SFPMA

Menu
Register / Sign Up

Welcome to SFPMA

Reset

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

MAKE SURE YOUR DOCS DON’T COST YOU MONEY By Eric Glazer, Esq.

MAKE SURE YOUR DOCS DON’T COST YOU MONEY By Eric Glazer, Esq.

MAKE SURE YOUR DOCS DON’T COST YOU MONEY

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

Let’s start with what some of you already know……..foreclosures are on the rise.  Incredibly, this is happening before huge special assessments are kicking in for many of you and before mandatory reserves go into effect.  If foreclosures are already on the rise, what’s going to happen when special assessments and reserves take hold of most communities?

If a bank forecloses on either a home in an HOA or on a unit in a condominium, the association is likely to take a huge financial hit if that home or unit is also delinquent to the association.  When a bank forecloses on a property, most of the time that bank winds up becoming the owner of that property because nobody bids against the bank at a foreclosure sale.  For example, if an owner fails to pay the mortgage, the bank eventually forecloses and gets a final judgment against the owner for the amount of the delinquency plus interest and attorney’s fees.  The judge sets an auction date.  At the auction, the bank usually bids the amount of their final judgment, there are no other bids and the bank winds up owning the property.

Now that the bank owns the property, do they have to pay all of the assessments that are owed to the association on that home or condominium unit?  Not even close.  The law states that the bank would only have to pay the lesser of:

  • One year of assessments or;
  • One percent of the original mortgage debt;

So, let’s say the bank is foreclosing on a $300,000.00 mortgage.  One percent of that mortgage is $3,000.00.  Let’s say the assessments are $600.00 per month.  One year of assessments is $7,200.00.  Therefore, at most the bank is responsible for $3,000.00 and not $7,200.00 and this is even if the prior owner has not paid for several years.  There can be $15,000.00 in delinquent assessments owed on the unit —the bank would still only have to pay $3,000.00 at most.

Here’s where the association can really get stung.  If the governing documents let the bank off the hook and state that the bank does not have to pay anything if they wind up foreclosing and owning the property.  Even though the law would require the bank to pay $3,000.00 in the above example, the association’s governing documents may allow the bank to pay zero!  SO……………MAKE SURE YOUR GOVERNING DOCUMENTS DO NOT CONTAIN SUCH A PROVISION AND IF THEY DO – AMEND IT IMMEDIATELY BEFORE FORECLOSURES IN YOUR COMMUNITY POSSIBLY BECOME ROUTINE!  DON’T LET THE BANKS OFF THE HOOK!

Next week we’ll talk about what happens when a third party buys the property at a foreclosure sale and not the bank.  You definitely will want to find out the good and the potential for disaster.

 

You can read more articles from Eric Glazer on his Blog. 

 

Tags: , ,
NEW LAW MAKES IT CLEAR THE ASSOCIATION MUST MAKE THE REPAIRS. BUT SUPPOSE MONEY IS TIGHT AND THE DOCS ARE RESTRICTIVE?

NEW LAW MAKES IT CLEAR THE ASSOCIATION MUST MAKE THE REPAIRS. BUT SUPPOSE MONEY IS TIGHT AND THE DOCS ARE RESTRICTIVE?

  • Posted: Jul 27, 2023
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on NEW LAW MAKES IT CLEAR THE ASSOCIATION MUST MAKE THE REPAIRS. BUT SUPPOSE MONEY IS TIGHT AND THE DOCS ARE RESTRICTIVE?

NEW LAW MAKES IT CLEAR THE ASSOCIATION MUST MAKE THE REPAIRS. BUT SUPPOSE MONEY IS TIGHT AND THE DOCS ARE RESTRICTIVE?

