Become a Member: JOIN SFPMA TODAY   LogIn / Register: LOGIN/REGISTER

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

Association Operations During Covid-19 | Episode 13 | Focus on Phase 3 by Kaye Bender Rembaum

Association Operations During Covid-19 | Episode 13 | Focus on Phase 3 by Kaye Bender Rembaum

  • Posted: Oct 22, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Association Operations During Covid-19 | Episode 13 | Focus on Phase 3 by Kaye Bender Rembaum

Association Operations During Covid-19 | Episode 13 | Focus on Phase 3

by Kaye Bender Rembaum

Watch the Video Listen and Learn! <Click the Link!

Kaye Bender Rembaum is a full service commercial law firm devoted to the representation of more community associations throughout Florida. Under the direction of attorneys Robert L. Kaye, Esq., Michael S. Bender, Esq., and Jeffrey A. Rembaum, Esq. Kaye Bender Rembaum is dedicated to providing clients with an unparalleled level of personalized and professional service regardless of their size and takes into account their individual needs and financial concerns.
The associates of Kaye Bender Rembaum establish relationships with clients to understand their needs and goals. Kaye Bender Rembaum assists clients in all matters of Association representation including, but not limited to, collection of assessments, contract negotiation, covenant review and amendment, covenant enforcement and construction defect claims. Kaye Bender Rembaum also keeps clients up-to-date on new developments in the law and how they are personally affected by them.Kaye Bender Rembaum provides prompt, effective, high quality, cost-efficient and understandable legal advice and services to a diverse client base. Associates strive to help clients operate and administer their communities better and to educate them on their responsibilities and duties under Florida law and their governing community documents. Robert Kaye, Michael Bender and Jeff Rembaum are industry leaders who are often sought out by public policy makers and the media for advice and commentary on community association law.The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. Thank you for your interest in Kaye Bender Rembaum

 

Tags: , ,
Association Publication of Deadbeat List & Third-Party Purchaser Assessment Liability: by KBRLegal

Association Publication of Deadbeat List & Third-Party Purchaser Assessment Liability: by KBRLegal

Association Publication of Deadbeat List & Third-Party Purchaser Assessment Liability:

by KBRLegal

Two New Cases Board Members and Managers Need to Know About

 

CASE No. 1: On June 12, 2020, the Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal (“5th DCA”) entered its opinion in Latheresa Williams, On Behalf Of Herself And All Others Similarly Situated v. Salt Springs Resort Association, Inc., and Bosshardt Property Management, LLC., Case No. 5D18-3913 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020), The holding of this case echoes advice I have all too often provided to board members and managers to NOT publish what is commonly referred to as a “deadbeat list.” This type of list is posted in the community and identifies each debtor’s name and sometimes the assessment balance past due, too. No good ever comes from publication of such a list. In fact, the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (the “FCCPA”) forbids it if such publication of the deadbeat list is to harass and/or annoy the debtor.

 

More specifically, section 559.72, Florida Statutes, provides in relevant part that “[i]n collecting consumer debts, no person shall… [p]ublish or post, threaten to publish or post, or cause to be published or posted before the general public individual names or any list of names of debtors, commonly known as a deadbeat list, for the purpose of enforcing or attempting to enforce collection of consumer debts.”

 

In this case, the plaintiff was seeking class action status for all others similarly treated. This could lead to tremendous liability should discovery later evidence that the association and/or its management company regularly published deadbeat lists. At trial, the court had granted a motion to dismiss filed by the association based on a prior case, Bryan v. Clayton, also a 5th DCA case dating back to 1977 where the Court held that maintenance assessments were not “debts” for purposes of the FCCPA. In order to re-consider the prior Bryan decision, all of the 5th DCA sitting appellate judges participated in the Williams case, a process legally known as an “En Banc” style of review.

 

The Court in Williams took note that the FCCPA is designed to protect consumers and does not limit unlawful activities only to “debt collectors,” but rather to “all persons” involved in the collection of a debt. By way of contrast, the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FFDCPA) applies only to debt collectors, which excludes the association and arguably its management company, and not to “all persons” involved in the collection of a debt, as in the FCCPA.

 

Under the prior Bryan holding, a past due assessment obligation was not even considered a “debt” for purposes of the FCCPA and the FFDCPA. In the recent Williams case, the Court went to great lengths to explain that, in fact, an association assessment obligation “is a debt which arose out of an obligation by a consumer out of a money, property, insurance or services transaction which is primarily for personal, family, or household purposes” and is therefore subject to FCCPA.

 

Thus, the Court remanded the case back to the trial court for further proceedings. While, its unknown how the plaintiff’s attempt for a class action certification will resolve, it is extremely likely that one or more defendants will be found to have violated the FCCPA for having published the “deadbeat list.” The takeaway from the Williams case is to never, ever publish a list of association debtors. This does not at all mean that the board cannot be provided a list of those members delinquent in their assessment obligations. However, it does mean such a list should not be made readily available to the membership by posting or mailing, etc.

