Become a Member: JOIN SFPMA TODAY   LogIn / Register: LOGIN/REGISTER

SFPMA Industry Articles | news, legal updates, events & education! 

Find Blog Articles for Florida’s Condo, HOA and the Management Industry. 

2020 Legal Update (1 CE credit) – With 2021 Legislative Preview / August 18, 2020  |  10:00 AM by Kaye Bender Rembaum

2020 Legal Update (1 CE credit) – With 2021 Legislative Preview / August 18, 2020  |  10:00 AM by Kaye Bender Rembaum

  • Posted: Aug 18, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on 2020 Legal Update (1 CE credit) – With 2021 Legislative Preview / August 18, 2020  |  10:00 AM by Kaye Bender Rembaum

2020 Legal Update (1 CE credit) –With 2021 Legislative Preview

by Kaye Bender Rembaum

August 18, 2020  |  10:00 AM

This course helps complete the state requirement for licensed CAMS, many of whom still need their third LU credit before the Sept. 30 deadline. The material is also excellent refresher material for board members. In addition, there will be a preview of the new 2021 legislation affecting community associations.

Register Today

Provider #: 0005092  |  Course #: 9630064

1 CE credit in LU

Presented by Allison L. Hertz, Esq., B.C.S. of Kaye Bender Rembaum

 

Tags: , ,
Governing Document Amendments In Light Of COVID-19 by Rembaum’s Association Roundup

Governing Document Amendments In Light Of COVID-19 by Rembaum’s Association Roundup

  • Posted: Aug 12, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Governing Document Amendments In Light Of COVID-19 by Rembaum’s Association Roundup

Governing Document Amendments In Light Of COVID-19

Rembaum’s Association Roundup presented by KBRLegal.com

As a result of the unexpected COVID-19 crisis and its ramifications on Florida’s community associations, there are lessons that can be learned. Early on, an unexpected issue many community associations faced was whether the board could rely on the emergency powers set out in the Florida Statutes to help protect both residents and property alike during this time of uncertainty (the “emergency power legislation”). The Condominium, Cooperative, and Homeowners’ Association Acts each provide that the board of directors is granted certain emergency powers in response to damage caused by an event for which a state of emergency is declared by the Governor. While local governments at the city and county level may similarly declare a state of emergency, the emergency powers only spring into existence upon the Governor’s issuance of an executive order declaring a state of emergency in response damage caused by event.

These emergency powers include, just to name a few, the ability to cancel and reschedule meetings, conduct such meetings with as much notice as may be practicable, levy assessments, restrict access to the property and so much more.  More specifically, Sections 718.1265 as to condominiums, 719.128 as to cooperatives, and 720.316 as to homeowners’ associations, Florida Statutes, each provide enumerated emergency  powers available to the board of directors that may be exercised “in response to damage caused by an event for which a state of emergency is declared…”. However, in light of COVID-19 pandemic the interpretation of the phrase “in response to damage caused by an event” created questions and confusion to both laymen and lawyers alike.

At issue was whether the emergency power legislation only applies to situations where there is actual property damage and/or as a result of a hurricane damage. Even if not necessarily intended for COVID-19 type situations,  to many lawyers, including this author, there was no question that the emergency powers could be utilized by board members of Florida’s community associations in response to the instant pandemic. Nevertheless, others questioned whether the emergency power legislation should apply since it was initially drafted in response to hurricane type events, and not a medical event such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

By way of background, the emergency power legislation was drafted in response to the series of hurricanes that hit Florida in 2004, however, it took the Florida Legislature approximately four years to pass them into law. A plain reading of the emergency power legislation even demonstrates that these statutes were drafted with hurricane type damage in mind, and not other disasters, such as global pandemics. But, that does not mean they cannot be applied to other situations.  In fact,  on March 27, 2020, the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation Division of Condominiums, Timeshares and Mobile Homes (the “Division”) issued an unexpected order that provided that the phrase “response to damage caused by an event” should not be considered when reading the emergency powers legislation. Then on May 20, 2020, the Division entered a second order explaining that its prior order would expire on June 1, 2020 which is slightly more than a month before the Governor’s state of emergency is set to expire on July 7, 2020. Without regard to whether the Division had the necessary authority to issue such orders in the first place, the result of its second order has attorneys asking, once again, does the emergency power legislation apply? While a great many lawyers experienced in the body of community association law believe so, that does not mean that a court would agree upon legal challenge. Candidly, it would be surprising if the court did not agree, but one never knows with certainty how a court will ultimately rule, most especially on issues of first impression, for which this certainly qualifies.

There is already legislative chatter about the need to revise the emergency power legislation to make it more adaptable to the different types of disasters that can occur. But, community association boards should be able to rely, right now, on the emergency powers in any situation where the Governor has declared a state of emergency where health of the members can be at issue. Even if the Florida legislature does amend the emergency powers to make it patently clear that the board may exercise its statutory  emergency powers during a declared state of emergency for a pandemic, such an amendment will take time and that could mean anything but a fast fix. So, what is an association to do to prepare for the next unanticipated state of emergency?

