Become our Member : JOIN SFPMA TODAY   LogIn / Register: LOGIN/REGISTER

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

Community Associations Threatened With Website Litigation Under the ADA

Community Associations Threatened With Website Litigation Under the ADA

  • Posted: Dec 30, 2019
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Community Associations Threatened With Website Litigation Under the ADA

Community Associations Threatened With Website Litigation Under the ADA

In the last few months, a growing number of community associations across Florida are being threatened with litigation because their websites are allegedly not friendly to visually impaired users.

  • So what does pizza have to do with a community association website?

Frankly, not a darn thing. It appears that the lawyers and firms threatening these specious lawsuits are conveniently conflating the obligations found under Title III of the ADA for places of public accommodation with the different set of obligations found in the Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHA) for housing providers.

Or, these lawyers are simply trying to avoid application of the ADA altogether since most private residential communities are not considered places of public accommodation. The ADA requires that every owner, lessor or operator of a “place of public accommodation” provides equal access to users who meet ADA standards for disability.

These lawsuits are attempting to apply the ADA standards for websites to housing providers impacted by the FHA.

These threatened website lawsuits are uniform in style (mostly forms sent in mass) and generally allege that a “tester” was unable to navigate an association’s website, resulting in a discriminatory impact on those who are visually impaired.

The suits allege that community association websites were not accessible to visually impaired persons thus violating the FHA. Community associations are considered housing providers under the FHA and, as such, must make reasonable accommodations for residents and guests with verifiable disabilities.

This is true in the realm of service and support animal requests and these new website lawsuits attempt to expand that obligation to include visually impaired visitors to an association website. It is curious that these testers did not reach out first and request that the allegedly deficient websites be modified for a visually impaired person to more easily navigate the site. Instead, demands are being summarily sent to community associations statewide who have websites in an attempt to reach a quick settlement.

The demand letters offer a conditional release for payment of “reasonable attorney fees” because the attorney sending the letter claims the firm is entitled to compensation for work completed to investigate, research and determine the community association’s noncompliance.

Of course one cottage industry begets another. In addition to a handful of law firms who believe they can generate some revenue with these tester lawsuits, we now also have a number of companies advising communities that they can make their websites compliant for fees ranging anywhere from $2,000-$5,000 and annual hosting around $300-$1,000 per year.

In actuality, the cost depends on the content and functionality of the website including the number of features that must be optimized for the visually impaired. There are also some solutions that are free depending on the website platform.

Many of the demands and threatened lawsuits appear to lack any merit and seem to be merely an attempt to obtain a quick settlement payment from community associations or their insurers.

Many of the communities who have been threatened have website features that are password-protected, are accessible only to owners, or don’t have the features that are the subject of the complaint, so the allegations appear to be specious.

While we can debate the merits of these tester lawsuits and even seek legislative clarification in the upcoming 2020 Legislative Session, in the interim, associations with websites need to speak with experienced counsel to confirm whether or not their association’s website must have the necessary software for disabled users.

This confirmation is particularly important if your community uses its website to list properties for sale or lease. As for the attorneys who have decided to send out these blanket demands without the benefit of further investigation, let’s hope they have a change of heart when associations push back.

Donna DiMaggio Berger is a board certified specialist in condominium and planned development law, a shareholder at Becker Law and the executive director of the Community Association Leadership Lobby.

 

 

Tags: , , , ,
Statutory Limitation on Condominium Transfer Fees

Statutory Limitation on Condominium Transfer Fees

Statutory Limitation on Condominium Transfer Fees

A Reminder that the Limit is the Limit

Transfer fees are those fees an association may charge in connection with the sale or lease of a unit. There are significant differences between allowable transfer fees for homeowners’ associations as compared against condominium associations. When it comes to transfer fees for condominium associations, Florida law is patently clear – in no event may such a fee exceed $100 per applicant. In spite of this clear limitation, some condominium associations charge more than the statutory maximum, and doing so is not without significant consequence.

