Become a Member: JOIN SFPMA TODAY   LogIn / Register: LOGIN/REGISTER

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

Considering a DIY construction project this summer, make sure to check with Aruba Permit Services first!

Considering a DIY construction project this summer, make sure to check with Aruba Permit Services first!

  • Posted: Jun 08, 2021
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Considering a DIY construction project this summer, make sure to check with Aruba Permit Services first!

If you are considering a DIY construction project this summer, make sure to check with Aruba Permit Services first to see if a permit is required! We are your one stop shop for all your permit needs! 🏠✅

Give us a call at 📞(954) 786-7292 or visit our website www.aruba-services.com to learn more!

Tags:
O&S Engineers & Architects, performed inspections and structural evaluation of the building’s exterior façade, roofs, and developed a repair program.

O&S Engineers & Architects, performed inspections and structural evaluation of the building’s exterior façade, roofs, and developed a repair program.

  • Posted: Feb 27, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on O&S Engineers & Architects, performed inspections and structural evaluation of the building’s exterior façade, roofs, and developed a repair program.

O&S Engineers & Architects

Members of SFPMA: Find out more how we can help with your Florida buildings,  O&S Engineers & Architects 

 

O&S Engineers & Architects is a multi-discipline engineering and architectural consulting firm specializing in the assessment, design and restoration of high-rise communities, commercial buildings and parking garages. 

Since 1996, our staff of licensed professionals have consistently and successfully produced positive results on numerous projects ranging from small properties to large developments. O&S has an impressive portfolio in numerous markets. 

 

O&S provides:

  • 40/50 Year Recertification
  • Architectural Design
  • Structural & Civil Engineering
  • Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing Engineering & Design
  • Capital Reserve Studies & Turnover Reports
  • Concrete Restoration
  • Building Envelope Design & Restoration
  • Balcony & Deck Restoration
  • Storm Damage Assessments & Inspections
  • Parking Garage Design & Restoration

For more information please follow us on social media or visit our website.

 

West Point Military Academy required a comprehensive structural assessment and exterior envelope renovation of the following buildings: Building 639, Water Treatment Plant, Scott Barracks, Eisenhower Barracks, The Fire House, and the Library Building. O&S Associates performed inspections and structural evaluation of the building’s exterior façade, roofs, and developed a repair program. O&S prepared repair drawings and technical specifications and made periodic observations of construction as part of construction management services.

The restoration of the buildings’ repairs was comprised of replacing the existing roofing with new cold-applied, built-up roofing, renovation of all exterior brick and stone façade elements, reconstruction of cracked and bulged brick masonry parapet wall, replacement of cracked and spalled brick masonry, removal and reinstallation of coping stones with new cap flashing, tuck pointing of brick and stone masonry, and installation of new windows, window sealants, and application of new surface sealer for the entire façade. Total cost of restoration was $14.2 million. O&S was selected to study the exterior envelope of several buildings at the West Point Military Academy and develop a repair program for a multi-year renovation project.

The existing roofing system at each building was deteriorated and leaking in multiple areas. All six buildings required a new roofing system. The total size of the roofs was approximately 800,000 square feet. The existing brick façade of building 639 needed extensive reconstruction. The water treatment plant, Eisenhower barracks, Scott barracks, and library building had ornate stone facade, cornices, and copings stones that needed careful design and construction.