 

 

CASE No. 2: On May 20, 2020, Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal entered its opinion in Old Cutler Lakes by the Bay Community Association, Inc. v. SRP SUB, LLC, Case No. 3D19-528 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) regarding the liability of a third-party purchaser at a mortgage foreclosure sale for assessments that came due prior to the third-party acquiring title to the property. The Court’s holding in this case is in line with its prior holding in the case of Beacon Hill Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Colfin Ah-Florida 7, LLC, 221 So. 3d 710 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017), which based its decision on the landmark case decided by Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal in Pudlit 2 Joint Venture, LLP v. Westwood Gardens Homeowners Association, Inc., 169 So.3d 145 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

 

In the Old Cutler Lakes case, SRP SUB, LLC (“SRP”) was the successful bidder at a foreclosure sale on a first mortgage held by Wells Fargo. After obtaining title by a certificate of title, SRP filed an action for declaratory relief seeking a determination as to its liability for assessments that accrued prior to the issuance of the certificate of title. In relevant part, the Declaration of Covenant and Restrictions of Old Cutler Lakes by the Bay (“Declaration”) provided the following:

 

The sale or transfer of any Lot pursuant to the foreclosure or any proceeding in lieu thereof of a first mortgage meeting the above qualifications, shall extinguish the lien of such assessments as to payments which became due prior to such sale or transfer.

 

This language is similar to the language contained in the declarations in the Beacon Hill and Pudlit 2 cases. In these cases, the courts applied a constitutional principal prohibiting the impairment of contracts in deciding that the statutory safe harbor did not control over the provisions of the declarations where the statute did not require such application and the declarations did not contain “Kaufman” language, which has the effect of making amendments to the Florida Statutes automatically applicable to a declaration as they are “amended from time to time.” As the provisions of the declarations expressly created rights for third-party purchasers, the third-party purchasers are “intended third-party beneficiaries” to such provisions which rights cannot be impaired pursuant to the constitutional principal prohibiting the impairment of contracts. In following the holdings of the Beacon Hill and Pudlit 2 cases, SRP was found not liable for any of the past due assessments that accrued prior to the issuance of the certificate of title. Thus, as with many declarations which have not been amended since their creation by the community’s developer, these, as yet to be amended, declarations may provide for a complete wipe out of all assessments that accrued prior to the transfer of title as a result of a mortgage foreclosure action or by deed in lieu of foreclosure.

 

The takeaway from the cases discussed above emphasizes the importance of reviewing and updating the association’s declaration, with the guidance of your association’s legal counsel, to ensure that it provides for necessary and available protections for the association and its members, including the use of “Kaufman” language, if appropriate to collect as much overdue assessment revenue as possible.

 

 

The Kaye Bender Rembaum Team Remains Available To You and Your Community Association

The health and safety of your Community and all residents is very important to us. We also realize that our clients have uncertainty and concerns around the continuing operation of your Community, and our team of attorneys will remain available to all of you during these times.

Be sure to check out our very useful and informative COVID-19 section on our website, which is updated regularly, as we continue to follow developments affecting community associations. You can visit it by clicking HERE.

 

 

 

Tags: , ,
community association boards completely overlook the significance of who is serving as the association’s registered agent. by Donna DiMaggio Berger

community association boards completely overlook the significance of who is serving as the association’s registered agent. by Donna DiMaggio Berger

 

Far too many community association boards completely overlook the significance of who is serving as the association’s registered agent. I’ve found associations whose registered agent is a former board member who is either deceased or who has moved away or a former law firm or lawyer who no longer represents the association.

Pursuant to Section 607.0501,F.S, the duties of a registered agent are to forward to the corporation at its official address any process, notice, or demand which is served on or received by the registered agent. If the registered agent fails in this regard, the association may miss crucial litigation deadlines as well as Code compliance hearings which can result in substantial damage to the association. Current board members and managers should also seriously consider whether they are up to the task of serving as Registered Agent as that role does come with potential liability.

 

Donna DiMaggio Berger is a Board Certified Specialist in Condominium and Planned Development Law as well as a Fellow in the College of Community Association Law a prestigious national organization which recognizes excellence and ethics in the field of community association law. Ms. Berger has counseled condominium, cooperative, timeshare, mobile home and homeowner associations throughout Florida.  Her work with these communities includes covenant enforcement, covenant amendment, contract review and drafting, collections and foreclosures, as well as advising these associations about the statutory and documentary guidelines for the daily administration of their communities.

Ms. Berger has led various advocacy initiatives working with legislators and other public policy makers on behalf of those who live, serve and work in common interest ownership communities. She has testified before the Florida Legislature regarding community association law and frequently appears on radio talk shows and in print media discussing these issues.

 

 

Tags: , , ,
Q&A Broward County Emergency Order 20-22 – Impact on Community Associations by Campbell Property Management and Michael Bender from Kaye Bender Rembaum

Q&A Broward County Emergency Order 20-22 – Impact on Community Associations by Campbell Property Management and Michael Bender from Kaye Bender Rembaum

  • Posted: Jul 20, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Q&A Broward County Emergency Order 20-22 – Impact on Community Associations by Campbell Property Management and Michael Bender from Kaye Bender Rembaum

Q&A Broward County Emergency Order 20-22 – Impact on Community Associations

WEBINAR Florida Register

Q&A Broward County Emergency Order 20-22 – Impact on Community Associations Cases are rising FAST in Florida. Your Broward County Leaders have reacted to this by imposing new regulations and making existing regulations more restrictive.  Make sure you understand the impact on your Condo or HOA! Join Campbell Property Management and Michael Bender from Kaye Bender Rembaum to learn about Broward County’s latest Emergency Order 20-22 and its impact on community associations during this brief, 30 minute webinar. Thursday, July 23 at 12:00 PM Please submit a question you would like us to answer when you register. We will address as many questions as possible during the webinar. Register Here! This webinar is for Broward County community associations only.