 

In fact, unit owners of a condominium association recently brought a successful class action lawsuit in Miami-Dade County against their condominium association that charged transfer fees beyond the statutory limit. That association now faces a significant financial impact from the suit. Not only must the association return the money charged over the statutory limit to each member of the class, the settlement stipulated that the association must pay $95,000.00 in attorney fees to the law firm representing the residents. The class period was from 2014 to 2019, and the association may end up paying over $200,000.00 to satisfy all the claims in the class. Yikes!

 

Join the Roundup: 

Please click here if you would like to receive Rembaum’s Association Roundup in your inbox!

 

Specifically, section 718.112(2)(i), Florida Statutes, provides that “no charge shall be made by a condominium association in connection with the sale, mortgage, lease, sublease, or other transfer of a unit unless i) the association is required to approve such transfer and ii) a fee for such approval is provided for in the declaration. In no event may such fee exceed $100 per applicant other than husband/wife or parent/dependent child, which are considered one applicant.” The law does allow the association to require a prospective lessee place a security deposit, not to exceed the equivalent of one month’s rent, into an escrow account maintained by the association.

 

It is important to note that the statute requires that the condominium’s declaration provide authority to the association to approve a transfer and to impose the transfer fee. If these powers are not granted in your declaration of condominium, the condominium association may not charge any transfer fee. If the declaration of condominium does provide for a transfer fee, then the association must abide by the statutory maximum.

 

It is not unheard of for more than one condominium association to attempt to circumvent the statutory limitation by changing the name of the fee. Some may call the charges “screening fees” or “move in fees,” but that does not change the fact that the fees are still legally considered transfer fees. Remember, the limit is the limit, regardless of whether the condominium association’s expenses in obtaining credit and criminal history reports exceeds the $100.00 limitation. Any condominium association charging more than the statutory maximum is violating the statute and opens itself up to liability. With the award of attorney fees, there is an incentive for attorneys to bring more cases challenging any transfer fees that violate the statute. Your condominium association could be liable for hundreds of thousands of dollars for charging improper transfer fees.

 

On the other hand, there is good news for homeowners’ associations, these statutory maximums only apply to condominium associations. However, homeowners’ associations are not without some statutory limitation. Section 689.28, Florida Statutes, declares that transfer fee covenants violate public policy by impairing marketability of real property. However, section 689.28(2)(c)7., Florida Statutes, does allow a homeowners’, condominium, cooperative, mobile home, or property owners’ association to charge a fee if the declaration allows such a charge. So, a homeowners’ association may only charge a transfer fee if the authority is granted to the association in the declaration. Just keep in mind, if your declaration specifies a set fee, your association is limited to the fee provided in the declaration.

 

Now is a good time for all board members to review their community’s governing documents and seek advice from the association’s lawyer as to whether any existing transfer fee complies with the statutory requirements. A simple check now can help your association avoid costly litigation in the future.

Article written by Jeff Rembaum of KBRLegal.com 
with permission for SFPMA to republish for our industry.

 

Kaye Bender Rembaum, Attorneys at Law

The law firm of Kaye Bender Rembaum, with its 19 lawyers and offices in Broward, Palm Beach and Hillsborough Counties, is a full service law firm devoted to the representation of more than 1,200 community and commercial associations, developers, and their members throughout the State of Florida. Under the direction of attorneys Robert L. Kaye, Michael S. Bender and Jeffrey A. Rembaum, the law firm of Kaye Bender Rembaum strives to provide its clients with an unparalleled level of personalized and professional service that takes into account their clients’ individual needs and financial concerns.

