Become a Member: JOIN SFPMA TODAY   LogIn / Register: LOGIN/REGISTER

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

Facing South Florida: Condo Safety Concerns TV host: Eric Glazer watch it now!

Facing South Florida: Condo Safety Concerns TV host: Eric Glazer watch it now!

  • Posted: May 15, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Facing South Florida: Condo Safety Concerns TV host: Eric Glazer watch it now!

Jim DeFede’s guest for Sunday’s show was Eric Glazer, one of the state’s leading condo attorneys who has been pushing for years to make condos safer.

Glazer has been warning about a tragedy like the one in Surfside.

The two discussed, among other things, why the legislature failed to pass anything during its session.

Glazer also said why he believes Gov. Ron DeSantis has refused to do anything to make condos safer nearly a year after the deadly building collapse.

Watch the Program NOW.

Join KBR’s Peter Mollengarden for delicious hot breakfast with awesome education (2 CEUs)

Join KBR’s Peter Mollengarden for delicious hot breakfast with awesome education (2 CEUs)

  • Posted: May 15, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Join KBR’s Peter Mollengarden for delicious hot breakfast with awesome education (2 CEUs)

Join KBR’s Peter Mollengarden for delicious hot breakfast with awesome education (2 CEUs)

The West Palm Breakfast Group!
Wed., May 18, 2022 | 7:30am | PBI Holiday Inn
Peter C. Mollengarden, Esq., from KBR, with also be there.
Not close to Palm Beach Airport, or know of someone who will benefit from this seminar?
Please feel free to share this email!
“These are Not Your Mother’s Appliances”
Course #: 9631376 | Provider #: 0007779 | 2 CE credits in OPP for CAMS
Courses presented by:
Fred Kaye | A-1 Appliance & Refrigeration Repair
Everyone who attends will get a FREE GIFT of charcoal for their refrigerators! Yes…charcoal! Come join us and find out WHY!
There will be a delicious, free hot breakfast and door prizes!
Airport (PBI) Holiday Inn: 1301 Belvedere Rd., West Palm Beach, FL 33405
Kaye Bender Rembaum | Visit Us Online
Pompano: 1200 Park Central Boulevard South; Tel: 954.928.0680
Palm Beach Gardens: 9121 North Military Trail, Ste. 200; Tel: 561.241.4462
Tampa: 1211 N. Westshore Boulevard, Ste. 409; Tel: 813.375.0731
Offices in Miami by appointment: 800.974.0680
OUT OF SIGHT DOES NOT MEAN OUT OF MIND  By Eric Glazer, Esq.

OUT OF SIGHT DOES NOT MEAN OUT OF MIND By Eric Glazer, Esq.

  • Posted: May 09, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on OUT OF SIGHT DOES NOT MEAN OUT OF MIND By Eric Glazer, Esq.

OUT OF SIGHT DOES NOT MEAN OUT OF MIND

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

I like to re-publish this article every few years because it is so important.  As we get closer to summer we are simultaneously getting closer to lots and lots of empty condominium units because many owners are returning up north for a few months.  Just because you leave your Florida condominium for a few months however does not mean that your responsibility to maintain your unit stops once you hit the Georgia border.

Every declaration of condominium has a general clause that requires the owner of the unit to maintain his or her unit in good condition.  In fact, arbitration decisions have held that “where an owner does not reside in the unit, it is incumbent on the owner to routinely and periodically examine and inspect the unit to ensure the absence of leaks and conditions that would otherwise lead to damage to the building and its occupants.  In recognition of the fact that where multiple owners occupy a single building, a problem that develops in one unit may well affect other units and the common element components of the building.”  See: Los Prados Condominium Association v. Lemley Case No. 03-6092; May 25, 2004, Arbitrator, Scheuerman.