Tags: , ,
WAIT – IT GETS WORSE By Eric Glazer, Esq. Published July 13, 2020

WAIT – IT GETS WORSE By Eric Glazer, Esq. Published July 13, 2020

  • Posted: Jul 13, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on WAIT – IT GETS WORSE By Eric Glazer, Esq. Published July 13, 2020

WAIT – IT GETS WORSE

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

I recently explained how lucky the banks are when they foreclose on a unit or a home and take back ownership.  The law protects them, and despite how much the unpaid condo or HOA assessments are, the bank is only responsible for the lesser of one year of assessments or 1% of the mortgage.  Many of you are outraged over that and I’m with you.

The association always hopes that a 3rd party buys the property at the bank’s foreclosure sale instead of the foreclosing bank, because under the law, a 3rd party, unlike the bank, would owe all past due assessments to the association.

But even though the law requires some payments to the association, your condo or HOA may get zero because of a terrible provision that may be looming in your governing documents.  Despite the fact that the law requires banks to pay the lesser of one year of assessments or 1% of the mortgage, and requires a 3rd party purchaser to pay all past due assessments, many of you have provisions in your governing documents that say the banks owe nothing when they take back ownership of a home or unit after a foreclosure and that a 3rd party purchaser owes nothing if they buy the property at a foreclosure sale.  That’s right, not a penny is owed to the association.  You are wiped out.

So what controls, the law or your governing documents?  In May Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal ruled in Old Cutler Lakes by the Bay Community Association v. SRP SUB .  A third party purchaser took title to a unit within the community via a bank mortgage foreclosure auction.

The governing documents contained the following provision: “The sale or transfer of any Lot pursuant to the foreclosure or any proceeding in lieu thereof of a first mortgage meeting the above qualifications, shall extinguish the lien of such assessments as to payments which became due prior to such sale or transfer.”

The Third DCA concluded that the 3rd part purchaser at the sale is not liable for any of the past-due assessments, attorney’s fees and/or costs that accrued prior to its acquiring title.

So what do you do now?  Check your governing documents.  Make sure they don’t contain a similar provision.  If they do, you certainly want to talk you’re your attorney about amending them properly so you at least get the crumbs owed to the association when a bank forecloses.

 

Click the banner below, Read other Articles.

 

Tags: , ,
FACIAL COVERING REQUIREMENTS COUNTY BY COUNTY & A HAND SANITIZER RECALL by Kaye Bender Rembaum

FACIAL COVERING REQUIREMENTS COUNTY BY COUNTY & A HAND SANITIZER RECALL by Kaye Bender Rembaum

  • Posted: Jul 06, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on FACIAL COVERING REQUIREMENTS COUNTY BY COUNTY & A HAND SANITIZER RECALL by Kaye Bender Rembaum

FACIAL COVERING REQUIREMENTS COUNTY BY COUNTY & A HAND SANITIZER RECALL

by Kaye Bender Rembaum

Below you will find face covering requirements for Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Manatee Counties. In addition, the cities of Hallandale and Aventura are disucussed.

Where appropriate, face covering requirements for those living in condominiums and homeowners’ associations are discussed as well.

A recall was issued for a certain manufacture of hand sanitizer products which is presented immediately below the face covering information.

 

PALM BEACH COUNTY

Palm Beach County Order No. 2020-012 provides that effective June 25, 2020, facial coverings are required to be worn in public.  Specifically, facial coverings are required to be worn in:

 

i) Businesses and establishments of any type, including, without limitation, restaurants, retail stores, grocery stores, gyms, indoor recreational facilities and vehicles for hire,

ii) Public places, including outdoor areas that are open and regularly accessible, and outdoor common areas within private communities, where social distancing is not possible or not being practiced, 

iii) Palm Tran transit services, and

iv) County and municipal governmental facilities. 

 

Facial coverings are defined under the Palm Beach County Order as any covering which snugly covers the nose and mouth, whether store bought or homemade, mask or clothing covering, including, but not limited to, a scarf, bandana, handkerchief, or other similar cloth covering and which is secured in place. The Order is clear that facial coverings are required to be worn in outdoor common areas within private communities accessible to more than one housing unit where social distancing cannot be accomplished or is not being practiced.

One must also wear a facial covering while working in or visiting businesses and establishments, including indoor recreational facilities.

Businesses and establishments are further required to ensure compliance with the Order and establish a process for verification of compliance upon customer entry into the establishment, and to conspicuously post a specific sign in three languages (CLICK HERE TO LINK-http://discover.pbcgov.org/pdf/covid19/Retail-Mask-Poster.pdf) indicating that persons must wear facial coverings and maintain social distancing.