 

Firehouse Building: The firehouse consists of a single-story, four-vehicle garage; a two-story center portion; and a single-story portion located to the left of the two-story portion. The garage portion and the single-story portion has a flat roof, and the two-story portion has a hip roof with roofing tiles (asbestos tiles). O&S provided the following repair program:

  • Replacement of flat roof
  • Removal and disposal of existing asbestos tiles at the two-story portion (asbestos abatement) and installation of new roofing shingles
  • Removal and reinstallation of precast coping stones with lead-coated copper cap flashing
  • Replacement of corroded lintels
  • Rebuilding of cracked corners
  • Tuckpointing of deteriorated mortar joints
  • Pressure wash clean and apply waterproof coating on inside face of parapet walls
  • Pressure wash clean brick facia and coping stones and apply water-repellent surface sealer
  • Remove joint deteriorated joint sealants and install mortar joints
  • Repairs were approximately $170,000

 

Building 639: Building 639 is an L-shaped building with five roof setbacks. The original building was built in 1937. O&S provided the following repair program:

  • Reconstruction of three corners with proper through-wall flashings and cap flashings
  • Existing limestone copings removed, saved, cleaned and reinstalled
  • Reconstruction of all other corners to introduce proper expansion joints at corners
  • Removal of about five courses of face brick or removal of limestone facia and reinstallation of the same after steel repairs
  • Replacement of deteriorated and/or spalled brick masonry as required
  • Introduction of two new vertical expansion joints on the North and South Building Elevations
  • Tuck-pointing of deteriorated mortar joints
  • Cleaning, sealing, and pointing of existing limestone copings
  • Cleaning by pressure washing and sealing the exterior brick masonry with clear penetrating water repellent sealer
  • Repairs were approximately $440,000

 

Wastewater Treatment Plant: The original water filtration facility was constructed in 1931. Several building additions have been made over the years in 1936, 1944, and 1945. O&S provided the following repair program:

  • Removal of all existing roofing and installation of new roofing
  • Removal of all coping stones, installation of new lead coated copper cap flashing, and termination of the roofing flashing underneath the cap flashing, and reinstallation of the coping stones with new anchors
  • Removal of sealants from the perimeter of all windows, doors, joints and openings and installing new sealants
  • Removal of delaminated concrete from walls and repair using polymer-modified mortar
  • Tuckpointing of cracked, deteriorated, and open wall joints
  • Repair of cracked corners of stone headers, sills, and stone trims around doors, windows, and openings
  • Replacement of rotted wood planking with new pressure treated plywood for roofing planks in Building B
  • Replacement of rotted wood beams with new beams in Building B
  • Repairs were approximately $570,000

 

Scott Barracks: The Scott Barracks consists of a main roof, approximately 166’ long by 46’ wide with three small high roofs. The rear parapet wall is 4’ high and the front and all other parapet walls are 7’ high. All walls are built with exterior stone facing and interior brick facing and with precast coping stones. O&S provided the following repair program:

  • Removal of precast coping stones, installing cap flashing, and reinstallation of the coping stones with new anchors
  • Removal of all sealants in mortar joints from the inside face of the brick walls and tuckpointing the brick facia as needed
  • Repair of precast stones that are chipped using repair mortars that match the stone
  • Repairs were approximately $245,000

 

Project Data:

O&S Associates was responsible for A/E Design, Construction Management, and Construction Administration on this 5-year Design/Build IDIQ at the United States Military Academy at West Point. The five-year contract included work at restoration work at multiple buildings around the campus. Most buildings were historic structures. The campus repairs included roof restoration, roof replacement, exterior wall restoration, asbestos abatement, waterproofing, and other related services. O&S also provided Construction Inspection services for the Waste Water Treatment Plant, the Library, the Firehouse, several barracks, and some educational buildings. Each set of buildings had different issues related to water infiltration. As part of the Design/Build team, O&S was responsible for ensuring the cost, quality, and schedule for the project.

 

Special Features:

O&S provided construction inspection services for multiple historic buildings at West Point Military Academy. Building 639 is an “L” shaped building with five roof setbacks. The original building was built in 1937. O&S provided a comprehensive repair program that included the introduction of two new vertical expansion joints on the North and South Building Elevations. The original water filtration facility was constructed in 1931. Several building additions have been made over the years in 1936, 1944, and 1945. O&S provided a complete replacement of the entire roofing system. O&S also provided services for other buildings at the West Point Military Academy Campus including the Library, Holleder Hall, Old Chapel Building, and the Eisenhower Barracks.