Thank You, SFPMA.COM

 

 

Tags: , ,
HURRICANE SEASON IS HERE – IF YOU SUFFER A CASUALTY, YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS NEW LAW

HURRICANE SEASON IS HERE – IF YOU SUFFER A CASUALTY, YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS NEW LAW

HURRICANE SEASON IS HERE – IF YOU SUFFER A CASUALTY, YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS NEW LAW

A good reason why society provides for prevailing party attorney fees and costs is to make a potential plaintiff think twice before filing a lawsuit. Imagine being able to sue your adversary in court without worry that if you lose you will NOT have to pay prevailing party attorney fees and costs to the other side. Such a situation could lead to an avalanche of lawsuits, and that is exactly what happened when Florida laws permitted contractors holding an “assignment of benefits” in their favor, who were unhappy with the award from the insurance company, to sue the insurance company with nothing to lose but to pay for their own attorney. Simply put, an assignment of benefits is an agreement transferring a homeowner’s insurance benefits to a contractor who may then file a claim against the homeowner’s insurance policy without the involvement of the homeowner. Notwithstanding the assignment of benefits, the homeowner is still responsible to pay the insurance premium and deductible. If the contractor then makes a claim against the insurance policy and is unhappy with the insurance proceeds received, the contractor can sue the insurance company with no threat of having to pay prevailing party attorney fees if the contractor lost its lawsuit against the insurance company. Without the fear of a prevailing party attorney fees award, these types of lawsuits became very prevalent. Insurers claim that this led to ever increasing insurance premiums. Not anymore!

 

Due to the passage of House Bill 7065 (“HB 7065”), officially taking effect on July 1, 2019, consumers may begin to notice a decrease in their insurance premiums as HB 7065 creates liability for the contractor for attorney fees and costs based upon the difference between the amount recovered and the amount offered during settlement negotiations as compared to the disputed amount. When HB 7065 takes effect, if the contractor holding the assignment of benefits sues and the difference between the judgment obtained by the contractor and the presuit settlement offer by the insurer is less than 25% of the disputed amount, the insurer is entitled to an award of reasonable attorney fees. On the other hand, if the difference between the judgment obtained by the contractor and the presuit settlement offer by the insurer is at least 50% of the disputed amount, the contractor is entitled to an award of reasonable attorney fees. Finally, if the difference between the judgment obtained by the contractor and the presuit settlement offer by the insurer at least 25%, but less than 50%, of the disputed amount, no party is entitled to an award of attorney fees.

 

Insurers claim that the old system resulted in abuse of property insurance claims, as contractors were inflating repair costs and essentially operating without significant financial risk during insurance litigation, thus allowing contractors to assert numerous claims in hopes that one would stick. As a result, insurance companies were left bearing the costs of these lengthy litigation’s, and thus, sought to recover their litigation expenses through the consumer – the homeowner – by increasing insurance premiums. While a homeowner is still able to enjoy the benefits of the one-way attorney fee privilege, this right is no longer transferable to the contractors through assignment of benefits. Clearly, this is a drastic change that will affect contractors around the entire State.

If you have any questions regarding the impact of this new law, please discuss them with your association’s attorney.

With hurricane season approaching, in the event you experience a casualty, before signing an assignment of benefits in favor of the contractor who shows up, often uninvited, not only do you need to read the fine print, but it is strongly suggested you have an attorney review the assignment of benefits contract first.

http://rembaumsassociationroundup.com/2019/06/19/hurricane-season-is-here-if-you-suffer-a-casualty-you-need-to-know-about-this-new-law/

BROUGHT TO YOU BY:  https://kbrlegal.com/

Legal Sponsors of SFPMA  with offices in Pompano Beach, Palm Beach and Tampa Florida.

EMERGENCY POWERS  

HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATIONS

 

720.316 Association emergency powers.—

(1) To the extent allowed by law, unless specifically prohibited by the declaration or other recorded governing documents, and consistent with s. 617.0830, the board of directors, in response to damage caused by an event for which a state of emergency is declared pursuant to s. 252.36 in the area encompassed by the association, may exercise the following powers:

(a) Conduct board or membership meetings after notice of the meetings and board decisions is provided in as practicable a manner as possible, including via publication, radio, United States mail, the Internet, public service announcements, conspicuous posting on the association property, or any other means the board deems appropriate under the circumstances.
(b) Cancel and reschedule an association meeting.
(c) Designate assistant officers who are not directors. If the executive officer is incapacitated or unavailable, the assistant officer has the same authority during the state of emergency as the executive officer he or she assists.
(d) Relocate the association’s principal office or designate an alternative principal office.
(e) Enter into agreements with counties and municipalities to assist counties and municipalities with debris removal.
(f) Implement a disaster plan before or immediately following the event for which a state of emergency is declared, which may include, but is not limited to, turning on or shutting off elevators; electricity; water, sewer, or security systems; or air conditioners for association buildings.
(g) Based upon the advice of emergency management officials or upon the advice of licensed professionals retained by the board, determine any portion of the association property unavailable for entry or occupancy by owners or their family members, tenants, guests, agents, or invitees to protect their health, safety, or welfare.
(h) Based upon the advice of emergency management officials or upon the advice of licensed professionals retained by the board, determine whether the association property can be safely inhabited or occupied. However, such determination is not conclusive as to any determination of habitability pursuant to the declaration.
(i) Mitigate further damage, including taking action to contract for the removal of debris and to prevent or mitigate the spread of fungus, including mold or mildew, by removing and disposing of wet drywall, insulation, carpet, cabinetry, or other fixtures on or within the association property.
(j) Notwithstanding a provision to the contrary, and regardless of whether such authority does not specifically appear in the declaration or other recorded governing documents, levy special assessments without a vote of the owners.
(k) Without owners’ approval, borrow money and pledge association assets as collateral to fund emergency repairs and carry out the duties of the association if operating funds are insufficient. This paragraph does not limit the general authority of the association to borrow money, subject to such restrictions contained in the declaration or other recorded governing documents.
(2) The authority granted under subsection (1) is limited to that time reasonably necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the association and the parcel owners and their family members, tenants, guests, agents, or invitees, and to mitigate further damage and make emergency repairs.
History.—s. 19, ch. 2014-133.

EMERGENCY POWERS  

CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATIONS

 

718.1265 Association emergency powers.—

(1) To the extent allowed by law and unless specifically prohibited by the declaration of condominium, the articles, or the bylaws of an association, and consistent with the provisions of s. 617.0830, the board of administration, in response to damage caused by an event for which a state of emergency is declared pursuant to s. 252.36 in the locale in which the condominium is located, may, but is not required to, exercise the following powers:

(a) Conduct board meetings and membership meetings with notice given as is practicable. Such notice may be given in any practicable manner, including publication, radio, United States mail, the Internet, public service announcements, and conspicuous posting on the condominium property or any other means the board deems reasonable under the circumstances. Notice of board decisions may be communicated as provided in this paragraph.
(b) Cancel and reschedule any association meeting.
(c) Name as assistant officers persons who are not directors, which assistant officers shall have the same authority as the executive officers to whom they are assistants during the state of emergency to accommodate the incapacity or unavailability of any officer of the association.
(d) Relocate the association’s principal office or designate alternative principal offices.
(e) Enter into agreements with local counties and municipalities to assist counties and municipalities with debris removal.
(f) Implement a disaster plan before or immediately following the event for which a state of emergency is declared which may include, but is not limited to, shutting down or off elevators; electricity; water, sewer, or security systems; or air conditioners.
(g) Based upon advice of emergency management officials or upon the advice of licensed professionals retained by the board, determine any portion of the condominium property unavailable for entry or occupancy by unit owners, family members, tenants, guests, agents, or invitees to protect the health, safety, or welfare of such persons.
(h) Require the evacuation of the condominium property in the event of a mandatory evacuation order in the locale in which the condominium is located. Should any unit owner or other occupant of a condominium fail or refuse to evacuate the condominium property where the board has required evacuation, the association shall be immune from liability or injury to persons or property arising from such failure or refusal.
(i) Based upon advice of emergency management officials or upon the advice of licensed professionals retained by the board, determine whether the condominium property can be safely inhabited or occupied. However, such determination is not conclusive as to any determination of habitability pursuant to the declaration.
(j) Mitigate further damage, including taking action to contract for the removal of debris and to prevent or mitigate the spread of fungus, including, but not limited to, mold or mildew, by removing and disposing of wet drywall, insulation, carpet, cabinetry, or other fixtures on or within the condominium property, even if the unit owner is obligated by the declaration or law to insure or replace those fixtures and to remove personal property from a unit.
(k) Contract, on behalf of any unit owner or owners, for items or services for which the owners are otherwise individually responsible, but which are necessary to prevent further damage to the condominium property. In such event, the unit owner or owners on whose behalf the board has contracted are responsible for reimbursing the association for the actual costs of the items or services, and the association may use its lien authority provided by s. 718.116to enforce collection of the charges. Without limitation, such items or services may include the drying of units, the boarding of broken windows or doors, and the replacement of damaged air conditioners or air handlers to provide climate control in the units or other portions of the property.
(l) Regardless of any provision to the contrary and even if such authority does not specifically appear in the declaration of condominium, articles, or bylaws of the association, levy special assessments without a vote of the owners.
(m) Without unit owners’ approval, borrow money and pledge association assets as collateral to fund emergency repairs and carry out the duties of the association when operating funds are insufficient. This paragraph does not limit the general authority of the association to borrow money, subject to such restrictions as are contained in the declaration of condominium, articles, or bylaws of the association.
(2) The special powers authorized under subsection (1) shall be limited to that time reasonably necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the association and the unit owners and the unit owners’ family members, tenants, guests, agents, or invitees and shall be reasonably necessary to mitigate further damage and make emergency repairs.
History.—s. 15, ch. 2008-28.