NEW CONDO LAW MAKES IT CLEAR THAT THE CONDO MUST MAKE THE REPAIR

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

I get so many calls and e-mails each week about whether the condominium or the unit owner is responsible to fix something that’s broken.  Florida Statute 718.113 was recently amended and here’s what it says:

 

(1)   Maintenance of the common elements is the responsibility of the association, except for any maintenance responsibility for limited common elements assigned to the unit owner by the declaration. The association shall provide for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of the condominium property for which it bears responsibility pursuant to the declaration of condominium.

 

That kind of clarifies it, doesn’t it?  The association shall provide for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of the condominium property for which it bears responsibility pursuant to the declaration of condominium.  Notice the word shall is used.  In simple terms, shall means must.  So there is no argument……if the declaration says the association is responsible, the association must repair it.

But suppose the association does not have money to make the repair?  Now what?  The association can certainly special assess right?  But suppose the docs place a limit on the amount of the special assessment or require a unit owner vote to approve a special assessment and the unit owners won’t vote in favor of it?  Now what can you do?

Of course you may be able to borrow money.  Florida’s not for profit statute allows condominiums to borrow money.  So, the condo is in the clear right?  Not so fast.  Suppose the condo docs require a vote of the owners in order for the condo to borrow money and the owners won’t vote in favor of a loan?

 

How can the condominium make the repairs it is required by law to make if it can’t assess or borrow?

So here is this attorney’s opinion.  I don’t care about any language in a declaration that prevents an association from passing an assessment in order to make mandatory repairs.  The board can and must pass the assessment in order to comply with their statutory obligation to repair and maintain the common property.

On the other hand, if the governing documents do not prevent an association from borrowing money, the association certainly can.  However……if the governing documents will not allow the association to borrow money unless a certain number of the owners approve, the association cannot borrow unless the owners vote to approve.  No bank will approve a loan if the governing documents require the owners to vote in order to borrow, and the vote has not been obtained.  Get legal advice if you need money and you feel tied up by your docs.

 

Tags: ,
ANOTHER NEW LAW:  HB 437 — FLAGS, TURFS AND BOATS

ANOTHER NEW LAW:  HB 437 — FLAGS, TURFS AND BOATS

ANOTHER NEW LAW:  HB 437

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

I can’t tell you how may fights I have been involved in regarding flags other than the U.S. flag flying above someone’s home and the fact that someone put down fake grass or stored a boat, that nobody can see, in their backyard.  Well, here’s a new statute that solves both of those problems:

Florida Statute 718.113

If any covenant, restriction, bylaw, rule, or requirement of an association prohibits a homeowner from displaying flags permitted under this paragraph, the homeowner may still display one portable, removable United States flag or official flag of the State of Florida in a respectful manner up to two of the following, and one portable, removable flags official flag, in a respectful manner, not 48 larger than 4 1/2 feet by 6 feet:, which represents

  1. The United States flag.
  2. The official flag of the State of Florida.
  3. A flag that represents the United States Army, Navy,  Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force, or Coast Guard., or
  4. A POW-MIA flag.
  5. A first responder flag. A first responder flag may incorporate the design of any other flag permitted under this paragraph to form a combined flag. For purposes of this subsection, the term “first responder flag” means a flag that recognizes and honors the service of any of the following: a. Law enforcement officers as defined in s. 943.10(1).
  6. Firefighters as defined in s. 112.191(1).
  7. Paramedics or emergency medical technicians as those terms are defined in s. 112.1911(1).
  8. Correctional officers as defined in s. 943.10(2).
  9. 911 public safety telecommunicators as defined in s. 401.465(1).
  10. Advanced practice registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, or registered nurses as those terms are defined in s. 464.003.
  11. Persons participating in a statewide urban search and rescue program developed by the Division of Emergency Management under s. 252.35.
  12. Federal law enforcement officers as defined in 18 U.S.C. s. 115(c)(1), regardless of any covenants, restrictions, bylaws, rules, or requirements of the association.

In addition, in an HOA, the homeowner may erect a 20 foot flagpole on any portion of their property and fly the U.S. flag and any of the flags mentioned above.