So, if you’re headed up north for a few months, and you know that a friendly neighbor is going to remain in Florida, make sure to leave that neighbor a key to your unit and ask him or her to check the place every now and then.  And…..if your association governing documents require that you leave the association with a key, you BETTER DO THAT!  There is virtually no excuse for failing to do so, but that’s for another column.  If you don’t leave a key, remember that the law provides:

(5) RIGHT OF ACCESS TO UNITS.—

(a) The association has the irrevocable right of access to each unit during reasonable hours, when necessary for the maintenance, repair, or replacement of any common elements or of any portion of a unit to be maintained by the association pursuant to the declaration or as necessary to prevent damage to the common elements or to a unit.

If the association thinks a leak is coming from your unit, if they don’t have a key, they’re using a locksmith and/or breaking your lock or door to get in.  And, they’re entitled to do it, if they have no other reasonable means to get in.  And…….. it’s the unit owner who is going to pay for the lock and door repair if there really was a leak.  Bottom line…be smart….plan ahead and make sure that when Florida gets in your rear view mirror this year, someone is still left behind watching your unit.

Keep informed with articles for Condo and HOA’s 

Short Term Rentals A Neighborhood Problem. by Joseph E. Adams of Becker

Short Term Rentals A Neighborhood Problem. by Joseph E. Adams of Becker

  • Posted: May 05, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Short Term Rentals A Neighborhood Problem. by Joseph E. Adams of Becker

Short Term Rentals A Neighborhood Problem

Joseph E. Adams

Q: How can a homeowners’ association regulate owners renting out their houses to short term guests?  If the association were to enforce with a penalty, how can it collect on it? (E.H., via e-mail)

A: The place to start is knowing what your governing documents and local laws say about the subject. For example, some municipalities limit rentals in residential areas to a 30-day minimum, so violations could be reported to the local code enforcement agency.

Most documents limit the use of homes to “residential use.” These provisions have been extensively litigated in courts across the country and there is not a bright line test defining what activities constitute residential or commercial uses. However, courts have generally been reluctant to apply a residential use provision as a restriction on short-term rentals, and there is at least one appellate court decision in Florida to that effect.

Therefore, the most effective way to address rental restrictions is a specific provision in your declaration of covenants setting forth permissible and impermissible rental durations. Many declarations contain such a provision, while some do not. If your declaration does not contain a rental limitation, it would have to be amended in the manner set forth in the declaration. Most declarations require some level of super-majority approval for amendment, two-thirds and 75% being the most common standards. Some declarations require the vote be calculated based on all eligible voters, and some provide that the calculation is based on those who vote at a duly noticed meeting at which a quorum is established.

You should also be aware that the Florida Homeowners’ Association Act was amended in 2021 to limit the ability of homeowners’ associations to amend rental rights. The retroactive application of that statute to pre-existing associations is a complicated and open legal question. The new law provides that amendments limiting the duration or frequency of permissible rentals is only applicable to those owners who vote in favor of the amendment, those who vote against the amendment or don’t vote are “grandfathered,” but the amendment would be binding on their successors in title.

Importantly, Section 720.306(1)(h) of the Florida Homeowners’ Association Act does permit amendments that prohibit rentals for a term of less than six months or prohibit rentals of less than three times during a calendar year to be applied to all parcel owners if the declaration is properly amended, whether an owner voted in favor of the amendment or not.

Once you have determined what the actual rule is, the next question is how you enforce it. As stated above, if the rental violates local ordinances, referring the matter to code enforcement may be an effective and inexpensive way to seek redress.

Fining and suspension of common area use rights are one avenue, but probably not the most effective for this kind of violation. Many homeowners’ associations do not have the level of amenities where suspension of the right to use them deters violations. Fines are capped at one thousand dollars in the aggregate for ongoing violations, unless the governing documents permit a higher amount. There is also a somewhat detailed notice and hearing process that must be followed to impose a fine or suspension.  If a fine is properly levied, it can be a lien upon the home if it is for one thousand dollars or more and the language of your documents may also come into play. Otherwise, the venue to collect a fine is small claims court, and the prevailing party in a suit to collect a fine is entitled to recover their attorneys’ fees from the losing party.