 

In the event of Damage to your Buildings and Filing a Claim:

Search our Members Directory and find companies ready help you!

 

Tags: ,
Kaye Bender Rembaum, with offices in Pompano Beach and Palm Beach Gardens, has opened an office in Tampa and named Shawn Brown, Esq. as Managing Attorney.

Kaye Bender Rembaum, with offices in Pompano Beach and Palm Beach Gardens, has opened an office in Tampa and named Shawn Brown, Esq. as Managing Attorney.

  • Posted: May 10, 2019
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Kaye Bender Rembaum, with offices in Pompano Beach and Palm Beach Gardens, has opened an office in Tampa and named Shawn Brown, Esq. as Managing Attorney.

Community Association Law Firm Kaye Bender Rembaum

Opens Third Office in Florida

Shawn Brown, Esq. joins Firm as Managing Attorney of new Tampa office

 

SOUTH FLORIDA – Leading Florida association law firm Kaye Bender Rembaum, with offices in Pompano Beach and Palm Beach Gardens, has opened an office in Tampa and named Shawn Brown, Esq. as Managing Attorney.

“This is a tremendous opportunity for us to expand our footprint on the west coast,” said Robert Kaye, Esq., managing Firm member of Kaye Bender Rembaum. “Shawn shares our commitment for delivering exceptional service to our clients. His knowledge and experience will be an asset as we continue to build our presence in the Tampa market.”

Prior to joining Kaye Bender Rembaum, Brown was a partner in the law firm of Frazier & Brown and the law firm of Redding & Brown, both in Tampa.

Board Certified in Condominium and Planned Development Law by The Florida Bar, Brown is an active member of the Condominium and Planned Development Committee where he serves as chair of the Safe Harbor Subcommittee, is a member of the legislative review group and is tasked with reviewing and providing comments and edits to the legislation affecting community associations each legislative session. He also served as a member of the Auxiliary Committee, reviewing and editing different chapters in the 4th Edition of the Florida Condominium and Community Association Law published by The Florida Bar. Brown also sits on the Real Property Litigation Committee, where he is chair of the Judicial Litigation Support and Education Subcommittee, and the Problem Studies Committee of the Real Property, Probate and Trust Law Section of The Florida Bar.

“I am thrilled to join such a well-respected Firm with a proven track record of success in community association law,” said Brown. “I look forward to this opportunity and

growing our presence here with existing and new clients.”