Florida Statute 720.3045 now states:

Regardless of any covenants, restrictions, bylaws, rules, or requirements of an association, and unless prohibited by general law or local ordinance, an association may not restrict parcel  owners or their tenants from installing, displaying, or storing any items on a parcel which are not visible from the parcel’s frontage or an adjacent parcel, including, but not limited to, artificial turf, boats, flags, and recreational vehicles.

I’m getting ready for lots of fights regarding visibility of boats as boat owners will look to save the costs of monthly storage.

Tags: ,
As a community association manager, you are responsible for overseeing and managing the operations of an association

As a community association manager, you are responsible for overseeing and managing the operations of an association

WHY WE CAN’T REVIEW LEGAL DOCUMENTS

By Rafael Aquino  ( see below the article )

As a community association manager, you are responsible for overseeing and managing the operations of an association. Board members rely heavily on their expertise and knowledge to ensure the smooth functioning of the association. However, there are times when board members may ask a CAM to assist them in tasks outside their job responsibilities.

One such task is reviewing legal documents for the association. While it may seem like a simple task, it is not something that community association managers are permitted to do. This is because reviewing legal documents requires legal expertise and knowledge, which only a licensed attorney can provide.

Certain ethical and legal obligations bind community association managers. We are not licensed to provide legal advice or services, and doing so could put our license and reputation at risk. It is essential to understand that giving legal advice or services without a license is illegal and could lead to severe consequences.

If a board member asks you to review legal documents, you must inform them that you are not permitted to do so. Instead, it would be best if you recommended that they consult with a licensed attorney specializing in community association law. This will protect your license and reputation and ensure that the association receives the best possible legal advice.

It is also important to note that if a community association manager recommends a particular provider for legal services, it is for a reason. When recommending a provider, they do so based on their knowledge and experience in the industry.

To put it in perspective, it would be like asking a dentist to perform brain surgery. While both are in the medical field, they require vastly different skill sets and knowledge. Just like a dentist would recommend a neurosurgeon for brain surgery, a community association manager would recommend a licensed attorney for legal services.

In conclusion, as community association managers, we must understand and uphold our ethical and legal obligations. Reviewing legal documents is not within the scope of our job responsibilities, and it is important to recommend a licensed attorney for such tasks. By doing so, we are protecting our license and reputation and ensuring that the association receives the best possible legal advice.

For more information about Rafael P. Aquino and Affinity Management Services

please visit www.ManagedByAffinity.com or call 1-800-977-6279

Tags: ,

PENNY WISE POUND FOOLISH By Eric Glazer, Esq.

PENNY WISE POUND FOOLISH By Eric Glazer, Esq.

PENNY WISE POUND FOOLISH

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

In light of the new laws requiring mandatory inspections, mandatory repairs and mandatory reserve studies, some associations are looking to cut back and save money. 

That’s not a bad idea; unless you’re cutting back on your legal counsel reviewing all of the contracts provided to you by those engineers, architects or general contractors who perform any of these inspections or repairs.

I’m starting to see more of this and it’s an alarming trend.  It boggles my mind that an association would spend millions of dollars on a contract for repair of their property, but won’t spend a few hours on their attorney reviewing that contract first.  No question in my mind that the failure of the Board to have that contract reviewed by counsel before signing, is a breach of their fiduciary duty to the unit owners they represent.

I teach a class called “Before You Sign That Contract.”  It talks about so many ways in which the association can suffer financial loss by having the wrong clauses in the contract or by failing to insert certain clauses into the contract.  Once sentence can potentially cost the association hundreds of thousands of dollars.  And you chose to cheap out on a few hours of attorney’s time?  Really?

Even smaller contracts need to be reviewed.  If the association does not have the proper remedies in the contract for the contractor’s breach, the situation can turn into a long lasting nightmare where the association will never be made whole.  And…….the association will have to spend its own attorney’s fees now to correct the problem with no chance of recovering them later on.

We are about to enter into a historic time here in Florida where these types of contracts will be flying off the shelves. 