The better approach for this type of violation is direct legal action by the association against the owner seeking a court order (injunction) to enforce the rule against short term rentals. Well-written documents may give you additional leverage in a court action. Generally speaking, the winning party can collect their legal fees from the losing party. The association’s lawyer should be brought into the picture early in the process, so he or she can advise what pre-suit steps may be necessary to protect your ability to enforce the restriction.

Joseph E. Adams is a Board Certified Specialist in Condominium and Planned Development Law, and an Office Managing Shareholder with Becker & Poliakoff. Please send your community association legal questions to jadams@beckerlawyers.com. Past editions of the Q&A may be viewed at floridacondohoalawblog.com.

Kaye Bender Rembaum is a full service commercial law firm dedicated to the representation of community associations throughout Florida.

Kaye Bender Rembaum is a full service commercial law firm dedicated to the representation of community associations throughout Florida.

  • Posted: May 05, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Kaye Bender Rembaum is a full service commercial law firm dedicated to the representation of community associations throughout Florida.

Kaye Bender Rembaum is a full service commercial law firm dedicated to the representation of community associations throughout Florida. Under the direction of attorneys Robert L. Kaye, Esq., Michael S. Bender, Esq., and Jeffrey A. Rembaum, Esq. Kaye Bender Rembaum provides its clients with an unparalleled level of personalized and professional service regardless of their size and takes into account their individual needs and financial concerns. They have offices in Pompano Beach, Palm Beach Gardens and Tampa, and in Miami-Dade by appointment.

The associates of Kaye Bender Rembaum establish relationships with clients to understand their needs and goals. Kaye Bender Rembaum assists clients in all matters of Association representation including, but not limited to, collection of assessments, contract negotiation, covenant review and amendment, covenant enforcement and construction defect claims. Kaye Bender Rembaum also keeps clients up-to-date on new developments in the law and how they personally affect them. The firm provides prompt, effective, high quality, cost-efficient and understandable legal advice and services to a diverse client base. Associates strive to help clients operate and administer their communities better and to educate them on their responsibilities and duties under Florida law and their governing community documents. Robert Kaye, Michael Bender and Jeffrey Rembaum are industry leaders who are often sought out by public policy makers and the media for advice and commentary on community association law.

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. Thank you for your interest in Kaye Bender Rembaum.


Practice Areas

Kaye Bender Rembaum is dedicated to providing clients with an unparalleled level of personalized and professional service regardless of their size and takes into account their individual needs and financial concerns. Our areas of concentration include:

  • Assessment Collections
  • Construction Defect Claims
  • Contract Drafting and Negotiation
  • Covenant Enforcement
  • Fair Housing
  • Land Use and Zoning
  • Litigation and Arbitration
  • Master / Sub Association Issues
  • Pre and Post Turnover Planning
  • Review and Amendments of Covenants

Contact Us

Tags:
Statutory Meeting Requirements by Becker

Statutory Meeting Requirements by Becker

  • Posted: May 04, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Statutory Meeting Requirements by Becker

Statutory Meeting Requirements

 POSTED ON 

Many condominium and homeowners’ associations’ activities are required to have a certain amount of transparency. One way that association activities are made transparent is through statutory provisions requiring most kinds of meetings to be open and noticed to the membership. In fact, applicable laws governing the operation of condominium and homeowners’ associations allow board members to communicate by email but prohibits them from voting on issues by email.

Notably, a gathering of a quorum of board members to conduct association business is considered a board meeting (whether taking place in person or by real-time electronic means) and is required to be noticed and open to association members. However, two important exceptions apply. Namely, meetings of the board or an association committee at which the association’s attorney is participating for the purpose of rendering advice upon proposed or pending litigation are not required to be open to association members. Similarly, board meetings held to discuss personnel matters are also not required to be open to association members.