 

Owner:

United States Military Academy at West Point
Construction Cost: $14.2 million

 

 

 

Tags:
ARE GOVERNING DOCUMENTS PREVENTING YOU’RE ASSOCIATIONS PROGRESS?

ARE GOVERNING DOCUMENTS PREVENTING YOU’RE ASSOCIATIONS PROGRESS?

  • Posted: Feb 03, 2019
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on ARE GOVERNING DOCUMENTS PREVENTING YOU’RE ASSOCIATIONS PROGRESS?

Updating community association documents is a difficult, often cumbersome task.

For this reason, many HOA and COA boards simply table the discussion, putting it off for a better, more convenient, time in the future. However, outdated policies and governing documents often make it hard for community managers to move forward when change is necessary, and would ultimately benefit the full membership. While, the actual rewording of existing covenants, bylaws and ancillary documents is a task for legal teams.

 

WHEN SHOULD COA & HOA BOARDS CONSIDERING UPDATING GOVERNING DOCUMENTS?

If you association’s CC&Rs and bylaws have not been reviewed for five years, or more, it is time to request a legal review to ensure your documents comply with current statutes and laws. Older documents may not address modern communication options like emailing, texting and owners’ portal. Also, there have been important changes that will improve an association’s ability to collect delinquent assessments that can be negatively impacted by outdated governing documents.  If your documents have not been updated, then due to the safe harbor law and joint and several liability, back owed association dues may not roll over if the house is sold. The documents can be re-written to include language that mentions if the house has past due assessments when sold, then the new owners can be held liable for these payments.

When considering whether to ask your attorney to look for inconsistencies in condominium planning or subdivision maps, you may also want to ask the legal team to review the original articles of incorporation and other policies that cover code restrictions and financial reporting. It is imperative that the board keeps these written policies up-to-date to prevent ambiguities and confusion for directors and the membership.

There are several key tasks that association leaders must assume responsibility for during a review. For example, the board is responsible for notifying homeowners about the upcoming review, and gaining the appropriate level of voting support before implementing any changes to documents.

 

 

HOW CAN YOUR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION GAIN FULL SUPPORT FROM YOUR MEMBERSHIP?

To elevate the chances of gaining acceptance from your homeowners to proposed amendments, the board needs to make a strong effort to keep the membership informed throughout the process. It is a good idea to appoint a committee to oversee the process and act as “points of contact” for stakeholders who have questions. The committee members may also solicit feedback from members via telephone, email or face-to-face contact.

There is another, efficient, less burdensome way to solicit support, especially if one reason for the review is that your association plans to modify fee, assessment and debt collection documents. Partnering with a full-service, industry-specific organization that intimately understands HOA, COA and time-share business models helps ensure that your communication is always compliant. Axiom Resources professionals work closely with community associations to develop collection strategies aligned with all federal, state and local statutes, laws and restrictions. In the role of industry mentor, key personnel help directors and board members design communication policies that benefit homeowners, while protecting community assets.

Leveraging the power behind years of experience in the community association industry, HOA and COA boards can address bad debt and potential debt challenges before problems escalate to the point that homeowners and association management become frustrated.

 

COLLABORATING WITH A MENTOR & PARTNER

Using An Association Attorney that provides services supported by industry professionals who understand the nuances and regulatory challenges associated with covenanted community management. Please visit our Members Directory on SFPMA or call today to discuss ways our team can help you navigate the document review process and implement stronger debt management solutions that benefit homeowners and the association.

 

Tags: , ,
What is “Transition or Turnover?”

What is “Transition or Turnover?”

  • Posted: Oct 20, 2015
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on What is “Transition or Turnover?”

“Transition” is the term of art describing the multi-step process to transfer responsibility for the Community Association to the homeowners/unit owners.

Transition is a process, not an event. At the end of that process, control of the Community Association is ultimately turned over to the owners.

