Become our Member : JOIN SFPMA TODAY   LogIn / Register: LOGIN/REGISTER

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

Is your community association indemnified from legal action resulting from collection activities? Don’t Get Sued, Get Axela!

Is your community association indemnified from legal action resulting from collection activities? Don’t Get Sued, Get Axela!

  • Posted: Jul 20, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Is your community association indemnified from legal action resulting from collection activities? Don’t Get Sued, Get Axela!

Don’t Get Sued, Get Axela!

HOAs, Condominium Associations, Cooperatives, and other community associations are regularly adjusting how they do business based on new laws and updates to existing statutes that supersede their own governing documents. Lately, a barrage of new legislation has taken direct aim at how community associations handle the collection of delinquent fees from home and unit owners who have fallen behind on their fees and assessments. Failure to follow these laws can put an association, its management company, and even its attorney in danger of being sued.

nosue get axela 2

Legal Requirements

Axela Technologies has long been the leader in providing indemnification for HOAs, condominium associations, cooperatives and community association management firms by offering fully compliant third-party debt and delinquency collection services. We pride ourselves on keeping our business practices compliant with your state collection laws and are vigilant on newly passed legislation.

California’s Davis-Stirling Act, for example, outlines the “do’s and don’ts” for associations seeking to collect the fees that are owed to them from delinquent homeowners. Appropriately, each year the legislature has amended, revised and added numerous provisions of the Act. Requiring associations  to be aware of the latest requirements in order for the association to proceed with collection of delinquent assessments.

Now Florida has revised their own laws for collecting delinquent assessments, adding additional protections for homeowners that all condominium associations, HOAs, and association management firms must adhere to on top of all their existing workload.

nosue get axela 1

New Florida Laws

Among the most important changes in Florida law is Senate Bill 56: Community Association Assessment Notices (“SB 56”). The waiting period before notices can be sent to delinquent home or unit owners has been extended. HOAs already had to wait 45 days before notices that a lien was being sought against the debtor’s property could be sent. Additionally, a similar waiting period is needed for the post-lien notice of intent to foreclose.

Put simply, the new notice requirements will establish a 120-day period of collection efforts that associations must incur before proceeding with a foreclosure action. There will now be a mandatory 30-day courtesy notice of late assessment, a 45-day notice of intent to record a claim of lien, and a 45-day notice of intent to foreclose on that claim of lien. These changes take effect on July 1, 2021.

nosue get axela 3

The Attorneys’ Function

The largest portion of the remaining legislative changes refer specifically to the work performed by attorneys on behalf of the associations they represent. While attorneys are sometimes needed for filing liens and enforcing the security interests of the associations they represent, it is almost always a far better decision to engage with a third-party debt collection service to properly service both the association and the delinquent home or unit owner prior to getting an attorney involved. Axela complies with all state laws in every state that it services and fully indemnifies the association and assures full compliance with state and federal law as well as the individual association’s own governing documents.

Is your HOA, condominium association, cooperative, or association management firm struggling to keep up with the latest legislation and indemnification while simply trying to collect the money it is owed from delinquent home or unit owners? Even the simplest collection task can come under legal scrutiny. With our “no cost or risk to the association” assurance, engaging Axela Technologies for your delinquency collection needs may be one of the easiest business decisions you’ll make in this litigious environment. Get in touch today and let us show you how we can collect your money without putting your association or association management business at risk of violating the law.

 

Tags: , ,
The Subtle and Not-So-Subtle Differences Between Homeowners and Condominium Associations

The Subtle and Not-So-Subtle Differences Between Homeowners and Condominium Associations

  • Posted: Jul 20, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on The Subtle and Not-So-Subtle Differences Between Homeowners and Condominium Associations

The Subtle and Not-So-Subtle Differences Between Homeowners and Condominium Associations

Florida has created an abundance of legislation governing homeowners’ and condominium associations. You would think that, by now, laws affecting both types of communities would have more parity than they actually do. (Please note that that commercial condominiums are not addressed in this article.)

Perhaps the most appreciative difference between a homeowners association and a residential condominium association is that the homeowners association exists in common law, but the condominium only exists because of legislation adopted by the Florida Legislature. That said, homeowners associations are subject to Chapter 720, Florida Statutes, and condominium associations are subject to Chapter 718, Florida Statutes. There is both parity and significant differences between these two Acts, the latter of which are further addressed below. We begin by examining bidding.