Association members are entitled to speak at open meetings on “designated items” (HOA) or an item on the agenda in a condominium. However, the rights of members to speak at meetings is subject to any rules adopted by the association governing the frequency, duration, and manner of member statements. The right to attend open meetings includes the right to tape record or videotape them, as long as such recording activity is not disruptive. Furthermore, the Division of Florida Condominiums has adopted rules regarding recording condominium association meetings (found in Fla. Admin. Code Rule 61B-23.002(10)), and the Homeowners’ Association Act provides that homeowners’ associations may adopt their own pertaining to recording homeowners’ association meetings.

As such, there are statutory meeting requirements that must be followed for board meetings which must be kept in mind when an association is adopting or changing its procedures. Failing to follow the basic statutory requirements may result in problems. Questions about board meetings, committee meetings, which have their own set of requirements, and members’ meetings should be directed to legal counsel for guidance.

 

 

 

 

As leaders in Community Association Law, we not only helped write the law – we also teach it.

Did you know Becker provides over 200 educational classes per year throughout the State of Florida on a variety of topics ranging from board member certification to compliance, and everything in between? Our most popular classes are now available online!

To view our entire class roster, visit:
beckerlawyers.com/classes

Tags: ,
Watch the Webinar: Updating Governing Documents

Watch the Webinar: Updating Governing Documents

  • Posted: May 03, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Watch the Webinar: Updating Governing Documents

Watch the Webinar: Updating Governing Documents

We recently held an educational “Updating Governing Documents” webinar with Emily Gannon from Kaye Bender Rembaum to discuss why updating governing documents is critically important. The Webinar covered: The Hierarchy of Governing Documents The Amendment Process Common Misconceptions and more…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdKVohy_DhY&feature=emb_imp_woyt

AMAZING PODCAST THAT DISCUSSES THE COLLAPSE IN SURFSIDE IN DETAIL AND FROM SO MANY DIFFERENT ANGLES.

AMAZING PODCAST THAT DISCUSSES THE COLLAPSE IN SURFSIDE IN DETAIL AND FROM SO MANY DIFFERENT ANGLES.

  • Posted: Apr 28, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on AMAZING PODCAST THAT DISCUSSES THE COLLAPSE IN SURFSIDE IN DETAIL AND FROM SO MANY DIFFERENT ANGLES.

THE MIAMI HERALD HAS PREPARED AN AMAZING PODCAST THAT DISCUSSES THE COLLAPSE IN SURFSIDE IN DETAIL AND FROM SO MANY DIFFERENT ANGLES.

IN TODAY’S MIAMI HERALD, ERIC GLAZER IS INTERVIEWED REGARDING THE LAWS THAT LED TO THE DISASTER AND HOW THE LEGISLATURE IGNORED PRIOR WARNINGS.

TO LISTEN TO THE PODCAST CLICK HERE


EPISODE 8: THE RULES ARE DIFFERENT HERE Almost a year after the tragic fall of Champlain Towers South in Surfside, the Florida Legislature has done nothing to prevent another disaster. It’s an approach often taken in Tallahassee: Miami-Dade County’s problems are its own to fix. But the flaws at Champlain South aren’t necessarily limited to Miami-Dade, or even Florida. They could be present in older waterfront buildings around the world.

Episode 8: The Rules Are Different Here of Collapse: Disaster in Surfside, a new podcast from Miami Herald/Treefort Media, shows listeners how the long-term consequences of the deadly accident are still up in the air — and explores how previous decades of inaction by lawmakers and the Champlain South condo board contributed to the collapse.

Listen to the Podcast and hear the interview with Eric Glazer.

Tags:
Becker’s Take it to the Board with Donna DiMaggio Berger podcast features a variety of guests including our very own attorneys from across the firm’s practice areas and offices.

Becker’s Take it to the Board with Donna DiMaggio Berger podcast features a variety of guests including our very own attorneys from across the firm’s practice areas and offices.

  • Posted: Apr 24, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Becker’s Take it to the Board with Donna DiMaggio Berger podcast features a variety of guests including our very own attorneys from across the firm’s practice areas and offices.