 

For condominiums, the Declaration establishes a “Period of Declarant Control” based upon statute. For property owners’ associations, the Declaration may establish such a period, but currently, the declarant control period is is not addressed by statute.

During the Period of Declarant Control, the Developer appoints members of the board of directors for the Association; hires and has contact with the Association’s management company; and is the architectural control committee. At the expiration of the Period of Declarant Control, the Developer resigns its board of director positions. The owners hold a meeting to elect a new board of directors comprised of owners. The Developer turns over the Association’s books and records, and relinquishes control of the Association to the owners.

How do we begin the transition process?

As transition nears, it is time for the Declarant and the owners to initiate discussions on the transition process, and for owners to become familiar with the governing documents. There are several suggestions to help get the process started in earnest. For example, owners can propose adding one or more homeowners to the Board prior to transition; can set up a transition committee or advisory committee; can schedule a community meeting to explain that control of the Association will soon be turned over to the owners; and can seek volunteers for the transition committee. Some of the owners may have experience and expertise in the issues the community may face, and these owners can be very helpful druing transition.

 

Conclusion

Transition requires a thorough review and understanding of all aspects of your Association, including knowledge of financial issues; maintenance and engineering needs; the need to transfer common area (in non-condominium associations); insurance policies and needs; management responsibilities; covenant enforcement; and so on. Without knowledgeable guidance from an independent attorney experienced in common interest communities, owners can be overwhelmed with the immense responsibilities. Start early with your transition committee and contact a knowledgeable attorney to begin the process with your association.

 

Stop us if you’ve heard this one before: You announce an HOA election providing proper notice, yet only a handful of owners show up to vote. You end up short of your quorum requirements, and you have to start all over again with your fingers crossed that next time, your luck will be better, and your election will be successful. Or instead, you hold your election, get definitive results—you think—but then the election gets challenged.
We can help you do better!  many community association lawyers who’ve devoted their extensive—and impressive—careers to solving the challenges HOAs face every day. You’ll learn from members valuable, workable tactics you can implement immediately to make your election process smoother, more successful, and less contentious.
You’ll learn:

1- How to determine the specific steps your HOA must follow to conduct proper elections
2- Details on the most common mistakes boards make from election start to finish, and the most likely challenges to your election—and how to nip them in the bud
3- Information to help you identify your quorum requirements and creative tactics to ensure you get a quorum
4- Common rules governing who can run for your HOA board, along with insights on the pros and cons of changing your eligibility requirements—and tips on how to do it if you decide you should
5- Suggestions for general rules your board may want to consider passing to make holding elections easier
6- Tips to provide effective notice—and undercut any attempt to unwind your completed election based on claims of insufficient or improper notice
7- What you must know about proxies
8- Techniques you can deploy on the day of the election to avoid on-the-spot glitches
Plus much more!
It’s just an hour of your time, but you’ll walk away much wiser and better prepared for your HOA’s next election.

 

 

contact KBRLegal.com They are the experts in Association Law in South Florida. The Courses they give monthly can help you with understanding what is needed as a board member and your community.

 

Tags: , ,
DEVELOPER TRANSITION

DEVELOPER TRANSITION

  • Posted: Oct 20, 2015
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on DEVELOPER TRANSITION

Community associations are conceived by the developer who typically forms a non-profit corporation to own the land and amenities

 

In the case of condominiums, certain parts of the building exterior. Initially, the developer owns all of the lots or units in the association and has all of the votes; therefore, the developer controls the association. A board of directors typically consisting of the developer and other individuals professionally related to the developer is established to manage the affairs of the association including not only the physical attributes, but also the financial and administrative issues such as collecting owner assessments, holding the annual meeting, and enforcing the deed restrictions.