The Order does not specifically identify indoor common elements or common areas of condominium and homeowners’ associations as businesses or establishments where facial coverings must be worn. However, due to the fact that any type of business or establishment must comply and indoor recreational facilities are specifically listed as establishments in the Order, we believe that the Order likely applies to indoor common element and common area facilities.  Therefore, we recommend that you treat your indoor facilities as establishments under the Order until further orders or guidance is provided by the County.  This means that associations should monitor and require compliance with facial covering requirements, particularly in indoor recreational facilities, and conspicuously post the designated sign required by the Order.

There are exceptions to the facial covering requirements for certain individuals and in certain situations where they are not feasible, including, but not limited to, by children under two (2), by persons who have medical conditions such as asthma or COPD, and while consuming food or beverages.  However, the exceptions are limited and should be implemented in accordance with the Order so as not to cause the spread of the virus.  Finally, compliance is serious as the county has now indicated that fines and penalties may be issued for businesses that do not comply. Whether this includes associations is to be determined.

 

BROWARD COUNTY

Generally, facial coverings must be worn anytime you obtain a good or service from any establishment, including entering, exiting, and otherwise moving around within the establishment (and must be worn by persons working in those establishments during in-person interactions).

The covering should cover the nose and mouth, and comply with the CDC recommendations on the use and sanitation of such coverings. There are certain limited exemptions, including, without limitation, children under the age of two or children of any age while in the custody of licensed childcare facilities, persons with medical conditions, or during the time-period when you are receiving a good/service that precludes wearing a facial covering (e.g., eating, drinking, receiving a facial grooming).

Violations are subject to potential civil penalties (fines) and/or criminal enforcement (2nd degree misdemeanor).  Suspected violations can be reported to local municipal code enforcement.  The Broward County Order does not specifically require facial coverings within private residential communities (condos/HOAs). Please note, however, that cities may have stricter requirements than the county, so you should confirm with your city accordingly.

Any questions concerning the county requirements can be directed to the County COVID19 Hotline: ‪(954) 357-9500.

 

The relevant FAQ from the county, and the three (3) Orders are below:

FAQ about Facial Coverings from County: https://www.broward.org/CoronaVirus/Documents/FacialCoveringsFAQs.pdf

EO #12: https://www.broward.org/CoronaVirus/Documents/EmergencyOrder20-12.pdf

EO #13: https://www.broward.org/CoronaVirus/Documents/EmergencyOrder20-13.pdf

EO #14: https://www.broward.org/CoronaVirus/Documents/EmergencyOrder20-14.pdf

 

CITY OF HALLANDALE

Facial coverings are required within the common areas of all buildings with multiple residents per Emergency Order HB20-12.

 

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD

All persons beyond legal boundary of residential property are required to wear facial coverings consistent with CDC guidelines as per Emergency Order 2020-06.

 

 

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY

Miami-Dade County issued Emergency Order 20-20 on April 9, 2020 (“Order 20-20”) which requires that all persons working in or visiting grocery stores, restaurants, pharmacies, construction sites, public transit vehicles, vehicles for hire, and locations where social distancing measures are not possible to wear facial coverings. In other words, face masks are required where social distancing is not possible. The Order defines a facial covering as “any covering which snugly covers the face and mouth, whether store bought or homemade, and which is secured with ties or ear loops.”

On May 15, 2020, Miami-Dade County issued Emergency Order 23-20 (“Order 23-20”) further providing that anyone “working in or visiting an establishment, including but not limited to airports, seaports, and mass transit facilities and vehicles” must wear a facial covering as described in Order 20-20. However, Order 23-20 provides an exemption for children under the age of two years, persons who have trouble breathing, where federal or state safety regulations prohibit the wearing of facial coverings, and for persons engaged in strenuous physical activity.

On May 27, 2020, Order 23-20 was amended to provide an additional exemption to the facial covering requirement “while persons are eating or drinking.” Additionally, Order 23-20 adopts The New Normal; A Guide for Residents and Commercial Establishments (the “New Normal Guidelines”) which includes industry specific protocols for the reopening of retail and commercial establishments, including general reopening guidelines that provide that facial coverings must be worn inside businesses and commercial establishments or wherever social distancing is not possible.

On June 22, 2020, Mayor Carlos A. Gimenez released a statement regarding the importance of wearing masks and social distancing. He reiterated that masks are required indoors at business establishments and outdoors when people cannot practice social distancing to remain at least six (6) feet apart. In his statement, Mayor Gimenez acknowledged the stricter rules issued by some municipalities in Miami-Dade County, including Miami, North Miami Beach, Aventura, Hialeah, and Miami Gardens.

 

CITY OF AVENTURA

As pertains to community associations, the City Manager of Aventura issued Emergency Order Number 12 (“Order 12”) which provides additional mandates requiring the use of facial coverings in the interior “Common Areas” of commercial buildings and residential condominium and cooperative buildings. Order 12 provides that common areas include lobby/reception areas, hallways, elevators, mailrooms, clubhouse/meeting rooms, and stair wells. That means that you are required to wear a mask in any interior common areas of condominium or cooperative buildings in the City of Aventura. It is important to note that Order 12 provides that property managers/building managers are required to enforce the facial covering requirement.