Well, at least in this instance it is quite likely that your association can act much more quickly to amend the community’s declaration or bylaws, than the Florida legislature can to amend the Florida Statutes.  With that in mind, the board can sponsor and the association membership can adopt an amendment to the declaration or bylaws that clarifies that the emergency powers set out in the Florida Statutes (with specific reference) apply to all states of emergency declared by the Governor to the extent the safety and welfare of the members and/or the property is at issue. In addition, or as an alternative, specific emergency powers can be drafted in the declaration or bylaws, too.

 

 

A few suggestions for consideration include:

  • During any emergency the Board may hold meetings with notice given only to those Directors with whom it is practicable to communicate, and the notice may be given in any practicable manner.  The Director, or Directors, in attendance at such a meeting shall constitute a quorum.
  • The Board may cancel, reschedule and/or postpone Board and member meetings, including the annual meeting, if necessary to protect the health and welfare of the members.
  • Corporate action taken in good faith during an emergency under this section to further the ordinary affairs of the association shall bind the Association; and shall have the rebuttable presumption of being reasonable and necessary.
  • The Board may use reserve funds to meet Association needs and may use reserve funds as collateral for Association loans.  The Board may adopt emergency assessments with such notice deemed practicable by the Board.
  • The Board may adopt emergency Rules and Regulations governing the use and occupancy of the Units, Common Elements, Limited Common Elements, and Association Property, with notice given only to those Directors with whom it is practicable to communicate.
  • Any Officer, Director, or employee of the Association acting with a reasonable belief that his actions are lawful in accordance with these emergency Bylaws shall incur no liability for doing so, except in the case of willful misconduct.
  • The Board shall act to keep all members informed of all Board actions taken pursuant to these emergency powers by U.S. Mail, closed circuit tv, social media, or email, etc. as may be practicable under the circumstances.

If your association is interested in adopting such an amendment to your association’s governing documents, please be certain to seek out competent legal counsel that has the requisite expertise in the area of community association law.

 

Jeffrey Rembaum’s, Esq. of Kaye, Bender, Rembaum attorneys at law, legal practice consists of representation of condominium, homeowner, commercial and mobile home park associations, as well as exclusive country club communities and the developers who build them. Mr. Rembaum is a Certified Specialist in Condominium and Planned Development Law.

He is the creator of ‘Rembaum’s Association Roundup’, an e-magazine devoted to the education of community association board members, managers, developers and anyone involved with Florida’s community associations.  His column appears monthly in the Florida Community Association Journal. Every year since 2012, Mr. Rembaum has been selected to the Florida Super Lawyers list and was also named Legal Elite by Florida Trends Magazine. He can be reached at 561-241-4462.

 

 

 

Tags: , , ,
WEBINAR: NAVIGATING THE FEDERAL FAIR HOUSING: ASSISTANCE ANIMAL OR PET by KBR Legal, Pompano Beach

WEBINAR: NAVIGATING THE FEDERAL FAIR HOUSING: ASSISTANCE ANIMAL OR PET by KBR Legal, Pompano Beach

  • Posted: Jul 20, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on WEBINAR: NAVIGATING THE FEDERAL FAIR HOUSING: ASSISTANCE ANIMAL OR PET by KBR Legal, Pompano Beach

WEBINAR: NAVIGATING THE FEDERAL FAIR HOUSING: ASSISTANCE ANIMAL OR PET

WEBINAR Florida Register

WEBINAR: NAVIGATING THE FEDERAL FAIR HOUSING: ASSISTANCE ANIMAL OR PET Date/Time Date(s) – 2020-07-23 1:00 pm – 2:15 pm Location Pompano Beach Office Register HERE A one-hour CE credit course with credit available as IFM or ELE. Provider #: 0005092 | Course #: 9630144 Online bookings are not available for this event.

Tags: , , , ,
Q&A Broward County Emergency Order 20-22 – Impact on Community Associations by Campbell Property Management and Michael Bender from Kaye Bender Rembaum

Q&A Broward County Emergency Order 20-22 – Impact on Community Associations by Campbell Property Management and Michael Bender from Kaye Bender Rembaum

  • Posted: Jul 20, 2020
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Q&A Broward County Emergency Order 20-22 – Impact on Community Associations by Campbell Property Management and Michael Bender from Kaye Bender Rembaum

Q&A Broward County Emergency Order 20-22 – Impact on Community Associations

WEBINAR Florida Register

Q&A Broward County Emergency Order 20-22 – Impact on Community Associations Cases are rising FAST in Florida. Your Broward County Leaders have reacted to this by imposing new regulations and making existing regulations more restrictive.  Make sure you understand the impact on your Condo or HOA! Join Campbell Property Management and Michael Bender from Kaye Bender Rembaum to learn about Broward County’s latest Emergency Order 20-22 and its impact on community associations during this brief, 30 minute webinar. Thursday, July 23 at 12:00 PM Please submit a question you would like us to answer when you register. We will address as many questions as possible during the webinar. Register Here! This webinar is for Broward County community associations only.