They will be everywhere, in every condominium.  Be careful.  If you didn’t hear me the first time, I said BE CAREFUL AND DON’T BE CHEAP.  GET LEGAL HELP BEFORE SIGNING.

DON’T COME TO ME AFTER YOU SIGNED A CONTRACT AND SAY “HEY ERIC…OUR ASSOCIATION SIGNED THIS MULTI MILLION DOLLAR CONTRACT.  CAN YOU NOW GET US OUT OF IT?

THE ANSWER IS OFTEN TIMES……NO I CANNOT.  YOU SHOULD HAVE ASKED ME TO LOOK AT IT BEFORE SIGNING IT.

Tags: ,
A FEW BIG CHANGES IN THE LAW By Eric Glazer, Esq.

A FEW BIG CHANGES IN THE LAW By Eric Glazer, Esq.

A FEW BIG CHANGES IN THE LAW

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

Believe it or not, it’s getting harder to sue someone or to sue a business in the State of Florida.

First, it’s more risky now to sue your insurance company.  The typical case that comes to mind is the one where a condominium association sues its own insurance company for failing to pay for roof damage because the insurance company does not believe the storm caused all that damage.  Until now, there was no risk for the condominium association.  The attorney took the case on a contingency and, if the association won the case the association would be entitled to an award of attorney’s fees against the insurance company.  And, even if the association lost, the association did not have to pay attorney’s fees to the lawyers for the insurance company.  In other words, the risk of paying attorney’s fees only ran one way.  No longer.  Now the association has no right to collect attorney’s fees against their insurer even if the case is settled or won.  The association bears the risk of not having their fees paid by their carrier which should ultimately result in a smaller recovery.

Perhaps the biggest change to the law since I’m in practice went into effect last week.  The statute of limitations regarding negligence actions went from four (4) years to two (2) years.  That is a bombshell.

The law is primarily intended to go after personal injury lawyers and prevent personal injury cases from winding up in the courtroom.  From a condominium and HOA perspective the change in the law will also have major effects.  For example, all claims for damages to condominium or HOA property caused by someone else now have to be filed in two years and not four.  This could be damage caused by contractors the association hire, or unit owners who live or rent on the property.

There are some other bills of interest that may pass during the legislative session and if they do, I’ll let you know.

 

Tags:
ALL ABOUT E-MAILS By Eric Glazer, Esq.

ALL ABOUT E-MAILS By Eric Glazer, Esq.

  • Posted: Mar 08, 2023
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on ALL ABOUT E-MAILS By Eric Glazer, Esq.

ALL ABOUT E-MAILS

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

 

There really is a lot to know when it comes to e-mails.  Here’s a brief outline:

Can Directors Communicate and Vote By e-mail?

Members of the board of administration may use e-mail as a means of communication but may not cast a vote on an association matter via e-mail.

Example:  Friday night is a board meeting.  On the agenda is whether or not to hire Joe’s Landscaping Service.  Between now and Monday the Board members can send e-mails to each other suggesting whether or not to hire Joe’s.  Even if all decide to hire Joe’s, that vote must still take place Friday night at the properly noticed Board meeting.

Are these e-mails official records of the association, accessible to the unit owners?

E-mails on the personal computers of individual directors are not official records of the condominium association. The property of an individual director does not become the property of the association because of his office on the board.  Even if directors communicate among themselves by e–mail strings or chains, about the operation of the association, the status of the electronic communication on their personal computer would not change.

Similarly, an e–mail to an individual director or to all directors as a group, addressed only to their personal computers, is not written communication to the association. This must be so because there is no obligation for a director to turn on the personal computer with any regularity, or to open and read e–mails before deleting them.  The conclusion may be different if the association owns a computer on which the management conducts business including e–mails (analogous to government public records); or if e–mails are printed up and passed around for discussion at a board meeting.

Does that Mean A Director’s E-mail can Never Be Seen By Anyone?