 

Bidding: A homeowners association is only required to obtain bids if the aggregate cost of the project (referring to the materials, work, and/or services) exceeds 10 percent of the total budget including reserves, if any. On the other hand, condominium associations are required to obtain bids if the aggregate cost of the project exceeds 5 percent of the total budget including reserves, if any. Please note, there is no requirement in the legislation for a community association to obtain a definitive number of a bids. Therefore, at least two would be appropriate. Also remember, there are exceptions to the bidding requirement for professional services such as attorneys, accountants, and landscape architects.

 

Certified Written Inquiry: A condominium association owner has the right to send a certified written inquiry to the board, and the board is obligated to answer it within 30 days (or 60 days if the certified written inquiry is provided to the community association’s lawyer to respond to). A failure to respond means that if the owner files a legal action over the item for which certified written inquiry was provided and loses, the owner will not be responsible to pay for the association’s prevailing party attorneys’ fees. There is no similar provision for a homeowners association.

 

Common Areas: Common areas in a homeowners association are owned by the association itself. In other words, no owner can claim an ownership interest in a homeowner association’s common areas. However, as to condominiums, the equivalent of the homeowner association’s common area is referred to as “common elements”. All of the unit owners of the condominium association own an indivisible interest in the common elements.

 

Disputes: In a homeowners association, disputes between an association and a parcel owner regarding use of or changes to the parcel or the common areas and other covenant enforcement disputes, disputes regarding amendments to the association documents, disputes regarding meetings of the board and committees appointed by the board, membership meetings not including election meetings, and access to the official records of the association must be the subject of a demand for pre-suit mediation served by an aggrieved party before the dispute is filed in the local court. Before a homeowners association can commence litigation where the amount in controversy is in excess of $100,000, the approval of a majority of a quorum of the membership is required. There is no similar provision as applied to condominium associations.

 

In a condominium association, prior to the institution of court litigation, a party to a “dispute” (as such term is hereinafter defined) must petition the Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation for non-binding arbitration or, as of July 1, 2021, avail themselves of the presuit mediation process as set out in Chapter 720.  “Disputes” subject to mandatory arbitration or presuit mediation include 1) the authority of the board of directors, under this chapter or association document to: i) require any owner to take any action, or not to take any action, involving that owner’s unit or the appurtenances thereto ii) alter or add to a common area or element; or 2) the failure of a governing body, when required by this chapter or an association document, to: i) properly conduct elections ii) give adequate notice of meetings or other actions iii) properly conduct meetings iv) allow inspection of books and records; and 3) a plan of termination pursuant to §718.117, Fla. Stat.

 

Elections: Elections in a homeowners association take place as per the bylaws, while elections for condominiums take place following the regime set out in chapter 718, Florida Statutes, more specifically §718.112, Fla. Stat., and the provisions of the Florida Administrative Code. In order to hold a homeowners association election, a quorum must be attained unless the bylaws provide otherwise. No quorum is required to hold a condominium election, but rather 20 percent of the eligible voters need to cast a ballot in order to hold the election. In a condominium association of more than 10 units, co-owners of a unit cannot serve on the board at the same time unless there are not enough candidates, or they own more than one unit. Commencing July 1, 2018, condominium association board members cannot serve more than eight consecutive years absent certain exceptions (note, this statute is not retroactive in its application). There is no similar co-owner prohibition and term limit restriction for homeowners associations.

 

Elections by acclimation: In a condominium association if the same number of candidates, or less, run for the board as the number of seats available, then there is no need to have the election. This is referred to as an “election by acclimation” which means, those candidates will comprise the present board upon the annual meeting. If the election is contested because there are more candidates than seats available and at least 20 percent of the eligible voters do not cast a ballot, then last year’s board rolls over.

 

As to homeowners associations, if the election process allows candidates to be nominated in advance of the meeting, the association is not required to allow nominations at the meeting. An election is not required unless more candidates are nominated than vacancies exist. If an election is not required because there are either an equal number or fewer qualified candidates than vacancies exist, and if nominations from the floor are not required pursuant to the statute or the bylaws and write-in nominations are not permitted, then the candidates who nominated themselves in advance shall commence service on the board of directors regardless of whether a quorum is attained at the annual meeting. Otherwise, if those conditions are not met and a quorum is not attained for a homeowners association’s election, then last year’s board rolls over to this year’s board.

 

Elections, Voting: Unless otherwise set out in the bylaws, homeowners association members vote in the election for the board by proxy and/or ballot. On the other hand, condominium association owners cannot vote for the election of directors by proxy but rather must vote themselves by secret absentee ballot using the the inner and outer envelope system. A homeowners association only needs to use the inner and outer envelope system when the bylaws call for secret absentee ballots.

 

Fines: A condominium association cannot levy a fine greater than $1,000 for any one violation and cannot lien and foreclose the fine under any circumstances. In a homeowners association, an association can foreclose to collect a fine if both i) the fine is $1,000 or more and ii) the authority to lien is set out in the declaration.

