Become our Member : JOIN SFPMA TODAY   LogIn / Register: LOGIN/REGISTER

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

Natural Gas Fuel Stations  by Becker Lawyers

Natural Gas Fuel Stations by Becker Lawyers

  • Posted: Dec 02, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Natural Gas Fuel Stations by Becker Lawyers

Natural Gas Fuel Stations

 BY  / of Becker

A few years ago, the Florida Legislature recognized that the use of electric vehicles conserves and protects the state’s environmental resources, provides significant economic savings to drivers, and serves an important public interest.  As a result, the Legislature created Section 718.113(8), Florida Statutes, to allow unit owners to install electric vehicle charging stations within the boundaries of the unit owner’s limited common element parking area.  During the 2021 legislative session, the Legislature expanded the statute to allow unit owners to also install natural gas fuel stations for a natural gas fuel vehicle.  The term “natural gas fuel” is any liquefied petroleum gas product, compressed natural gas product, or a combination of these products used in a motor vehicle. The term includes all forms of fuel commonly or commercially known or sold as natural gasoline, butane gas, propane gas, or any other form of liquefied petroleum gas, compressed natural gas, or liquefied natural gas. However, the term does not include natural gas or liquefied petroleum placed in a separate tank of a motor vehicle for cooking, heating, water heating, or electricity generation.

While the board may not prohibit a unit owner from installing an electric vehicle charging station or a natural gas fuel station within the boundaries of a limited common element or exclusively designated parking area, the board can impose certain requirements, including, but not limited to, a requirement that the electric vehicle charging station or natural gas fuel station must be separately metered or metered by an embedded meter and payable by the unit owner installing such charging or fuel station.

In addition to expanding the statute for natural gas fuel vehicles, the Legislature also amended the statute to give associations the authority to install or operate an electric vehicle charging station or a natural gas fuel station upon the common elements or association property as a common expense, and such installation does not constitute a material alteration to the common elements or association property.  As alternative fuel vehicles become more and more popular and as car manufacturers continue to transition away from gas vehicles, condominium associations now have the ability to add electrical vehicle charging stations and/or natural gas fuel stations on the common elements or association property to accommodate these new types of vehicles by a vote of the board of directors only.

Associations should take a proactive approach to this issue and consider adopting a policy for unit owner installed electric vehicle charging stations and/or natural gas fuel stations.  In addition, associations should start considering whether there are areas on the common elements or association property that would accommodate these installations by the association for the use of all owners as a common expense.

 

Tags: ,
Webinar: Why You Need Good Governing Documents by Becker Lawyers

Webinar: Why You Need Good Governing Documents by Becker Lawyers

  • Posted: Nov 24, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Webinar: Why You Need Good Governing Documents by Becker Lawyers

Webinar: Why You Need Good Governing Documents

Learn why it’s important for condo and community associations to have “good governing documents” and how that is the starting point for effective enforcement. Some of the topics covered will include:

  • Maintenance Responsibilities
  • Conflicts within governing documents and with the statutes
  • Sale and Lease Restrictions
  • Material Alterations

 

————————-

SPEAKERS:

Joseph Adams
SHAREHOLDER
Becker
jadams@beckerlawyers.com

Kevin L. Edwards
SHAREHOLDER
Becker
kedwards@beckerlawyers.com

 

Tags:
Real Estate Boom Meets the Crypto Boom Here in Miami – HUGO ALVAREZ

Real Estate Boom Meets the Crypto Boom Here in Miami – HUGO ALVAREZ

  • Posted: Nov 21, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Real Estate Boom Meets the Crypto Boom Here in Miami – HUGO ALVAREZ

Real Estate Boom Meets the Crypto Boom Here in Miami

Like our climate, there is no denying that South Florida’s real estate market has been scorching hot.  But while South Florida is well known for its real estate booms and busts, the current cycle is also running right into the latest technological wave – cryptocurrency.

Home prices have climbed to record numbers.  Those prices have been driven by a lack of supply but also by COVID related work and travel restrictions, which make year-round warm weather climates like South Florida very attractive.

At the same time, and while more people are staying at home to work, we have also seen a surge in cryptocurrency demand.  At the time this is posted, Bitcoin is trading at prices greater than $65,000 and analysts are predicting that its price will rise higher by year’s end and beyond.

Miami is currently undergoing a tech boom of its own.  This tech boom coincides with the ongoing and growing demand for cryptocurrency coupled with its unique geographic location.  Miami has hosted, and will continue to host, numerous high profile cryptocurrency events.  And with those high-profile events we will see more demand for our real estate.