Brown’s focus has been exclusively on the practice of all aspects of community association law and regularly practicing before the trial and appellate levels of state and federal courts, including arguing before the Florida Supreme Court and administrative agencies such as the Florida Division of Condominiums. He has extensive experience in all aspects of community association law and real estate law, representing condominium and homeowner associations and handling issues ranging from collection of assessments and foreclosures to covenant enforcement and litigation. He is routinely invited to provide both association boards of directors and community association managers with regular legislative and case law updates.

Brown also represents individuals in real estate transactions and litigation, devoting his practice to working with clients on a broad range of legal issues that community associations, property owners and buyers and sellers of real estate face on a regular basis.

A graduate of Stetson University and Stetson University College of Law, Brown was a recipient of the U.S. Senator Max Cleland scholarship and served as an intern to United States Senator Connie Mack in his Washington D.C. office while attending American University. He is a resident of Tampa.

The new Kaye Bender Rembaum office is located at 1211 N. Westshore Boulevard in Tampa.

Kaye Bender Rembaum is a full-service commercial law firm concentrating on the representation of more than 1,000 community associations throughout Florida. With offices in Broward, Hillsborough and Palm Beach counties, the Firm was recently presented with the 2019 Readers’ Choice Award for Legal Services by the Florida Community Association Journal, an award they’ve received annually since 2014. For more information, visit www.KBRLegal.com, call 954-928-0680 and follow the Firm on www.facebook.com/KayeBenderRembaum.

Members of SFPMA.Com – State of Florida Property Management Association  Pompano Beach Office,  Palm Beach Office,

EmmaJean Livingston | Pierson Grant PR

6451 North Federal Highway, Suite 1200 | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308
T: 954.776.1999, ext. 242 | E: elivingston@piersongrant.com

 

Tags: , , ,
Does an HOA have to renew records for the entire community and for each homeowner

Does an HOA have to renew records for the entire community and for each homeowner

  • Posted: Jan 02, 2019
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Does an HOA have to renew records for the entire community and for each homeowner

We were asked a Question– In Broward County does an HOA have to renew our records for our entire community or just for each homeowner? 

Florida Department of Economic Opportunity

Revitalization of Expired Homeowners Association Declarations and Covenants

In 1963, the Florida Legislature enacted the Marketable Record Title Act (“the Act”), codified as Chapter 712, Florida Statutes. The Act was intended to simplify title searches by extinguishing old title defects and other recorded issues affecting title to real property after 30 years, except for certain matters (see Section 712.03, Florida Statutes – Exceptions to marketability).

An unanticipated consequence of the Act was that it extinguished the covenants of some planned communities, which suddenly found they had lost their legal authority to collect assessments and enforce the covenants. Since then, the Florida Legislature has amended the statutes to provide both a process to preserve the covenants before they are extinguished by the Act, and a process to reinstate them if they have already been extinguished or have expired.

Applicable Statutes

 

 

Revitalizing Expired / Extinguished Homeowner Association Declarations of Covenants

Chapter 720, Part III, Florida Statutes, creates a mechanism to revive / reinstate / revitalize (these terms are all used to mean the same thing) a declaration of covenants that has ceased to govern some or all of the parcels in a subdivision. Briefly, the process includes the following steps:

  1. Parcel owners within a community must create an organizing committee composed of not less than three community members.
  2. The organizing committee must prepare the declaration of covenants and, if necessary, updated governing documents for the homeowners association, which must then be approved by a majority of affected parcel owners.
  3. Next, the committee must send the proposed revived declaration and homeowners association governing documents to the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) at the following address:
    • Department of Economic Opportunity
    • Attn: Division of Community Development
    • 107 East Madison Street, MSC 160
    • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-4120
  4. DEO has 60 days to determine whether the documents comply with the requirements of Chapter 720, Part III, Florida Statutes, and issue a letter determination approving or denying the requested revitalization. It is not uncommon for DEO to complete its review and issue a letter approval or denial before the sixtieth day.
  5. If DEO approves the proposed revitalized declaration and homeowners association governing documents, the declaration of covenants, articles of incorporation and bylaws of the homeowners association, the DEO determination letter of approval, and a legal description of each affected parcel must be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court in the county where the affected parcels are located within 30 days after the organizing committee receives DEO’s approval. The articles of incorporation must also be filed with the Department of State if they have not been previously filed. Immediately after recording, the organizing committee must provide copies of the recorded documents to the owners of all affected parcels.

