CONDOMINIUM OWNERS TO CONTINUE LIVING A LIE THAT THEIR ASSESSMENTS ARE CHEAP AND AFFORDABLE AND WOULD HAVE ALLOWED THE CAN TO BE KICKED DOWN THE ROAD AGAIN AND PUT LIVES AT RISK..
IRONICALLY, MY REQUEST FOR MANDATORY EDUCATION FOR BOARD MEMBERS WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE BILL, YET THE BILL GOES OUT OF ITS WAY TO CHARGE DIRECTORS WITH BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY FOR NOT FOLLOWING THESE NEW LAWS THAT MANY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO EVEN UNDERSTAND WITHOUT LEGAL ASSISSTANCE OR EDUCATION.
I DID MY BEST TO PUT THEM IN A FORMAT THAT IS AS SIMPLE TO FOLLOW AS YOU CAN GET, BUT BELIEVE ME YOU WILL NEED TO READ THEM OVER AND OVER TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THE LAW ACTUALLY REQUIRES.

TO GET YOUR COPY CLICK HERE.

PROXIES: WHAT ARE THEY AND WHEN CAN WE USE THEM? By Eric Glazer, Esq.

PROXIES: WHAT ARE THEY AND WHEN CAN WE USE THEM? By Eric Glazer, Esq.

  • Posted: May 24, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on PROXIES: WHAT ARE THEY AND WHEN CAN WE USE THEM? By Eric Glazer, Esq.

PROXIES: WHAT ARE THEY AND WHEN CAN WE USE THEM?

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

The term “proxy” is often thrown around incorrectly.  In simple English, if you can’t make it to a meeting to actually cast your vote or appear in person, you sign a document called a “proxy” which allows someone else to appear on your behalf.  They act in your place.  The proxy form may give the proxy holder little power, or a lot of power, depending upon how the proxy itself is written.

As we should all know by now, a quorum of owners (in attendance by person or by proxy) is required in order to have the annual election.  Let’s say you cannot make it to the annual meeting, but you know that your neighbor Joe is going.  You can execute a limited proxy form, simply authorizing Joe to show up for you in order that your attendance be counted toward a quorum.  Or, you can give Joe more power and sign a general proxy, allowing Joe the ability to do all things on your behalf as if you were present.  This may include actually voting in the annual election for you, voting on waiving reserves, voting on adopting amendments to the governing documents and other different types of powers.

The BIG DIFFERENCE between condominiums and HOAs when it comes to proxies is that in an HOA, proxies are allowed when voting in the election, unless the documents say they are not allowed.  That’s why, the campaigning is even different in an HOA as compared to a condominium.  In an HOA, you don’t need your neighbor’s vote in order to win the election, you simply need their proxy.  If you get their proxy, on the night of the election, you can show up holding a dozen different proxies from 12 different homes and you would get 12 ballots, one for each proxy that you have.  Then, you would get another ballot for your own home.  You get 13 votes, even though none of the people that gave  you their proxy is at the meeting.

The condominium statutes do not allow for proxy voting in the election.  Why the two statutes should differ makes no sense, but they always have.  In a condominium, you can give your neighbor a proxy which allows them to appear on your behalf at the annual meeting, solely in order that your attendance be counted toward a quorum that is needed, but you can’t give them a proxy which turns over your right to vote to them.

Unit owners in a residential condominium may vote by limited proxies for votes taken to waive or reduce reserves,  for votes taken to waive the year end  financial reporting requirements; for votes taken to amend the declaration ; for votes taken to amend the articles of incorporation or bylaws pursuant and for any other matter for which the statute  requires or permits a vote of the unit owners.

To be clear, if you are going to be in attendance at a meeting where a vote is being taken on these issues, you do not need to sign a proxy form.  Unit owners may vote in person at unit owner meetings. This subparagraph does not limit the use of general proxies or require the use of limited proxies for any agenda item or election at any meeting of a timeshare condominium association or a nonresidential condominium association.

In a condo a proxy given is effective only for the specific meeting for which originally given and any lawfully adjourned meetings thereof. A proxy is not valid longer than 90 days after the date of the first meeting for which it was given. Each proxy is revocable at any time at the pleasure of the unit owner executing it.  An example of a limited  proxy to use can be found by clicking here.

While the condo statute does not say what information the proxy must contain, the HOA statute does, and says:

To be valid, a proxy must be dated, must state the date, time, and place of the meeting for which it was given, and must be signed by the authorized person who executed the proxy. A proxy is effective only for the specific meeting for which it was originally given, as the meeting may lawfully be adjourned and reconvened from time to time, and automatically expires 90 days after the date of the meeting for which it was originally given. A proxy is revocable at any time at the pleasure of the person who executes it. If the proxy form expressly so provides, any proxy holder may appoint, in writing, a substitute to act in his or her place.

While the condo and HOA statutes allow the owners to vote by proxy if they can’t make it to a meeting, both of these statutes forbid directors from voting by proxy.    A board member cannot give another board member his or her proxy to vote on an issue the board must vote on, even if the board members is going to be out of town.  That board member can however take advantage of today’s technology and cast their vote by speakerphone or zoom.

There’s a lot to know about proxies…and hopefully this cleared up some of the confusion surrounding them.  Or…… did I just make it even more confusing than you thought?