 

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY

Order 2020-27 went into effect on 5pm June 24, 2020.  The order does not specifically apply to community associations as they are not a “business” under the order. Face coverings must be worn inside all indoor establishments. Businesses are required to enforce the mask order and can be charged with a second-degree misdemeanor if they don’t, a penalty of up to 60-days in jail and/or six months’ probation and a $500 fine.  The exception does not apply to children under two, persons with pre-existing medical conditions that would be worsened by a mask, hearing-impaired persons, those working in a profession that would be unable to perform their duties with a mask such as public safety, exercising, eating and drinking, or those already observing federal social distancing guidelines (the 6-foot rule).

Tampa is the only exception in Hillsborough where the mask rule would apply to community associations.  if you are outside your home, you must wear a face covering and if no face covering,  up to a $500 citation could be issued.  This would apply to community associations whenever a resident is outside of their residence.

 

PINELLAS COUNTY

Order 20-14 went into effect on 5pm June 24, 2020. Face coverings must be worn in all indoor public places in Pinellas County.  While not specifically drafted to apply to community associations, the definition of indoor public place would cover community associations when the residents can access the facility.  The only exceptions applicable to community associations are if less than 10 people are in the facility and they are practicing social distancing.  Parties not wearing a mask can receive a civil citation of $100 for a first offense, $250 for a second and $500 for a third. Additional repeat violations may result in a misdemeanor arrest.  The exceptions mirror those of Hillsborough County and Pinellas’s enforcement cannot conflict with the Americans with Disabilities Act.  The Order does not apply to government entities or hospitals or persons under the age of 18.

 

PASCO COUNTY

Order went into effect ‪5pm on June 25, 2020.  Face coverings must be worn inside all businesses, government offices, and schools.  The definition of businesses is nebulous enough to ensnare community associations under the “providing services to the public” standard.  If someone does not wear a mask in the aforementioned places, they will not be able to enter the business, or will be removed once inside. Individual business owners are required to enforce the ordinance or may face a fine up to $250. The exceptions mirrors Hillsborough County and Pasco’s enforcement cannot conflict with the Americans with Disabilities Act.  It is suggested you speak with your community association’s attorney due to the lack of specificity in Pasco County’s Order to determine if the Order may apply to your community association.

 

MANATEE COUNTY

No mask requirements.

 

 

HAND SANITIZER RECALL 

The Food and Drug Administration issued a warning on nine alcohol-based hand sanitizers manufactured by Eskbiochem SA de CV in Mexico because  it contains wood methanol, a toxic substance.  It can result in death if ingested or if  absorbed through the skin.

“Consumers who have been exposed to hand sanitizer containing methanol should seek immediate treatment, which is critical for potential reversal of toxic effects of methanol poisoning,” the FDA wrote on June 19.”

Following is list of the hand sanitizers manufactured by Eskbiochem:

 

All-Clean Hand Sanitizer (NDC: 74589-002-01)

Esk Biochem Hand Sanitizer (NDC: 74589-007-01)

CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 75% Alcohol (NDC: 74589-008-04)

The Good Gel Antibacterial Gel Hand Sanitizer (NDC: 74589-010-10)

CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 80% Alcohol (NDC: 74589-005-03)

CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 75% Alcohol (NDC: 74589-009-01)

CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 80% Alcohol (NDC: 74589-003-01)

Saniderm Advanced Hand Sanitizer (NDC: 74589-001-01)

 

 

Tags: , , ,
New Guidelines for Community Associations – Stricter Disciplinary Civil Penalties of Noncompliance Now In Effect

New Guidelines for Community Associations – Stricter Disciplinary Civil Penalties of Noncompliance Now In Effect

  • Posted: Jun 22, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on New Guidelines for Community Associations – Stricter Disciplinary Civil Penalties of Noncompliance Now In Effect

Florida’s Department of Business and Professional Regulation Issues New Guidelines for Community Associations

Stricter Disciplinary Civil Penalties of Noncompliance Now In Effect

 

Board members and property managers of condominium communities need to be aware that the State of Florida’s Department of Business and Professional Regulation issued revisions to rules pertaining to violations and penalties, 61B-21, Condominium Resolution Guidelines for Unit Owner Controlled Associations,

The disciplinary guidelines detail minor violations and penalty guidelines within Chapter 718, F.S.  If a violation is deemed minor, the division will send a Notice of Noncompliance to the association. A community association’s failure to timely comply with the Notice of Noncompliance may result in sanctions, including civil monetary damages and enforcement. For the violations not deemed minor by the division, there is no longer a notice/warning requirement and, if found guilty of the violation, the Association may be fined pursuant to the new standards in the rule.   Rulemaking Authority 120.695, 718.501(1)(d)6., (f) FS. Law Implemented 718.501(1)(d)6. FS. History–New 6-4-98, Amended 10-23-18. 

 These disciplinary guidelines were enacted to inform affected parties about the range of penalties which may be imposed for violations, pursuant to subsection 61B-21.003 detailing penalty guidelines in the following categories: Accounting Records, Assessing, Board, Budgets, Commingle, Common Expenses, Conflict of Interest, Converter Reserves, Debit Card, Elections, Estoppel Certificate, Final Order, Fiduciary Duty, Investigation, Property, Records, Reporting, Reserves, Special Assessment and Website.

 

“It is important for community associations and the governing boards to understand the consequences and potential monetary ramifications they will face if they do not abide by these new guidelines,” said Frank J Mari, Director of State of Florida Property Management Association. “Ignoring or not fully compiling with the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation’s rules, as well as Chapter 718, Florida Statutes, in a timely manner can have a detrimental effect on an association’s financial standing.”