Limited Role of DEO

As noted above, DEO’s role with regard to homeowners association covenants is limited to deciding whether documents proposing to revitalize expired/extinguished covenants that are submitted to DEO by an organizing committee comply with the requirements in Chapter 720, Part III, Florida Statutes. DEO has no authority to:

  • Extend the duration of homeowners association covenants that have not expired,
  • Deny approval of proposed revitalized covenants because of a dispute between a homeowners association and one or more of its members, including disputes in litigation,
  • Decide whether any of the lots in a subdivision are exempt from revitalized covenants,
  • Regulate homeowners associations,
  • Resolve complaints about homeowners associations, or
  • Provide legal advice.

If you need legal advice in connection with proposed revitalized homeowners association declarations, you may contact The Florida Bar’s Lawyer Referral Service at 1-800-342-8011, Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Eastern time, or through its website (The Florida Bar). The Florida Bar can provide you the names of attorneys in your area who may be able to assist you.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Meant by “Verified Copies” and “Affidavits”

Part III of Chapter 720, Florida Statutes, states that “verified copies” and “affidavits” must be submitted to DEO as part of the covenant revitalization process.

Verified Copies

A “verified copy” means that someone has sworn under oath and in the presence of a notary public or other officer legally authorized to administer oaths that the copy is a true and accurate copy of the original document. When verified copies are required, a notarized letter from a member of the organizing committee or an officer of the homeowners’ association may be attached to the copies as verification that they are accurate copies. The letter should say that the person signing it verifies that the documents attached to the letter are accurate (or true and correct, or exact) copies of the original documents. If the documents are not attached to the letter, the letter must identify the specific documents to which it refers. Copies of the association’s governing documents that have been obtained from the official records of the county where the subdivision is located and have been certified as accurate by the Clerk of Court are also acceptable.

Affidavits

An “affidavit” is a written statement confirmed by the oath or affirmation of the person making it (the affiant), taken before a person having authority to administer such an oath or affirmation. In other words, it is a written statement that is signed and sworn to be true in the presence of a notary public or other official who is legally authorized to administer oaths. It must be signed by the person making it, and be signed by and bear the original stamp or seal of the notary/official.

 

How Do I Obtain Copies of My Homeowners Association Governing Documents and Covenants?

The governing documents for a subdivision and homeowners association consist of the declaration of covenants, the articles of incorporation, and the bylaws. The declaration of covenants for a subdivision is usually recorded in the Official Records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court for the county in which the subdivision is located. Copies of the Articles of Incorporation and bylaws of the homeowners association can be obtained from the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations. Copies of the governing documents may also be obtained directly from the homeowners association.

 

Does the State of Florida Regulate Homeowners Associations?

No. Homeowners associations are required to comply with applicable Florida Statutes. However, they are not regulated by any state agency.

 

Who Handles Disputes / Complaints about Homeowners Associations?

Under Section 720.311, Florida Statutes, the Department of Business and Professional Regulation offers a dispute resolution program for some types of disputes between a homeowners association and parcel owners.

 

Tags: , ,
Escaping The Towering Inferno – Condominium Fire Sprinkler Retrofit and Engineered Life Safety System Requirements

Escaping The Towering Inferno – Condominium Fire Sprinkler Retrofit and Engineered Life Safety System Requirements

  • Posted: Oct 05, 2018
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Escaping The Towering Inferno – Condominium Fire Sprinkler Retrofit and Engineered Life Safety System Requirements

Escaping The Towering Inferno –

Condominium Fire Sprinkler Retrofit and Engineered Life Safety System Requirements

There appears to be some confusion surrounding the compliance date of the Engineered Life Safety System for those condominium associations that previously voted to opt out of the requirement to install condominium fire sprinkler retrofit. What is not confusing is that the safety of all occupants living in high-rise condominiums is paramount. No one wants to be responsible for death or injury caused by an incident that can be minimized with necessary precautions. How should the board of directors of a “high-rise” condominium balance the needs for fire safety against the considerable expense incurred in the implementation and installation of fire safety systems?