 

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Sheet: As to condominium associations §718.504, Fla. Stat., requires that a “Frequently Asked Questions and Answers” sheet be made available to prospective purchasers and to owners who request it. It must be updated annually and must include the following questions along with the answers to these questions: 1) What are my voting rights in the condominium association? 2) What restrictions exist in the condominium documents on my right to use my unit? 3) How much are my assessments to the condominium association for my unit type, and when are they due? 4) Do I have to be a member in any other association? If so, what is the name of the association and what are my voting rights in this association? Also, how much are my assessments? 5) Am I required to pay rent or land use fees for recreational or other commonly used facilities? If so, how much am I obligated to pay annually? 6) Is the condominium association or any other mandatory membership association involved in any court cases in which it may face liability in excess of $100,000? If so, identify each such case. There is no similar provision or requirement for homeowners associations.

 

Leasing Restrictions: Effective July 1, 2021  as to HOA leasing restrictions, any restriction that prohibits or regulates rental agreements applies only to (i) an owner who acquires title to a parcel after the effective date of the governing document or amendment, or (ii) an owner who consents, individually or through a representative, to the governing document or amendment.  As to condominium associations, according to §718.110(13), Fla. Stat., an amendment prohibiting unit owners from renting their units or altering the duration of the rental term or specifying or limiting the number of times unit owners are entitled to rent their units during a specified period, applies only to unit owners who consent to the amendment and unit owners who acquire title to their units after the effective date of the amendment.

 

Liens and Foreclosures: In a homeowners association, prior to recording a lien against a delinquent owner’s lot, the owner must be provided a statutorily compliant warning letter at least 45 days prior to recording the lien, warning the homeowner that if the assessment is not paid a lien may be recorded. Then, the owner must be provided a second letter at least 45 days prior to filing the foreclosure lawsuit warning that if the lien is not satisfied (paid-off), then a lawsuit to foreclose the lien may be filed anytime thereafter. For a condominium association the warning/waiting periods for both letters was 30 days. Effective July 1, 2021 this was changed to 45 days.

 

Material Alterations: Unless otherwise provided in the declaration of covenants and restrictions, a material alteration to a homeowners association’s common area is decided by the board. In condominium associations, material alterations require 75 percent approval of all unit owners unless the declaration provides otherwise.

 

Official Records Requests: In a homeowners association, official record requests must be made by certified U.S. mail to create the rebuttable presumption the association willfully failed to respond. There is no similar requirement for a condominium association. Every community association should adopt specific rules governing official records requests, how often they can be made, and where they must be delivered. If your association has not done so, you are urged to discuss this with the association‘s lawyer.

 

Quorums: A quorum of the membership for a homeowners association membership meeting consists of 30 percent of the entire membership unless a lower number is provided for in the bylaws. A quorum for a condominium association membership meeting occurs when there is a majority of the voting interests present unless a lower number is provided for in the bylaws.

 

Reserve Accounts: A homeowners association only has restricted reserve accounts if initially created by the developer or voted on and approved by a majority of the entire membership. In a condominium association, the budget must include reserve accounts for capital expenditures and deferred maintenance. These accounts must include, but are not limited to, roof replacement, building painting, and pavement resurfacing, regardless of the amount of deferred maintenance expense or replacement cost, and any other item that has a deferred maintenance expense or replacement cost that exceeds $10,000. Condominium boards and homeowners association boards with restricted reserves may propose lower or no reserves to the membership which is subject to approval by a majority of a quorum of the members. However, neither board is obligated to propose lower reserves. A condominium association board and a homeowners association board with restricted reserves must fully fund those reserves in the budget each year as must homeowners association boards whose association has adopted restricted reserves.

 

Transfer Fees: As per §689.28, Fla. Stat., transfer fees when buying and leasing a home in the state of Florida are prohibited. But, there are exceptions for both homeowners and condominium associations with this caveat. There is no cap, per se, that a homeowners association can charge a prospective member as a part of acquiring their property, but such fee must be authorized in the declaration (or other recorded document). However, as per §718.112 Fla. Stat., a condominium association can only charge up to $150 per applicant. A husband/wife or parent/dependent child are considered one applicant. A condominium association can only charge a transfer fee if it has the authority to approve transfers, and the authority for the transfer fee, specifically, must be set out in the declaration or bylaws (and as set forth above, as of July 1, 2021 it is presently limited to a maximum $150.00).