 

Early in the development process the developer, acting on behalf of the board of directors, may hire a manager or management firm and delegate much of the day-to-day operation of the association to this third-party manager. This seems to be where things get a bit confusing at times for not only the developer but for the homeowners and the manager as well. The management company often finds itself in a juggling act between meeting the desires of the developer while also acting in the best interest of their employer (the board of directors). The board has a fiduciary responsibility to make decisions and set policies that are in the best interest of the association and the manager is bound by contract to carry out the decisions and policies of the board. Sounds simple, but in the real world of community living and governance, misconceptions about the different parties’ roles and responsibilities grow right along with the community.

 

To clarify the roles that each party plays, you will find below a short list of the most common misconceptions about developer-controlled communities. Please keep in mind that the clarifications are based on typical scenarios and you should always refer to the governing documents for your specific community to obtain the most reliable answers.
Does the manager work for the developer? NO, Managers act at the direction of the entire board of directors, not the developer, one individual director or committee member (unless the board grants a particular individual the authority to deal with a specific matter). The management agreement between an association and a management company usually stipulates that the board should identify one person to act as liaison to the manager.
The developer pays the manager. Not so! Typically, the developer will subsidize or deficit fund the association until there are homeowners paying in sufficient assessments to cover the expenses. The association, whether funded by developer subsidy or owner assessments, pays the manager and all other contractors that perform work for the association. The board collectively decides on all such transactions.

 

The developer does not pay assessments. In some cases, the developer drafts the documents in such a way that it is exempt from paying regular assessments. With that get out of jail free card exemption, the developer assumes the responsibility for funding the budget until there are enough homeowners paying assessments to cover all of the expenses of the association. The board of directors (including the developer members) must set the rate of the assessment based on what each lot should pay – – assuming the community is complete and all lots were assessed.

 

The manager is the homeowners’ advocate. Well, not exactly. Although the manager is responsible for implementing the decisions and policies of the board, homeowners should have enough interest in their community to present their concerns to the board either in person or in writing. The best way to be heard is to submit to the management company in writing anything you would like passed on to the board. The manager does not vote on any board issues. Owners should attend board meetings to learn what’s happening in the association. Those who can’t attend meetings should read the newsletter, visit your community website or contact board or committee members for updates. If you are unaware of whether or not your association maintains a website, you should contact the manager or management firm.

 

The manager is responsible for choosing contractors. Keeping in mind that the management company itself is a contractor of the association, the board (with occasional recommendations made by the management company) tries to choose the best contractors for the association. The manager does not have direct control over the contractors’ actions and they are not responsible for poor performance. The manager is responsible for monitoring contractors’ performance and reporting problems to the board. The board is responsible for any subsequent actions. The developer is responsible for the quality and quantity of the amenities, replacement of defective components and addition of amenities during the development period. Once amenities are completed, they are turned over to the association for the purpose of upkeep, insuring, and use.

 

The developer is responsible for construction defects in individual homes. Only if the developer built the home is he responsible for defects or poor construction. The homebuilder is responsible for problems that arise relating to construction of the home, lot drainage and other issues involving an individual home within a community. In a single family development, this distinction is very clear; however, in a condominium project, the governing documents will detail those items that become the individual owner’s responsibility versus association responsibility.

 

To summarize, the management duties of a developer-controlled community should not differ significantly from a homeowner-controlled community. In each case, the manager works at the direction of the board of directors. The developer board just happens to be comprised of the same person(s) wearing several hats developer, director, committee member and association member. Both the manager and the board must work together and in the appropriate capacity that best serves the association and its entire membership. When these interests work in harmony, the community as a whole is strengthened.

 

We stand ready to assist our Community Association clients at every stage of a project. In the transition period, our attorneys consult with the newly-elected Board and facilitate compliance from the developer in turning over documents and payments owed to the Association. Our lawyers have successfully shepherded many Boards through developer transition, attesting to our many decades of experience.