A high-rise building is a building where an occupiable floor is greater than seventy-five feet (75’) above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access. Pursuant to Florida law, condominiums that are considered high-rise buildings are required to have, or otherwise install, a fire sprinkler system, unless the condominium association had previously opted out, or is otherwise exempt, as further addressed below, by following the proper statutory protocol for which the deadline to do so has long since passed. However, for those high-rise condominiums that did successfully opt out, the association is still responsible for the installation of an Engineered Life Safety System (the “ELSS”).

A caveat, and for some condominium associations, a blessing, is that the fire sprinkler system (or ELSS) is not required if every unit in the condominium has exterior walkway access. Therefore, if the only access into the condominium unit is through an interior hallway, the condominium association would need to install a fire sprinkler system (or have already opted out and thereby need to comply with the requirements of the ELSS).

Section 718.112(2)(l), Florida Statutes, is quite clear on the requirements to install a fire sprinkler system, but the statute does not address the condominium association’s requirements for the implementation of the ELSS – that comes from the Florida Fire Prevention Code (the “FFPC”). The FFPC defines an ELSS as a system which contains any or all of the following systems:

1) partial automatic sprinkler protection,

2) smoke detection alarms,

3) smoke control,

4) compartmentation, and/or

5) other approved lifesaving systems.

An ELSS must be developed by a registered professional engineer experienced in fire and life safety system design and authorized by the local compliance authority. Typical examples of ELSS within a high-rise condominium building could be a partial fire sprinkler system that serves the common areas, fire and smoke alarms that are in compliance with the local fire authority standards, and fire proof walls, floors and corridors designed to prevent the flow of the fire and smoke throughout the condominium building.

As to any high-rise building required to install the automatic fire sprinkler system that did not opt out, the FFPC requires that any condominium that meets the definition of a high-rise building, must, by December 31, 2019, have installed the automatic fire sprinkler system. As to those who opted out, the exact date for ELSS compliance is anything but clear. The Condominium Act does not provide a date, and while the FFPC provides a clear deadline for the installation of the automatic fire sprinkler system, the FFPC does not patently provide a similar date for the installation of the ELSS. Some lawyers and fire safety professionals take the position that, because the ELSS is a substitute for the automatic fire sprinkler system, December 31, 2019 is, therefore, the ELSS compliance date. However, others may take the position that the lack of patent clarity in the FFPC means no deadline is provided.

Whether the local fire safety authorities will actually interpret and enforce the Florida Fire Prevention Code to require an ELSS approved plan, or ELSS completed installation by December 31, 2019 or even still, take the position that no ELSS deadline is provided at all is anyone’s guess. The answers might even vary by jurisdiction. What is clear is that:

  • The Florida legislature needs to address the ELSS compliance deadline to provide clarity for the betterment and safety of all of Florida’s high-rise communities; and
  • Any board member of a high-rise condominium association with questions regarding any of the issues addressed herein needs to consult with both their association’s legal counsel and with the local fire safety officials with jurisdiction for enforcement of the ELSS.

Jeffrey Rembaum, Esq. of Kaye, Bender, Rembaum attorneys at law, legal practice consists of representation of condominium, homeowner, commercial and mobile home park associations, as well as exclusive country club communities and the developers who build them. He is a regular columnist for The Condo News, a biweekly publication and Legal Writer for Florida Rising Magazine, was inducted into the 2012, 2013 & 2014 Florida Super Lawyers. He can be reached at 561-241-4462.

Re Published with Permission: JR / KBR Legal

Tags: , ,