Becker’s Take it to the Board with Donna DiMaggio Berger podcast features a variety of guests including our very own attorneys from across the firm’s practice areas and offices.

Think you know what community association life is all about? Think again. Residents must obey the rules, directors must follow the law, and managers must keep it all running smoothly. Take It to the Board explores the reality of life in a condominium, cooperative or homeowners’ association, what’s really involved in serving on its board, and how to maintain that ever-so-delicate balance of being legally compliant and community spirited. Leading community association attorney Donna DiMaggio Berger acknowledges the balancing act without losing her sense of humor as she talks with a variety of association leaders, experts, and vendors about the challenges and benefits of the community association lifestyle.

If you’ve got a question, Take It To The Board with Donna DiMaggio Berger – We Speak Condo & HOA!

Episodes are available for subscription on iTunesAmazon Music, Spotifyor listen through any podcast streaming app.

Rental Restrictions in Homeowners’ Associations by Robert L. Kaye – KBRLegal.com

Rental Restrictions in Homeowners’ Associations by Robert L. Kaye – KBRLegal.com

  • Posted: Apr 24, 2022
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Rental Restrictions in Homeowners’ Associations by Robert L. Kaye – KBRLegal.com
A large percentage of Florida residential property owners are subject to restrictive covenants on their property, be it by a declaration of condominium or declaration of covenants. In addition to these restrictions, Florida Statutes contain additional restrictions that apply to these properties, some of which involve use restrictions. For condominiums, the provisions of the statutes are of a heightened significance because but for the statutes, condominium ownership of property does not exist. However, for homeowners’ associations, restrictive covenants have been in use for centuries, well in advance of the existence of such statutes. As a result, certain statutory provisions may not apply to every homeowners’ association in Florida.
There is a restriction within both the U.S. and Florida Constitutions that limit the ability of the state to enact a law that will impair an existing contract or vested contractual right. Use restrictions contained in declarations of covenants have been identified by Florida courts as existing contracts between the property owner and the entity that operates the community under the governing documents (the association). There is also case law in Florida that addresses whether a change in the statute applies to the community based upon if a particular phrase is included in the governing documents (commonly referred to as Kaufman language).
If the governing documents include Kaufman language, any changes made by the legislature in a given year will automatically be incorporated into the governing documents and apply to that community. Conversely, if there is no Kaufman language, only what is referred to as “procedural” changes made by the legislature will apply to that community. An example of a procedural change would be a change in a notice requirement for elections. Statutory changes that are “substantive” would not apply in that instance to that community. An example of a substantive change would be requiring the association to take on all exterior maintenance of the residential dwellings (presuming the documents do not already provide for that obligation). Without the Kaufman language in the governing documents, this latter statutory change would not apply to that community, as such change would likely be considered unconstitutional.
During the legislative session in 2021, Section 720.306 of the Florida Statutes was amended to add subsection (h), which provides, in pertinent part, that any amendment to a governing document after July 1, 2021 that prohibits or regulates rental agreements applies only to a parcel owner who acquires title to the parcel after the effective date of the amendment or to a parcel owner who consents to the amendment (with specific exceptions relative to short term rentals and limiting rentals to up to 3 times a year). However, under the analysis discussed above, rental restrictions and the ability to amend governing documents are generally considered substantive vested rights. As such, this new statute appears to impair the existing contractual rights of many property owners in homeowner association communities.
The first step in considering whether this new rental restriction change applies to a particular homeowner association community is to check the governing documents for Kaufman language (this also assumes that the documents were not initially created on or after July 1, 2021). Typically, Kaufman language is not included in original documents by developers of communities, but many associations have added it by amendment after the developer was no longer involved. If the Kaufman language is in the documents, the new statutory rental restriction provisions apply. If, however, there is no Kaufman language, the new rental restriction statute would not be applicable to the community. In this instance, the membership could still amend the governing documents to prohibit or regulate rentals within the community, which should be enforceable against all current owners, regardless of whether or not they voted in favor of the amendment.
The issue of whether or not this new statutory change regarding rental restrictions violates the Federal and State Constitutions has not been tested in the Florida or Federal courts as of this writing. Before considering amending the governing document in a homeowner association community to create rental restrictions, it is recommended to consult with the association attorney as to the limitations that may apply.