All this to say, it is only a matter of time before using cryptocurrency to purchase real estate becomes routine.  We are not there yet but that day is coming.

Opening potential real estate transactions to crypto holders broadens the pool of buyers that sellers can sell to.  But doing so is not without risk.

Crypto is unregulated and prone to fraud.  Crypto transactions may violate certain laws and regulations intending to govern “traditional” transactions.  For instance, the anonymity associated with cryptocurrency may prove challenging when trying to trace the source of the funds which is often a requirement for a “traditional” real estate transaction.  Additionally, given the volatile nature of the crypto price fluctuations it may be difficult to peg the actual sales price of the real estate until the “very last minute.”  And then there are numerous tax implications associated with any crypto transaction that may further complicate a real estate transaction.

While there are numerous challenges in rendering a crypto transaction common place today, with the advent of Web 3.0, and the continued growth of cryptocurrency, it is only a matter of time before real estate transactions are routinely funded in this way.

And Miami, with its booming tech movement and thriving real estate market, will be at the forefront of this coming trend.

Feel free to contact me should you wish to discuss Miami’s ongoing tech movement, crypto, or real estate in general.


Hugo Alvarez

HALVAREZ@beckerlawyers.com

Tags: , , ,
Sunshine Laws” for Condominium Associations

Sunshine Laws” for Condominium Associations

  • Posted: Nov 16, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Sunshine Laws” for Condominium Associations

Sunshine Laws” for Condominium Associations

by Becker

Florida’s Sunshine in the Government Act, (“Sunshine Laws”) requires transparency and disclosure in government and business. Although the Sunshine Laws do not apply to condominium associations, the Florida Condominium Act (“Act”) found in Chapter 718, Florida Statutes, contains its own set of “sunshine” requirements for these communities, with transparency being the key to compliance. Issues generally arise in condominiums when there is or appears to be a lack of transparency between the board of directors and the association members.

First, boards need to determine which gatherings must be open to association members. While boards may desire to avoid certain topics in open meetings, the Act requires board meetings to be open to members; in fact members have a statutory right to attend such meetings. A “meeting” of the board occurs when a quorum of the board members is present. There are two statutory exceptions to the requirement that board meetings must be open to the members: 1) meetings with the association’s attorney to discuss proposed or pending litigation, if the meeting is held for the purpose of seeking or rendering legal advice, and 2) when “personnel matters” are under discussion. Personnel matters should be limited to discussions of specific issues pertaining to association employees. So, can individual board members meet or call one another to discuss association business as long as the meeting or phone call comprises less than a quorum of the board? Yes. However, remote meetings of a quorum of the board still constitute meetings that must be open to members. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Act provides that members of the board of administration may use e-mail as a means of communication but may not cast a vote on an association matter via e-mail.

The second important “sunshine” law is the noticing of meetings. The requirement that meetings be open to members is of little benefit if owners do not know when or where the meetings are taking place. Under the Act, notice of all board meetings must be posted conspicuously on the condominium property for at least 48 hours before the meeting. However, certain meetings, such as meetings where non-emergency special assessments or amendments to rules regarding unit use are considered, require notices to be mailed, delivered, or electronically transmitted to the unit owners AND posted conspicuously on the condominium property not less than 14 days prior to the meeting. The notices also need to clearly identify the agenda items that will be discussed at the meeting.

The Act also provides owners certain rights at board meetings. Owners have a right to speak at all open board meetings on all designated agenda items. The right to speak does not mean that every unit owner is entitled to endlessly debate motions, but it does mean that the owners are entitled to be heard regarding matters the board intends to consider at the meeting. The association may adopt written reasonable rules governing the frequency, duration and manner of unit owner statements. Owners may also record or videotape such meetings.

What about committees? The sunshine laws also apply to committees that are empowered to take final action on behalf of the board, or committees that make recommendations to the board regarding the association budget. Under the Act, all committees are subject to sunshine requirements unless the association bylaws specifically exempt committees from the sunshine laws.
If you have questions about these laws and how to handle meetings in your community, contact your community association attorney.