If an association fails to comply with a Notice of Noncompliance, a civil penalty will be imposed between $5 and $10, per unit, for each minor violation. The penalty will be assessed beginning with the middle of the specified range and adjusted either up or down based upon any aggravating or accepted mitigating circumstances. The minimum total penalty to be assessed shall be calculated according to these guidelines or $500, whichever amount is greater. In no event shall a penalty for a minor violation exceed $2,500, the statutory maximum for a single minor violation. For all other violations (those not deemed to be minor), the penalty imposed is between $10-$30 per unit for each violation and the statutory maximum is $5,000.00. For both types of violations, multiple counts of the violated provision or a combination of the listed violations are added together to determine an overall total penalty.

 

SFPMA – State of Florida Property Management Association is an Organization in Florida that Advocates Educates for Members in the Condo, HOA and Property Management Industry. On behalf of our Industry Members our goal is to keep the industry informed and Provide information for their protection. We have on our Website sfpma.com resources where Board Members, Property Managers can Learn, Network, Engage and Find Top Companies that work in the industry – Search for companies on our Members Directory

Legal Sponsors: KBRLegal.com – Pompano Beach and Palm Beach offices. are the Legal Sponsors for our Association we value the important information and articles they provide for our industry.

 

 

Tags: , , ,
WEBINAR: GUEST RESTRICTIONS AND SCREENING by Kaye Bender Rembaum Today at 1pm Register Now..

WEBINAR: GUEST RESTRICTIONS AND SCREENING by Kaye Bender Rembaum Today at 1pm Register Now..

  • Posted: Jun 16, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on WEBINAR: GUEST RESTRICTIONS AND SCREENING by Kaye Bender Rembaum Today at 1pm Register Now..

WEBINAR: GUEST RESTRICTIONS AND SCREENING by Kaye Bender Rembaum

by KBRLegal.com

Date/Time
Date(s) – 2020-06-16
1:00 pm – 2:00 pm

Location
Pompano Beach Office

Course #: 9630142 | Provider #: 0005092  |  1 CE Credit in HR or ELEOne registrant per form will be accepted.
Limited to the first 100 to register

REGISTER HERE

Online bookings are not available for this event.

 

Tags: , ,
Stay Ahead of the Curve: Lessons in Technology Learned from Covid-19 by Jeffrey Rembaum, Esq. Kaye Bender Rembaum

Stay Ahead of the Curve: Lessons in Technology Learned from Covid-19 by Jeffrey Rembaum, Esq. Kaye Bender Rembaum

  • Posted: Jun 04, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Stay Ahead of the Curve: Lessons in Technology Learned from Covid-19 by Jeffrey Rembaum, Esq. Kaye Bender Rembaum

Stay Ahead of the Curve:  Lessons in Technology Learned from Covid-19

by Jeffrey Rembaum, Esq.   Kaye Bender Rembaum

 

The statutory emergency powers granted to community associations as a result of the Covid-19 State of Emergency proved to be a valuable resource for the orderly operations of Florida’s community associations. Many associations had to make significant changes to how they conducted the business of their association. For example, holding board meetings via “Zoom” and “GotoWebinar” became invaluable. But, when the State of Emergency is over can annual meetings and board meetings continue to take place on the internet? Sure they can, subject to the important considerations explained below. In addition, what other technologies can be utilized by the board?

 

 In fact, at the present time there are three statutory grants of technology that an association can utilize to make conducting the business of the association easier on a regular basis. They include, holding meetings electronically, voting electronically, and using email as an official means of communication to the members rather than the U.S. Postal Service. Electronic board meetings allow the board to continue conducting the business of the association without putting themselves or others in harm’s way. But even more than that, by attending electronically think of all of the gas that is saved since no one has to drive to the meeting. More than that, think of the extra time spent not driving or walking to the meeting and how it could be used as family quality time or just to relax.

 

However, if the board chooses to use video conferencing, it is important to remember that the board must comply with the statutory provisions regarding board meetings. The members must receive notice of the meeting pursuant to the bylaws of the association, and in any event, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Additionally, condominium association members must have the right to speak to all designated agenda items and HOA members also get the additional right to speak on any item discussed by the board (this is because from a strict statutory interpretation condominium association boards are only supposed to address what is set out on the agenda, while such restriction does not apply to HOA boards). Remember, there is no exception to the meeting notice requirements and the need to provide opportunity for member comment. Therefore, any video conferencing software the board utilizes must allow members to virtually attend the meeting and have the opportunity to speak.

 

The second technology that associations can utilize to make life easier is electronic voting. Florida law allows condominiums, homeowners associations, and cooperatives to conduct elections and other owner votes electronically. When an association board adopts electronic voting, each member of the association must opt in, in writing, and can then vote safely from the comfort of their own home. Imagine all of the time saved by punching a computer button to get the tally, rather than counting by hand, in some instances over 1,000 votes!