Just because the e-mail may not be an “official record” of the association does not mean that nobody can ever get to see it.  Trust me, if the association is involved in litigation, and I serve a subpoena on a director for their e-mails which may have relevant information, the court will require production of those e-mails.  So board members be warned, before you hit the SEND button think about whether or not you would be comfortable with a judge, jury or opposing counsel reviewing it as well.

Are the E-mail Addresses of the Unit Owner’s an Official Record obtainable by an Owner?

E-mail addresses are not accessible to the unit owners, unless the reason why the association is in possession of that e-mail address is because the unit owner signed a form consenting to receive notices by e-mail.

Have any additional questions?  Send us an e-mail.

Tags: ,
THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE – AFRAID TO PASS REQUIRED EDUCATION

THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE – AFRAID TO PASS REQUIRED EDUCATION

THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE – AFRAID TO PASS REQUIRED EDUCATION

DOES THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE WANT YOU TO REMAIN DUMB?

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

For those of you who are intelligent and decided to come to a Board Certification class in the last few months and learn all about the new safety and reserve laws, I applaud you.  It was my honor meeting you and teaching you all over the state.

I love that look in your eyes and the groan that comes over the crowd when I tell you that you do not need to be here today.  You did not have to get certified by taking what I believe is both a board certification and a life safety class.  The Florida Legislature still allows Board members to get certified by signing a ridiculous form that says you have read your governing documents and you promise to enforce them.

Are the new safety and reserve laws found in your governing documents?  Of course not.  You have to be taught them to know what you are now required to do in order that another Champlain Towers disaster never happens again.  You don’t learn these laws by staying home in your pajamas, printing a form off the computer and signing it.  When the members of your Board can get certified by signing that self-serving form, lives are at risk.

It’s ironic that they placed language in the new laws requiring the directors to follow them or face breach of fiduciary duty charges.  So…..according to The Florida Legislature, you must apply these new laws in your condominium, you just don’t have to learn them and know what is actually required of you.

Every legislator I have ever spoken to about a mandatory educational course in order to get Board certified is in favor of it.  Yet, it remains a mystery why in the past it has been removed from the statute.  The classes are free and are even accessible via ZOOM.  This year, there are several condominium bills floating around at the moment.  Not a single one has any mention of mandatory education for Board members.

Back to the title “Does The Florida Legislature Want You To Remain Dumb?”  How else would you explain it?

Tags: , ,
JUST WALK AWAY – By Eric Glazer, Esq.

JUST WALK AWAY – By Eric Glazer, Esq.

JUST WALK AWAY

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

I was recently watching an interview of a black belt in karate.  In addition he was built like The Hulk.  He started to say what he does when someone curses him out and even challenges him to a fight.  I was certainly expecting him to describe how he turns others into rubble.  On the contrary, he said that whenever he finds himself in that position, instead of fighting back, he simply walks away.  To say I was originally surprised is an understatement.  I mean this guy could pulverize any opponent.  Instead, he chooses to just walk away.

He spelled out why.  If he beats someone up he faces both criminal and civil charges.  And for what?  Because some dope said a few nasty words about him?  Much better to just walk away from any situation that allows for it.  Wow, I was impressed by this guy’s brain, not just his muscle.

It got me to thinking about my career in condominium and HOA law.  How much time in my life did I spend hearing board members and unit owners verbally go at each other.  How much time in my life did I spend hearing unit or homeowners argue with other unit or homeowners?  It’s ridiculous.

In none of these arguments was anything accomplished whatsoever.  They were all a waste of time for those arguing and everyone who unfortunately had to listen to the nonsense.  I’ve seen physical fights break out and even walkers and canes fly through the air.  And for what?  What was accomplished?  Nothing.

So, board members, unit owners, home owners and even managers, I’m talking to you.  Next time someone is looking for a fight, do what the karate guy does, walk away.  It will probably drive the other person crazy.

[AdSense-A]

 

Tags: ,