 

Employment Law Change That Community Associations Should Be Aware Of : by Ned Bassen, Jamie B. Dokovna

Employment Law Change That Community Associations Should Be Aware Of : by Ned Bassen, Jamie B. Dokovna

  • Posted: Nov 11, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Employment Law Change That Community Associations Should Be Aware Of : by Ned Bassen, Jamie B. Dokovna

Employment Law Change That Community Associations Should Be Aware Of

by Ned Bassen, Jamie B. Dokovna of Becker Lawyers

Senate Bill 1532 amending §409.2576, Florida Statutes went into effect. Previously, only employers with 250 or more employees were required to report newly hired and re-hired individuals to Florida’s State Directory of New Hires within 20 days of hiring. Independent contractors were excluded. Now, as of October 1, any employer, regardless of the number of employees that is a “service recipient” defined as “a person engaged in a trade or business who pays an individual for services rendered in the course of such trade or business” must report all new hires and re-hires to the State’s database. Additionally, employers must report their independent contractors who are paid $600 or more during a calendar year.

 

The purpose of the statute is to provide information to the Florida Child Support Program to facilitate the collection and disbursement of child support payments and to monitor and enforce child support payments. The statute, however, is silent regarding penalties for failing to report. That said, employers with less than 250 employees should update their onboarding process to include the new reporting requirements and all employers regardless of size should determine whether reporting requirements exist for any independent contractor used by them, update onboarding policies to reflect the changes in the law and provide training for those who perform onboarding and payroll, so they are aware of these changes.

by Ned Bassen, Jamie B. Dokovna ( Learn more click our V Cards )

   

Tags: , ,
“Community Associations Affected by the 2021 Legislative Session Part X,” News-Press

“Community Associations Affected by the 2021 Legislative Session Part X,” News-Press

  • Posted: Oct 26, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on “Community Associations Affected by the 2021 Legislative Session Part X,” News-Press

 

Our attorneys are thought leaders in their field who keep our clients updated on the latest developments in their areas of interest. Explore our robust library of articles, blog posts, guidebooks, media commentary, and news.

 

“Community Associations Affected by the 2021 Legislative Session Part X,” News-Press

This week continues our review of the 2021 legislative changes affecting Florida community associations focusing on two bills that address COVID-19 pandemic legal issues.

Senate Bill 72 took effect on March 29, 2021. This law was initially reported in this column on April 25, 2021. SB 72 outlines the legal process a plaintiff must follow to bring a claim based on an alleged COVID-19 infection from the defendant’s premises. The new law creates several legal hurdles for a plaintiff seeking damages, including the requirement that the complaint (initial lawsuit filing) be accompanied by an affidavit signed by a physician licensed in the State of Florida stating the physician’s belief within a reasonable degree of medical certainty that the plaintiff’s COVID-19 injury was the result of the defendant’s acts or omissions.

The statute requires that the court first hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the defendant made a good faith effort to comply with public health standards. If the court finds that the defendant did make such a good faith effort, the defendant is immune from liability.

If the court determines that the defendant did not make a good faith effort, the plaintiff may proceed with the lawsuit, but the plaintiff must show that the defendant committed gross negligence in order for the defendant to be held liable. Gross negligence is a much higher standard than is required in most civil lawsuits.

Senate Bill 2006 became effective July 1, 2021. Section 252.36 of Florida Statutes, which deals with the emergency management powers of the Governor, was amended to provide that an executive order, proclamation, or rule establishing a state of emergency must be limited to a duration of not more than 60 days and may be renewed as necessary during the duration of the emergency. If renewed, the order, proclamation, or rule must specifically state which provisions are being renewed. Further, at any time, the Legislature, by concurrent resolution, may terminate a state of emergency or any specific order, proclamation, or rule thereunder. Upon such concurrent resolution, the Governor shall issue an executive order or proclamation consistent with the concurrent resolution.

Section 252.38(4) of the Florida Statutes addresses emergency orders imposed by political subdivisions, meaning local governments such as counties, cities, towns, and villages. Local orders issued in response to hurricanes or other weather-related emergencies are not covered by this law. The new law vests the Governor with power, at any time, to invalidate an emergency order issued by a political subdivision if the Governor determines that such order unnecessarily restricts individual rights or liberties. The law grants broad discretion to the Governor in determining what local orders “unnecessarily restrict individual rights or liberties.” Obviously, these changes were the result of the plethora of sometimes complicated and occasionally contradictory local orders regarding COVID-19, especially during the early phases of the pandemic.

New Section 381.00316 of the Florida Statutes, states that a “business entity” may not require “patrons or customers” to provide any documentation certifying COVID-19 vaccination or post-infection recovery to gain access to, entry upon, or service from the entity’s business operations. The law does not otherwise restrict instituting screening protocols consistent with authoritative or controlling government-issued guidance to protect public health.