 

To adopt electronic voting, the Board must first adopt a resolution authorizing an online voting system. The board resolution must provide that members will receive notice of the opportunity to vote online and must establish reasonable procedures and deadlines for members to consent, in writing, to online voting, and procedures for members to opt out of online voting. Once the board has approved electronic voting, the board must select an online voting system that complies with the requirements of Florida law. The online voting system must be able to do the following: (1) authenticate the owner’s identity, (2) authenticate the validity of each electronic vote to ensure that the vote is not changed during transmission, (3) transmit a receipt to each owner who casts an electronic vote, (4) be able to separate any authentication or identifying information from the ballot when voting must be done by secret ballot, and (5) be able to store and keep electronic votes accessible for recount, inspection, and review purposes.

 

Please take note that the board cannot force owners to vote electronically. Thus, a necessary step is to obtain each member’s written consent to participate in electronic voting. If an owner does not consent or opts out of electronic voting, then the board must allow that owner to paper vote.

 

The third technology an association can utilize which saves money, paper and time, is using electronic notices for official association communications. In other words, give up postage stamps in favor of using e-mail. Generally, associations are required to send official notices via mail or hand delivery. However, the association may choose to send notice via e-mail but only if an owner has provided their written consent to receive their notices electronically.

 

E-mails used for official association communications can only be sent to those owners who consent, in writing, to receive their official notices by electronic transmission. The written consent must specifically authorize the association to transmit notice electronically. An owner who has consented to electronic notice may opt out at any time. The association must retain a roster of the e-mail addresses and the written consents of owners as an official record of the association. The member is responsible to ensure the association’s emails are not blocked or categorized as spam. Failure to receive an email due to a member’s inability to receive the email will not be a valid reason for objecting. Budget adoption notices, annual meeting notices, election notices, board meeting notices and so much more can be provided via email.

 

  Over the last several months, many associations have had to learn how to utilize technology to conduct the business of their association during the Covid-19 pandemic. Some have done so correctly and likely others have not. Thus, in utilizing any of the technology discussed in this article, an important step is to consult with your association’s attorney to ensure proper compliance with all the statutory requirements. Let us also turn a negative into a positive by continuing to use technology to assist the association with smooth operation. Who knows, perhaps one day, there will be a way for members to virtually enjoy the amenities, too. Until then, you’ll find me at the pool deck.

 

 

Jeffrey Rembaum’s, Esq.

legal practice consists of representation of condominium, homeowners, commercial and mobile home park associations, as well as exclusive country club communities and the developers who build them. Mr. Rembaum is a Certified Specialist in Condominium and Planned Development Law. He is the creator of “Rembaum’s Association Roundup,” an e-magazine devoted to the education of community association board members, managers, developers and anyone involved with Florida’s community associations. His column appears monthly in the Florida Community Association Journal. Every year since 2012, Mr. Rembaum has been selected to the Florida Super Lawyers list, and was also named Legal Elite by Florida Trends Magazine.

He can be reached at 561-241-4462.

 

Tags: , , ,
Upcoming Events for the week of May 18

Upcoming Events for the week of May 18

  • Posted: May 21, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Upcoming Events for the week of May 18

Upcoming Events for the week of May 18-23

You can View the events on our Calendar

 

ASSOCIATION CONTINUITY and OTHER COVID-19 CONCERNS: Episode3

Thursday May 21, 2020
12 Noon – 1:00pm
Castle Group’s Craig Vaughan and Attorneys Michael Bender & Jeffrey Rembaum bring you this event.

 

 

 

BOARD CERTIFICATION FOR CONDOMINIUMS, COOPERATIVES AND HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATIONS

May 21 @ 12:00 pm – 2:00 pm
Learn the basics of Fiduciary duty, financial reporting and budget preparation, meetings and meeting notices, elections, fraud prevention, and much more! Enjoy a fun class while at the same time fulfilling the State’s Board Member certification requirements.
Provider: 0007237 Course: 9626870
Instructor: William and Susan Raphan / Katzman Chandler

 

Condo Craze & HOAs HOSTED BY – ERIC M. GLAZER, ESQUIRE

SUNDAYS AT 11:00 a.m. ON 850 WFTL

May 24 @ 11:00 am – 12:00 pm

 

Become a Licensed Property Manager

Online Courses for Licensing can be completed while your at home.

This might be a great time to Take your online Testing and become a CAM

CAM License Courses and Board Members Certification in Florida

 

 

ProLicense Florida CAM LICENSE COURSE 

ProLicense Florida Pre – CAM LICENSE COURSE

ProLicense Florida Continuing Education

 

Florida CAM Courses – BECOME A PROPERTY MANAGER (CAM)

Florida CAM Courses – ONLINE STATE COURSES Pre Licensing

Florida CAM Courses – ONLINE STATE COURSES Continuing CAM Education

 

Florida Cam Schools Licensing

Florida Cam Schools Pre Licensing

Florida Cam Schools Continuing Education

 

 

Tags: , , ,
From One Disaster to the Next / Hurricane Season Starts June 1

From One Disaster to the Next / Hurricane Season Starts June 1

  • Posted: May 09, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on From One Disaster to the Next / Hurricane Season Starts June 1

From One Disaster to the Next

Hurricane Season Starts June 1

 