 

Warranties: A developer and general contractor of a condominium provides statutory warranties to buyers of units as further detailed in Chapter 718, Fla. Stat. There are no similar statutory warranties set out in Chapter 720, Fla. Stat., for buyers of a home within a homeowners association. A developer of a condominium, pursuant to relevant law, also provides an implied warranty of habitability. As to a homeowners association, §553.835, Fla. Stat., provides in relevant part that there is no such warranty for off-site improvements (i.e., the common areas) with a small exception for the shared components of a townhome type community.

 

Websites: A condominium association that has a condominium with 150 or more units must host an association website and post certain official records to it. Homeowners associations have no similar requirement.

 

If you have any questions in regard to these matters be sure to discuss them with an attorney of your choosing.

(Reprinted with permission from the April 2021 edition of the Florida Community Association Journal and updated to reflect  recent legislation effective July 1, 2021)

 

Tags: , ,
Selective Enforcement: A Grossly Misunderstood Concept in the entire body of community association law.

Selective Enforcement: A Grossly Misunderstood Concept in the entire body of community association law.

  • Posted: Jul 14, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Selective Enforcement: A Grossly Misunderstood Concept in the entire body of community association law.

Selective Enforcement: A Grossly Misunderstood Concept in the entire body of community association law.

by https://kbrlegal.com/

Without exception, the affirmative defense of “selective enforcement” is one of the most misunderstood concepts in the entire body of community association law. How often have you heard something like this: “The board has not enforced the fence height limitation, so it cannot enforce any other architectural rules”? Simply put, nothing could be further from the truth.

When a community association seeks to enforce its covenants and/or its board adopted rules and regulations, an owner can, under the right circumstances, assert an affirmative defense such as the affirmative defense of selective enforcement. An affirmative defense is a “yes I did it, but so what” type of defense. In civil lawsuits, affirmative defenses include the statute of limitations, the statute of fraudswaiver, and more. However, it’s just not as simple as that. For example, a fence height limitation is a very different restriction than a required set back. Under most if not all circumstances, the failure to enforce a  fence height requirement is very different from the failure to enforce a setback requirement. Ordinarily, the affirmative defense of selective enforcement will only apply if the violation or circumstances are comparable, such that one could reasonably rely upon the non-enforcement of a particular covenant, restriction, or rule with respect to their own conduct or action.

In the seminal case of Chattel Shipping and Investment Inc. v. Brickell Place Condominium Association Inc., 481 So.2d 29 (FLA. 3rd DCA 1986), 45 owners had improperly enclosed their balconies. Thereafter, the association informed all of the owners that it would thereafter take “no action with respect to existing enclosed balconies, but prohibit future balcony constructions and enforce the enclosure prohibition.” As you might have already predicted, nevertheless, thereafter an owner of a unit, Chattel Shipping, enclosed their unit; and the association secured a mandatory injunction in the trial court requiring the removal of the balcony enclosure erected without permission. The owner appealed. In the end, the appellate court disagreed with the owner who argued that the association decision to enforce the “no enclosure” requirement only on a prospective basis was both selective enforcement and arbitrary. The court held that the adoption and implementation of a uniform policy under which, for obvious reasons of practicality and economy, a given building restriction will be enforced only prospectively cannot be deemed “selective and arbitrary.”

In Laguna Tropical, A Condominium Association Inc. v. Barnave, 208 So. 3d 1262, (Fla. 3d DCA 2017), the court again used the purpose of the restriction in its determination of whether the association engaged in selective enforcement. In Laguna Tropical, a rule prohibited floor covering other than carpeting unless expressly permitted by the association. Additionally, the rule provided that owners must place padding between the flooring and the concrete slab so that the flooring would be adequately soundproof. In this case, an owner installed laminate flooring on her second floor unit and the neighbor below complained that the noise disturbed his occupancy. As a result of the complaint, the association demanded that the owner remove the laminate flooring. However, the owner argued selective enforcement because the association only enforced the carpeting restriction against the eleven exclusively upstairs units in the condominium. The court noted that the remaining units in the condominium were either downstairs units only, or were configured to include both first-floor and second-floor residential space within the same unit.

Again, the court looked to the purpose of the prohibition on floor coverings other than carpet and found that the prohibition was plainly intended to avoid noise complaints. Therefore, no selective enforcement was proven because no complaints were shown to have arisen regarding any units except the eleven exclusively upstairs units.