The term “business entity” includes not-for-profit corporations and would therefore include community associations. However, there is substantial debate whether the new prohibition against “vaccine passports” applies to owners, residents, or others in a community, specifically whether such persons are “customers” or “patrons.” If an entity violates the statute, the Department of Health may impose a fine not to exceed $5,000.00 per violation.

 

Joseph Adams is a Board Certified Specialist in Condominium and Planned Development Law, and an Office Managing Shareholder with Becker & Poliakoff. Please send your community association legal questions to jadams@beckerlawyers.com. Past editions of the Q&A may be viewed at floridacondohoalawblog.com.

 

Tags: ,
Becker provides a variety of resources to help our community association board members, managers, and owners thrive.

Becker provides a variety of resources to help our community association board members, managers, and owners thrive.

  • Posted: Oct 08, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Becker provides a variety of resources to help our community association board members, managers, and owners thrive.

Becker provides a variety of resources to help our community association board members, managers, and owners thrive. From educational classes to a leading industry blog and podcast, informative videos, and other ancillary services and products geared exclusively to community associations, we’re here to help you navigate the complexities of community living.

 

NEW PODCAST
Take it to the Board with
Donna DiMaggio Berger

 

As leaders in Community Association Law, we not only helped write the law – we also teach it.
Becker’s robust continuing education program provides over 200 classes per year on a variety of topics ranging from board member certification to compliance, and everything in between.

Our most popular classes are now available online!

PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE
Interdisciplinary Sea Level Rise Advisory Team

 

Community Association Industry Trailblazers: Becker Continues to Deliver Cutting-Edge Technologies

Your Site. Your Way. Same Day! Provide owners with easy access to association documentation with this legally compliant website management solution.

 

Seamlessly facilitate and increase member participation in important votes with this easy-to-use, secure voting software solution that’s compliant with state law.

 

 

 

Annual Retainer Benefits

  • Preferred Hourly Billing
  • Annual Meeting & Election Notice Packages
  • Preferred Pricing for BeckerBALLOT.com
  • Exclusive Access to MyCommunitySite.com Discounts
  • Online Collections Status Reporting Portal
  • Community Association Leadership Lobby (CALL) Membership
  • First access to Becker’s Community Association Guidebook Series

For more information on becoming an annual retainer client, please call 954.987.7550.

 

 

 

 

 

Tags:
Absentee Owners and Unoccupied Condominium Units by Becker

Absentee Owners and Unoccupied Condominium Units by Becker

  • Posted: Oct 05, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Absentee Owners and Unoccupied Condominium Units by Becker

Absentee Owners and Unoccupied Condominium Units

 

In condominium associations throughout the state, it is common for there to be seasonal unit owners who leave their units unoccupied during portions of the year. For associations faced with periodically unoccupied units in multifamily condominium buildings, there are distinct legal issues worth considering in advance of problems arising.

Florida’s Condominium Act (the “Act”) does not require absentee unit owners to have their unoccupied units periodically inspected for damage or deterioration. To overcome the absence of a statutory requirement, associations may adopt amendments to their declaration of condominium so that such inspection requirements are enacted to avoid problems originating in unoccupied units going undetected and/or unreported for long periods. Additionally, while the Act authorizes associations to “operate” association-installed hurricane protections to guard against damage to the condominium property, it does not require such protection to be installed. Therefore, it may be prudent to require all unit owners, including but not limited to absentee owners, to install such protection. To incentivize compliance, Section 718.111(11)(j), Florida Statutes provides that the responsibility for damages not paid for by insurance proceeds is shifted from the association to unit owners when such damages result from the unit owners’ failure to comply with the association’s declaration or rules.

The Act provides associations with an irrevocable right of access to enter units when necessary to undertake maintenance of common elements, and as necessary to prevent damage to common elements or to a unit. Associations should ensure that their documents or rules require a working key to all exterior doors and/or that contact information for local persons caring for unoccupied units be provided to the association. It is not recommended for an association to wait until an emergency arises before first contemplating how it will gain access to unoccupied units.

Fortunately, this subject is one that most association law practitioners have addressed in one manner or another. Condominium associations that find themselves concerned about unoccupied units are encouraged to discuss this with legal counsel so that a strategy for dealing with such units may be developed.

 

   Read and Learn through a wealth of Informative Articles Provided by Becker Lawyers and Partners.  https://www.floridacondohoalawblog.com/category/insight/

And don’t forget:  BeckerBALLOT.com  When your Community has a VOTE and you need simply the best way for everyone to be involved!