Tags: , ,
Did He Really Write That about Our Association on Facebook?

Did He Really Write That about Our Association on Facebook?

  • Posted: Feb 25, 2018
  • By:
  • Comments: Comments Off on Did He Really Write That about Our Association on Facebook?

PRESENTS

Rembaum’s Association Roundup

The community association legal news that you can use!

The free e-magazine for Community Association Managers, Board Members, Owners & Developers

Have an association related question? Find your answer at

RembaumsAssociationRoundup.com

 

Did He Really Write That about Our Association on Facebook?

An interesting question that arises from time to time is whether the protections of the United States Constitution (and the Florida Constitution) apply within the gates of a community association. In most circumstances, in order to begin a constitutional analysis the very first step is whether there is any governmental action taking place. Clearly, in the context of a homeowners’ association resident publishing their own opinions on a blog, there is no governmental action. Even so, insofar as freedom of the press is concerned, the First Amendment to the United States Constitution reigns supreme, though not without certain limitations. In a recent Fifth District Court of Appeal case, Fox v. Hamptons at Metrowest Condominium Association, Inc., the Court had the opportunity to examine this issue.

 

In this case, association member, Fox, appealed the trial court’s order finding him guilty of civil contempt of court for violating a settlement agreement that he entered into with the association. He argued that portions of the trial court’s contempt order constituted a prior restraint on his protected speech rights under both the Florida Constitution and the United States Constitution. In short, the Court agreed.

 

The background of this case is a typical scenario where Fox failed to comply with the association’s declaration and its rules and regulations which caused irreparable harm to other owners and residents within the association. The association’s complaint also alleged that Fox was engaged in a continuous course of conduct “designed and carried out for the purpose of harassing, intimidating, and threatening other residents, the Association and its representatives.” The trial court had entered a preliminary injunction and then the parties reached a settlement agreement in which Fox agreed to cease certain activities.

 

It did not take long for Fox to violate the terms of the settlement agreement. As a result, the association filed a motion for contempt and argued that Fox willfully and intentionally violated the terms of the settlement agreement, and thus the final judgment, too. The trial court found Fox in civil contempt and, in so doing, also ordered that Fox stop posting, circulating, and publishing any pictures or personal information about current or future residents, board members, management, employees, or personnel of the management company, vendors of the association, and any other management company of the association on any website, blog, or social media. He was further ordered to take down all such information currently on any of his websites or blogs. The trial court’s order also prohibited Fox from starting any new blogs, websites, or social media websites related to the association. If anyone reached out to Fox with inquiries regarding the association, pursuant to the court’s order, he was not allowed to post a response online. Instead, he would have to call the person to express his concerns verbally.

 

On appeal, Fox argued to the Court that the trial court’s punishment violated his right to speak freely. In the end, the Court agreed that the trial court’s blanket prohibition of Fox’s online speech constituted an unconstitutional prior restraint on his free speech rights. In so doing, the Court noted that “[i]t has been established that ‘[p]rior restraints on speech and publication are the most serious and the least tolerable infringement on First Amendment rights.’” The Court also noted that the United States Supreme Court has “consistently classified emotionally distressing or outrageous speech as protected, especially where that speech touches on matters of political, religious or public concern.” The Court then cited other cases finding that statements on an individual’s blog constituted opinion speech protected by the First Amendment.

 

However, the Court wisely noted that “the right to free speech and the freedom of the press are not without their limits” and, in so doing, cited to prior United States Supreme Court opinions which reminds readers of that “[f]reedom of speech does not extend to obscenity, defamation, fraud, incitement, true threats, and speech integral to criminal conduct. Speech that does not fall into these exceptions remains protected.” If the writer/publisher prints libelous, defamatory, or an injury story, the remedy does not lie with an injunction, but rather with a claim for damages or criminal action after publication.

 

With the aforementioned in mind, the Court determined that the trial court erred when it prohibited Fox from making any statements at all pertaining to the association on his websites, blogs, and social media. Therefore, the trial court order was reversed in part, but only in regard to the complete prohibition imposed on Fox on posting on any website, blog, or social media. However, the Court also opined trial court did not err in determining that the previously agreed-upon settlement agreement could be enforced and it affirmed the contempt order. The case was then remanded back to the trial court for determination of an order consistent with the opinions of the Court.

KBRLegal.com – Sponsors of SFPMA.  Legal and Laws for Community Associations.

Rembaum’s Association Roundup

The community association legal news that you can use!

The free e-magazine for Community Association Managers, Board Members, Owners & Developers

Have an association related question? Find your answer at

RembaumsAssociationRoundup.com

 

Tags: , ,