What about cats and dogs? In another case, Prisco v. Forest Villas Condominium Apartments Inc., 847 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), the Fourth District Court of Appeals heard an appeal alleging selective enforcement regarding the association’s pet restrictions. The association had a pet restriction which stated that other than fish and birds, “no pets whatsoever” shall be allowed. In this case, the association had allowed an owner to keep a cat in her unit, but refused to allow another owner to keep a dog. The association argued that there was a distinction between the dog and the cat. However, on appeal, the court found that the restriction was clear and unambiguous that all pets other than fish and birds were prohibited. Therefore, the court reasoned that the facts which make dogs different from cats did not matter because the clear purpose of the restriction was to prohibit all types of pets except fish and birds. In other words, the court held that the plain and obvious purpose of a restriction should govern any interpretation of whether the association engaged in selective enforcement.

If an association has a “no pets” rule and allows cats, must it allow dogs, too? There is a long line of arbitration cases that have distinguished dogs from cats and other pets for purposes of selective enforcement. For example, in Beachplace Association Inc. v. Hurwitz, Case no. 02-5940, a Department of Business and Professional Regulation Division of Florida Condominium Arbitration case, the arbitrator found, in response to an owner’s selective enforcement defense raised in response to the association’s demand for removal of a dog, that even though cats were allowed, that comparison of dogs to cats was not a comparative, like kind situation. Further the arbitrator found that cats and dogs had significant distinctions such as barking versus meowing, and therefore the owner’s attempted use of the selective enforcement argument failed.

But, in Hallmark of Hollywood Condominium Association Inc. v. Andrews, Case 2003-09-2380, another Department of Business and Professional Regulation Division of Florida Condominium Arbitration case, the learned arbitrator James Earl decided that because the association has a full blown “no pets of any kind”  requirement and since cats were allowed, then dogs must be allowed, too. In other words, the defendant owner’s waiver defense worked. But, the arbitrator wisely noted in a footnote as follows: “The undersigned notes that there is a long line of arbitration cases that have distinguished dogs from cats and other pets for purposes of selective enforcement. However, the fourth district court of appeal has ruled that where the condominium documents contain particular language prohibiting all pets, any dissimilarity between dogs and cats is irrelevant and both must be considered. See Prisco.” The distinction between the two arbitration cases could be explained because of timing in that the 4th DCA’s decision in Prisco was not yet published when Hurwitz was decided.

From these important cases, it can be gleaned that

(i) even if an association has ignored a particular rule or covenant, that by giving written notice to the entire community that it will be enforced prospectively, the rule or covenant can be reinvigorated and becomes fully enforceable once again (though of course, prior non-conforming situations may have to be grandfathered depending on the situation),

(ii) if an association or an owner is seeking an estoppel affirmative defense, they must be sure all of the necessary elements are pled,

(iii) at times a court will look to the purpose of the rule itself where it makes sense to do so, and

(iv) dogs and cats are different, but they are both considered “pets.”

Remember to always discuss the complexities of re-enforcement of covenants and rules and regulations that were not enforced for some time with your association’s legal counsel in an effort to mitigate negative outcomes. The process (commonly referred to as “republication”) can restore the viability of a covenant or rule that may have been waived due to the lack of uniform and timely enforcement.

 

JOIN US FOR A DOUBLE WEBINAR ON JULY 28TH, 2021.

JOIN US FOR A DOUBLE WEBINAR ON JULY 28TH, 2021.

  • Posted: Jul 14, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on JOIN US FOR A DOUBLE WEBINAR ON JULY 28TH, 2021.

JOIN US FOR A DOUBLE WEBINAR ON JULY 28TH, 2021.

GREGG WALLICK WILL BE TEACHING ROOFING 101 AND WILL BE POINTING OUT DANGER SIGNS IN YOUR ROOF AND ANSWERING ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS.

ATTORNEY ERIC GLAZER KNOWS THAT ASSOCIATIONS ARE MORE EAGER THAN EVER TO BEGIN MAKING REPAIRS, BUT WILL TEACH THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTRACT REVIEW BEFORE SIGNING ON THE DOTTED LINE.

TO REGISTER FOR THIS ON-LINE WEBINAR: CLICK HERE

Can They Do That? Video Series by Becker

Can They Do That? Video Series by Becker

  • Posted: Jul 07, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Can They Do That? Video Series by Becker

Can They Do That? Video Series

Becker’s video series, tackles some of the unique problems that homeowners and renters face today. We answer questions, no matter how far-fetched they may seem. From service animals to nudists in your community, we get to the bottom of it and let you know – “Can They Do That?”

by Becker

 