Once your Board adopts a Resolution which offers an online voting system option for your members, those members consenting to vote online will be invited to register and vote using BeckerBALLOT.

Your association will be asked to provide a roster of eligible voters (members who have consented) to BeckerBALLOT.

Eligible voters will be invited to activate their account online and vote!

Tags: ,
Should Condominium Associations Be Permitted to Invest Operating & Reserve Funds? SB 1490 Says Yes!

Should Condominium Associations Be Permitted to Invest Operating & Reserve Funds? SB 1490 Says Yes!

  • Posted: Sep 27, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Should Condominium Associations Be Permitted to Invest Operating & Reserve Funds? SB 1490 Says Yes!

Should Condominium Associations Be Permitted to Invest Operating & Reserve Funds? SB 1490 Says Yes!

For years there have been significant legal constraints on a condominium association’s ability to use reserve funds. In addition to the statutory requirement to obtain membership approval for non-designated reserve usage, the prevailing school of thought was that association funds could not be invested since investments can and do fail.

A newly filed bill by Senator Jason Pizzo, SB 1490, could create a significant change in terms of an association’s ability to invest the community’s operating and reserve funds in depositories other than a traditional bank or savings and loan.

The bill provides as follows:

“Unless otherwise prohibited in the declaration, and in accordance with s. 718.112(2)(f), an association, including a multicondominium association, may invest any funds in one or any combination of investment products described in this subsection.”

If this bill passes and an association invests funds in any type of investment product other than a depository account, the association must meet all of the following requirements:

The board shall annually develop and adopt a written investment policy statement and select an investment adviser who is registered under s. 517.12, F.S. and who is not related by affinity or consanguinity to any board member or unit owner. Any investment fees and commissions may be paid from the invested reserve funds or operating funds.

The investment adviser selected by the board shall invest any funds not deposited into a depository account in compliance with the prudent investor rule in s. 518.11, F.S. It is important to note that the statutory prudent investor rule is a test of conduct and not resulting performance. Under this statute, no specific investment or course of action is, taken alone, considered prudent or imprudent. Instead, the investment adviser is deemed to be acting as a fiduciary and he or she may invest in every kind of property and type of investment, subject to that statute.

The fiduciary’s investment decisions are evaluated on the basis of whether he or she exercised reasonable business judgment regarding the anticipated effect on the investment portfolio as a whole under the facts and circumstances prevailing at the time of the decision or action. Although the proposed statute requires that funds invested be subject to insurance under the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, it is important to note that this insurance is only there if the brokerage firm fails, not if the investment turns out to be ill-advised and loses the association’s money.

The investment adviser shall act as a fiduciary to the association in compliance with the standards set forth in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 at 29 U.S.C. s. 1104(a)(1)(A)-(C).

At least once each calendar year, the association shall provide the investment adviser with the association’s investment policy statement, the most recent reserve study report or a good faith estimate disclosing the annual amount of reserve funds which would be necessary for the association to fully fund reserves for each reserve item, and the financial reports.

The investment adviser shall annually review these documents and provide the association with a portfolio allocation model that is suitably structured to match projected reserve fund and liability liquidity requirements. There must be at least thirty-six (36) months of projected reserves in cash or cash equivalents available to the association at all times.

Portfolios managed by the investment adviser may contain any type of investment necessary to meet the objectives in the investment policy statement; however, portfolios may not contain stocks, securities, or other obligations that the State Board of Administration is prohibited from investing in under ss. 215.471, 215.4725, and 215.473, F.S. or that state agencies are prohibited from investing in under s. 215.472.

Lastly, the bill would exempt registered investment advisors from having their bids subjected to the competitive bidding requirements found in Section 718.3026, F.S. The companion bill to SB 1490 is HB 1005 (Killebrew/Fine).

As more associations change their old habits and begin to fund reserves, the allure of more aggressive investment vehicles for these funds, which can be substantial amounts, is undeniable. However, the risk is also undeniable. As such, if this bill becomes law and the investment of reserves becomes available, boards are strongly encouraged to take an extremely cautious, measured approach with reserves.

While investment of your association’s operating and reserve funds might result in a substantially better return than a savings account, you might also see significant losses. The investment of association funds must be done with careful consideration of the demographic in your community, the age of your buildings and facilities, the required liquidity of your funds and, most importantly, the sensitivities and risk tolerance of your membership all taken into account. If your members fuss about your board’s landscaping decisions imagine the potential fallout if you make the wrong investment decisions!

 

Tags: , , ,