Robert L. Kaye, Esq. is a Board Certified Specialist in Condominium and Planned Development Law. Mr. Kaye serves on the Florida Bar’s Grievance Committee, the Committee on the Unlicensed Practice of Law and is a member of the Condominium Committee of the Real Property Section of The Florida Bar. He also lectures on Community Association law and is regularly published on the subject. Mr. Kaye hosts KBR’s appearances on the radio show, ‘Ask the Experts’, from 6pm to 7pm, the first Thursday of each month. See his full bio HERE.
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HOA AND CONDO LAW – IT’S LIKE NIGHT AND DAY! by Glazer Sachs

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HOA AND CONDO LAW – IT’S LIKE NIGHT AND DAY! by Glazer Sachs

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HOA AND CONDO LAW – IT’S LIKE NIGHT AND DAY!

By Glazer Sachs / written by Jan Bergemann

To be very honest, I am at a total loss when I look at the HOA Act the Florida legislature created with FS 720. Sometimes I wonder why they created this statute at all, considering that the provisions contained in this statute have no teeth — and it is widely known that even the best laws are useless without any proper enforcement tools.

The history of FS 720 clearly shows that enforcement of its provisions is only possible for homeowners who have lots of spare change in their pockets.

The biggest “joke” in the statutes is one sentence. Many good families lost their homes and life savings because the following sentence headlines the whole Florida HOA Act:

FS 720.302(2) The Legislature recognizes that it is not in the best interest of homeowners’ associations or the individual association members thereof to create or impose a bureau or other agency of state government to regulate the affairs of homeowners’ associations.

In all honesty, the only ones served by this sentence are specialized attorneys and their bank accounts – to the detriment of the homeowners living in these community associations.

While the FLORIDA CONDO ACT (FS718) has many detailed provisions that can be partially and easily enforced by a regulatory agency (Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes), approximately 2.5 million homeowners living and/or owning property in these homeowners’ associations are treated like unwanted stepchildren by the Florida legislature.

With the existing, unenforceable statutes in place, it’s a financially risky proposition for retirees and investors to buy property within these communities. Homeowners are left to fight for themselves with no help to enforce the existing laws.

Simple matters, such as elections, record requests or financial issues, turn into expensive lawsuits that can quickly become monsters eating up families’ life savings. Many homeowners run around with blinders, ignoring permanent violations of Florida statutes, because they don’t want to risk spending their last dime on legal bills.

The proper legislation that would make life in homeowners’ associations much easier – and less expensive – is in place, but only for condominium associations.

The provisions contained in FS 720 are stacked against the homeowners, especially since in many associations budget shortfalls caused by unpaid dues and/or foreclosures are causing heavy financials burdens on the owners still paying their dues.

High legal bills are creating an even bigger hardship on the owners still paying the ever-increasing assessments, caused by the fact that the provisions contained in the HOA Act FS 720 provide no easy solutions for simple disputes.

The question that baffles everyone: Why is the Florida legislature unwilling to enact simple laws that would stop most of these shenanigans we are all reading about daily in the media? The established wording from the condo statutes could easily be used for the HOA statutes. Case law and the Florida Administrative Code is in place.  Nobody has to reinvent the wheel.

But who fights these bills that would simplify life in HOAs in Florida? The only feasible explanation: The service providers, especially the attorneys that claim to lobby for the associations. They are the only ones who benefit from these useless HOA statutes.

It is definitely easier to fleece the owners if the laws are confusing and can be interpreted any way anybody wants. With the statutes for HOAs it is very easy to create mini-dictatorships and fill their own pockets – if some determined folks so desire. Is that what the folks who “invented” homeowners’ associations had in mind when they created these communities?

 

Tags: ,