Our board wants to adopt a budget that includes a contingency fund. – “Can they do that?”
Aired 11/23/2020
Our board has proposed a budget in which they’re changing the way we’re funding reserves. – “Can They Do That?”
Aired 11/17/2020
Our condominium has never funded reserves, and yet, the board has proposed and adopted a budget that provides for full funding of reserves. – “Can They Do That?”
Aired 11/05/2020
I put up a political sign for my favorite candidate. My HOA and the Board sent me a letter telling me to take it down. I have a right to free speech don’t I? – “Can they do that?”
Aired 10/09/2020
A hurricane is a few days away from landfall near my condominium. The association sent a notice that elevators and the building air conditioning will be shutdown for 36 hours before landfall. “Can they do that?”
Aired 9/22/2020
I came across an unofficial community website that was using our official logo and name. The website included some damaging information about the association. “Can they do that?”
Aired 8/26/2020
I received a notice that my property is in violation of local code and ordinances. The city wants to start imposing fines on my property. “Can they do that?”
Aired 7/28/2020
The insurance company wants to take my Florida claim and litigate in New York. “Can they do that?”
Aired 6/29/2020
I’m going to go on a trip right now. Prices are really low to travel, and I want to visit my family. My employer’s telling me that if I go on the trip I’m not able to come back to work. My employer is going to mandate that I quarantine myself for 14 days when I come back. “Can They Do That?”
Aired 5/27/2020
Tags: , , ,
Becker is proud to announce that the firm has signed The Diversity in Government Relations Coalition Industry Pledge.

Becker is proud to announce that the firm has signed The Diversity in Government Relations Coalition Industry Pledge.

  • Posted: Jul 03, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Becker is proud to announce that the firm has signed The Diversity in Government Relations Coalition Industry Pledge.

Becker is proud to announce that the firm has signed The Diversity in Government Relations Coalition Industry Pledge.

 

The DGR Coalition aspires to foster and strengthen diversity, equity, and inclusion among entities that influence local, state, and federal policy through data collection, strategic communications, and stakeholder engagement. This pledge is part of its greater non-partisan efforts to “put forth evidence-based best practices that govern our actions…throughout the field.”

The Diversity in Government Relations Coalition Industry Pledge, a first-of-its-kind in the government relations industry, reads:

“We commit to increasing understanding of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and its impact on the government relations field; intentionally addressing the gaps in diverse representation of our staff and our leadership teams that influence local, state, federal and international policy; and exploring the unintended consequences that result from policy and advocacy that lack diverse representation, voice, and perspective.”

“Becker is delighted to align ourselves with the Coalition’s goal of creating an equitable, inclusive future,” said Omar Franco, leader of the firm’s Federal Lobbying practice and the firm’s designee to sign the pledge. “The firm and, in particular, its Government Law & Lobbying team have long understood the importance of having all voices represented in our ranks; signing this pledge is yet another way we can be a proactive part of the conversation.”

Becker is also a member of the Law Firm Antiracism Alliance (LFAA), a partnership of over 285 law firms committed to racial equality. The LFAA’s mission is to collaborate with racial justice legal service organizations and law firms’ pro bono teams to confront the root cause of racism.

For further samples of Becker’s commitment to diversity and inclusion, please view the perspectives below:

Becker’s Government Law & Lobbying practice counts its racial, ethnic, gender and political diversity as an integral part of its formula for success. The team believes its diversity provides clients with the distinct advantage of collaborating with an array of state and federal legislators and local government officials from both sides of the aisle, as well as the various caucuses. To learn more about the Government Law & Lobbying practice, please click here.

For more information about the DGR Coalition and how to participate in its Industry Pledge, please click here.

 

Tags:
Nothing worse than delivering to clients with flooded docks – Call us Today!

Nothing worse than delivering to clients with flooded docks – Call us Today!

  • Posted: Jun 29, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Nothing worse than delivering to clients with flooded docks – Call us Today!

We were hired to inspect, clean, and document the underground storm utilities and structures for 12 commercial office buildings and 6 retention ponds on a large stretch of land on International Drive. Having crews in Miami and Orlando has me excited about the future!

 

SOUTH FLORIDA COMMERCIAL PLUMBING CONTRACTORS

GreenTeam Service Corp. is a professional and reliable commercial plumbing contractor, providing timely service for commercial buildings including Class-A office buildings, industrial properties and healthcare facilities throughout South Florida. GreenTeam’s number one focus is customer experience

We live by the words: Exceptional service.  No exceptions.

Providing off-the-chart service is more than just a motto at GreenTeam Service Corp. We hold each other accountable and never quit until we know we’ve done a quality job for each and every client we come into contact with. Put GreenTeam’s unending dedication to service into play for your next plumbing project. You’ll be glad you did!

HEALTHCARE | CLASS-A OFFICE | INSTITUTIONAL
INDUSTRIAL | HOA | HOSPITALITY | GOVERNMENT

Storm drain cleaning and vac truck projects and we couldn’t be more thrilled. We are now servicing Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach. Let’s get you on the schedule!