 

FS 720.303(8) ASSOCIATION FUNDS; COMMINGLING.–
(c) Association funds may not be used by a developer to defend a civil or criminal action, administrative proceeding, or arbitration proceeding that has been filed against the developer or directors appointed to the association board by the developer, even when the subject of the action or proceeding concerns the operation of the developer-controlled association.

Florida Statutes 720 contains many provisions that are specifically valid for so-called developer-controlled associations, meaning associations that are not fully built out and the association board consists of members appointed by the developer. FS 720.303(8) clearly states that legal fees are the responsibility of the developer, as long as he/she controls the association. Admittedly, not everybody knows it, but a developer who hired a law firm to sue a homeowner for libel and/or slander and is otherwise involved in all kinds of lawsuits should take the time to confer with his law firm about specific provisions in FS 720.

 

DEVELOPER TRANSITION – FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Q: What is Developer Transition?
A: Transition (more commonly referred to as “turnover”) is simply the process in which the right to control the association shifts from the developer to the homeowners. Some homeowners mistakenly believe that “turnover” is the point in time they receive title to the buildings and common property and confirm that the developer has met all of its obligations. This is not the case. The transfer of property takes place as each home or unit is completed and sold. What is transferred at developer transition is control of the association.
Q: Why is Developer Transition significant?
A: Developer transition is an important milestone for a community. Following a successful transition, the homeowners are in control of their own community and can make all the decisions through their elected Board of Directors.
Q: When does Developer Transition occur?
A: For condominiums, transition or turnover begins when the developer has sold 15% or more of the total units. At this point, the homeowners are entitled to elect one-third (1/3) of the members of the Board. The homeowners are entitled to elect a majority of the Board three (3) years after 50% of the units have been sold, or three (3) months after 90% of the units have been sold, whichever occurs first. There are other statutory events that can trigger the transition, such as bankruptcy or receivership for the developer, which should be discussed further with legal counsel.
For homeowners associations (“HOA’s”), the homeowners are entitled to elect a majority of the Board three (3) months after 90% of the homes have been sold.
Q: Can the Developer require an earlier Transition date?
A: Yes. The developer may provide an early transition date in the community documents.
Q: For how long will the Developer be entitled to elect Board members?
A: The developer will be entitled to appoint at least one member to the Board provided the developer holds for sale at least five percent (5%) of the homes.
Q: My condominium association is ready for Developer Transition but nothing has happened. What happens next?
A: Within 75 days after the homeowners are entitled to elect a member or members of the Board, the association (as controlled by the developer) shall give not less than 60 days’ notice of an election for the members of the Board. The notice may be given by any unit owner if the developer-controlled association fails to do so.
Q: Must the homeowners accept Developer Transition?
A: Yes. When the homeowners are legally permitted to take control and control is tendered by the developer, the homeowners must accept operational responsibility.
Q: Is the developer obligated to turn over anything other than control of the Board?
A: Yes. At the time of transfer of control, the developer must deliver to the new Board, at the developer’s expense, all property of the association including, but not limited to, association funds, meeting books, original Declaration and bylaws, plans and specifications, insurance policies, agreements and service contracts and all warranties. The association’s legal counsel should also ensure that title to all parcels is deeded to the association, free and clear of liens. These items must be delivered within 90 days of the date that the homeowners are entitled to take control of the association. The association’s legal counsel can provide a comprehensive checklist of items that must be delivered by the developer.
Q: How do the homeowners confirm at Transition that the association’s finances are in good order?
A: The association’s financial records generated since the incorporation of the association through the date of turnover must be audited by an independent CPA, at the expense of the developer. The accountant determines if expenditures were made for association purposes and whether the developer paid the proper amounts of assessments.
Q: Following Transition, can the homeowners cancel or break agreements entered into by the Developer-controlled Board?
A: Yes. With the vote of 75% of the membership, a condominium association can cancel original contracts entered into by the developer for the maintenance, management or operation of the condominium property. This is significant because it allows the homeowner-controlled Board to make its own choices for management, vendors and other services such as television programming services.

 

Tags: ,