    If the effects of the Covid-19 virus were not enough, June 1st begins Florida’s unenviable hurricane season. Never has it been more important to board members and managers to understand the emergency powers approved by the legislature and codified into Florida Statutes in Chapters 718, 719 and 720 for use during a declared “state of emergency.”  Many associations have already utilized these powers in their efforts to curb the Covid-19 virus from spreading.  If you are not yet familiar with these powers, well, you need to become learned before disaster strikes.
    The statutorily required pre-requisite to utilizing the legislative emergency powers is that the Governor of the State of Florida has declared a “state of emergency”.  Importantly, when exercising emergency powers, there should be a rational relationship between the action undertaken and the disaster itself.  For example, an emergency special assessment needed to fix the condominium roof damaged by a hurricane during a state of emergency makes good sense. However, just because there was a hurricane and a state of emergency declared, does not mean the emergency powers can be used to levy a special assessment to build a new gazebo, most especially when there was never a gazebo before.
  The Covid-19 situation illustrates to many seasoned community association lawyers that the emergency powers granted by the legislature were drafted for use in response to, and in preparation for, natural disasters. More specifically, “in response to damage caused by an event for which a state of emergency is declared.”  Suffice it to say, use of the emergency powers to help contain a virus epidemic was likely not contemplated. Nevertheless, circumstances warranted that the emergency powers be utilized during the Covid-19 crisis for which a state of emergency was indeed declared. Likely, as a result of the Covid-19 virus, the community association emergency powers granted by the Florida legislature will be tweaked by the legislature in its next session to provide for better applicability to an ever-evolving world where states of disaster are not limited to weather events alone.
    The specific emergency powers legislation can be found in section 718.1265 Florida Statutes for condominium associations, section 720.316 Florida Statutes for homeowners’ associations and section 719.128 Florida Statutes for cooperative associations.  While each are very similar, there are a few subtle differences that go beyond the scope of this article.  Also, it should be noted that an association can amend its governing documents to prohibit a board member’s use of the statutory emergency powers.  Perhaps, one justifiable reason to do so would be if the membership approves its own version of emergency powers which most obviously should be discussed with the association’s legal counsel before considering to do so.
    A few of the emergency powers that are common to all of Florida’s community associations, unless otherwise provided, include:
  1. Conduct board meetings and membership meetings with notice given as is practicable under the circumstances.
  2. Cancel and reschedule any association meeting.
  3. Name as ‘assistant officers’ persons who are not directors, which assistant officers shall have the same authority as the executive officers to whom they are assistants during the state of emergency to accommodate the incapacity or unavailability of any officer of the association.
  4. Relocate the association’s principal office or designate alternative principal offices.
  5. Enter into agreements with local counties and municipalities to assist counties and municipalities with debris removal.
  6. Implement a disaster plan before or immediately following the event for which a state of emergency is declared which may include, but is not limited to, shutting down or off elevators; electricity; water, sewer, or security systems; or air conditioners.
  7. Based upon advice of emergency management officials or upon the advice of licensed professionals retained by the board, determine any portion of the property unavailable for entry or occupancy by unit owners, family members, tenants, guests, agents, or invitees to protect the health, safety, or welfare of such persons.
  8. Require the evacuation in the event of a mandatory evacuation order.
  9. Based upon advice of emergency management officials or upon the advice of licensed professionals retained by the board, determine whether the property can be safely inhabited or occupied.
  10. As to condominiums, mitigate further damage, including taking action to contract for the removal of debris and to prevent or mitigate the spread of fungus, including, but not limited to, mold or mildew, by removing and disposing of wet drywall, insulation, carpet, cabinetry, or other fixtures on or within the condominium property, even if the unit owner is obligated by the declaration or law to insure or replace those fixtures and to remove personal property from a unit.
  11. As to condominiums, contract, on behalf of any unit owner or owners, for items or services for which the owners are otherwise individually responsible, but which are necessary to prevent further damage to the condominium property. In such event, the unit owner or owners on whose behalf the board has contracted are responsible for reimbursing the association for the actual costs of the items or services, and the association may use its lien authority provided by s. 718.116 to enforce collection of the charges. Without limitation, such items or services may include the drying of units, the boarding of broken windows or doors, and the replacement of damaged air conditioners or air handlers to provide climate control in the units or other portions of the property.
  12. As to homeowners’ associations,  mitigate further damage, including taking action to contract for the removal of debris and to prevent or mitigate the spread of fungus, including mold or mildew, by removing and disposing of wet drywall, insulation, carpet, cabinetry, or other fixtures on or within the association property.
  13. Regardless of any provision to the contrary and even if such authority does not specifically appear in the declaration of condominium, articles, or bylaws of the association, levy special assessments without a vote of the owners.
  14. Without unit owners’ approval, borrow money and pledge association assets as collateral to fund emergency repairs and carry out the duties of the association when operating funds are insufficient.

These emergency powers are limited to that time reasonably necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the association and the owners and the owners’ family members, tenants, guests, agents, or invitees and shall be reasonably necessary to mitigate further damage and make emergency repairs.

 

Please be sure to review the legislation that is specifically applicable to your type of association, be it a condominium, cooperative or homeowners’ association, as the above powers were presented for purposes of this article.

Prior to taking any action, consultation with the association’s attorney is an absolute must as this article is intended to provide useful information for consideration and not specific legal advice.  Stay safe!

(Reprinted with permission from the May 2020 edition of the Florida Community Association Journal and as written by attorney Jeffrey Rembaum)

 

 

Tags: , ,