GreenTeam Service Corp

Call

(954) 210-4100   or

email plumbing@greenteamservicecorp.com

 

Tags:
Eradicating Pond Weed at Golf Course

Eradicating Pond Weed at Golf Course

SOLitude Lake Management has been servicing this property for over ten years. Due to southeast Florida’s tropical climate and year-round growing season, many plants, both native and non-native, become invasive on land and water, requiring constant control methods. Aquatic vegetation (algae, Vallisneria, and hydrilla) was managed by repeated herbicide treatments in order to maintain proper water flow and lake/pond health.

 

water flow and lake/pond health.

before-and-after-fl-gc-case study before and after procellacor invasive weeds floating hearts

Location: Palm Beach, FL

This property is a collection of suburban residential homes surrounding a golf course located at the northern tip of the Everglades. Due to seasonal flooding in this region, land development requires stormwater collection and flood control systems mandated by several drainage district government entities. This property has a series of interconnected lakes and ponds to collect and move floodwaters into discharge canals that eventually lead out to the Atlantic Ocean. Water flows into the site from other areas, including agricultural lands to the west. The lakes and ponds at the property provide important habitats to migratory and wading bird populations.

nutrient remediation products - on the job - lake and pond treatment - algae and aquatic weed control - alum - calcis - phoslock

Scope Of Work:

ProcellaCOR was used to eradicate invasive floating heart in two ponds. ProcellaCOR is a new herbicide technology that can be used for the selective control of some of our nation’s most invasive and recurring aquatic weeds. Leveraging new mechanisms to specifically target the unique growth processes of these undesirable species, ProcellaCOR helps property owners achieve long-term control of the following aquatic plants without the need for costly re-application. The product’s premium low dosing features allow for a 100-1000x reduction (compared to other aquatic herbicides) in the active ingredient necessary to eradicate the invasive and noxious aquatic weeds responsible for degrading the health and use of waterbodies. These superior results are paired with a Reduced Risk classification by the EPA, meaning it can be applied to lakes and ponds without impacting the native plants you enjoy or interfering with recreation.

Nymphoides_cristata-floating hearts invasive aquatic weeds

Project Description:

 In 2017, project managers observed a new species of aquatic invasive – Nymphoides cristata, commonly called floating hearts – a CATEGORY I on the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council’s (FLEPPC) 2017 List of Invasive Plant Species. Nymphoides have become established in South Florida surface waters after escaping from the ornamental plant trade. It has small heart-shaped leaves that float on the water’s surface while the roots grow into the hydrosoil. It is presumed that Nymphoides were introduced into the property by inflowing surface water from adjacent drainage canals.

Repeated attempts were made to control Nymphoides by carefully applying systemic herbicides that were already being used to treat other aquatics found on the property. The results of these treatments were unsuccessful. Next, a foliar contact herbicide was used to treat the plant on the water surface; however, it did nothing to the submersed portion, which continued growing.

procellacor nutrient remediation algae and aquatic weed before 3

In 2018, a new solution called ProcellaCOR became available. SOLitude began a test study in two ponds on the property with Nymphoides where previous control had not been successful. This alternative solution has several useful features (environmental and cost-effective) that made it a good choice for this problematic aquatic plant: 1) Its unique formulation targets a hormone in certain plants, Nymphoides being one of those, without affecting other native aquatic plants. 2) Application only needs to be done in the areas where the plant is physically growing, not the entire pond.

The ponds selected on the property for this test study were chosen for their similar size, the amount of Nymphoides present in the water (60 – 70% coverage), and location. Pond A is located farthest away from any surface water canal inflow. Pond B is located closest (40 feet) to the inflow surface water canal from the west. Water from Pond A is used to irrigate residential lawns. Pond B is not used for irrigation.

procellacor nutrient remediation algae and aquatic weed after 3

Efficacy was visible on plants within days of application, and complete control was established about three weeks later in both ponds. Regrowth of Nymphoides was not observed for approximately 8 months in Pond A and 10 months in Pond B. There were no incidents of issues using irrigation water from Pond A. Current treatment methods include the use of ProcellaCOR as needed to treat all waterbodies on the property with 100% control of Nymphoides.

 

Tags: ,
Do Boating Accident Cases Differ From Car Accident Cases? Yes and No

Do Boating Accident Cases Differ From Car Accident Cases? Yes and No

  • Posted: Jun 29, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Do Boating Accident Cases Differ From Car Accident Cases? Yes and No

Do Boating Accident Cases Differ From Car Accident Cases? Yes and No

Victims of both car and boating accidents often suffer severe injuries caused by the negligence of others and may be entitled to compensation if they can demonstrate how another person’s lack of responsibility caused their injuries.
Often, boating and car accident cases can be different and victims need to understand what makes their case unique. Work with an accident lawyer experienced in representing victims of BOTH.
Boating Accidents May Involve Maritime Law
Car accident cases are handled under state personal injury laws. Boating accidents may involve Florida laws or federal maritime laws, or both. These laws can apply to injuries occurring in interstate navigable waters, so any boating accident on a body of water, not landlocked within a single state could potentially be covered by maritime laws.
Some courts, however, only apply maritime law in certain types of cases.
Is this confusing? Absolutely.
Maritime laws can affect a victim’s ability to recover compensation., It is a good idea if injured in a boating accident to consult an attorney who understands how to argue for and against the application of maritime law.
Boating accident victims should consult a lawyer who knows how to succeed in both!.
Experience is Key
If you were injured in an accident that may have been caused by another person’s failure to act responsibly, contact our lawyers today for a free consultation.

Maus Law Firm

954-784-6310

Mr. Maus is a Florida native practicing law in South Florida since 1993. He currently limits his practice to the areas of insurance related claims – personal injury and homeowner property damage claims and commercial litigation. Mr. Maus has tried over 60 jury trials to verdict and has litigated claims throughout Florida.

Slow Your Roll: How to Address Speeding Issues in Your Association

Slow Your Roll: How to Address Speeding Issues in Your Association

  • Posted: Mar 22, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Slow Your Roll: How to Address Speeding Issues in Your Association

Speeding is a big problem for many community associations — a problem that is not always easily addressed or corrected. How can your board slow the speed of traffic in your community?

by Jennifer Horan

If your association does not currently have traffic rules, you may be able to rely on a nuisance provision in your Declaration. Alternatively, if your board has the authority to adopt rules and regulations regarding the common areas, the board can adopt traffic rules at a duly noticed board meeting. To enforce the rules, the association has a variety of enforcement tools available, including sending warning letters, notices of violation, fining, suspension of use rights, or further legal action.

Fining is the most common “enforcement tool” that is utilized to curb speeding, for associations who monitor speeding. Fining is most effective when pursued against owners/residents in the community. It is more difficult for an association to pursue fines against visitors, guests, invitees, or contractors who speed. So, for the most part, most associations that pursue fines for speeding opt to only pursue fines against owners/residents who speed. Anytime an association intends to fine an owner or resident, the process and procedures for fining must comply with the statute. Therefore, it would require the board to establish a fining committee (if your community does not already have a committee in place). Notice must be provided to the owner or resident of the violation and the owner or resident must be provided with an opportunity to be heard in front of a fining committee.

For those communities who do not want to impose fines, there are a variety of other enforcement tools available, including sending warning letters, notices of violation, suspension of use rights, or further legal action (such as seeking injunctive relief). When it comes to either fining or the suspension of use rights the association must follow the statutory procedure described above. An additional method of enforcement would be through an agreement with the county which would authorize a local law enforcement agency to enforce state traffic laws on the association’s private roads. Section 316.006, Florida Statutes, authorizes local law enforcement agencies to enforce state traffic laws on the private roads of associations pursuant to an agreement between the association and law enforcement. It requires a majority vote of the board of directors of a homeowners’ association to elect to have state traffic laws enforced by local law enforcement agencies on private roads that are controlled by the association.

There are other practical concerns with regard to enforcement against speeders, most notably, evidence of speeding. How can your board of directors “prove” that a vehicle is speeding? Depending on the speed of the vehicle, it could be established simply by the testimony of the person who saw the car speeding. Some communities have purchased equipment that monitors speed and that can also take photos or videos of the speeding vehicle. If your community is considering purchasing a speed gun, it should be noted that there is an administrative rule that deals with “speed measuring devices”. This rule provides that evidence of the speed of a vehicle measured by a radar speed measuring device is inadmissible in “any proceeding with respect to an alleged violation of provisions of law regulating lawful speed of vehicles” unless such evidence of speed is obtained by a law enforcement officer who meets certain requirements, including the satisfactory completion of certain training courses. The rule also requires a visual determination that the vehicle was speeding and a written citation based on evidence obtained from an approved speed measure device. Also, the particular speed measuring device must meet specifications and must be tested in accordance with other procedural rules related to the testing of speed measuring devices.
Slowing traffic helps promote a more relaxed residential environment and as you can see there are various options available. An association need not choose one however to the exclusion of all others. The key is be consistent and properly apply the various options chosen.

 

Jennifer Horan

 

 

Tags: , , ,